Haystack vs LlamaIndex

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Updated
Reviewed by our team on
Saved

At a glance

DimensionHaystackLlamaIndex
PricingFree (open-source); Haystack Enterprise paidFreemium (LlamaParse: 1k pages/day free; pay-as-you-go beyond)
Primary UseModular AI framework for RAG & agentsDocument parsing & structured extraction for LLMs
Target UserDevelopers/data scientists building production AI pipelinesDevelopers automating complex document processing
Key StrengthPipeline modularity, hybrid retrieval, multi-provider supportAgentic OCR, structured extraction, table/chart/ handwriting parsing
Open SourceFully open-source (Apache 2.0)LiteParse open-source; core platform proprietary
Best ForProduction RAG, multi-provider agents, multimodal appsInvoice processing, financial due diligence, complex document RAG

LlamaIndex is the strong choice if your primary need is parsing complex documents (handwriting, tables, charts) into structured data for LLMs. Haystack is better if you need a flexible, open-source framework for building end-to-end RAG pipelines and AI agents with full control over retrieval, generation, and multi-provider integration. They can even complement each other: use LlamaParse for extraction, then feed into a Haystack pipeline.

Haystack
Haystack

Open-source framework for production-ready AI agents and RAG pipelines

Visit Website
LlamaIndex
LlamaIndex

LLM-ready document parsing and structured extraction for agentic workflows

Visit Website
Pricing
Freemium
Freemium
Plans
$0/mo
Custom
Custom
$0/mo
$50/mo
$500/mo
Custom
Popularity
5.1k views
4.9k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
API
API
Categories
💻 Code & Development🤖 Automation & Agents
📊 Data & Analytics🤖 Automation & Agents
Features
Modular AI framework for building RAG pipelines
Standardized tool calling for AI agents
Hybrid retrieval strategies (dense + sparse)
Serializable, cloud-agnostic pipeline serialization
Kubernetes-ready deployment support
Built-in logging and monitoring
Branching and looping pipelines for complex workflows
Jinja-2 template engine for content generation
Multimodal support for image and audio processing
Context engineering for scalable memory and tool use
Open architecture with no vendor lock-in
Plain string input support for ChatGenerators (2.30+)
Community support via Discord and GitHub
Integration with Gemini Embedding 2 for multimodal search
Agentic OCR for layout-aware document parsing
Structured extraction with Pydantic schemas
VLM-powered document understanding agents
Handwritten text parsing and extraction
Table extraction from dense or irregular layouts
Chart-to-structured-data conversion
Auto-correction loops for error detection and fix
Support for 130+ unstructured file types (PDF, Office, images)
LiteParse: open-source local document parsing with markdown output
Indexing with chunking and embedding pipeline
Document segmentation via natural-language rules
Document classification using natural-language rules
Enterprise-grade security (HIPAA, GDPR, SOC2)
Flexible deployment (cloud or VPC)
Multi-step document agents via Workflows
Integrations
OpenAI
Anthropic
Mistral
Hugging Face
Weaviate
Pinecone
Elasticsearch
Gemini Embedding 2

Feature-by-feature

LlamaIndex focuses on document parsing with LlamaParse: agentic OCR, Pydantic-structured extraction, table/chart/handwriting parsing, and auto-correction. It handles 130+ file types and includes LiteParse, an open-source local parser now with markdown output (latest news). Haystack is a broader orchestration framework: modular RAG pipelines, hybrid retrieval (dense+sparse), standardized tool calling for agents, Jinja-2 templating, and multimodal support (image, audio). It offers cloud-agnostic serialization, Kubernetes readiness, and built-in monitoring. Haystack integrates with many LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Hugging Face, etc.) and vector stores; recent 2.30 release added plain string input to ChatGenerator. LlamaIndex's strength is deep document understanding (ParseBench score 84.9%), while Haystack excels in pipeline flexibility and provider agnosticism. They are complementary: LlamaIndex for parsing, Haystack for orchestration.

Pricing compared

LlamaIndex operates on a freemium model: LlamaParse offers 1,000 pages per day free; beyond that, it's pay-as-you-go. It also has a fully open-source local parser, LiteParse (now supports markdown). Haystack is completely open-source and free to use under Apache 2.0. Haystack Enterprise (paid) adds features like managed MCP tools, but the core framework is gratis. For teams needing advanced document parsing, LlamaIndex's free tier may be sufficient for small volumes, but heavy usage incurs costs. Haystack has no direct parsing cost, but requires self-hosting or cloud compute for LLM calls and vector databases. Overall, Haystack is more budget-friendly for custom pipelines, while LlamaIndex adds value for complex document extraction.

Who should pick which

  • Solo founder building an invoice automation tool
    Pick: LlamaIndex

    LlamaParse's agentic OCR and structured extraction directly handle invoices with tables and handwriting, providing ready-to-use data for LLMs.

  • Data scientist building a multi-provider RAG system
    Pick: Haystack

    Haystack's modular pipelines support multiple LLM providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Hugging Face) and hybrid retrieval, offering flexibility and no vendor lock-in.

  • Enterprise team needing compliant document agents
    Pick: LlamaIndex

    LlamaIndex offers HIPAA/SOC2 compliance and handles complex document types like technical manuals and inspection reports.

  • Developer creating a multimodal AI app with image/audio
    Pick: Haystack

    Haystack has built-in multimodal support for image and audio processing, along with Jinja-2 templating for content generation.

  • Team wanting an open-source, self-hosted pipeline
    Pick: Haystack

    Haystack is fully open-source (Apache 2.0), cloud-agnostic, and Kubernetes-ready, allowing complete control without vendor lock-in.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use LlamaParse with Haystack?

Yes, you can use LlamaParse as a component in a Haystack pipeline to extract structured data from documents, then pass it to Haystack's retrieval or generation nodes.

Which tool is better for parsing handwritten text?

LlamaIndex’s LlamaParse includes VLM-powered document understanding agents that handle handwritten text parsing, making it the better choice.

Does Haystack support multimodal (image/audio)?

Yes, Haystack has built-in multimodal support for processing images and audio within pipelines.

Is LlamaIndex open-source?

LlamaIndex offers LiteParse as an open-source local parser (now with markdown output), but the core LlamaParse platform is proprietary with a freemium pricing model.

Can I switch LLM providers easily with Haystack?

Yes, Haystack is designed to be provider-agnostic, integrating with OpenAI, Anthropic, Mistral, Hugging Face, and more without code changes.

What is the free limit for LlamaParse?

LlamaParse offers 1,000 pages per day for free; additional usage is pay-as-you-go.

Is Haystack suitable for production?

Yes, Haystack is production-ready with features like pipeline serialization, Kubernetes deployment, built-in logging, and monitoring.

Does LlamaIndex support table extraction?

Yes, LlamaParse includes table extraction from dense or irregular layouts, converting them to structured data.

More Haystack or LlamaIndex comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.