Ai4eh

Ai4eh

Agentic AI pentesting that continuously maps your attack surface and validates exploitability with proof-of-exploit.

55/100MonitorFree · from €3,000/testPaid

If your pentest report arrives late, ranked by CVSS, and half-full of findings nobody can actually exploit, Ethiack is built for exactly that complaint. The guarantee is the sharpest part of the offer: you pay nothing on an on-demand test unless a validated vulnerability with proven exploitation is found. Continuous Core adds 24/7 testing, external attack surface management, and adversarial exposure validation for up to 50 assets at €9,000/year (currently discounted 25% from €12,000/year). The catch is scope discipline — 50 assets goes quickly once you count subdomains, APIs, and mobile apps, and beyond that you are into Enterprise custom pricing. If you need an air-gapped deployment, a

Verified 6d ago · liveness 55/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/ai4eh

Best for
  • Security teams drowning in vulnerability noise who need exploitability-validated findings only
  • SMEs wanting ongoing external attack surface testing without an annual pentest cycle
  • Fast-shipping tech companies that want testing wired into CI/CD on every code push
  • Compliance owners who need live evidence for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, or DORA
Not ideal for
  • Teams needing an on-premises or air-gapped deployment
  • Buyers who want a human-only pentest with no AI in the workflow
  • Companies wanting a cheap vulnerability scanner with CVSS-only severity output
Visit Website

IntermediateFast-shipping tech teams wiring Ethiack into CI/CD via the GitHub or GitLab integration can expect testing to begin shortly after connection, since event-driven tests fire on code pushes and infrastructure changes. SMEs starting with attack surface management get value from the first mapping pass. Compliance-driven buyers should plan on the 5-day window from on-demand pentest to audit-readyWebAPI availableVerified 6d ago
Pricing
Free · from €3,000/test
PaidFree tier4 plans3 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Fast-shipping tech teams wiring Ethiack into CI/CD via the GitHub or GitLab integration can expect testing to begin shortly after connection, since event-driven tests fire on code pushes and infrastructure changes. SMEs starting with attack surface management get value from the first mapping pass. Compliance-driven buyers should plan on the 5-day window from on-demand pentest to audit-ready
Runs on
Web
API available · 4 integrations
Who it's for
Security engineer at a fast-shipping SaaS companyCompliance owner working toward NIS2 or DORAIT lead at an SME with an unknown asset footprint
Live sentiment
Is Ai4eh actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Ethiack if you need an air-gapped or on-premises deployment, want a human-only pentest with no AI in the loop, or run an estate well past 50 assets and cannot move to an Enterprise quote.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Continuous Core covers up to 50 assets, where an asset includes domains, subdomains, servers, IPs, APIs, and web or mobile applications — so a large subdomain footprint can consume the plan faster than the headline

Price reality

Continuous Core at €9,000/year (currently 25% off the €12,000/year list price) is a fit for SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies covering a modest estate of up to 50 assets. On-demand pentests at €3,000/test suit teams that need one compliance-ready engagement rather than year-round testing. Once you pass 50 assets or need internal, mobile, and cloud coverage, you are into Enterprise custom pricing — cheaper than a large annual consultancy retainer, but no longer a published number you can

In short

Ai4eh — Agentic AI pentesting that continuously maps your attack surface and validates exploitability with proof-of-exploit. Best for Security teams drowning in vulnerability noise who need exploitability-validated findings only, SMEs wanting ongoing external attack surface testing without an annual pentest cycle, Fast-shipping tech companies that want testing wired into CI/CD on every code push. Free to start; paid plans from €3,000.

What's new in Ai4eh

Checked 6 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 5 news mentions.

What people actually say about Ai4eh — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

1 mentions across 1 source (GitHub) · researched Jul 24, 2026.

50% positive50% critical

Average across the 1 source that answered — each source counts once, not each post.

Recurring strengths
  • +Proof-of-exploit validation eliminates false positives.
  • +Continuous pentesting with 24/7 coverage.
  • +CI/CD integration enables event-driven security testing.
  • +Covers external, internal, cloud, IoT, OT, and supply chain.
  • +Risk-based scoring based on real-world exploitability.
Recurring frustrations
  • −Very limited community feedback makes it hard to trust.
  • −No independent reviews or case studies available.
  • −Pricing is not transparent—only listed as 'paid'.
  • −Lack of user testimonials raises skepticism.
  • −Setup complexity for non-security experts is unknown.
Patterns worth knowing
Promise of AI-driven pentesting with real exploit validation is compelling but unproven.
Seen on GitHub
Lack of community feedback makes it hard to evaluate reliability.
Seen on GitHub
Interest in continuous, CI/CD-integrated security testing.
Seen on GitHub
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~Unknown
Hidden costs people mention
  • • Potential enterprise-only add-ons for custom reports and advanced features

Viability Score

55/100
Monitor

How well maintained and how widely used is Ai4eh? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
20
Site health
95
User sentiment
50
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Agentic AI pentesting engine (Hackian) running autonomous attack simulation
  • Proof-of-exploit validation on every confirmed risk
  • Continuous attack surface management across external, internal, and third-party assets
  • Adversarial exposure validation with event-driven testing on code pushes and infrastructure changes
  • Execution of thousands of attack scenarios in minutes
  • Attack path chaining to demonstrate real-world exploitability
  • On-demand pentest with compliance audit-ready report within 5 days
  • Continuous pentesting with 24/7 security testing
  • Risk-based vulnerability management prioritized by real exploitability
  • Compliance reporting for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, and DORA
  • Discovery of shadow IT and unknown subdomains, APIs, and third-party exposure
  • Coverage across mobile, IoT, OT, and cloud assets
  • Black box or grey box testing options
  • Step-by-step remediation guidance and unlimited retesting
  • CI/CD integration and third-party tool integrations

About Ai4eh

PaidIntermediateAPI availableWeb

Ethiack is an agentic AI pentesting platform built around Hackian, an autonomous engine that maps your attack surface, runs thousands of attack scenarios in minutes, chains attack paths, and returns proof-of-exploit on every confirmed risk. It is aimed at security-conscious SMEs, fast-shipping tech companies, and compliance teams that want evidence rather than a CVSS-sorted guess list. Three things do the heavy lifting. Continuous attack surface management keeps a live map of external, internal, and third-party assets, surfacing shadow IT, unknown subdomains, and APIs. Adversarial exposure validation runs event-driven testing triggered by code pushes, infrastructure changes, or new threat knowledge, so the platform keeps probing rather than waiting for the next annual window. Compliance and reporting modules produce audit-ready evidence for ISO27001, SOC2, PCI, NIS2, and DORA, with risk-based prioritization that reflects real exploitability instead of generic severity scores. Ethiack also publishes its own offensive research, including the KindaRails2Shell RCE chain on Rails, pre-authentication detection for WP2Shell in WordPress core, and a self-built benchmark for AI pentesting after it publicly criticised existing ones. In July 2026 it launched a redesigned Ethiack Portal aimed at continuous-security workflows. Ongoing coverage matters here: the WP2Shell and KindaRails2Shell work is folded back into detection, so new classes of attack are caught without you filing a ticket. Buyers comparing against traditional pentest firms or manual-heavy crowdsourced platforms should weigh Ethiack's pitch of continuous, evidence-backed validation at a published price: €3,000 per on-demand test, or €9,000/year for Continuous Core covering up to 50 assets.

Behind the Verdict

Ethiack's differentiation is the proof-of-exploit loop. Most vulnerability management tools hand you a list sorted by severity and let your team argue about which findings are real. Ethiack's Hackian engine executes exploitation routines, chains attack paths, and only surfaces risks it has actually confirmed — the vendor claims near-zero false positives and over 80% accuracy in finding exploitable vulnerabilities, and quotes customers like NOS saying that when Ethiack alerts them, it is always valid. That single property is what changes remediation behaviour: your engineers stop triaging noise and start fixing the thing that would have been breached. The second pillar is frequency. Event-driven testing fires on code pushes, infrastructure changes, and new threat knowledge, so testing is wired into the same rhythm as shipping instead of an annual calendar event. Ethiack pairs that with human ethical hackers on on-demand pentests, which is the right compromise for teams that want AI throughput but still need a named human signature on a compliance report. The third pillar, and the one that rarely gets enough credit, is the research programme. KindaRails2Shell (a Rails RCE chain reached through a MATLAB file), pre-auth WP2Shell detection in WordPress core, and Ethiack's self-built AI pentesting benchmark all feed back into coverage. That means the platform's detection set grows with the threat landscape, not with your procurement cycle. Where it strains: Continuous Core is priced around 50 assets, defined broadly to include domains, subdomains, servers, IPs, APIs, and web or mobile applications. For a mid-size estate that number is consumed faster than expected, and Enterprise is a custom quote, so budgeting has a cliff in it. There is also no on-premises or air-gapped option, which rules out regulated environments that cannot send traffic outbound. And if your organisation's process requires a human-only tester with no AI in the loop, Ethiack is philosophically the wrong fit. Compared with traditional pentest firms, you trade a deep but infrequent manual engagement for continuous, narrower, evidence-backed testing. Compared with crowdsourced platforms, you trade a large human bench for AI throughput plus a smaller expert layer. The right buyer is a team that ships weekly, has a compliance deadline, and is tired of paying for findings it cannot action.

Researching Ai4eh? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Ai4eh actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Security engineer at a fast-shipping SaaS company

Connect GitHub and let Ethiack run event-driven tests whenever code is pushed, with findings validated by proof-of-exploit and routed into Jira for the on-call engineer.

Outcome: Exploitable issues are caught on the commit that introduced them rather than in the next annual pentest, and the team spends remediation time only on confirmed exploits.

Compliance owner working toward NIS2 or DORA

Run an on-demand pentest across the web application and API in black or grey box mode, then pull the audit-ready report produced within 5 days.

Outcome: You get documentation an auditor accepts, with risk-based prioritization tied to proven exploitation instead of CVSS scores.

IT lead at an SME with an unknown asset footprint

Turn on continuous attack surface management and let Ethiack map external, internal, and third-party assets, including unknown subdomains and APIs.

Outcome: Shadow IT and forgotten third-party exposure surface in a live map you can act on, and 24/7 testing keeps the map current.

Use Cases

Limitations

  • The Ethiack platform is agentic AI-driven, with Continuous Core limited to 50 assets (an asset spans domains, subdomains, servers, IPs, APIs, and web or mobile applications) and an Enterprise tier for broader coverage.
  • Testing focuses on web, API, and infrastructure assets; on-demand pentests deliver compliance-ready reports within 5 days, while continuous testing is a Core-plan capability, so an on-demand test is a snapshot rather than ongoing monitoring.
  • There is no on-premises or air-gapped deployment option.
  • Coverage beyond Core — internal, mobile, and cloud across an entire estate, plus the Visualizer map, custom reporting, custom test types, and custom integrations — requires Enterprise, which is quoted rather than published.
  • If you want a human-only tester with no AI in the loop, or a cheap scanner that just returns CVSS scores, this is the wrong shape of product.

as of 2026-10-02

Verification history

We have re-verified Ai4eh 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Continuous Core covers up to 50 assets, where an asset includes domains, subdomains, servers, IPs, APIs, and web or mobile applications — so a large subdomain footprint can consume the plan faster than the headline
  • On-demand pentests are €3,000 per test, and each test is a snapshot, so teams that want a full year of coverage should budget for Continuous Core rather than repeated single tests.
  • The full attack surface — internal, mobile, and cloud — plus the Visualizer map, custom reporting, custom test types, and custom integrations are Enterprise-only, so anything beyond Core moves you to a custom quote.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Ai4eh's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Continuous Core at €9,000/year (currently 25% off the €12,000/year list price) is a fit for SMEs and fast-shipping tech companies covering a modest estate of up to 50 assets. On-demand pentests at €3,000/test suit teams that need one compliance-ready engagement rather than year-round testing. Once you pass 50 assets or need internal, mobile, and cloud coverage, you are into Enterprise custom pricing — cheaper than a large annual consultancy retainer, but no longer a published number you can

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Ai4eh — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Fast-shipping tech teams wiring Ethiack into CI/CD via the GitHub or GitLab integration can expect testing to begin shortly after connection, since event-driven tests fire on code pushes and infrastructure changes. SMEs starting with attack surface management get value from the first mapping pass. Compliance-driven buyers should plan on the 5-day window from on-demand pentest to audit-ready

Switching to or from Ai4eh

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From an annual manual pentest: run an on-demand Ethiack pentest to establish a proof-of-exploit baseline, then move to Continuous Core for year-round coverage.
  • →From a CVSS-only vulnerability scanner: connect your repositories and let Ethiack re-validate existing findings by exploitation so you can close or dismiss them on evidence.
  • →From a crowdsourced pentest platform: keep the same asset list and shift to event-driven testing on code pushes, retaining human ethical hackers on on-demand engagements.
  • →From spreadsheets of known assets: let continuous attack surface management rebuild the inventory, including unknown subdomains, APIs, and third-party exposure.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a traditional pentest firm: export your validated findings and remediation history as evidence to scope a manual engagement.
  • ↗To a broader ASPM or vulnerability management suite: use Ethiack's risk-based prioritization output to seed your new platform's risk register.
  • ↗To an in-house security programme: take the remediation guides and proof-of-exploit records and fold them into your internal runbooks.

Integrations

GitHubGitLabSlackJira

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Ai4eh”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Ai4eh” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Ai4eh.

Tools that pair well with Ai4eh

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Ai4eh, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Ai4eh vs Audioeye

Choose Ai4eh if you need continuous, validated security pentesting with proof-of-exploit and CI/CD integration for proactive risk management. Choose AudioEye if your priority is web accessibility compliance with automated scanning, expert audits, and legal support. These tools serve entirely different domains — security vs. accessibility — so the decision hinges on which compliance requirement (NIS2/DORA vs. ADA/WCAG) is more critical for your organization.

Ai4eh vs Sublime Security

Choose Ai4eh if your priority is continuous, validated penetration testing across your entire attack surface (external, internal, third-party) with CI/CD integration and compliance evidence. Choose Sublime Security if your main threat vector is email—BEC, VEC, phishing—and you need low false positives with custom detection rules. They solve different problems; the decision hinges on whether you need infrastructure security validation or advanced email defense.

Ai4eh vs Push Security

Ai4eh and Push Security solve fundamentally different problems. Ai4eh (Ethiack) is ideal for organizations that need continuous, validated pentesting with proof-of-exploit and compliance evidence, especially those integrating security into CI/CD. Push Security is a must-have for teams battling browser-based attacks (AiTM, ClickFix, OAuth phishing) and securing AI tool usage—without forcing a browser migration. Choose Ai4eh for proactive vulnerability validation; choose Push for real-time browser threat detection and identity hardening.

Alternatives to Ai4eh

View all
Veria Labs

Veria Labs

Autonomous AI pentester that maps your attack surface, proves real exploits against staging, and opens fix PRs for review.

Contact SalesTry
Salt Security

Salt Security

Agentic AI security that maps every AI agent, MCP server, and API in your environment before attackers find them.

Contact SalesTry
Xeol

Xeol

Xeol detects end-of-life and abandoned open-source packages in your dependency tree before attackers exploit them.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Ai4eh? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.