Ai4eh

Ai4eh

Agentic AI pentesting that proves exploitability with proof-of-exploit, continuously.

55/100MonitorPaidPaid

For teams tired of noisy scanners and annual snapshots, Ethiack delivers continuous, proof-backed validation that cuts through the noise. The €3,000 on-demand test is a budget-friendly compliance win, and Core at €9,000/year covers 50 assets. But if you need a free tool or fully manual testing, look elsewhere — this is a paid, AI-first service.

Verified 7d ago · liveness 55/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/ai4eh

Best for
  • Security teams needing continuous validation of exploitability
  • SMEs wanting affordable ongoing pentesting without annual contracts
  • Fast-shipping tech companies integrating security into CI/CD
  • Compliance officers requiring real-time evidence for audits (SOC2, ISO27001, NIS2)
Not ideal for
  • Organizations looking for a free or open-source security tool
  • Teams requiring manual-only pentesting without AI assistance
  • Businesses needing on-premises installation or air-gapped environments
Visit Website

IntermediateFor the On-demand plan, you can book a test and receive a compliance-ready report within 5 days. For the Core plan, expect to set up integrations (GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Jira) in a day, with initial attack surface mapping starting immediately and first validated findings within a few days. Enterprise setup may take longer due to custom integrations and broader asset coverage.WebAPI availableVerified 7d ago
Pricing
Paid
Paid3 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
For the On-demand plan, you can book a test and receive a compliance-ready report within 5 days. For the Core plan, expect to set up integrations (GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Jira) in a day, with initial attack surface mapping starting immediately and first validated findings within a few days. Enterprise setup may take longer due to custom integrations and broader asset coverage.
Runs on
Web
API available · 4 integrations
Who it's for
SME Security LeadCompliance OfficerDevOps Engineer
Live sentiment
Is Ai4eh actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Ethiack if you need a free or open-source security tool, require fully manual pentesting without AI, or need on-premises deployment in air-gapped environments — this is a paid, AI-first, SaaS-only service.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

The Core plan is limited to 50 assets; going beyond that requires upgrading to Enterprise, which is custom-priced and likely significantly more expensive.

Price reality

Ethiack's pricing fits SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies that need continuous, evidence-backed pentesting without the cost of a full-time security team. At €3,000 per on-demand test and €9,000/year for Core (with 50 assets), it's more affordable than traditional manual pentests (often €10k+ per engagement) and more predictable than crowdsourced platforms like HackerOne, which charge per vulnerability. However, for enterprises needing unlimited assets and advanced features, the custom-priced

In short

Ai4eh — Agentic AI pentesting that proves exploitability with proof-of-exploit, continuously. Best for Security teams needing continuous validation of exploitability, SMEs wanting affordable ongoing pentesting without annual contracts, Fast-shipping tech companies integrating security into CI/CD. Plans from $3000/mo.

What's new in Ai4eh

Checked 7 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 5 news mentions.

What people actually say about Ai4eh — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

1 mentions across 1 source (GitHub) · researched Jul 24, 2026.

50% positive50% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +Proof-of-exploit validation eliminates false positives.
  • +Continuous pentesting with 24/7 coverage.
  • +CI/CD integration enables event-driven security testing.
  • +Covers external, internal, cloud, IoT, OT, and supply chain.
  • +Risk-based scoring based on real-world exploitability.
Recurring frustrations
  • Very limited community feedback makes it hard to trust.
  • No independent reviews or case studies available.
  • Pricing is not transparent—only listed as 'paid'.
  • Lack of user testimonials raises skepticism.
  • Setup complexity for non-security experts is unknown.
Patterns worth knowing
Promise of AI-driven pentesting with real exploit validation is compelling but unproven.
Seen on GitHub
Lack of community feedback makes it hard to evaluate reliability.
Seen on GitHub
Interest in continuous, CI/CD-integrated security testing.
Seen on GitHub
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~Unknown
Hidden costs people mention
  • Potential enterprise-only add-ons for custom reports and advanced features

Viability Score

55/100
Monitor

How well maintained and how widely used is Ai4eh? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
20
Site health
95
User sentiment
50
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: August 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Agentic AI pentesting engine (Hackian)
  • Proof-of-exploit validation for every confirmed risk
  • Continuous attack surface mapping
  • Event-driven testing on code pushes and infrastructure changes
  • On-demand pentesting with 5-day turnaround
  • Continuous pentesting with 24/7 validation
  • Risk-based vulnerability management
  • Compliance reporting for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, DORA
  • CI/CD integration (GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Jira)
  • Step-by-step remediation guidance
  • Shadow IT and unknown asset discovery
  • Supply chain and third-party exposure management
  • Visual attack surface map (Enterprise)
  • Beacon V2 for internal asset testing
  • Black box or grey box testing

About Ai4eh

PaidIntermediateAPI availableWeb

Ethiack is an autonomous ethical hacking platform that pairs AI-driven pentesting with human expertise to continuously map, test, and validate your attack surface. The agentic AI engine, Hackian, executes thousands of attack scenarios in minutes, chains attack paths, and delivers proof-of-exploit for every confirmed risk — so your team isn't chasing false positives. Designed for security-conscious SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies, Ethiack covers external, internal, mobile, IoT, OT, cloud, and supply chain assets, and integrates into CI/CD pipelines for event-driven testing on code pushes or infrastructure changes. The platform offers two primary engagement models: on-demand pentesting with a 5-day turnaround, and continuous pentesting with 24/7 validation. Key features include continuous attack surface mapping, risk-based vulnerability management with real-world exploitability scores, compliance-ready reports for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, and DORA, and step-by-step remediation guidance. The redesigned Portal (July 2026) streamlines workflows, and recent detection updates cover Rails and WordPress critical RCEs — WP2Shell and KindaRails2Shell — reflecting its deep web app coverage. With over 150K exploitable findings reported and €150M+ in prevented damages, Ethiack is trusted by 1,000+ teams, including ANA Aeroportos and Sonae MC. Its core differentiator: it proves what attackers can actually exploit, backed by validation, not just a CVSS score. Compared to traditional pentest providers or manual-heavy crowdsourced platforms like HackerOne, Ethiack delivers faster, continuous, evidence-backed validation at a predictable price point.

Behind the Verdict

Ethiack positions itself as an autonomous ethical hacking platform that combines AI-driven pentesting with human expertise. Its core promise is to prove exploitability with proof-of-exploit, rather than just reporting CVSS scores. This is a meaningful differentiator in a market flooded with vulnerability scanners that generate noise. The agentic AI engine, Hackian, continuously maps your attack surface, executes exploitation routines, and chains attack paths, delivering proof for every confirmed risk. That means your team spends less time triaging false positives and more time fixing what actually matters. Strengths: The continuous testing model is a clear upgrade over annual pentests. With event-driven testing on code pushes and infrastructure changes, you get security validation as part of your development workflow. The compliance-ready reports for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, and DORA are a big plus for regulated industries. The 5-day turnaround on on-demand tests is fast, and the unlimited retesting is generous. The redesigned Portal (July 2026) streamlines workflows, and recent detection updates show deep web app coverage, including WP2Shell and KindaRails2Shell critical RCEs. Weaknesses: The Core plan is limited to 50 assets, which may be restrictive for larger organizations. The pricing, while transparent, is not trivial — €3,000 per on-demand test and €9,000/year for Core. For teams that need on-premises deployment or air-gapped environments, Ethiack is not a fit. Also, if you prefer fully manual pentesting without AI assistance, this platform’s AI-first approach may not align. Where it fits: SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies that need continuous validation without the cost of a full-time security team. Compliance officers who need live, evidence-backed reports. Where it doesn’t fit: organizations with zero budget for security testing, or those that require on-premises solutions. Compared to HackerOne, which is crowdsourced and manual-heavy, Ethiack offers faster, continuous, evidence-backed validation at a predictable price. Versus traditional pentest providers, it’s more reactive and sustainable.

Researching Ai4eh? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Ai4eh actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

SME Security Lead

You're responsible for security at a 200-person tech company and need to continuously validate your attack surface without hiring a full-time pentester. You sign up for Ethiack Core, connect your GitHub and Slack, and set up event-driven testing on code pushes. Within a week, Hackian maps your external assets, discovers a shadow IT subdomain, and validates a critical RCE with proof-of-exploit.

Outcome: You've closed a critical gap in your security posture and have live evidence for your next audit, all without manual triage.

Compliance Officer

You're preparing for a NIS2 audit and need evidence that your attack surface is continuously tested. You use Ethiack On-demand (€3,000) to get a compliance-ready report within 5 days, covering your web app and API. The report includes validated vulnerabilities with proof-of-exploit and step-by-step remediation advice, which you share with your dev team.

Outcome: You pass the audit with documented, exploit-validated findings and a clear remediation plan.

DevOps Engineer

You want to integrate security testing into your CI/CD pipeline. You connect Ethiack to GitLab and configure it to trigger a pentest on every code push. Hackian runs hundreds of attack scenarios in minutes, and if a critical vulnerability is found, it blocks the merge and notifies you via Jira.

Outcome: You catch vulnerabilities before they hit production, reducing rework and security incidents.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

Hackian

as of 2026-08-21

Limitations

  • The Ethiack platform is agentic AI-driven, with a Core plan limited to 50 assets and an Enterprise tier for broader coverage.
  • Testing focuses on web, API, and infrastructure assets, with on-demand pentests delivering compliance-ready reports within 5 days.
  • Continuous testing is available through the Core plan, while on-demand tests provide a snapshot rather than continuous monitoring.

as of 2026-08-16

Verification history

We have re-verified Ai4eh 4 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Contact sales for a quote
Effective monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Ai4eh tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

On-demand

€3,000/test

Ideal for

SMEs or teams needing a one-off, compliance-ready pentest for a web app or API, with a 5-day turnaround and unlimited retesting.

What this tier adds

Starting tier: a single €3,000/test pentest by AI and human hackers, with a compliance-ready report within 5 days and proof-of-exploit validation.

Core

€9,000/year (was €12,000)

Ideal for

SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies that need continuous security testing and attack surface management for up to 50 assets.

What this tier adds

Adds continuous 24/7 testing, external attack surface management, CI/CD integration, and risk-based vulnerability management to the On-demand package, for €9,000/year (was €12,000).

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Enterprises needing full attack surface coverage (internal, mobile, cloud), custom reporting, and pentesting as a service at scale.

What this tier adds

Adds entire attack surface coverage, Visualizer attack surface map, custom report types, and custom integrations to Core, with custom pricing.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • The Core plan is limited to 50 assets; going beyond that requires upgrading to Enterprise, which is custom-priced and likely significantly more expensive.
  • On-demand pentests cost €3,000 each — if you need frequent tests (e.g., quarterly), the cost adds up quickly compared to the annual Core plan.
  • Enterprise-tier features like full attack surface coverage (internal, mobile, cloud) and custom integrations are only available on the custom-priced Enterprise plan, so you may need to negotiate.
  • The 25% off Core plan is a limited-time summer sale (€9,000/year instead of €12,000) — if you miss it, you'll pay the full price.
  • There is no free tier; the 30-day free trial requires commitment to a paid plan after it ends.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Ai4eh's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Ethiack's pricing fits SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies that need continuous, evidence-backed pentesting without the cost of a full-time security team. At €3,000 per on-demand test and €9,000/year for Core (with 50 assets), it's more affordable than traditional manual pentests (often €10k+ per engagement) and more predictable than crowdsourced platforms like HackerOne, which charge per vulnerability. However, for enterprises needing unlimited assets and advanced features, the custom-priced

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Ai4eh — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For the On-demand plan, you can book a test and receive a compliance-ready report within 5 days. For the Core plan, expect to set up integrations (GitHub, GitLab, Slack, Jira) in a day, with initial attack surface mapping starting immediately and first validated findings within a few days. Enterprise setup may take longer due to custom integrations and broader asset coverage.

Switching to or from Ai4eh

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From manual pentests: Book an On-demand test to get a fast, validated baseline, then move to Core for continuous testing.
  • From vulnerability scanners (e.g., Nessus): Import your asset list and let Ethiack's continuous mapping discover unknowns; start with a free trial to validate findings.
Migrating out
  • To another pentesting platform (e.g., HackerOne): Export your validated findings and remediation history from Ethiack's reports and import them into the new platform's tracker.
  • To an in-house security team: Use Ethiack's step-by-step remediation guides and risk scores to hand off actionable items to your internal team.

Integrations

GitHubGitLabSlackJira

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Tools that pair well with Ai4eh

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Ai4eh, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Ai4eh vs Audioeye

Choose Ai4eh if you need continuous, validated security pentesting with proof-of-exploit and CI/CD integration for proactive risk management. Choose AudioEye if your priority is web accessibility compliance with automated scanning, expert audits, and legal support. These tools serve entirely different domains — security vs. accessibility — so the decision hinges on which compliance requirement (NIS2/DORA vs. ADA/WCAG) is more critical for your organization.

Ai4eh vs Sublime Security

Choose Ai4eh if your priority is continuous, validated penetration testing across your entire attack surface (external, internal, third-party) with CI/CD integration and compliance evidence. Choose Sublime Security if your main threat vector is email—BEC, VEC, phishing—and you need low false positives with custom detection rules. They solve different problems; the decision hinges on whether you need infrastructure security validation or advanced email defense.

Ai4eh vs Push Security

Ai4eh and Push Security solve fundamentally different problems. Ai4eh (Ethiack) is ideal for organizations that need continuous, validated pentesting with proof-of-exploit and compliance evidence, especially those integrating security into CI/CD. Push Security is a must-have for teams battling browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing) and securing AI tool usage—without forcing a browser migration. Choose Ai4eh for proactive vulnerability validation; choose Push for real-time browser threat detection and identity hardening.

Alternatives to Ai4eh

View all
Veria Labs

Veria Labs

Autonomous AI pentester that maps attack surfaces, proves exploits, and drafts fixes.

Contact SalesTry
Cycode

Cycode

Secure and govern AI-generated code from prompt to runtime with agentic development security.

Contact SalesTry
Salt Security

Salt Security

Agentic AI security platform mapping every agent, MCP server, and API.

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Ai4eh? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.