Groq vs Together AI
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Groq | Together AI |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Freemium (free tier with rate limits; paid tokens at $0.85/M input, $2.50/M output; Batch API 50% less) | Freemium (pay-as-you-go for serverless; dedicated plans start at ~$0.50/hr for inference, ~$2/hr for fine-tuning) |
| Core Technology | Custom LPU (Language Processing Unit) silicon designed for inference latency | GPU clusters (GB300, H200, B200) with FlashAttention-4 & ATLAS kernels |
| Model Selection | Focus on day-zero support for new open models (e.g., Llama 4 Scout, OpenAI GPT OSS) | 100+ open-source models including DeepSeek V4 Pro, Qwen3.7-Max, Llama 4 Maverick, MiniMax-M3 |
| Key Features | Sub-200ms latency, Batch API (50% cheaper), prompt caching, built-in tools (web search, code exec), Orpheus TTS | Batch inference (up to 30B tokens/model), fine-tuning, managed storage, sandbox (CodeSandbox), voice agents |
| Best For | Real-time apps, latency-sensitive agents, cost-efficient inference, voice AI | Production coding agents, large batch inference, fine-tuning, dedicated GPU workloads |
| Recent News | Raised $650M in June 2026 after Nvidia's failed acquisition; Orpheus TTS launched on GroqCloud (April 2026) | ISO 27001:2022 certified; no other recent news |
If your priority is raw latency for real-time apps (chatbots, voice assistants), Groq’s LPU architecture and sub-200ms responses are unmatched, especially with its recent $650M funding ensuring stability. Together AI is the better choice for heavy batch inference (up to 30B tokens), fine-tuning, and production coding agents needing high TPS on open-source LLMs. Choose Groq for speed and predictability; choose Together AI for scale and flexibility.
Full-stack AI cloud for inference, fine-tuning, and pre-training on open-source models.
Visit WebsiteFeature-by-feature
Together AI and Groq serve different inference niches. Together AI provides a full-stack cloud with GPU clusters (GB300, H200, B200) and kernel optimizations like FlashAttention-4, enabling serverless inference for 100+ models, batch processing up to 30B tokens per model, and fine-tuning with proprietary ATLAS techniques. It also offers managed storage (zero egress), sandbox environments via CodeSandbox, and voice agents. Groq, by contrast, uses custom LPU chips designed solely for low-latency inference, achieving sub-200ms responses. Its strengths include an OpenAI-compatible API (two lines of code), a Batch API with 50% cost reduction, prompt caching for cheaper cache-hit responses, and built-in tools like web search and code execution. Groq also supports Orpheus TTS for real-time speech. While Together AI’s model selection is broader (100+ vs. day-zero support), Groq’s focus on latency and cost efficiency for real-time apps is unmatched. Both platforms now emphasize security (Together AI ISO 27001), but Together AI is better for training and large-scale batch, whereas Groq excels for latency-sensitive production inference.
Pricing compared
Both platforms follow a freemium model. Together AI offers pay-as-you-go serverless inference with dedicated options (e.g., ~$0.50/hr for inference, ~$2/hr for fine-tuning) and no egress fees. Groq provides a free tier with rate limits; paid tokens cost $0.85 per million input tokens and $2.50 per million output, with a 50% discount for Batch API requests. Groq’s pricing is linear and predictable, which appeals to cost-conscious teams. However, Together AI can be more economical for high-volume batch processing using its dedicated clusters, especially for workloads exceeding 30B tokens. Groq’s recent $650M raise (June 2026) signals financial stability and potential future price adjustments. For real-time apps with moderate throughput, Groq’s predictable pricing is a win; for scalable, heterogeneous workloads, Together AI’s dedicated infrastructure offers better value. Users should consider token volume and latency needs: Groq’s free tier is generous for testing, while Together AI’s batch discounts favor production-scale async tasks.
Who should pick which
- Real-time chatbot developerPick: Groq
Groq's sub-200ms latency and OpenAI-compatible API enable snappy conversational agents, and the built-in web search and code execution tools enhance bot capabilities. The free tier allows rapid prototyping.
- Enterprise batch inference userPick: Together AI
Together AI's batch inference handles up to 30B tokens per model, and dedicated GPU clusters (H100, B200) provide deterministic performance for large-scale async processing.
- Fine-tuning specialistPick: Together AI
Together AI offers research-backed fine-tuning with FlashAttention-4 and ATLAS kernels, plus managed storage with zero egress, making it ideal for custom model training.
- Voice AI startupPick: Groq
Groq's Orpheus TTS model (live on GroqCloud since April 2026) and low-latency inference enable real-time voice applications. The $650M raise ensures long-term platform stability.
- Coding agent producerPick: Together AI
Together AI's high TPS on open-source LLMs, sandbox environments via CodeSandbox, and support for production coding workloads make it a better fit for agent-heavy coding pipelines.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which platform is faster for real-time AI apps?
Groq, thanks to its custom LPU architecture, delivers sub-200ms response times, ideal for chatbots, copilots, and voice assistants.
Can I fine-tune models on Groq?
No, Groq focuses exclusively on inference. Together AI supports fine-tuning with research-optimized techniques like FlashAttention-4.
How do their free tiers compare?
Both offer freemium models. Together AI provides pay-as-you-go serverless access; Groq offers a free tier with rate limits. For significant usage, both require paid plans.
Which platform has better batch processing?
Together AI, with batch inference handling up to 30B tokens per model. Groq's Batch API offers 50% cost reduction but is designed for asynchronous workloads, not massive throughput.
Is Groq's pricing really 'predictable'?
Yes, Groq advertises linear, predictable pricing with no surprise bills, at $0.85/M input tokens and $2.50/M output. Together AI's dedicated plans are hourly, which may vary based on usage.
Does Together AI offer any unique enterprise features?
Together AI is ISO 27001:2022 certified for security, provides managed storage with zero egress fees, and sandbox environments via CodeSandbox, which are beneficial for enterprise development.
What recent developments affect these platforms?
Groq raised $650M in June 2026 after Nvidia's failed acquisition attempt, and launched Orpheus TTS (April 2026). Together AI announced ISO 27001 certification but no major news.
Can I use OpenAI SDK with either platform?
Groq's API is OpenAI-compatible and can be integrated in two lines of code. Together AI offers its own REST API and Python/Node.js SDK, but not explicit OpenAI compatibility.
More Groq or Together AI comparisons
If you need the absolute lowest latency and earliest access to frontier open-weight models for real-time coding assistants, Fireworks AI is the clear winner — especially with its newer models like GLM
For fast, low-latency production inference with low cost, Groq is the winner thanks to its custom LPU and sub-200ms response times. If you need a vast model library, community collaboration, or enterp
Choose Baseten if you need ultra-low latency inference (sub-300ms) for custom models or real-time voice agents, and you value multi-cloud high availability and model monetization. Choose Together AI i
If you live in Google's world or need native multimodal reasoning (images, audio, video), Gemini is the clear choice. But for speed-obsessed developers building real-time apps or agents, Groq's LPU de
For end users needing a versatile conversational assistant with multimodal features, ChatGPT is the clear choice. For developers and enterprises prioritizing speed and cost efficiency in LLM inference
For teams that need a curated library of 100+ open-source models with high-performance serverless inference and fine-tuning via a managed API, Together AI is the stronger choice. However, if you requi
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.