n8n vs Torq

Torq is laser-focused on security operations: its agentic alert triage delivers AI verdicts on every alert, powered by a Context Graph that grounds decisions in your environment's model, and Torq Recall learns implicitly from resolved cases to improve future triage. It features HyperAgents for specialized investigations, natural language remediation via Socrates, and transparent audit logs with human-in-the-loop oversight. n8n, by contrast, is a general-purpose workflow engine: it offers a visual canvas with JavaScript/Python code, 500+ integrations, AI agent builder supporting multi-agent and RAG, human-in-the-loop approvals, MCP support, and agent-to-agent (A2A) orchestration. While Torq is purpose-built for SOC, n8n provides broader adaptability—e.g., IT Ops automating onboarding, sales generating insights from reviews. Notably, n8n's open-source nature means full code access and self-hosting; Torq is cloud-only. Both have strong audit capabilities, but Torq's audit logs are specifically for AI actions in a security context, while n8n's audit logs and workflow history are general-purpose. Recent news highlights n8n's new A2A protocol enabling cross-agent communication, and a community node for data leak prevention, showing its enterprise readiness. Torq's latest news emphasizes its leadership in the AI SOC space with Reflex learning from corrections.

Torq uses a contact-based enterprise pricing model, typical for specialized security platforms, with no public tiers. This suggests high upfront costs and likely custom contracts based on alert volume and features. n8n follows a freemium model: self-hosted starting free (open-source) with cloud paid plans starting at $20/month for starter, scaling to enterprise with SSO, RBAC, etc. The open-source version includes most features, making n8n accessible for small teams or those with tight budgets. For organizations requiring on-prem deployment due to compliance or data residency, n8n's self-hosting is a clear advantage. Torq's enterprise-only pricing may be justified by its narrow focus on SOC efficiency, but it's a barrier for smaller teams. n8n offers flexibility: you can start free and scale, while Torq demands a bigger commitment. If budget is a primary concern, n8n wins easily. However, for large SOCs where alert triage automation can save millions, Torq's value proposition might offset its opaque pricing.