Dust vs Cryptohopper

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis generated Live tool data as of 2026-11-13
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

Dust or Cryptohopper: which should you choose?

DimensionDustCryptohopper
What it isWorkplace AI agent platform with 70+ business connectorsCloud crypto trading bot for major exchanges
Core workflowDefine agents with skills, knowledge, permissions; run on schedule/trigger/chatConfigure strategies or copy traders; automate entries/exits on exchanges
Automation triggersScheduled and event-driven agent runsSmart Trade triggers, trailing orders, DCA, copy trading
Notable integrationsSlack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce, Zendesk, Okta, Zapier, Make, n8nBinance, Coinbase Pro, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Zapier
Recent launchSelf-improving reusable skills (Jul 2026)MCP server for AI agents consuming live market data
Dust
Dust

Dust builds multiplayer AI agents that pull company context from 70+ connectors and act inside Slack, CRM and docs.

Visit Website
Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper

Cryptohopper combines an AI crypto trading bot with an MCP server that streams live ticker and orderbook data into Claude or ChatGPT.

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Paid
Plans
FreeFree
Pro€24/seat/mo billed annually
Max€120/seat/mo billed annually
EnterpriseCustom
Explorer$24.16/mo billed annually
Adventurer$57.50/mo billed annually
Hero$107.50/mo billed annually
Popularity
10 views
7.3k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
WebAPIPlugin
WebMobile
Categories
🤖 Automation & Agents
📈 Investing & Market Research🤖 Automation & Agents
FeaturesDustCryptohopper
Build custom agents with your own instructions, skills, knowledge and connected tools
Choose a model per agent from 20+ frontier and open-source models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, DeepSeek)
Self-improving Skills: reusable instruction sets that encode team expertise and adapt from usage
Multi-agent orchestration with scheduled and event-driven triggers
70+ connectors including Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce and Zendesk
Connect any other tool via native and remote MCP servers
Frames: interactive dashboards and apps, white-labellable on Enterprise
Pods: collaborative workspaces with shared context for people and agents
Spaces for segmenting company data and permissions by team
Dual-layer permission model separating agent data access from user access
SSO via Okta, Entra ID and Jumpcloud, plus SCIM provisioning and deprovisioning
Audit logs, usage analytics and adoption reporting
US or EU data residency, with single-tenant deployment on Enterprise
Developer API, Conversation API and Data Source API for programmatic access
Forward an email thread to an agent to loop it into the conversation
Automated 24/7 crypto trading on your own connected exchange accounts
Copy Bot mirrors an experienced trader one-on-one on your exchange
Trading Signals from third-party signallers executed within your risk settings
No-code Strategy Designer with technical indicators and candlestick patterns
Backtesting on historical data with profit, win/loss and balance replay
Paper Trading on live prices with a simulated balance
Trailing stop-loss and take-profit, DCA safety orders and short selling
Algorithm Intelligence scores strategies per market trend and switches (Hero)
Market Making, Exchange Arbitrage and Triangular Arbitrage bots
Cryptohopper MCP server gives Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor or Gemini live ticker and orderbook data
Hopper Arena where AI models trade against each other on live markets
Free multi-exchange Trading Terminal for manual trading across accounts
Event-based triggers with notifications and automated sell orders
Editable Marketplace strategies, bot templates and Copy Bots
iOS and Android app with the same bots as the web dashboard
IntegrationsDustCryptohopper
Slack
Notion
Google Drive
GitHub
Salesforce
Zendesk
Okta
Entra ID
Jumpcloud
Zapier
Make
n8n
Power Automate
Binance
Kraken
Coinbase Advanced
Bitvavo
OKX
KuCoin
Crypto.com
Claude
ChatGPT
Cursor
Gemini

What do real users say about Dust vs Cryptohopper?

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Dust

86 mentions across 6 sources · 49% positive — mixed (weighted across 6 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • 70+ native connectors (Slack, Notion, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub) let agents act on real company systems
  • • Per-agent model choice across 20+ frontier and open-source models enables cost/quality tuning
  • • Dual-layer permission model separates what agents access from who can use them
  • • US or EU data residency plus SSO, SCIM and audit logs address enterprise governance needs

What frustrates them

  • • No authentic community feedback exists in the scraped data to validate the tool's real-world reliability
  • • Credits reset each period with no rollover, risking mid-month exhaustion for busy teams
  • • Enterprise-only features (unlimited connectors, pooled credits, single-tenant) leave smaller tiers constrained
  • • Name collision with games, novels and a messaging app makes independent research genuinely hard

Researched Sep 29, 2026

Cryptohopper

29 mentions across 3 sources · 31% positive — critical (weighted across 3 sources)

Product Hunt, App Store, Bluesky

What users praise

  • • Broad feature set includes Strategy Designer, backtesting, paper trading, copy bots, and arbitrage.
  • • Cloud-hosted bot runs 24/7 with API keys that trade but cannot withdraw funds.
  • • MCP server streams live ticker and orderbook data to Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, and Gemini.
  • • Algorithm Intelligence (Hero tier) automatically switches strategies based on market trend.

What frustrates them

  • • Email verification codes fail repeatedly, blocking new users from logging in on mobile.
  • • API connections to Crypto.com and Coinbase fail after hours of setup.
  • • The mobile app crashes and displays incorrect PnL percentages.
  • • Support is AI-first and reportedly cannot resolve basic connection issues.

Researched Nov 8, 2026

Who should pick Dust, and who should pick Cryptohopper?

  • Ops lead wiring AI into Slack and Zendesk
    Pick: Dust

    Dust's 70+ connectors, Spaces segmentation, and dual-layer permissions let a support or sales ops team deploy agents on real tickets and knowledge, not a generic chatbot.

  • European enterprise needing EU data residency and SSO
    Pick: Dust

    Dust targets EU data residency with Okta/Entra ID/Jumpcloud SSO, SCIM provisioning, and audit logs — the pre-rollout controls large orgs require.

  • Beginner crypto trader
    Pick: Cryptohopper

    Copy Bot mirrors an experienced trader one-on-one, and paper trading plus the signals marketplace lower the entry bar — though Explorer costs $24.16/mo after the trial.

  • Algorithmic trader designing strategies without code
    Pick: Cryptohopper

    The Strategy Designer ships 130+ indicators, and backtesting plus DCA, trailing orders, and short selling cover the full loop before going live.

  • Developer building an AI agent that needs live crypto data
    Pick: Cryptohopper

    Cryptohopper's MCP server feeds live market data — it published guides on ticker and orderbook data for exactly this agent workflow; Dust connects business systems, not exchanges.

Frequently Asked Questions

Could one team use both?

Only if a crypto-trading desk wanted agents for internal ops alongside automated exchange trading. Company-wide, the buyers, budgets, and risk owners differ, which is why they aren't shortlisted against each other.

Which has a free option?

Dust is freemium; Cryptohopper gives a 3-day trial before the $24.16/mo Explorer plan. Note Dust's credits are consumption-based and don't roll over.

Do the MCP integrations mean these overlap?

No. Dust uses MCP to let agents call external tools inside business workflows; Cryptohopper's MCP server exposes live crypto market data to AI agents. Same protocol, opposite direction.

What's the biggest hidden cost in each?

For Dust, variable credit spend driven by model choice and tool use. For Cryptohopper, the subscription is predictable but your trading capital carries the real risk.

Which is easier to set up?

Neither is zero-config. Dust explicitly says agents, skills, and permissions need real configuration; Cryptohopper still requires exchange connections and strategy setup despite its no-code designer.

Does Cryptohopper handle futures or perpetuals?

Its own not_for list says traders needing advanced futures or derivatives order types should look elsewhere; it's SaaS-only with no self-hosted option.

What else are Dust and Cryptohopper compared with?

Where can you read more about Dust and Cryptohopper?

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Analysis generated by our model pipeline from live data: