CodeGateway vs Spider Cloud
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
CodeGateway or Spider Cloud: which should you choose?
| Dimension | CodeGateway | Spider Cloud |
|---|---|---|
| What it sells | One key + prepaid wallet routed to 89 LLMs | Scrape/crawl/search API returning markdown or JSON |
| Pricing model | Prepaid wallet, $5 min top-up, no monthly fee, 1.07× list | Freemium; pay-as-you-go and a flat-rate Unlimited plan |
| Core differentiator | Three endpoint styles incl. /v1/messages and /v1/images/generations | Browser rendering + stealth 200s, 215M+ proxy exits |
| Tooling | One-line base_url swap for Claude Code, Cursor, Codex CLI, Aider | MCP server at mcp.spider.cloud; LangChain, LlamaIndex, CrewAI |
| Team features | Workspaces with owner/admin/member and shared balance pools | Crawl output streamed to S3, GCS, Sheets, Azure Blob, Supabase |
One API key for Claude, GPT and Gemini via a multi-model API gateway with a flat 1.07× markup.
Visit Website
Web scraping, crawling and search API that returns clean markdown or JSON for RAG pipelines and AI agents.
Visit WebsiteHow do CodeGateway and Spider Cloud compare feature by feature?
Spider Cloud is a data-acquisition layer. One API across api.spider.cloud (scrape, crawl, web search), browser.spider.cloud (full WebSocket browser sessions) and proxy.spider.cloud (215M+ residential/ISP exits in 199 countries). Output formats are markdown, JSON, HTML, raw and plain text; crawls stream one JSONL line per page in order, and prompt-based extraction returns named fields as JSON at either scrape or crawl scope, with a two-phase model scheme for complex layouts. Browser rendering executes scripts and runs infinite scroll; stealth mode returns 200 on protected pages. The September news adds a provider router so scrape/crawl bodies can run on outside providers with your own keys. MCP server at mcp.spider.cloud plugs web reading into Claude Code, Codex, Cursor and Claude Desktop.
CodeGateway is a model-access layer — it doesn't touch web content at all. It exposes 89 models across Claude, GPT, Gemini, DeepSeek, xAI, Qwen, Mistral, Moonshot and Zhipu through three endpoint shapes (Anthropic /v1/messages, OpenAI Chat Completions, OpenAI Responses) plus /v1/images/generations billed per image. Native SSE streaming passes through for CLI output, per-model cache read/write rates are published, and TOTP 2FA is available. Its October whitepaper documents integer micro-dollar accounting down to $10^-10.
In practice their overlap stops at "both are called by coding agents": Spider gives the agent something to read, CodeGateway gives the agent a model to think with.
Which is cheaper, CodeGateway or Spider Cloud?
Spider Cloud is freemium, and the July writeup contrasts a flat-rate Unlimited plan against pay-as-you-go — both runnable on one API key. The Unlimited plan is genuinely flat, but the documented exclusions matter when budgeting: residential proxying, AI extraction and zero retention are not inside the $1/GB rate, LinkedIn, Facebook and Google search automation are excluded on Unlimited, geo-targeting isn't available there as currently documented, and Unlimited queues nothing server-side, so your app must handle a 429 with Retry-After. High-volume, steady crawling is where the flat plan earns its keep; bursty or feature-heavy workloads should be modelled on pay-as-you-go first.
CodeGateway charges a flat 1.07× consumption multiplier over Anthropic, OpenAI and Vertex official list prices, taken from a prepaid wallet with no monthly fee, a $5 minimum top-up and balances that never expire. Metering is to $10^-10 with no round-up loss, and the whitepaper covers rounding, streaming metering, aborted-request settlement and tier markups — useful if you're auditing spend. Two costs get underestimated: fixed Stripe fees punish frequent small top-ups, and the 1.07× stacks on whatever list price the underlying vendor sets. Teams consolidating several vendors onto a shared pool get workspace-level invoices and usage export; solo devs already happy with direct billing get no discount for switching.
Who should pick CodeGateway, and who should pick Spider Cloud?
- RAG team whose crawler chokes on JS-heavy pagesPick: Spider Cloud
Browser rendering plus stealth 200s and JSONL crawl streaming is exactly the gap, and prompt extraction returns named fields as JSON without a second parsing step.
- Developer in a region with blocked or flaky Anthropic/OpenAI accessPick: CodeGateway
A one-line base_url swap for Claude Code and Cursor over Cloudflare's edge is the whole migration, and SSE streaming keeps CLI output live.
- Small team consolidating Claude, GPT and Gemini spendPick: CodeGateway
Shared balance pools, owner/admin/member roles, consolidated invoices and published cache rates are built for that, at a flat 1.07× with no monthly fee.
- Data team streaming crawls into a warehousePick: Spider Cloud
Connectors push crawl output straight to S3, GCS, Google Sheets, Azure Blob or Supabase, and the new provider router lets you route requests through your own provider keys.
- Team building an agent that both browses and reasonsPick: Spider Cloud
Start with the MCP server at mcp.spider.cloud to give Claude Code or Cursor web reading, then add a model gateway only if vendor access or billing is the bottleneck.
Frequently Asked Questions
Can CodeGateway fetch web pages for me?
No — the data describes it as routing model traffic across text and image endpoints. Page fetching, browser sessions and proxies are Spider Cloud's territory.
Does Spider Cloud route LLM calls?
Its provider router (announced 2026-09-10) routes scrape and crawl requests to outside providers using your own keys. It is a data-fetching router, not a multi-model LLM gateway.
Can I use both in the same stack?
Yes, and the roles are complementary: Spider supplies rendered pages as markdown or JSON, CodeGateway supplies the models that consume them. Nothing in either product's data suggests a conflict.
Which one has a free entry point?
Both are listed as freemium. CodeGateway's paid path starts at a $5 prepaid top-up; Spider Cloud offers pay-as-you-go alongside its flat-rate Unlimited plan.
What does CodeGateway's 1.07× actually apply to?
Its stated consumption multiplier over Anthropic, OpenAI and Vertex official list prices, with per-model cache rates published separately on a live pricing table.
What else are CodeGateway and Spider Cloud compared with?
These aren't competitors, so there's no either/or decision here — most teams building agent products end up using both. If your problem is shipping and operating a web app or agent backend, Vercel is
These are not competitors. Power BI is a governed BI layer for Microsoft-centric organizations; Spider Cloud is HTTP plumbing that returns rendered web pages to agents and retrieval pipelines. If you
These are not competitors — they are two halves of a stack, and nobody should be choosing one over the other. Pick LM Studio if your problem is where inference runs: you want open models and the Bioni
These aren't competitors — pick based on the problem, not the price. If you need dashboards, governed self-service exploration, and agentic analytics on top of data you already store, Tableau is the b
These are not competitors — don't frame this as a pick-one decision. Spider Cloud is infrastructure you buy to get live web pages into an agent or retrieval pipeline; Amplitude is the analytics layer
These tools are not competitors — they solve different problems for different buyers. Spider Cloud is a developer API for pulling live web data into agents and RAG pipelines, with a freemium entry poi
Where can you read more about CodeGateway and Spider Cloud?
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: