Clawvisor vs Sublime Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionClawvisorSublime Security
PricingFree open-core / Team plan paidContact for pricing (paid, no free tier)
Primary Use CaseAI agent security gateway (task approval, credential isolation)Email threat detection & response (BEC, VEC, phishing)
DeploymentSelf-hosted open-core (agent-adjacent)Cloud SaaS (M365 / Google Workspace)

For SOC teams defending against sophisticated email attacks, Sublime Security offers deep detection with low false positives. For engineering teams deploying AI agents (Claude Code, MCP) and needing safety without friction, Clawvisor is the essential gateway. Choose based on your threat surface: inbox vs. agent tool calls.

Clawvisor
Clawvisor

Task-level authorization for AI agents: approve the purpose once, every tool call is scoped to it.

Visit Website
Sublime Security
Sublime Security

Agentic email security that auto-triages reported phishing and writes custom detections for your SOC

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Contact Sales
Plans
$0/mo
$120/mo (annual) or $150/mo (monthly)
$50 (2,000 calls) to $350 (20,000 calls)
Custom
$0
Popularity
5 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPIPluginCLI
APIWeb
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC
Features
Task-level authorization: approve the purpose once, all tool calls scoped to it
Fail-closed by default: agents start with zero access
Credential vault: secrets encrypted, agents receive no token at all
Server-side credential injection so agents never hold a key
Purpose verification rejects off-task requests and injected instructions
Risk scoring on every request before execution, flagging prompt injection in tool arguments
Scope review at approval time showing exact scopes like calendar/list_events
Full audit trail: every request, purpose declaration, decision, and credential injection logged
Per-task usage attribution by tool calls and tokens
Usage rolls up per task, per agent, and per approver
Policy authored in plain English as RBAC/ABAC rules
Self-hosted open-core under Elastic License 2.0 with no seat caps or call limits
Native MCP server governance with task-scoped policies (Feb 2026)
Git-backed policy management via pull requests (Mar 2026)
Drop-in adoption with any agent harness: one skill, no SDK required
Autonomous Security Analyst (ASA) auto-triages user-reported phishing end to end
Autonomous Detection Engineer (ADÉ) authors backtested org-specific detections
One-click approval before any new detection goes live
Custom detections written in Sublime Script, a YARA-like language
Full transparency into every verdict: matched detections and signal analysis
Behavioral threat-hunting interface for proactive investigation
Automated response actions: quarantine, alert and remediation
Detects BEC and vendor email compromise
Detects credential phishing, callback phishing, QR code phishing, ICS phishing
Prompt injection and malware/ransomware detection in email
Email DLP for stopping sensitive data loss over email (GA)
Advanced graymail protection filtering bulk and newsletter noise (public beta, July 2026)
Native deployment over Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace mail
Free email analyzer plus analyzer API for ad-hoc message scans
API for programmatic access to detections and verdicts
Integrations
Gmail
Google Calendar
GitHub
Slack
Notion
Linear
Postgres
Stripe
Dropbox
MCP servers
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace

What real users say: Clawvisor vs Sublime Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Clawvisor

23 mentions across 2 sources · 35% positive — critical (averaged across 2 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube

What users praise

  • • Task-level approval reduces approval fatigue, matching a real pain point.
  • • Fail-closed by default offers secure zero-access starting point for agents.
  • • Credential vault keeps secrets away from agent, good security posture.
  • • Per-task cost attribution helps track spending by tool calls and tokens.

What frustrates them

  • • Almost no direct user feedback to validate real-world performance.
  • • Agent identity overhead might overcomplicate simpler use cases.
  • • Lack of community discussion makes it hard to assess reliability.
  • • YouTube banter is all about OpenClaw, not Clawvisor.

Researched Aug 31, 2026

Sublime Security

20 mentions across 2 sources · 80% positive (weighted across 2 sources)

YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Verdicts show matched detections and signal analysis — analysts can read why, not trust a score
  • • Sublime Script is a YARA-like language your engineers can inspect, test, and tune
  • • ASA auto-triages user-reported phishing end to end, cutting the abuse-mailbox backlog
  • • ADÉ authors backtested, environment-specific detections that land ready for one-click approval

What frustrates them

  • • Community footprint is thin — one video thread, and no independent Reddit or HN validation
  • • Vendor efficiency claims (80% faster, 70% fewer FPs) are unverified by third parties
  • • Tuning workload is real and continuous if no one owns the rule library
  • • Not set-and-forget — teams replacing a legacy SEG should expect an operational shift

Researched Oct 14, 2026

Who should pick which

  • SOC analyst fighting BEC/VEC in large org
    Pick: Sublime Security

    Sublime provides AI-powered detection of impersonation and social engineering with low false positives, plus custom rules and deep email visibility.

  • Engineering team deploying Claude Code or MCP agents
    Pick: Clawvisor

    Clawvisor handles task-level authorization, credential isolation, and audit trail needed to safely run agents without per-call approval fatigue.

  • Security architect integrating agent governance
    Pick: Clawvisor

    Clawvisor's fail-closed design and policy-based control plane integrate with existing agents and tools, providing compliance and safety.

  • IT admin needing basic email protection
    Pick: Sublime Security

    Only if facing advanced threats; for basic needs, legacy gateways may suffice, but Sublime's AI can reduce false positives.

Frequently Asked Questions

Clawvisor vs Sublime Security: which should you choose?

For SOC teams defending against sophisticated email attacks, Sublime Security offers deep detection with low false positives. For engineering teams deploying AI agents (Claude Code, MCP) and needing safety without friction, Clawvisor is the essential gateway. Choose based on your threat surface: inbox vs. agent tool calls.

Do Sublime and Clawvisor compete directly?

No. Sublime secures email, Clawvisor secures AI agent tool calls. They solve different problems for different teams.

Can I use Clawvisor for email security?

Clawvisor is not designed for email security. It can gate agent calls to email APIs (Gmail), but it doesn't analyze email content for phishing or BEC.

Is Sublime only for large enterprises?

Sublime targets mid-to-large enterprises with dedicated security teams, but smaller orgs with advanced threats can also benefit.

What is the pricing model for each?

Sublime: contact for pricing (paid). Clawvisor: open-core (free) with paid team plan for RBAC/advanced policies.

Which integrations are supported?

Sublime integrates with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. Clawvisor integrates with MCP servers, Gmail, Google Calendar, GitHub, Slack, Notion, Linear, Postgres, Stripe, Dropbox, Filesystem, Shell.

More Clawvisor or Sublime Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026