Matharena vs Surge AI

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-15
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionMatharenaSurge AI
PricingFreeContact (custom pricing)
Primary FunctionOpen-source math benchmarking platformExpert human feedback for RLHF & red teaming
Target AudienceResearchers & LLM devs evaluating math reasoningFrontier AI labs & enterprise teams needing expert human eval
Key FeatureCompetition math leaderboards (AIME, IMO, Putnam, etc.)Antidote leaderboard graded by domain experts
Math CapabilityCovers elite math competitions & Project EulerRiemann-bench: extreme math where frontier models score <10%
IntegrationsNo API (open web platform)Python SDK & REST API

For researchers benchmarking open-source LLMs on elite math, Matharena is the free, community-driven choice with immediate access to competition data. Surge AI is the expert human-in-the-loop platform for frontier labs that need rigorous, domain-expert evaluations for RLHF and safety — at a higher cost but with deepertailoring. Choose based on whether you need automated math benchmarks or nuanced human feedback.

Matharena
Matharena

Free benchmark leaderboard that scores LLMs on elite competition math from AIME and IMO to Lean proof datasets

Visit Website
Surge AI
Surge AI

Expert human feedback, proprietary benchmarks, and RL environments for frontier AI alignment and red teaming.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Contact Sales
Plans
$0/mo
Popularity
4 views
7.4k views
Skill Level
Advanced
Advanced
API Available
Platforms
Web
WebAPI
Categories
📡 LLM Observability & Evals
🏷️ Data Labeling & Training Data
Features
Interactive LLM math benchmark leaderboard
Dataset track: ArXivLean with monthly views (03/2026 through 06/2026)
Dataset track: BrokenArXiv with monthly views (02/2026 through 06/2026 and Overall)
Dataset track: ArXivMath with monthly views (12/2025 through 06/2026 and Overall)
Click any leaderboard cell to view the raw model output
Filter leaderboards by competition or dataset month
Compare models side-by-side across entries
Deprecated: Visual Math via Kangaroo 2025 grades 1-2 through 11-12 and Overall
Deprecated: Final-Answer Comps including AIME 2025/2026, HMMT Feb 2025, HMMT Nov 2025, HMMT Feb 2026, BRUMO 2025, SMT 2025, CMIMC 2025, Apex, Apex Shortlist
Deprecated: Proof-Based Comps including USAMO 2025/2026, IMO 2025, IMC 2025, Miklós Schweitzer 2025, Putnam 2025
Deprecated: Project Euler problem view
Mistral Prover (Leanstral 1.5 + K3) scored 38/46 verified on ArXivLean June 2026 (82.61%)
Muse Spark 1.3 added September 13
Claude-Opus-5 (max) added to leaderboard
Kimi K3 and Muse Spark 1.1 added to leaderboard
Expert human workforce spanning doctors, lawyers, engineers, and writers
RLHF preference data collection and feedback for model fine-tuning
Red teaming and adversarial testing with domain specialists
Custom data labeling for multimodal and complex tasks
Complex RL environments including EnterpriseBench and CoreCraft
MCP-native RL environments for enterprise agent tasks
Riemann-bench benchmark for extreme math verification
GDP.pdf benchmark for real-world PDF understanding
ComplexConstraints benchmark for entangled, conditional instruction following
HANDBOOK.md benchmark for long-context policy following (handbooks up to 124 pages)
Chartography benchmark for professional chart understanding (Kaplan-Meier, candlesticks, contour maps, Bode plots)
Tuesday Work Index composite benchmark for real professional work capabilities
Python SDK and REST API for integration into training pipelines
Off-the-shelf expert workforce and data products
Post-training on agentic RL environments with measured transfer to external tool-use benchmarks

What real users say: Matharena vs Surge AI

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

Matharena

39 mentions across 2 sources · 68% positive (averaged across 2 sources)

Hacker News, GitHub

What users praise

  • Uses fresh, uncontaminated competition problems for honest evaluation.
  • Transparent per-cell raw output viewing for detailed analysis.
  • Covers final-answer, proof-based, and visual math benchmarks.
  • Frequent updates with latest competition results, staying current.

What frustrates them

  • Reproducibility is inconsistent — some models get wildly different scores.
  • Documentation is sparse, confusing setup for new users.
  • Only GPT-5 (High) gets Agent mode, unfair for open models.
  • Requested models (Gemini Flash 2.5, Claude Opus 4.6) not added promptly.

Researched Jul 3, 2026

Surge AI

47 mentions across 3 sources · 49% positive — mixed (weighted across 3 sources)

Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy

What users praise

  • Expert human workforce (doctors, lawyers, engineers) ensures high-quality evaluations.
  • Benchmarks cited by OpenAI and Anthropic for credibility.
  • Specializes in RLHF and red teaming for frontier AI alignment.
  • Custom RL environments, including MCP-native, for enterprise tasks.

What frustrates them

  • Contact-based pricing: no transparency, likely costly for small teams.
  • Limited community feedback and reviews hamper informed decisions.
  • Focus on expert tasks may not cater to general data labeling needs.
  • Benchmarks show models still fail, meaning alignment is incomplete.

Researched Sep 8, 2026

Who should pick which

  • AI Researcher evaluating LLM math reasoning
    Pick: Matharena

    Free access to elite competition benchmarks and leaderboards, with recent June 2026 datasets and model outputs for transparent analysis.

  • Frontier AI Lab needing expert human feedback for RLHF
    Pick: Surge AI

    Surge provides a curated workforce of domain experts for high-quality alignment; recently used by Microsoft for MAI-Thinking-1 benchmarking.

  • Safety Team conducting red teaming
    Pick: Surge AI

    Surge's red teaming and adversarial testing with expert graders (doctors, lawyers) is built for rigorous safety evaluation.

  • Competition Math Enthusiast
    Pick: Matharena

    Interactive leaderboards for AIME, IMO, Putnam, etc., provide a fun and informative way to see model performance.

  • Enterprise training models on complex documents
    Pick: Surge AI

    GDP.pdf benchmark and custom data labeling for multimodal AI address enterprise needs; Surge's API allows integration into workflows.

Frequently Asked Questions

Matharena vs Surge AI: which should you choose?

For researchers benchmarking open-source LLMs on elite math, Matharena is the free, community-driven choice with immediate access to competition data. Surge AI is the expert human-in-the-loop platform for frontier labs that need rigorous, domain-expert evaluations for RLHF and safety — at a higher cost but with deepertailoring. Choose based on whether you need automated math benchmarks or nuanced human feedback.

Which platform is better for evaluating math reasoning?

Matharena is specialized for math competitions with free leaderboards. Surge's Riemann-bench targets extreme math but requires costly human grading.

Does Matharena provide human evaluation?

No, Matharena is fully automated, relying on final-answer and proof-based scoring without human graders.

Does Surge AI offer any free tier?

No, Surge AI requires contacting for pricing and likely has no free tier.

Can I use Matharena API for automated benchmarking?

Matharena does not provide an API; it's a web platform for browsing leaderboards.

Which tool is used by Microsoft for LLM evaluation?

Surge AI was used by Microsoft to benchmark MAI-Thinking-1, per July 2026 news.

Which platform suits a solo developer on a budget?

Matharena is free and sufficient for automated math evaluation. Surge's cost is likely prohibitive.

Are there benchmarks beyond math on either platform?

Matharena only covers math. Surge includes creative writing (Hemingway-bench), document understanding (GDP.pdf), and instruction following (ComplexConstraints).

How often are benchmarks updated?

Both update frequently: Matharena as new competitions conclude; Surge releases new benchmarks regularly (e.g., Riemann-bench, GDP.pdf in June 2026).

More Matharena or Surge AI comparisons

Explore each tool further

Browse these categories

Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 3, 2026