Dust vs Cryptohopper
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Dust | Cryptohopper |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Workplace AI agent platform with 70+ business connectors | Cloud crypto trading bot for major exchanges |
| Pricing model | Freemium; credits vary by model/tool use and don't roll over | Paid; Explorer from $24.16/mo after 3-day trial |
| Core workflow | Define agents with skills, knowledge, permissions; run on schedule/trigger/chat | Configure strategies or copy traders; automate entries/exits on exchanges |
| Automation triggers | Scheduled and event-driven agent runs | Smart Trade triggers, trailing orders, DCA, copy trading |
| Notable integrations | Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce, Zendesk, Okta, Zapier, Make, n8n | Binance, Coinbase Pro, Kraken, KuCoin, OKX, Bybit, Bitstamp, Gate.io, Zapier |
| Recent launch | Self-improving reusable skills (Jul 2026) | MCP server for AI agents consuming live market data |
Dust builds custom AI agents wired into your company's Slack, CRM and docs, with shared team workspaces.
Visit Website
Cryptohopper is a cloud crypto trading bot for automated trading, Copy Bot social trading, and MCP-powered AI agents.
Visit WebsiteWhat real users say: Dust vs Cryptohopper
Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.
Dust
86 mentions across 6 sources · 49% positive — mixed (weighted across 6 sources)
Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
What users praise
- • 70+ native connectors (Slack, Notion, Salesforce, Zendesk, GitHub) let agents act on real company systems
- • Per-agent model choice across 20+ frontier and open-source models enables cost/quality tuning
- • Dual-layer permission model separates what agents access from who can use them
- • US or EU data residency plus SSO, SCIM and audit logs address enterprise governance needs
What frustrates them
- • No authentic community feedback exists in the scraped data to validate the tool's real-world reliability
- • Credits reset each period with no rollover, risking mid-month exhaustion for busy teams
- • Enterprise-only features (unlimited connectors, pooled credits, single-tenant) leave smaller tiers constrained
- • Name collision with games, novels and a messaging app makes independent research genuinely hard
Researched Sep 29, 2026
Cryptohopper
44 mentions across 3 sources · 44% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)
YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store
What users praise
- • Cloud-hosted, so bots trade 24/7 across exchanges without your machine staying on
- • Copy Bot and the strategy Marketplace let beginners skip coding entirely
- • Paper trading with real data is a genuinely useful sandbox before risking capital
- • No-code Strategy Designer with indicators opens the door for non-programmers
What frustrates them
- • API connections to major exchanges fail for multiple experienced reviewers after following steps correctly
- • Mobile app reported to crash and to give incorrect PnL percentages
- • Verification code flow on the app is broken according to several 2024-2026 reviews
- • Support AI couldn't resolve basic connection issues after hours of back-and-forth
Researched Sep 29, 2026
Feature-by-feature
Feature sets barely overlap. Dust's unit is the AI agent: per-agent model choice from 20+ options (GPT, Claude, Gemini, Mistral, DeepSeek), instructions, skills, attached knowledge, and tools. Agents connect to 70+ business systems — Slack, Notion, Google Drive, GitHub, Salesforce, Zendesk — and can call external tools via native and remote MCP servers. Orchestration covers scheduled and event-driven runs plus multi-agent setups. Governance is the differentiator: Pods for shared workspaces, Spaces for per-team data segmentation, a dual-layer permission model separating agent data access from user access, SSO (Okta, Entra ID, Jumpcloud), SCIM provisioning, audit logs, and usage/cost analytics. July 2026 added self-improving skills that adapt from usage. Cryptohopper's unit is the trade: automated A.I. algorithms, Copy Bot to mirror a trader one-on-one, DCA, trailing orders, short selling, paper trading, backtesting, and a no-code Strategy Designer with 130+ indicators, plus Market Making and Arbitrage tools on the Hero tier. A Trading Terminal manages multiple exchange accounts from one dashboard, a signals marketplace supplies third-party analysts, and the MCP server lets AI agents consume live crypto ticker/orderbook data. Dust governs internal knowledge work; Cryptohopper executes orders on Binance, Coinbase Pro, and Kraken.
Pricing compared
Dust is freemium with consumption-based credits: cost varies by the model you pick per agent and by tool use, and credits don't roll over, so finance teams should expect variable spend rather than a flat seat price — its own not_for list flags buyers who need predictable flat-rate pricing. Enterprise governance (SSO via Okta, Entra ID, Jumpcloud; SCIM; audit logs; Spaces segmentation) suggests a sales-assisted tier, but no public seat price is stated. Cryptohopper is strictly paid: the Explorer plan runs $24.16/mo after a 3-day trial, with paid tiers above it — Market Making and Arbitrage sit on the Hero tier. Account management in the Trading Terminal is free, so you can hold multiple exchange accounts without paying for that layer alone. The comparison is apples-to-oranges: Dust bills for AI model/tool consumption across your company's workflows, Cryptohopper bills a subscription for trade automation, with your actual risk being trading capital, not credits. Budgeting for them looks nothing alike.
Who should pick which
- Ops lead wiring AI into Slack and ZendeskPick: Dust
Dust's 70+ connectors, Spaces segmentation, and dual-layer permissions let a support or sales ops team deploy agents on real tickets and knowledge, not a generic chatbot.
- European enterprise needing EU data residency and SSOPick: Dust
Dust targets EU data residency with Okta/Entra ID/Jumpcloud SSO, SCIM provisioning, and audit logs — the pre-rollout controls large orgs require.
- Beginner crypto traderPick: Cryptohopper
Copy Bot mirrors an experienced trader one-on-one, and paper trading plus the signals marketplace lower the entry bar — though Explorer costs $24.16/mo after the trial.
- Algorithmic trader designing strategies without codePick: Cryptohopper
The Strategy Designer ships 130+ indicators, and backtesting plus DCA, trailing orders, and short selling cover the full loop before going live.
- Developer building an AI agent that needs live crypto dataPick: Cryptohopper
Cryptohopper's MCP server feeds live market data — it published guides on ticker and orderbook data for exactly this agent workflow; Dust connects business systems, not exchanges.
Frequently Asked Questions
Could one team use both?
Only if a crypto-trading desk wanted agents for internal ops alongside automated exchange trading. Company-wide, the buyers, budgets, and risk owners differ, which is why they aren't shortlisted against each other.
Which has a free option?
Dust is freemium; Cryptohopper gives a 3-day trial before the $24.16/mo Explorer plan. Note Dust's credits are consumption-based and don't roll over.
Do the MCP integrations mean these overlap?
No. Dust uses MCP to let agents call external tools inside business workflows; Cryptohopper's MCP server exposes live crypto market data to AI agents. Same protocol, opposite direction.
What's the biggest hidden cost in each?
For Dust, variable credit spend driven by model choice and tool use. For Cryptohopper, the subscription is predictable but your trading capital carries the real risk.
Which is easier to set up?
Neither is zero-config. Dust explicitly says agents, skills, and permissions need real configuration; Cryptohopper still requires exchange connections and strategy setup despite its no-code designer.
Does Cryptohopper handle futures or perpetuals?
Its own not_for list says traders needing advanced futures or derivatives order types should look elsewhere; it's SaaS-only with no self-hosted option.
More Dust or Cryptohopper comparisons
Choose marvis-risk-agent if your priority is auditable, governed credit risk model validation with local data privacy—it's free and open-source. Choose Cryptohopper if you need a feature-rich, cloud-b
For most traders, Cryptohopper is the clear winner: it offers a wider range of tools (AI, copy trading, backtesting), supports 11+ exchanges, and has transparent pricing starting at $24.16/mo. The Pol
Choose Capsule if you need automated expense and mileage tracking for your small business or freelance work—it's simpler and free to start. Choose Cryptohopper if you're actively trading cryptocurrenc
These tools serve entirely different domains: Cryptohopper for automated crypto trading vs. Perplexity Finance for personal finance tracking with AI. Choose Cryptohopper if you trade crypto and want c
Kaiso and Cryptohopper serve entirely different purposes—ISO compliance vs. crypto trading. Choose Kaiso if you need AI-accelerated ISO certification with expert oversight; choose Cryptohopper if you
These tools solve completely different problems. Cryptohopper is for automating crypto trading with AI and copy trading; Happenstance finds people via warm intros. Pick Cryptohopper if you trade crypt
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: September 21, 2026