Amux vs Temporal AI

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionAmuxTemporal AI
PricingFreemium: self-hosted free; managed tier pricing undisclosedFreemium: free tier limited actions; paid usage-based billing
Primary Use CaseMulti-agent orchestration & monitoring for coding agentsDurable execution for AI agents & microservices
Core ArchitectureSingle Python server using tmux sessions per agentSDK-based durable workflows with state capture
Key FeatureSelf-healing watchdog, kanban board, mobile PWAAutomatic retries, timeouts, and state persistence
Integration StyleIntegrates with Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLIIntegrates with OpenAI Agents SDK, Google ADK, Slack
Best ForRunning many parallel coding agents from one dashboardReliable, long-running, failure-tolerant workflows

Choose Temporal AI if you need enterprise-grade durable execution with automatic retries and state persistence for AI agents or microservices – it's battle-tested at OpenAI and Replit. Pick Amux if you're a developer running many AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) and want a lightweight self-hosted dashboard with self-healing and mobile access. They solve different problems: reliability vs. parallelism.

Amux
Amux

Open-source control plane to orchestrate parallel AI coding agents.

Visit Website
Temporal AI
Temporal AI

Durable execution platform keeping AI agents and workflows running through failures with automatic state capture and retries.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
$20/mo
$200/yr
$0/mo (with $1,000 in credits)
$100/mo
$500/mo
Custom
Popularity
18 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
WebMobileCLIAPI
WebAPICLI
Categories
🛠️ Autonomous Coding Agents🕸️ Agent Frameworks & Orchestration
🕸️ Agent Frameworks & Orchestration⚙️ Developer Infrastructure
Features
Self-healing watchdog (auto-compacts, restarts, replays)
Web dashboard with live session peek
Plan strip showing live task list and next steps
Review dashboard with Trends view and Fleet org chart
Kanban board with atomic task claiming via SQLite CAS
Agent-to-agent messaging via channels and @mentions
Shared notes and memory across sessions (markdown)
CRM for contacts and companies
Scheduler for cron-like recurring tasks
Mobile PWA with offline queue and background sync
Native iOS app for on-the-go management
REST API for all dashboard features
Cloud tunnel for stable public HTTPS URL
Skills and slash commands (e.g., /commit, /review-pr)
Single-file architecture with inline HTML
Durable execution with automatic state capture
Workflow orchestration with automatic retry and recovery
Activities with automatic retries and timeouts
Native SDKs for Python, Go, TypeScript, Ruby, C#, Java, PHP, Rust (preview)
Human-in-the-loop with signals and pause/resume
Saga pattern via compensating transactions
Full visibility UI for workflow state
Serverless Workers for Google Cloud Run (pre-release)
Serverless Workers for AWS Lambda (public preview)
Standalone Activities for independent execution
Workflow Streams for real-time interactivity
Task Queue Priority & Fairness (GA)
Temporal Worker Controller (GA) for K8s lifecycle
External Storage for large payloads (public preview)
Custom Roles for granular permissions (pre-release)
Integrations
Claude Code
Codex
Gemini CLI
GitHub
SQLite
tmux
Mail.app
R2
Tailscale
LangGraph
OpenAI Agents SDK
Google ADK
Google Cloud Run
AWS Lambda
Azure
Slack
NVIDIA
Salesforce
Twilio
Docker
Kubernetes
Braintrust

Who should pick which

  • Solo founder building AI agents
    Pick: Temporal AI

    Needs reliability: automatic retries and state capture prevent losing agent progress on crashes. Temporal's free tier covers initial usage.

  • Developer running 20+ Claude Code sessions
    Pick: Amux

    Amux's kanban board, self-healing, and mobile PWA let you monitor and orchestrate many coding agents from one dashboard. Lightweight and free to self-host.

  • Enterprise building financial transaction system
    Pick: Temporal AI

    Saga pattern, compensating transactions, and durability ensure data consistency in long-running processes. Enterprise integrations and usage-based billing scale.

  • Open-source enthusiast wanting agent control plane
    Pick: Amux

    Amux's single-file architecture is easy to hack and self-host. Free, with mobile access and no vendor lock-in.

  • Team building multimodal AI pipeline
    Pick: Temporal AI

    Workflow Streams, serverless workers, and Slack integration enable real-time human oversight across complex agent chains.

Frequently Asked Questions

Amux vs Temporal AI: which should you choose?

Choose Temporal AI if you need enterprise-grade durable execution with automatic retries and state persistence for AI agents or microservices – it's battle-tested at OpenAI and Replit. Pick Amux if you're a developer running many AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) and want a lightweight self-hosted dashboard with self-healing and mobile access. They solve different problems: reliability vs. parallelism.

What is the main difference between Temporal AI and Amux?

Temporal focuses on durable execution: guaranteed state persistence and retries for any workflow. Amux is a lightweight control plane for managing many parallel coding agents (Claude Code, Codex) from a dashboard. They solve different problems: reliability vs. orchestration.

Can Amux handle long-running, failure-prone workflows?

Amux has self-healing watchdog that restarts crashed agents, but it does not capture execution state automatically like Temporal. For critical processes that must survive failures without data loss, Temporal is better.

Does Temporal's pricing change with recent updates?

Yes. In June 2026, Temporal introduced usage-based billing with a 'Billable Action Count' metric for improved cost transparency. The free tier still exists but with limited actions.

Is Amux suitable for non-coding agent workflows?

Not really. Amux is designed specifically for AI coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI). For other types of agents or microservices, Temporal or other workflow engines are more appropriate.

Which tool offers better integration with OpenAI?

Temporal has an official integration with OpenAI Agents SDK (announced at Replay 2026). Amux does not mention direct OpenAI integration; it targets coding agents like Claude Code and Codex.

Can I use Temporal without writing code?

No. Temporal requires writing workflow code in one of its SDKs (Python, Go, TypeScript, etc.). Amux is configuration-based: you launch agents via dashboard without coding workflows.

Does Amux have a managed cloud version?

Yes, but pricing is not disclosed. The free version is self-hosted. Temporal Cloud is the managed offering with usage-based billing.

Which tool is easier for a solo developer to start with?

For solo devs running many coding agents, Amux's self-hosted free tier is simpler: just run a single Python script. For building reliable AI agents, Temporal's free tier with SDKs is accessible but requires learning the workflow model.

More Amux or Temporal AI comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026