Agenta

Agenta

Open-source workspace to build, evaluate, and deploy AI agents through chat

85/100Safe BetFree · from $29/moFreemium

Agenta is a compelling open-source choice for teams that want a shared, chat-driven workspace for building agents with built-in evaluation. The recent pivot to agent building and frequent updates show strong momentum, but production monitoring is still thinner than LangSmith's. For collaboration and self-hosting, it's a solid pick.

Verified 9d ago · liveness 85/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/agenta

Best for
  • Teams of 2+ needing a shared workspace for agent and prompt management
  • Product managers and domain experts building/refining agents via chat UI
  • Developers building LLM agents that require detailed tracing and debugging
  • Organizations wanting a self-hostable open-source agent platform
Not ideal for
  • Solo developers who just need a lightweight prompt testing tool
  • Teams requiring advanced production monitoring with real-time alerting
  • Users who prefer a fully managed solution with zero self-hosting overhead
Visit Website

Beginner-friendlyFor Hobby users, setup is immediate—sign up and start chatting with an agent. Pro/Business includes guided onboarding; expect a few hours to connect integrations and build your first agent. Self-hosting takes 1-2 days with Docker Compose, plus configuration for your model providers.WebAPI available5.2k viewsVerified 9d ago
Pricing
Free · from $29/mo
FreemiumFree tier6 plans6 hidden costs
Learning curve
Beginner-friendly
For Hobby users, setup is immediate—sign up and start chatting with an agent. Pro/Business includes guided onboarding; expect a few hours to connect integrations and build your first agent. Self-hosting takes 1-2 days with Docker Compose, plus configuration for your model providers.
Runs on
Web
API available · 15 integrations
Who it's for
Engineering leadProduct managerSales operations
Live sentiment
Is Agenta actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Agenta if you need advanced production monitoring with real-time alerting, or if you're a solo developer seeking a minimal prompt testing tool without collaboration needs.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Going past 10,000 agent runs per month on Pro or Business adds $5 per additional 10,000 runs, which can escalate with heavy automation.

Price reality

Agenta's freemium model fits small teams starting with the Hobby plan (free, 2 users) and scales to Pro at $29/mo for unlimited users—competitive with LangSmith's $39/mo starter but adds built-in evaluation. Business at $299/mo adds governance (SSO, SOC 2) for regulated teams. Self-hosted open source is free with unlimited everything, a cost advantage over proprietary platforms.

In short

Agenta — Open-source workspace to build, evaluate, and deploy AI agents through chat. Best for Teams of 2+ needing a shared workspace for agent and prompt management, Product managers and domain experts building/refining agents via chat UI, Developers building LLM agents that require detailed tracing and debugging. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.

What's new in Agenta

Checked 9 days ago

Across the latest 4 updates: 2 feature updates, 1 launch and 1 changelog entry.

What people actually say about Agenta — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

96 mentions across 6 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Jul 25, 2026.

36% positive64% critical

Average across the 6 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.

Recurring strengths
  • +Unified playground for side-by-side model comparison across providers.
  • +Live evaluation on edit speeds up prompt iteration significantly.
  • +UI designed for non-technical experts to edit prompts collaboratively.
  • +Open-source with self-hosting option avoids vendor lock-in.
  • +Automated evaluation using LLM-as-a-judge or custom code.
Recurring frustrations
  • Missing built-in approval workflows for enterprise governance.
  • Audit trail features are not yet available out of the box.
  • Scalability for high-throughput async LLM calls is unclear.
  • Trace sampling may drop edge cases under production load.
  • Self-hosted version lacks official support SLA.
Patterns worth knowing
Strong UI collaboration between devs and non-devs is appreciated
Seen on Hacker News, Product Hunt
Need for approval workflows and audit trails for production
Seen on Product Hunt
Trace-to-test-set conversion is a unique and valuable feature
Seen on Product Hunt
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • Self-hosting may require DevOps effort and infrastructure costs
  • Higher-tier features like SSO are only on Enterprise plan

Viability Score

85/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Agenta? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
36
What the vendor publishes
80

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Build agents through chat with instructions and skills
  • Equip agents with MCP tools and integrations (1000+ apps)
  • Automate agents with schedules and event triggers
  • Unified playground with real-time evaluator scoring
  • Full version history for agents and prompts
  • Automated evaluation with LLM-as-a-judge or custom code
  • Human evaluation workflow for domain expert feedback
  • Annotation queues for trace scoring
  • Turn any trace into a test set with one click
  • Trace every run with step-by-step costs
  • Model agnostic – any LLM provider or harness
  • Self-hostable open-source deployment (MIT license)
  • Human-in-the-loop approval for consequential actions
  • Shared workspace files and persistent context
  • Background agents (scheduled and event-triggered)

About Agenta

FreemiumBeginner-friendlyAPI availableWeb

Agenta is an open-source workspace where teams build, evaluate, and deploy AI agents. It's designed for AI engineers, product managers, and domain experts who need a shared environment to create agents conversationally, equip them with skills and MCP tools, and automate them with schedules and event triggers. The platform includes a unified playground with real-time evaluator scoring, full version history for agents and prompts, and automated evaluation via LLM-as-a-judge or custom code. Human evaluation workflows let domain experts provide feedback through annotation queues, and any trace can be turned into a test set in one click. Every run is traced with step-by-step costs, and agents can be self-hosted on your infrastructure with the MIT-licensed open-source edition. Agenta 2.0, introduced in July 2026, pivoted from prompt management to this agent workspace, adding shared workspace files and background agents. Pricing is freemium: a free Hobby plan for individuals, Pro at $29/month for production teams, Business at $299/month for governance needs, and custom Enterprise options for cloud or self-hosted deployment. Unlike LangSmith's focus on monitoring, Agenta combines collaborative agent building with built-in evaluation, making it a strong fit for teams that want to iterate on agents together and keep control of their infrastructure.

Behind the Verdict

Agenta 2.0 represents a major shift from prompt management to a full agent workspace, a direction that aligns with how AI development is moving. The chat-based agent building is genuinely accessible—you can describe a task and the agent iterates with you, using tools like PostHog and your workspace files. The versioning of agents, prompts, skills, and tools like code is a standout feature for teams that need to see exactly what changed and roll back if something breaks. Strengths: The open-source, MIT-licensed core means you can self-host and keep your data and agents on your own infrastructure, a key differentiator for privacy-conscious organizations. You're not locked into a proprietary model—you can use Claude Code, OpenAI Codex, or Pi, and bring your own models. The built-in evaluation (LLM-as-a-judge, custom code, human annotation) is more integrated than in many competitors, and the ability to turn any trace into a test set streamlines the feedback loop. The shared workspace files and background agents (scheduled/event-triggered) foster team collaboration and automation. Weaknesses: Production monitoring is not as deep as LangSmith's—Agenta focuses more on building and evaluation than on real-time alerting and operational metrics. The free Hobby plan is very limited (2 team members, 5,000 runs/month, 1-week trace retention), and the per-run overage ($5 per 10k runs) can catch you off guard at scale. There's no dedicated mobile or desktop app; the experience is web-based. Some advanced features like granular tool permissions are only on paid tiers, though self-hosting removes many limits. Where it fits: Teams of 2+ that want a shared environment to build, evaluate, and improve agents together, especially if they need self-hosting or appreciate the open-source ethos. It's also great for product managers and domain experts who prefer a chat UI over code. Where it doesn't: Solo developers wanting a lightweight prompt tester, or teams needing advanced production monitoring with alerting—those might look at LangSmith or similar. If you want a fully managed, zero-self-hosting solution, the cloud plans are good, but the self-host option is a major draw for many.

Researching Agenta? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Agenta actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Engineering lead

Set up a code review agent that reviews every pull request, leaves inline comments, and flags security issues.

Outcome: Automated code review with versioned agent config, traceable runs, and human approval for critical changes.

Product manager

Create an onboarding facilitator agent that monitors metrics in PostHog and updates a PRD in the workspace.

Outcome: Agents run on a schedule, update files, and flag drops, giving the PM timely insights without manual checks.

Sales operations

Trigger a sales prospecting agent when a new signup occurs, researching the prospect and drafting outreach.

Outcome: Event-triggered automation that runs instantly, with tracing for cost and approval gates for outbound messages.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

GPT-5.6 Sol

as of 2026-08-30

Limitations

  • The Hobby plan includes 2 team members, 5,000 agent runs per month, and 1-week trace data retention.
  • Pro and Business plans include 10,000 agent runs per month with $5 per additional 10,000 runs.
  • Paid plans include unlimited projects, agents, workflows, and users.
  • The platform is available as a hosted cloud service or self-hosted, with no mobile or desktop apps mentioned.

as of 2026-08-28

Verification history

We have re-verified Agenta 17 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 17 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Agenta tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Hobby

$0/mo

Ideal for

Individual exploring agent building with a free tier, 2 team members, and 5,000 runs per month

What this tier adds

Free entry point with limited team size and retention; unlimited projects and agents

Pro

$29/mo

Ideal for

Production teams needing unlimited members and schedules, with 10,000 runs per month and unlimited evaluations

What this tier adds

Adds unlimited team members, unlimited schedules/triggers, and 1-month trace retention vs Hobby

Business

$299/mo

Ideal for

Teams requiring governance features like SSO, RBAC, and SOC 2 report for compliance

What this tier adds

Adds SSO, RBAC, SOC 2 report, and 3-month retention vs Pro

Enterprise (Cloud)

Custom

Ideal for

Large organizations needing custom usage, audit logs, custom domains, and dedicated support

What this tier adds

Cloud tier with audit logs, custom domains, custom security terms, and custom SLA

Open Source (Self-Hosted)

Free

Ideal for

Teams wanting full control on their own infrastructure with unlimited everything for free

What this tier adds

Self-hosted with bring-your-own models; includes all core features without usage limits

Enterprise (Self-Hosted)

Custom

Ideal for

Organizations needing commercial support and advanced controls on self-hosted deployment

What this tier adds

Adds audit logs, custom domains, deployment support, and security reviews vs open source

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Going past 10,000 agent runs per month on Pro or Business adds $5 per additional 10,000 runs, which can escalate with heavy automation.
  • The free Hobby plan is limited to 2 team members and 5,000 runs per month, so growing teams must upgrade to Pro ($29/mo) to add members.
  • Trace data retention is capped at 1 week on Hobby, 1 month on Pro, and 3 months on Business—longer retention requires Enterprise custom pricing.
  • SSO, role-based access control, and audit logs are locked to Business or Enterprise tiers, so security-conscious teams can't stay on Pro.
  • Self-hosting requires your own infrastructure and maintenance, including Docker Compose setup and ongoing upgrades.
  • Some features like granular tool permissions and custom domains are only available on paid tiers, not the free Hobby plan.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Agenta's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Agenta's freemium model fits small teams starting with the Hobby plan (free, 2 users) and scales to Pro at $29/mo for unlimited users—competitive with LangSmith's $39/mo starter but adds built-in evaluation. Business at $299/mo adds governance (SSO, SOC 2) for regulated teams. Self-hosted open source is free with unlimited everything, a cost advantage over proprietary platforms.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Agenta — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For Hobby users, setup is immediate—sign up and start chatting with an agent. Pro/Business includes guided onboarding; expect a few hours to connect integrations and build your first agent. Self-hosting takes 1-2 days with Docker Compose, plus configuration for your model providers.

Switching to or from Agenta

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From LangSmith: Start a new project in Agenta, recreate your prompts and evaluation criteria, then connect your existing model providers.
  • From prompt management tools: Use the chat interface to rebuild your prompts as agents, and import existing trace data if possible.
Migrating out
  • To LangSmith: Export your traces and evaluation results, then recreate agents as prompts in LangSmith's monitoring-focused environment.
  • To an alternative platform: Use Agenta's open-source code to extract your agent definitions and skills manually.

Integrations

Claude Codepi.devOpenAI CodexOpenCodeHermesGitHubLinearGmailSlackNotionGoogle SheetsPostHogLangChainLlamaIndexOpenAI

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Tools that pair well with Agenta

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Agenta, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Alternatives to Agenta

View all
MLflow

MLflow

Open source platform to debug, evaluate, monitor, and optimize AI agents and ML models.

FreeTry
OpenAgents

OpenAgents

Open-source platform for building, hosting, and running language agents in the wild

FreeTry
Langfuse

Langfuse

Open-source LLM observability for tracing, evaluating, and optimizing AI agents end-to-end.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Agenta? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.