Exogram vs Sublime Security

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-10-18
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionExogramSublime Security
PricingFreemium (open-core; Enterprise with SSO/RBAC, SIEM support)Paid (contact-only pricing)
Primary Use CaseGovernance & audit for AI agent tool executionAI-driven email security (BEC, VEC, phishing)
Key DifferentiatorDeterministic policy enforcement (0.07ms per decision), cryptographic audit trailConversational AI detection, YARA-like custom rules (Sublime Script)
Target UserSecurity engineers hardening AI agent pipelinesSOC analysts in mid-to-large enterprises
IntegrationsLangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, MCP, REST API, etc.Microsoft 365, Google Workspace
Recent News Impactv3.2.0 adds Knowledge Graph & Behavioral Synthesis EngineNo recent news captured

If you deploy AI agents in production and need deterministic governance with cryptographic audit, Exogram’s open-core model and ultra-low overhead (0.07ms/decision) make it a standout choice for security-conscious teams. For advanced email threat detection (BEC, VEC) with low false positives, Sublime Security offers powerful custom detection via Sublime Script—but its contact-only pricing and reliance on M365/Google Workspace limit flexibility. Choose Exogram for agent security; choose Sublime for email security.

Exogram
Exogram

Exogram is a personal AI memory vault with a permanent encrypted context graph and a 0.07ms deterministic execution gate for agent tool

Visit Website
Sublime Security
Sublime Security

Agentic email security that auto-triages reported phishing and writes custom detections for your SOC

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Contact Sales
Plans
$0/forever
$19/mo
Custom/annual
$0
Popularity
2 views
7.5k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
WebAPIPlugin
APIWeb
Categories
🛡️ AI Governance & Guardrails
🚨 Threat Detection & SOC
Features
Deterministic tool-call evaluation in 0.07ms with no LLM in the decision path
SHA-256 hash-linked append-only cryptographic audit chain (v3.1.0)
Agent Identity Resolution with per-agent permit/deny lists enforced before policy evaluation (v3.1.0)
Behavioral Synthesis Engine extracting behavioral profiles, dominant themes and temporal shifts (v3.2.0)
Interactive force-directed Knowledge Graph of the semantic trust network (v3.2.0)
Infinite-hop Personal Neural Network across Personal, Social and Work spheres
Multi-Provider AI Swarm running Claude 3.7, GPT-4o, Gemini, Perplexity and Kimi together
Laya (~30ms) Living Tiles for finished drafts and schedules
Permanent encrypted SQLite WAL memory vault with AES-256 encryption at rest
1-Click Memory Porter to import context from ChatGPT, Claude or Gemini in about 60 seconds
Native FastMCP server for Cursor, Claude Desktop and Windsurf
Chrome extension for one-click capture of web pages as context
Autonomous dream cycle contradiction resolution and semantic conflict handling
HTTP 409 execution idempotency locks that seal transactions against double-spend retries (v3.0.0)
1-Click cryptographic JSON and markdown export of the full memory vault
Autonomous Security Analyst (ASA) auto-triages user-reported phishing end to end
Autonomous Detection Engineer (ADÉ) authors backtested org-specific detections
One-click approval before any new detection goes live
Custom detections written in Sublime Script, a YARA-like language
Full transparency into every verdict: matched detections and signal analysis
Behavioral threat-hunting interface for proactive investigation
Automated response actions: quarantine, alert and remediation
Detects BEC and vendor email compromise
Detects credential phishing, callback phishing, QR code phishing, ICS phishing
Prompt injection and malware/ransomware detection in email
Email DLP for stopping sensitive data loss over email (GA)
Advanced graymail protection filtering bulk and newsletter noise (public beta, July 2026)
Native deployment over Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace mail
Free email analyzer plus analyzer API for ad-hoc message scans
API for programmatic access to detections and verdicts
Integrations
Cursor
Claude Desktop
Windsurf
ChatGPT
Claude
Gemini
Perplexity
FastMCP
MCP
Microsoft 365
Google Workspace

What real users say: Exogram vs Sublime Security

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Exogram

4 mentions across 1 sources · 65% positive (averaged across 1 source)

Hacker News

What users praise

  • • Ultra-fast deterministic tool-call evaluation at 0.07ms per decision.
  • • Cryptographic audit trail (SHA-256 hash-linked, append-only) ensures tamper-proof logging.
  • • Open-core with AGPL license allows full code inspection and modification.
  • • Separates probabilistic reasoning from deterministic enforcement, removing LLM from the decision path.

What frustrates them

  • • Extremely early-stage with little real-world deployment proof.
  • • No independent third-party reviews or benchmarks available.
  • • Enterprise features and pricing are opaque.
  • • Limited integration ecosystem beyond LangChain, AutoGen, and CrewAI.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Sublime Security

20 mentions across 2 sources · 80% positive (weighted across 2 sources)

YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Verdicts show matched detections and signal analysis — analysts can read why, not trust a score
  • • Sublime Script is a YARA-like language your engineers can inspect, test, and tune
  • • ASA auto-triages user-reported phishing end to end, cutting the abuse-mailbox backlog
  • • ADÉ authors backtested, environment-specific detections that land ready for one-click approval

What frustrates them

  • • Community footprint is thin — one video thread, and no independent Reddit or HN validation
  • • Vendor efficiency claims (80% faster, 70% fewer FPs) are unverified by third parties
  • • Tuning workload is real and continuous if no one owns the rule library
  • • Not set-and-forget — teams replacing a legacy SEG should expect an operational shift

Researched Oct 14, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Security engineer deploying AI agents
    Pick: Exogram

    Exogram provides deterministic policy enforcement, cryptographic audit, and integration with LangChain/AutoGen—exactly what’s needed for production agent governance.

  • SOC analyst combating email fraud
    Pick: Sublime Security

    Sublime’s AI-based BEC/VEC detection and custom YARA-like rules (Sublime Script) are tailored for advanced email threats with low false positives.

  • Compliance officer needing audit trails
    Pick: Exogram

    Exogram generates SHA-256 chained audit entries suitable for SOC 2 and EU AI Act compliance, out of the box.

  • IT team supplementing legacy email gateway
    Pick: Sublime Security

    Sublime’s deep visibility and automated remediation complement existing email security, targeting gaps like impersonation attacks.

  • Developer using multi-agent frameworks
    Pick: Exogram

    Exogram integrates with LangChain, AutoGen, and CrewAI, adding governance without altering agent logic.

Frequently Asked Questions

Exogram vs Sublime Security: which should you choose?

If you deploy AI agents in production and need deterministic governance with cryptographic audit, Exogram’s open-core model and ultra-low overhead (0.07ms/decision) make it a standout choice for security-conscious teams. For advanced email threat detection (BEC, VEC) with low false positives, Sublime Security offers powerful custom detection via Sublime Script—but its contact-only pricing and reliance on M365/Google Workspace limit flexibility. Choose Exogram for agent security; choose Sublime for email security.

Which tool has lower false positives?

Sublime Security emphasizes low false positive rates through adaptive learning. Exogram is deterministic—it doesn't rely on LLMs for decisions, so false positives are a matter of policy configuration, not AI uncertainty.

Can Exogram detect phishing emails?

No—Exogram is a governance layer for AI agent actions, not an email security platform. For email threats, Sublime Security is the appropriate choice.

Does Sublime Security integrate with AI agent frameworks?

No. Sublime integrates only with Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace for email protection. Exogram integrates with LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, and more.

Which tool is better for compliance?

Exogram is purpose-built for compliance (SOC 2, EU AI Act) with cryptographic audit trails. Sublime Security helps with email security compliance but lacks agent-specific audit.

Is Exogram open source?

Exogram is open-core—the core governance engine is open source, with enterprise features (SSO, RBAC, SIEM) as paid add-ons.

What is Sublime Script?

Sublime Script is a YARA-like language in Sublime Security for writing custom email detection rules, enabling fine-tuned threat hunting.

Can Exogram work with any LLM agent?

Yes—it provides a REST API and MCP integration, plus SDK wrappers for popular frameworks, making it agent- and LLM-agnostic.

Does Sublime Security offer a free tier?

No, Sublime Security is paid with contact-only pricing. Exogram offers a free community edition.

More Exogram or Sublime Security comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026