ai-data-extractor vs Surge AI

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis generated Live tool data as of 2026-11-13
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

ai-data-extractor or Surge AI: which should you choose?

Dimensionai-data-extractorSurge AI
What it isFree MIT Python CLI for local chat-log extractionExpert human data, RLHF, red teaming, and benchmark vendor
Pricing modelFree (open source)Contact sales; no self-serve or per-unit pricing published
BuyerIndividual developers, researchers, privacy-focused tinkerersFrontier AI labs, AI safety teams, enterprise model builders
OutputNormalized JSONL, one conversation per line, stored locallyPreference data, red-team findings, citable benchmark scores
Source coverageTen assistants incl. Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Cline, Roo Code, AiderHuman workforce spanning doctors, lawyers, engineers, writers
Newest additionCline/Roo Code and Aider extractorsComplexConstraints benchmark and Tuesday Work Index
ai-data-extractor
ai-data-extractor

Free MIT Python CLI that turns AI coding assistant chat history into one normalized JSONL dataset for fine-tuning and analytics.

Visit Website
Surge AI
Surge AI

Expert human RLHF data, red teaming, and agent benchmarks for frontier AI labs

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Contact Sales
Plans
—
—
Popularity
9 views
7.4k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
CLIDesktop
Web
Categories
🏷️ Data Labeling & Training Data💻 Code & Development📊 Data & Analytics
🏷️ Data Labeling & Training Data
Featuresai-data-extractorSurge AI
Extract Claude Code session history from ~/.claude/projects/**/*.jsonl
Parse Codex CLI rollout files from ~/.codex/sessions/**/rollout-*.jsonl
Read Cursor chat data from SQLite state.vscdb in global and workspace storage
Heuristic extraction from Windsurf SQLite storage with an undocumented schema
Trae support combining SQLite and JSONL sources via heuristic parsing
Extract Continue sessions from ~/.continue/sessions/*.json
Extract Gemini CLI chats from ~/.gemini/tmp/<hash>/chats/*.json
Parse OpenCode session, message, and part trees
Extract Cline and Roo Code tasks storing raw Anthropic-format message arrays (added Jan 2026)
Extract Aider markdown chat transcripts per project directory (added Jan 2026)
Auto-detect macOS, Linux, and Windows data roots without OS flags
Normalize every source into one JSONL conversation-per-line format
Capture user messages, assistant responses, code context, diffs, and tool calls
CLI flags for --all, --sources, --list, --output-dir, --search-path, and --merge
Run extractors standalone with python -m extractors.<name> for debugging
Expert human workforce of doctors, lawyers, tax specialists and engineers for AI training data
RLHF preference data collection and human feedback for post-training
Red teaming and adversarial testing staffed with credentialed domain specialists
Off-the-shelf post-training runs built on expert evaluation data
SWE Consultant Network of practicing software engineers for agentic coding tasks
GDP.xlsx benchmark: 70 tasks across 12 knowledge-work domains of professional spreadsheets
sudo L7 benchmark for staff-level engineering judgment in coding agents
GDP.pdf benchmark for professional document comprehension
DAYJOB benchmark family for economically valuable agents, with Healthcare, Finance and Tax verticals
DAYJOB: Tax evaluates agents across 50 realistic tax environments and messy records
Chartography benchmark for chart reasoning across diagrams and plots
ComplexConstraints benchmark for instruction following with interdependent constraints
HANDBOOK.md benchmark for long-context policy adherence
Tuesday Work Index composite score for real professional work
RL environments including CoreCraft and EnterpriseBench via Python SDK and REST API

What do real users say about ai-data-extractor vs Surge AI?

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

ai-data-extractor

No verifiable community signal. We scanned public discussion on Sep 30, 2026 and found posts matching the name “ai-data-extractor”, but could not establish that they are about this product rather than something else sharing its name. Rather than publish a score built on the wrong subject, we publish none.

Surge AI

53 mentions across 3 sources · 53% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, Bluesky, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Credentialed workforce of doctors, lawyers, tax specialists and staff engineers rather than open-call crowd annotators
  • • Broad public benchmark suite: GDP.xlsx, sudo L7, GDP.pdf, DAYJOB, Chartography, ComplexConstraints, HANDBOOK.md
  • • Public post-training results (Kimi K2.7: +20.0pp SWE-Marathon, +12.4pp DeepSWE) show transferred gains
  • • HANDBOOK.md cited on Hacker News as a serious long-context enterprise instruction-following eval

What frustrates them

  • • Almost no first-hand user reviews in the dataset — pricing, support and usability are unverified
  • • Benchmark credibility questioned when the vendor also sells post-training on those evals
  • • Only 'contact us' pricing; no published tiers, free trial or transparent cost per task
  • • Expert-human workforce is expensive and slow relative to crowd-labeling platforms

Researched Nov 7, 2026

Who should pick ai-data-extractor, and who should pick Surge AI?

  • Solo developer building a fine-tuning dataset
    Pick: ai-data-extractor

    It normalizes your own Claude Code, Codex CLI, and Cursor history into one JSONL file locally, at no cost and with no upload.

  • Privacy-focused engineer backing up years of chats
    Pick: ai-data-extractor

    Extraction runs entirely on disk with no account — useful before an app clears its local database.

  • Frontier lab post-training a model on expert preferences
    Pick: Surge AI

    Surge supplies credentialed doctors, lawyers, and engineers for RLHF preference data and adversarial red teaming that generalist annotators cannot produce.

  • Team needing a benchmark number for a system card
    Pick: Surge AI

    GDP.pdf, ComplexConstraints, Riemann-bench, and HANDBOOK.md are citable evaluations — OpenAI cited GDP.pdf in its GPT-5.6 release, where the flagship scored 30.7%.

  • Enterprise builder training agents on complex professional documents
    Pick: Surge AI

    MCP-native RL environments and EnterpriseBench target enterprise agent tasks, with a Python SDK and REST API for pipeline integration.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use ai-data-extractor to build a dataset for an AI lab?

It is not built for that. It extracts the chat history of the person running it, locally, so it produces your conversations — not a vetted, expert-graded corpus a lab would train on. Use it for your own datasets, backups, or analytics.

What does Surge AI charge per labeling task?

No rate card is published; pricing is contact-sales and engagements appear scoped around pilots for RLHF, red teaming, and benchmark work. If you need transparent per-unit pricing or instant self-serve signup, this is explicitly not the vendor for you.

Does ai-data-extractor support every assistant perfectly?

No. Claude Code, Codex CLI, Cursor, Continue, Gemini CLI, OpenCode, Cline, Roo Code, and Aider are parsed from documented local formats. Windsurf and Trae rely on heuristic parsers against undocumented schemas, so treat those as the fragile ones.

Which Surge benchmarks can I cite in a release or regulatory filing?

GDP.pdf for real-world professional PDF comprehension, Riemann-bench for extreme math verification, ComplexConstraints for entangled conditional instruction following, and HANDBOOK.md for long-context policy following up to 124 pages, plus the newer Tuesday Work Index composite.

Do I need an account or internet connection for ai-data-extractor?

No account and no upload — everything runs locally and your chat data never leaves your machine. You do need the Python environment and the assistant's history already written to disk.

What is the Tuesday Work Index?

A Surge composite benchmark launched to measure frontier AI performance across real professional work capabilities, drawing on its existing expert-built evaluations. Qwen 3.8 Max scored 58.7 on it, up 8.6 points from 3.7 Max.

What else are ai-data-extractor and Surge AI compared with?

Where can you read more about ai-data-extractor and Surge AI?

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: