AffinityBots is live · free plan, paid from $19/mo billed annually · last verified 23 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
AffinityBots
No-code AI agent builder for multi-agent orchestration, with a visual workflow editor and MCP-based integrations.
AffinityBots earns its place if you want agents that genuinely hand work to each other. Hub-style dynamic workflows, guardrails, and MCP-based connections to external tools are a real step beyond chaining nodes in n8n, and the free tier (3 active workflows, 200 actions, 1,000 credits/month) is enough to prove a workflow before paying. Budget for Pro at $49/mo billed annually rather than Starter — 1,000 actions and 10,000 credits per month run out quickly, and add-ons exist precisely because of that. If you want branch-level control over every error path, n8n is still the answer. If you need SOC 2 or HIPAA guarantees, wait for the Enterprise tier.
Verdict generatedVerified 7d ago · liveness 48/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/affinitybots
- Small business owners automating lead capture and qualification
- Support teams building FAQ agents from a document base
- Operations managers orchestrating multi-agent workflows across tools
- Marketers running content workflows off a trigger
- Teams that need code-level control over every branch and error path (n8n fits better)
- High-volume workflows that will exceed 5,000 actions/month on Pro
- Organizations that need SOC 2, HIPAA, or advanced security guarantees today
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip AffinityBots if you need branch-level control over every error path, or if compliance is a blocker — advanced security, SLA guarantee, and on-premise deployment sit behind the custom Enterprise tier.
Actions and AI credits are separate meters: Pro's 5,000 actions and 50,000 credits per month can be consumed by the same workflow, so one busy month hits both ceilings.
Free covers prototyping — 3 active workflows, 200 actions, 1,000 credits — so you can prove a workflow before paying. Starter at $19/mo billed annually suits simple single-agent jobs. Pro at $49/mo billed annually is the realistic tier for anything customer-facing; add-ons extend it instead of forcing Enterprise. The $19/mo Bring Your Own Keys plan is the cheapest way to Pro-level limits if you already pay OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini. Enterprise is quote-only.
In short
AffinityBots — No-code AI agent builder for multi-agent orchestration, with a visual workflow editor and MCP-based integrations. Best for Small business owners automating lead capture and qualification, Support teams building FAQ agents from a document base, Operations managers orchestrating multi-agent workflows across tools. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo billed annually.
What is AffinityBots?
AffinityBots — No-code AI agent builder for multi-agent orchestration, with a visual workflow editor and MCP-based integrations. Best for Small business owners automating lead capture and qualification, Support teams building FAQ agents from a document base, Operations managers orchestrating multi-agent workflows across tools. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo billed annually.
AffinityBots is a no-code platform for building AI agents and chaining them into workflows. You design each agent in a visual builder, give it a knowledge base and (on paid tiers) long-term memory, add custom agent skills, then deploy it to Telegram, Discord, or an embeddable chat widget on your own site. Agents are also reachable through a public chat API and an MCP server endpoint at /api/mcp/server, so outside apps can call them over the Model Context Protocol, and the docs describe connecting agents to external MCP servers and services via OAuth. The workflow layer is the differentiator. Alongside linear sequential pipelines, AffinityBots supports dynamic workflows that use hub-style delegation to route work across multiple agents and then continue through sequential steps in the same builder. Workflows start manually, on a webhook, on a schedule, from a form, or from an integration trigger, and you can insert guardrails that validate and filter agent output before it moves on. Pricing is freemium. Free gives you unlimited agents, 3 active workflows, 200 actions and 1,000 AI credits per month, a 1M-character knowledge base, and 3 agent skill builds per month. Starter is $19/mo billed annually (the pricing page shows a $120/year saving versus monthly), Pro/Team is $49/mo billed annually (a $240/year saving), and both take credit and action add-ons. Pro includes one seat at +$15/seat/mo and multiple workspaces for 5 team members. A separate $19/mo Bring Your Own Keys plan applies Pro limits to your own OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini keys. Enterprise is custom and adds custom model training, white-label, on-premise deployment, advanced security, and an SLA guarantee. The company also publishes point-by-point comparisons against n8n for sales, lead gen, content, support, and AI teams, plus OpenClaw and Grok Bot. It fits operators and small teams who want genuine multi-agent delegation without an engineering hire. It fits less well if you need SOC 2, HIPAA, or other compliance guarantees today — advanced security is listed as an Enterprise capability.
Key features
- No-code visual AI agent builder
- Hub-style dynamic multi-agent delegation
- Sequential workflow pipelines in the same builder
- Custom agent skills built with AI or imported from packages
- Community skill library
- Knowledge base with document and data ingestion
- Long-term agent memory (custom memory priced per agent on Starter)
- Guardrails that validate and filter agent outputs
- Workflow triggers: manual, webhook, scheduled, form, integration
- Deploy agents to Telegram
- Deploy agents to Discord
- Embeddable website chat widget
- Public chat API for custom frontends
- MCP server endpoint at /api/mcp/server
- Connect external MCP servers and services via OAuth
Behind the verdict
The interesting thing about AffinityBots is not the agent builder — plenty of tools let you write a system prompt and attach documents. It is the workflow engine underneath. The docs split workflows into sequential (a linear pipeline of agents for predictable step-by-step automation) and dynamic (hub-style delegation that routes work adaptively across agents and then continues with sequential steps in the same builder). Dynamic delegation is the part most no-code tools fake by chaining steps and calling it multi-agent. Guardrails, which validate and filter outputs before the workflow proceeds, are the other half of making that safe enough to run unattended. Deployment surfaces are broader than most competitors at this price. Agents ship to Telegram, Discord, or an embeddable website widget, and the platform exposes a public chat API for custom frontends plus an MCP server at /api/mcp/server that lets external apps — and other MCP-speaking agents — reach your AffinityBots agents. The docs cover MCP authentication, JSON-RPC, rate limits, tool scope, and runtime troubleshooting, which suggests MCP is treated as a first-class integration path rather than a marketing bullet. Integrations are added by connecting external MCP servers and services over OAuth, and the pricing page lists unlimited integrations on every tier including Free. Knowledge and memory are split deliberately: a knowledge base of documents and data (1M characters on Free, 20M on Starter, 50M on Pro, unlimited on Enterprise) and separate long-term memory that carries conversation context. Custom long-term memory is listed at $15 per agent on Starter and unlimited on Pro. Agent skills — custom capabilities you build with AI, import from packages, or pull from community skills — are rationed by plan at 3/month on Free, 25/month on Starter, and unlimited on Pro, which is a subtle constraint: a fast-moving team on Starter can outrun its skill budget before it outruns anything else. On cost, be realistic. Every tier is metered in two currencies at once. Actions run 200/month on Free, 1,000 on Starter, 5,000 on Pro. AI credits run 1,000, 10,000, and 50,000 respectively, and the pricing page states plainly that credits flex with model choice and tool usage. A workflow that fans out across five agents on every inbound lead burns credits in a way a single-agent FAQ bot never will. Credit and action add-ons exist on paid plans for exactly that reason, and the comparison table lists "Credit add-ons" publicly only on Enterprise. The $19/mo Bring Your Own Keys plan is the smartest line item here for anyone already paying OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini directly: it applies Pro limits to your own keys and puts model spend under your control, though the published price is quoted per month without the annual qualifier applied to the other tiers, so confirm the billing terms when you sign up. Where it does not fit: high-volume pipelines that will blow through 5,000 actions and 50,000 credits a
Models under the hood
as of 2026-10-31
Limitations
- Usage is metered in two currencies and credits flex with model choice and tool usage.
- Free supports 3 active workflows, 200 actions/month, 1,000 AI credits/month, and 3 skill builds/month; Starter caps at 1,000 actions and 10,000 credits/month with 25 skill builds; Pro caps at 5,000 actions and 50,000 credits/month.
- Knowledge base capacity scales by plan (1M characters Free, 20M Starter, 50M Pro, unlimited Enterprise).
- Custom model training, white-label, on-premise deployment, advanced security, and SLA guarantee are Enterprise-only.
as of 2026-10-03
Researching AffinityBots? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is AffinityBots still active?
AffinityBots is live · free plan, paid from $19/mo billed annually · last verified 23 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is AffinityBots? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about AffinityBots?
How we verified this
Every listed fact about AffinityBots— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 23 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified AffinityBots 12 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed pricing page, limitations
- — changed pricing page
- — changed pricing page
- — changed use cases, who should skip it, setup time, our verdict, limitations, pricing fit, features, who it suits, hidden costs, integrations, description, summary, pricing tiers, switching out, switching in
- — changed features, who it suits, description, our verdict, integrations, who should skip it, pricing tiers, summary
Showing the 6 most recent of 12 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does AffinityBots cost in 2026?
AffinityBots: Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo billed annually. Pricing last verified 23 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published AffinityBots tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Solo builder or very small team proving that a multi-agent workflow actually works before committing budget.Adds: Starting tier: unlimited agents and integrations, but 3 active workflows, 200 actions/month, 1,000 AI credits/month, 1M-character knowledge, and 3 skill builds/month. |
| Starter | $19/mo billed annually | monthly, billed annually | Individual operator or small team running a handful of simple, low-volume workflows.Adds: Adds unlimited active workflows, 1,000 actions/month, 10,000 AI credits/month, 20M-character knowledge, 25 skill builds/month, API access, and basic analytics. |
| Bring Your Own Keys | $19/mo | monthly | Teams already paying OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini directly who want Pro limits with model spend under their own control.Adds: Applies Pro limits to your account while you supply your own OpenAI, Anthropic, and Gemini API keys. |
| Pro / Team | $49/mo billed annually | monthly, billed annually | Growing business running customer-facing agents and multi-agent dynamic workflows at real volume.Adds: Raises limits to 5,000 actions and 50,000 credits/month, unlimited skill builds, 50M-character knowledge, advanced templates and analytics, priority support, one included seat, and multiple workspaces for 5 team members. |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | Large organizations needing custom model training, white-label, on-premise deployment, or an SLA.Adds: Removes all action, credit, and knowledge caps and adds knowledge assignments, custom model training, dedicated support, white-label, advanced security, custom integrations, on-premise deployment, and an SLA guarantee. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where AffinityBots's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Free covers prototyping — 3 active workflows, 200 actions, 1,000 credits — so you can prove a workflow before paying. Starter at $19/mo billed annually suits simple single-agent jobs. Pro at $49/mo billed annually is the realistic tier for anything customer-facing; add-ons extend it instead of forcing Enterprise. The $19/mo Bring Your Own Keys plan is the cheapest way to Pro-level limits if you already pay OpenAI, Anthropic, or Gemini. Enterprise is quote-only.
Has AffinityBots' pricing changed?
No plan price for AffinityBots has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick AffinityBots?
Pick AffinityBots if you are Small business owners automating lead capture and qualification, Support teams building FAQ agents from a document base, Operations managers orchestrating multi-agent workflows across tools, Marketers running content workflows off a trigger.
Look elsewhere if you are Teams that need code-level control over every branch and error path (n8n fits better), High-volume workflows that will exceed 5,000 actions/month on Pro, Organizations that need SOC 2, HIPAA, or advanced security guarantees today, Anyone needing agents inside a native mobile or desktop app.
Skip it if Skip AffinityBots if you need branch-level control over every error path, or if compliance is a blocker — advanced security, SLA guarantee, and on-premise deployment sit behind the custom Enterprise tier.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas AffinityBots actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Wire a form trigger to a lead-scoring agent and a CRM-sync agent in a sequential workflow, with a guardrail that blocks records missing an email address.
Outcome: Inbound leads are scored and pushed to the CRM automatically, and malformed entries stop at the guardrail instead of polluting the pipeline.
Load product documentation into the knowledge base, build a FAQ agent, attach long-term memory, and deploy it to the website widget plus Discord.
Outcome: Customers get answers from your own documents on both surfaces, and the agent escalates to a human when it cannot resolve the question.
Use a dynamic hub-style workflow where a router agent dispatches research, analysis, and reporting tasks to specialist agents, then rejoins the sequential path.
Outcome: One trigger produces a finished report assembled by several agents, without writing orchestration code.
Use cases
- Score, enrich, and route inbound leads across channels into your CRM
- Run a 24/7 support agent that answers from your own docs and escalates when stuck
- Qualify prospects and book meetings with an AI sales assistant
- Chain drafting, editing, and publishing agents into a content workflow
- Screen candidates and schedule interviews in a recruitment pipeline
- Set up a multi-agent research team that analyzes data and produces reports
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of AffinityBots — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Creating your first agent is documented as a 5-minute read, so a working single agent is roughly an afternoon including knowledge upload. Deploying to Telegram or Discord and adding OAuth-based MCP integrations add another session each. Dynamic multi-agent workflows with guardrails are the real time sink — budget a few days for your first one, then hours for subsequent variants.
Switching to or from AffinityBots
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From n8n: rebuild each linear pipeline as a sequential workflow, then replace chained HTTP nodes with agent steps and MCP integrations.
- →From a single-prompt chatbot: move your document set into the knowledge base and split the one prompt into specialist agents joined by a workflow.
- →From custom orchestration code: recreate each service call as an MCP integration and each reasoning step as an agent, then validate output with guardrails.
- ↗To n8n: export the logic as node graphs where you need branch-level control over error paths that workflows do not expose.
- ↗To a self-hosted framework: rebuild each agent as a service call and each MCP integration as a direct API client for full code ownership.
- ↗To Enterprise: stay on the same platform and add custom model training, white-label, and on-premise deployment rather than migrating.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “AffinityBots”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “AffinityBots” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about AffinityBots.
Official links
What are the best AffinityBots alternatives?
The closest alternatives to AffinityBots we list are n8n, Langflow and Cassidy. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| n8n | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Langflow | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Cassidy | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to AffinityBots
View all
Tools that pair well with AffinityBots
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside AffinityBots, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
n8n
n8n is a visual AI workflow and agent platform you can self-host, with 500+ integrations and JS/Python steps on one readable canvas.
Langflow
Low-code visual builder for AI agents, RAG pipelines, and MCP servers that deploys as an API
Cassidy
Cassidy builds no-code AI agents and multi-step workflows on your company documents, meetings, and CRM, with audit trails built in.
AffinityBots vs its closest rival
AffinityBots's closest head-to-head is with Presto Voice — If you run a QSR chain and want to automate drive-thru orders with a proven upselling engine, Presto Voice is the clear choice. For broader business automation—building no-code AI agents for sales, support, or operations—AffinityBots offers more flexibility and integrations at a lower entry price. Choose based on your primary use case: specialized drive-thru vs. general-purpose agent workflows. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Affinitybots vs Presto Voice
If you run a QSR chain and want to automate drive-thru orders with a proven upselling engine, Presto Voice is the clear choice. For broader business automation—building no-code AI agents for sales, support, or operations—AffinityBots offers more flexibility and integrations at a lower entry price. Choose based on your primary use case: specialized drive-thru vs. general-purpose agent workflows.
GeneratedAffinitybots vs Locus Robotics
Choose Locus Robotics if you run a large warehouse needing physical robots to pick and move items, boosting productivity 2-3x with flexible RaaS. Choose AffinityBots if you're a small team wanting to automate digital workflows (e.g., sales outreach, support tickets) without coding. They solve completely different problems—one automates physical labor, the other automates knowledge work.
GeneratedAffinitybots vs Truleo
If you're a law enforcement agency needing to connect siloed data (jail calls, body cameras, RMS) and automate intelligence workflows, Truleo is purpose-built with CJIS compliance and domain-specific features. For any other business looking to automate multi-step workflows with custom AI agents, AffinityBots offers a generous free tier and visual no-code builder at a fraction of the cost. Choose based on your industry and compliance needs.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Best-of guides
Used AffinityBots? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.