PMB vs Voyage AI

Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings

Analysis reviewed Live tool data as of 2026-09-01
Cross-checked through our multi-step verification ·
Saved

At a glance

DimensionPMBVoyage AI
PricingFree (open source, Apache 2.0)Contact sales (custom pricing)
Primary use casePersistent memory for AI coding agentsEnterprise RAG with domain-specific embeddings
DeploymentLocal, offline-first, no API keysCloud API
Key integrationsClaude Code, Cursor, Codex, Zed via MCPAny vector DB or LLM (no pre-built lists)
Specialized modelsN/A (context injection via hybrids recall)Voyage-3, finance, legal, code, multimodal
ComplianceNot mentioned (local data = minimal compliance risk)SOC 2, HIPAA

Voyage AI is built for enterprises needing high-accuracy, domain-specific retrieval at scale, while PMB targets developers who want simple, private, local memory for coding agents. Choose Voyage if you run a production RAG system on sensitive data; choose PMB if you're tired of re-explaining context to Claude Code or Cursor.

Try PMBTry Voyage AI
PMB
PMB

Local-first persistent memory for AI coding agents via MCP.

Visit Website
Voyage AI
Voyage AI

Specialized embedding models and rerankers for high-accuracy enterprise RAG, with 32K-token context and multimodal support.

Visit Website
Pricing
Free
Contact Sales
Plans
$0
—
Popularity
2 views
7.4k views
Skill Level
Intermediate
Intermediate
API Available
Platforms
CLIDesktop
WebAPI
Categories
🧠 Agent Memory & Runtimes🔌 MCP Servers & Agent Tooling
🗄️ Vector Databases & Retrieval
Features
Persistent SQLite memory file on disk
MCP-native integration with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Zed
Sub-millisecond classification and recall (~35 ms)
Auto-inject relevant lessons, decisions, and project overview on every prompt
Hybrid recall: BM25 + dense vectors + entity graph + RRF
Honest impact scoring: tracks whether each lesson is followed, flags dead memories
Local web dashboard with interactive entity graph (Map) and git-style timeline
Async writes: SQLite first, embedding and vector insert on background thread
Works offline, no API keys, no telemetry
Open source under Apache 2.0 license
Inspectable and exportable memory chunks
Entity nodes color-coded by type, sized by importance
Multi-project support with navigation lanes
Optional local LLM integration (Ollama) for summarization and graph extraction
Benchmarks: 94.6% recall@10 on LoCoMo, 88ms p50 recall at 2k memories
General-purpose embedding models: voyage-3.5, voyage-3.5 lite
Domain-specific models for finance, legal, and code
Company-specific fine-tuned models for proprietary data
Voyage 4 model series for improved retrieval quality
voyage-multimodal-3.5 for multimodal retrieval (images + text)
Low-dimensional embeddings (3x-8x shorter vectors) reduce storage costs
Long-context support up to 32K tokens
rerank-2.5 and rerank-2.5-lite with instruction following
Batch API for large-scale embedding workloads
voyage-context-3 provides chunk-level details with global document context
Low-latency inference with 4x smaller model
2x cheaper inference than previous models
SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance
Modular design: plug-and-play with any vector DB and LLM
Integrations
Claude Code
Cursor
Codex
Zed
Ollama

What real users say: PMB vs Voyage AI

Not marketing copy and not our opinion — a structured sweep of public discussion (reviews, forums, communities and video comments), showing what people praise and what they complain about for each tool.

PMB

81 mentions across 6 sources · 74% positive

Hacker News, Product Hunt, App Store, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • Local-first: all data stays on your disk, no cloud or API keys.
  • • Hybrid recall (BM25 + vectors + graph) delivers relevant memory in ~35 ms.
  • • Automatic write and read hooks integrate with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Zed.
  • • Honest impact scoring flags dead memories that agents don't follow.

What frustrates them

  • • No cloud or team-synced version, only local storage.
  • • Stale or reversed decisions can still surface without manual pruning.
  • • Automatic memory injection uses context window tokens, reducing solution runway.
  • • Only one maintainer; open issues may take time to resolve.

Researched Jul 4, 2026

Voyage AI

41 mentions across 4 sources · 48% positive — mixed

Hacker News, YouTube, Stack Overflow, Lemmy

What users praise

  • • High accuracy for RAG retrieval, especially with the reranker models.
  • • Domain-specific models for finance, legal, and code deliver better results.
  • • Low-dimensional embeddings cut vector storage costs by up to 8x.
  • • Supports long contexts up to 32K tokens, useful for large documents.

What frustrates them

  • • Data-training clause in terms raises privacy red flags for enterprises.
  • • Pricing is opaque, requiring contact with sales.
  • • Community support is sparse — few Stack Overflow answers or forum threads.
  • • No clear free tier, so trying it costs time with sales or API credits.

Researched Aug 26, 2026

Who should pick which

  • Enterprise RAG engineer
    Pick: Voyage AI

    Requires domain-specific embedding models (finance, legal) with 32K context, SOC 2/HIPAA compliance, and batch processing for large document corpora.

  • Solo developer building with Claude Code
    Pick: PMB

    Free, local-first persistent memory eliminates repetitive context re-explanation; integrates via MCP with no API keys or latency.

  • Small startup needing vector search on a budget
    Pick: Voyage AI

    Low-dimensional embeddings cut vector storage costs; contact pricing may yield affordable entry, though transparency is lacking.

  • Privacy-conscious developer using Cursor
    Pick: PMB

    All data stays local, no telemetry, no cloud dependency—ideal for proprietary code or sensitive projects.

  • Multimodal retrieval project
    Pick: Voyage AI

    Voyage recently announced voyage-multimodal-3.5, enabling image+text retrieval for RAG pipelines.

Frequently Asked Questions

PMB vs Voyage AI: which should you choose?

Voyage AI is built for enterprises needing high-accuracy, domain-specific retrieval at scale, while PMB targets developers who want simple, private, local memory for coding agents. Choose Voyage if you run a production RAG system on sensitive data; choose PMB if you're tired of re-explaining context to Claude Code or Cursor.

Can I use Voyage AI for free?

No, Voyage AI requires contacting sales for custom pricing; there is no free tier.

Is PMB truly offline?

Yes, PMB runs entirely locally with an SQLite file; no internet connection required after installation.

Which tools does PMB integrate with?

PMB integrates via MCP with Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, and Zed.

Does Voyage AI support multimodal?

Yes, voyage-multimodal-3.5 was recently announced, adding image+text embedding capabilities.

What compliance does Voyage AI offer?

Voyage AI provides SOC 2 and HIPAA compliance for enterprise workloads.

Can I self-host PMB?

Yes, PMB is open source under Apache 2.0; you can inspect and modify the code and run it locally.

Does Voyage AI have a reranker?

Yes, Voyage offers rerank-2.5 and rerank-2.5-lite with instruction following.

What recall method does PMB use?

PMB uses hybrid recall combining BM25, dense vectors, entity graph, and optional rerank, fused with Reciprocal-Rank-Fusion (RRF).

More PMB or Voyage AI comparisons

AI-Search vs Voyage AI comparison

Voyage AI and AI-Search serve completely different needs. Voyage AI is a specialized enterprise tool for high-accuracy embeddings and rerankers in RAG pipelines, ideal if you need domain-specific mode

Nubase vs Voyage AI comparison

Choose Voyage AI if you need domain-specific, high-accuracy embeddings and rerankers for enterprise RAG (finance, legal, code) with SOC 2/HIPAA compliance — expect sales-led pricing and modular integr

gitlab-duo-provisioning-blueprint vs Voyage AI comparison

Choose Voyage AI if your core need is high-accuracy retrieval on domain-specific data (finance, legal) with long-context support and low storage costs. Choose gitlab-duo-provisioning-blueprint if you

sandboxd vs Voyage AI comparison

If your need is high-accuracy retrieval over dense domain-specific documents (finance, legal, code), Voyage AI's specialized embedding models and rerankers are unmatched, but be prepared for enterpris

coreai-model-zoo vs Voyage AI comparison

These tools serve completely different needs. Choose Voyage AI if you run an enterprise RAG pipeline needing domain-tuned embeddings and rerankers, especially for finance/legal; its 32K context and lo

agentteam-email vs Voyage AI comparison

Voyage AI and agentteam-email solve completely different problems: Voyage AI is for high-accuracy retrieval in RAG (embedding/reranking), while agentteam-email manages email infrastructure for AI agen

Explore each tool further

PMB
View PMB reviewPMB alternatives
Voyage AI
View Voyage AI reviewVoyage AI alternatives

Browse these categories

Best AI Agent Memory & Runtimes toolsBest AI Vector Databases & Retrieval toolsBest AI MCP Servers & Agent Tooling tools
Still deciding? Get the weekly AI tools brief

One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.

Last reviewed: July 2, 2026