Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Sourcegraph Cody | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (limited), Pro $9/mo, Enterprise custom | Free (unlimited SWE-1.6), Pro $15/mo, Max $40/mo, Teams custom |
| Core Focus | Context-aware AI assistant for large, multi-repo codebases | Command center IDE for local and cloud coding agents |
| AI Models | Multiple LLMs (Claude, GPT, etc.) | SWE-1.6 (free), Claude, Gemini, OpenAI, GLM 5.2, Kimi K2.7 |
| Key Feature | Deep Search with auto-compaction, subagent for token efficiency | Agent Command Center, Spaces, agent diffs, handoff to Devin Cloud |
| Integrations | VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio, GitHub, GitLab, MCP, Cursor | Git, GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket, Slack, Teams, Linear, Jira, MCP |
| Not For | Solo/small projects wanting lightweight autocomplete | Users wanting a simple Copilot replacement or minimal IDE |
If you're an enterprise developer wrestling with a massive, multi-repo codebase and need deep context for chat and fixes, Sourcegraph Cody's Search API and Deep Search make it the smarter pick. If you run multiple coding agents (local + cloud) and want a single command center with free unlimited SWE-1.6, plus handoff to Devin Cloud, Windsurf is the way. Choose based on whether your pain point is codebase context or agent orchestration.
Who should pick which
- Enterprise developer in a large, multi-repo organizationPick: Sourcegraph Cody
Cody's deep integration with Sourcegraph Search API and Deep Search with auto-compaction provides unmatched context across repos, plus RBAC and admin controls for enterprises.
- Solo founder building an MVP with multiple agentsPick: Windsurf
Windsurf's free unlimited SWE-1.6 model and Agent Command Center let you run local and cloud agents without upfront cost, ideal for rapid prototyping.
- DevOps engineer automating code review security checksPick: Windsurf
Windsurf's Security in Devin Review (June 2025) catches auth bypasses and logic flaws in PRs, making it a fit for automated security reviews.
- Team automating custom code tasks with reusable promptsPick: Sourcegraph Cody
Cody's Custom Prompts allow teams to script common workflows like refactoring or testing across repos, with full codebase context.
- Developer needing handoff to cloud agents for long-running tasksPick: Windsurf
Windsurf's effortless handoff to Devin Cloud agents lets you close your laptop while agents continue, unmatched by Cody.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sourcegraph Cody vs Windsurf: which should you choose?
If you're an enterprise developer wrestling with a massive, multi-repo codebase and need deep context for chat and fixes, Sourcegraph Cody's Search API and Deep Search make it the smarter pick. If you run multiple coding agents (local + cloud) and want a single command center with free unlimited SWE-1.6, plus handoff to Devin Cloud, Windsurf is the way. Choose based on whether your pain point is codebase context or agent orchestration.
Which tool offers better context for large codebases?
Sourcegraph Cody, thanks to its Sourcegraph Search API and Deep Search with auto-compaction and subagent for file searches.
Is there a free tier with unlimited AI model access?
Windsurf offers free unlimited access to its SWE-1.6 model. Cody's free tier is limited in features.
Can I run multiple AI agents simultaneously?
Yes, Windsurf's Agent Command Center lets you dispatch and monitor multiple local and cloud agents.
Does Cody support MCP?
Yes, Sourcegraph provides an MCP server, as noted in their June 2025 update.
Which integrates with more IDEs?
Cody integrates with VS Code, JetBrains, Visual Studio (experimental), and Sourcegraph Web. Windsurf is itself a full IDE based on a custom editor.
What recent security features do they offer?
Windsurf introduced Security in Devin Review (June 2025) for automated PR security scanning. Cody doesn't mention a comparable feature.
Which is more affordable for a single developer?
Cody Pro is $9/mo vs Windsurf Pro $15/mo. However, Windsurf's free tier offers unlimited SWE-1.6, which may suffice.
Can I use Claude or GPT with both?
Yes. Cody supports multiple LLMs including Claude and GPT. Windsurf also supports OpenAI, Claude, and Gemini, and recently added Kimi K2.7 and GLM 5.2.
More Sourcegraph Cody or Windsurf comparisons
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if your team lives in multi-repo codebases and needs deep integration with GitHub/GitLab, with agentic search and batch changes. Choose Claude if you need a versatile AI for he
If your team lives in large, multi-repo codebases and needs deep code understanding with enterprise controls, Sourcegraph Cody is the pragmatic pick. But if you want an AI that takes a feature from id
Pick Windsurf (Devin Desktop) if you're orchestrating multiple agents and want a single IDE with free SWE-1.7 access and flexible multi-model orchestration via ACP. Choose GitHub Copilot if you live i
If you're an engineer juggling multiple coding agents, Windsurf (now Devin Desktop) gives you the orchestration hub you need. If you're a professional digging through long docs or want a versatile ass
Choose Sourcegraph Cody if you need deep codebase context across many repos and prefer a chat-based assistant with robust enterprise controls. Choose Devin Desktop if you want to manage multiple codin
For enterprises needing governance, compliance, and end-to-end SDLC automation, Augment Code's Cosmos is the clear choice—its agent orchestration and compliance features (SOC 2, HIPAA, ISO 42001) are
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.
Last reviewed: May 12, 2026