OpenHands vs Devin
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | OpenHands | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (open-source), self-hosted; optional paid cloud tiers | Contact for pricing (enterprise) |
| Autonomy Level | Autonomous agents with pre-built workflows and SDK | Full autonomous software engineer from planning to shipping |
| Target Audience | Engineering teams of all sizes wanting open, flexible automation | Enterprise engineering teams with mature DevOps |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Docker/K8s) or cloud; air-gapped possible | Cloud-based, enterprise-managed |
| Pre-built Workflows | Fix Vulnerabilities, Review PRs, Migrate Code, Triage Incidents | General autonomous coding (plan, code, test, ship) |
| Model Agnosticism | Model-agnostic, adapt to any LLM | Likely proprietary model (not disclosed) |
For enterprises wanting a turnkey, fully autonomous AI engineer that ships production code with minimal human intervention, Devin is the premium choice—provided you can afford its closed enterprise pricing. For teams seeking an open, customizable, and cost-effective platform to automate specific workflows like vulnerability fixing or code migration, OpenHands offers unparalleled flexibility and control without vendor lock-in.
Feature-by-feature
Devin is engineered as an end-to-end autonomous software engineer: it plans, writes, tests, and ships production code entirely on its own, working inside existing codebases and toolchains. Its strength lies in full autonomy for complex engineering tasks, making it ideal for enterprises that want to offload repetitive work and let engineers focus on architecture. In contrast, OpenHands provides a platform for building and deploying autonomous coding agents with pre-built workflows for common tasks like fixing vulnerabilities, reviewing PRs, migrating legacy code (COBOL to Java), and triaging incidents. OpenHands is model-agnostic, allowing teams to plug in any LLM, and offers a CLI, web GUI, and SDK for custom integrations. While Devin is a closed product with limited transparency, OpenHands is open-source and supports self-hosted deployments with Docker/Kubernetes for security-sensitive environments. Both can scale, but Devin's autonomy is broader, while OpenHands targets specific, repeatable workflows.
Pricing compared
Devin follows a contact-for-pricing model typical of enterprise software, which likely means high per-seat or platform fees, making it accessible only to larger organizations with budget. OpenHands is completely free as an open-source platform; teams self-host and manage model costs themselves. OpenHands may also offer optional paid cloud tiers for convenience, but the core is cost-effective for any team. Devin's value proposition is a fully managed, autonomous engineer that reduces headcount needs, while OpenHands requires internal expertise to set up and maintain the infrastructure, but offers significant savings and customization. For small to mid-sized teams, OpenHands is clearly more affordable; for large enterprises wanting zero setup and guaranteed enterprise support, Devin's premium pricing may be justified.
Who should pick which
- Enterprise engineering leaderPick: Devin
Devin provides a fully managed, autonomous AI engineer that ships production code, allowing senior engineers to focus on system design and architecture. Its enterprise-grade support and integration with existing toolchains simplify adoption for large teams.
- DevOps team automating vulnerability patchingPick: OpenHands
OpenHands offers a pre-built 'Fix Vulnerabilities' workflow that scans repos and opens PRs, plus a sandboxed runtime for secure execution. It's open-source and can be integrated into CI/CD pipelines cost-effectively.
- Legacy modernization team (e.g., COBOL to Java)Pick: OpenHands
OpenHands includes a dedicated 'Migrate Code' workflow with validation, automating the conversion of legacy code. Its model-agnostic design allows use of specialized models for such tasks.
- Startup with limited budget needing custom automationPick: OpenHands
OpenHands is free and open-source, allowing the startup to build custom agents via its SDK without licensing costs. They can self-host using Docker/K8s to manage costs and retain control.
- Security-conscious organization requiring air-gapped deploymentPick: OpenHands
OpenHands supports self-hosted, air-gapped deployments with Docker or Kubernetes, ensuring full control over data and code. Devin's cloud-only model cannot meet this requirement.
Benchmarks
| Metric | OpenHands | Devin |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (best public) | 55.0 %SWE-bench leaderboard, Sonnet 4.6 config | 14–20 %Cognition blog + independent runs |
| Monthly cost (1 dev, daily use) | $30–$100LLM API tokens only | $500+ /seatTeam plan public pricing |
| Cold-start latency | ~5 slocal Docker | ~30–60 scloud sandbox boot |
| Models supported | 30+ providersLiteLLM integration | 1 proprietary stackCognition-selected |
| GitHub stars | ~62kgithub.com/All-Hands-AI/OpenHands | N/A closed source— |
| Source availability | MIT licensefully open source | Closedproprietary SaaS |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Devin suitable for small teams?
Unlikely—Devin targets large enterprises with mature CI/CD and code review processes, and its contact-based pricing suggests high cost. Small teams should consider OpenHands for a free, flexible alternative.
Can OpenHands ship production code autonomously like Devin?
Yes, OpenHands agents can plan, write, and apply changes, but it depends on the workflow and configuration. However, it lacks Devin's end-to-end 'autonomous engineer' marketing and may require more setup.
Does OpenHands require model API keys?
Yes, OpenHands is model-agnostic, so you need to provide access to an LLM (e.g., OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source) and incur your own API costs. Devin likely includes model usage in its pricing.
Which tool integrates better with existing tools?
Devin claims deep integration with existing codebases and toolchains but specifics are not public. OpenHands natively integrates with GitHub, GitLab, Slack, CI/CD, and ticketing tools, and its SDK allows custom integrations.
Can I try Devin for free?
No—Devin requires contacting sales for access. OpenHands is free and open-source; you can deploy it immediately on your own infrastructure or use community-hosted sandboxes.
Is OpenHands secure for enterprise use?
Yes, OpenHands runs agents in isolated Docker or Kubernetes sandboxes, supports self-hosted deployments, and allows air-gapped environments. It provides fine-grained security controls.
Does Devin support legacy code migration?
Devin's marketing emphasizes autonomous coding for any production code, but it does not mention specific legacy migration workflows. OpenHands explicitly offers a 'Migrate Code' workflow (e.g., COBOL to Java).
Which tool is better for automating PR reviews?
OpenHands has a dedicated 'Review PRs' workflow for quality and security checks. Devin's scope is broader, but specific PR review automation is not highlighted; it aims to reduce overall engineering workload.