AMA is live · pricing from $29/mo billed annually · last verified 26 Oct 2026 · viability healthy
AMA
Voice-enabled AI marketing assistant that runs Google Ads, Meta Ads, social, email and reporting tasks through chat.
AMA fits agencies and small in-house teams whose work is mostly Google Ads, Meta Ads and reporting, and who would rather ask a question out loud than build another dashboard. Voice plus cross-account analysis on a $29/mo Launch plan (billed annually, or monthly at the same $29 listed rate) is a low-commitment way to try that workflow. The trade-offs are real: ad accounts, team members and tracked competitors are capped per tier, and AI work is metered by monthly credits that refresh rather than roll over. If you mostly need SEO tooling or a full self-hosted analytics stack, look elsewhere first.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 74/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/ama
- Agencies managing several Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts
- Small businesses with limited marketing staff who want AI-assisted ad management
- Startups launching paid campaigns without deep PPC expertise
- Marketers who prefer voice or chat to clicking through dashboards
- Teams whose marketing budget is spent on SEO or organic channels rather than paid ads
- Large in-house teams needing many seats and dozens of ad accounts on one plan
- Buyers who need their marketing stack running on a mobile device rather than a Windows or Mac desktop
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip AMA if you run paid campaigns mainly on ad networks other than Google and Meta, or if you need many seats and ad accounts on a plan cheaper than Enterprise.
AI Agents and AI Workflows consume your monthly AI credits each time they trigger, so switching on more automation shortens how far a plan's credits stretch.
Launch at $29/mo (billed annually, or monthly at the same listed rate) with 50 credits and a single ad account is priced for a solo operator or one small account. Growth at $49/mo billed annually with 5 ad accounts and 5 seats is the realistic agency entry point. Enterprise at $249/mo billed annually for 20 ad accounts and 20 seats costs more than many general-purpose marketing suites, so weigh it against what you would spend on PPC labour instead.
In short
AMA — Voice-enabled AI marketing assistant that runs Google Ads, Meta Ads, social, email and reporting tasks through chat. Best for Agencies managing several Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, Small businesses with limited marketing staff who want AI-assisted ad management, Startups launching paid campaigns without deep PPC expertise. Plans from $29/mo billed annually.
What is AMA?
AMA — Voice-enabled AI marketing assistant that runs Google Ads, Meta Ads, social, email and reporting tasks through chat. Best for Agencies managing several Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, Small businesses with limited marketing staff who want AI-assisted ad management, Startups launching paid campaigns without deep PPC expertise. Plans from $29/mo billed annually.
AMA is Adsby's desktop AI marketing assistant for Windows and Mac. You talk or type to it in plain language — ask how your Google Ads campaigns are performing and it reads your connected ad, analytics and search data and comes back with keyword suggestions, budget tips and optimisation steps. It covers Meta (Facebook and Instagram) audience and budget insights, social analytics with content ideas and posting-time suggestions, Google Analytics and Search Console report analysis, email campaign performance with subject-line rewrites, and funnel bottleneck identification. It also generates ad copy and keywords, monitors spend against your budgets with overspend alerts, runs competitor ad tracking, and produces white-label client reports. Adsby describes AI Agents and AI Workflows that act on your settings rather than only answering questions — the pricing page says credits are only spent when those agents or workflows are triggered. The site lists monthly billing across three tiers, annual billing at a 35% discount, and a 7-day free trial. It suits agencies, small businesses and startups that want AI-assisted ad management without deep PPC expertise.
Key features
- Voice-enabled conversational AI assistant
- Google Ads campaign analysis and optimisation suggestions
- AI-powered keyword generation for ads and SEO
- Automated ad copy creation (headlines, descriptions)
- Meta Ads (Facebook and Instagram) audience and budget insights
- Social media analytics with content ideas and posting-time suggestions
- Google Analytics and Search Console report analysis
- Email campaign performance analysis and subject-line improvement
- Funnel optimisation with bottleneck identification
- Budget monitoring and alerts
- Competitor ad tracking (1, 3 or 5 competitors by plan)
- White-label reporting for agencies
- AI Agents and AI Workflows that spend credits when triggered
- Desktop app for Windows and Mac
- Monthly and annual billing options
Behind the verdict
AMA's pitch is narrow and that is its strength. Everything on the product page is anchored to a marketing job: Google Ads campaign analysis with keyword and budget suggestions, Meta Ads audience and budget insights, social analytics with content ideas and timing, Google Analytics and Search Console report reading, email performance with subject-line improvements, and funnel bottleneck identification. You drive it by talking to it, which is the differentiator against dashboard-first tools — behind the voice sits the same report data you would otherwise click through. Two features deserve attention in an evaluation. First, AI Agents and AI Workflows, which the pricing page says spend your AI credits when triggered. That connects cost directly to how much automation you turn on, so ask for a credit-consumption estimate per workflow before you scale. Second, white-label reporting, which is listed on all three tiers and is the feature agencies will care about most. The limits are equally concrete. Ad accounts, team members and tracked competitors are fixed per plan — 1/1/1 on Launch (billed annually, $29/mo listed), 5/5/3 on Growth, 20/20/5 on Enterprise. The platform scope is Google Ads, Meta Ads, social, email and reporting. Windows and Mac are the stated surface, and the site names Adsby B.V. in Amsterdam as the vendor. Treat AMA as a daily operator's assistant for paid campaigns, not as a replacement for your ad platform's own optimisation tooling or your BI stack.
Limitations
- AMA is metered by monthly AI credits that refresh rather than roll over, and the pricing page says credits are spent only when AI Agents or AI Workflows are triggered.
- Each tier fixes ad-account, team-member and competitor-tracking limits — Launch 1/1/1, Growth 5/5/3, Enterprise 20/20/5.
- Covered channels center on Google Ads, Meta Ads, social, email and reporting.
- The scraped evidence covers homepage, pricing, features and blog pages, so docs, changelog and integrations depth remain outside what this run can judge.
as of 2026-09-26
Researching AMA? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is AMA still active?
AMA is live · pricing from $29/mo billed annually · last verified 26 Oct 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is AMA? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about AMA?
What people actually say about AMA — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 4 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt, Stack Overflow, Lemmy) · researched Sep 23, 2026.
Weighted by the 61 posts each of 4 sources contributed.
- +Beginner-oriented design targets marketers without deep PPC expertise
- +Native integrations with Google Ads, Meta Ads, Google Analytics and Search Console
- +Voice and text conversational querying could replace dashboard-digging for routine checks
- +White-label reporting is genuinely useful for agencies serving clients
- +7-day free trial lets buyers validate credit consumption before committing
- −Almost zero verifiable community feedback about the actual ad-management product
- −Search results are polluted by an unrelated ChatGPT client also called AMA
- −No mobile app despite strong hands-free voice marketing pitch
- −No Reddit, YouTube, App Store or GitHub coverage to corroborate vendor claims
- −Autonomous AI agent behavior touching live budgets is unvalidated publicly
- • Credits burn only when agents/workflows fire, but no public data on how fast 50 credits deplete
- • Extra ad accounts beyond plan limits likely require upgrade rather than add-on
How we verified this
Every listed fact about AMA— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 26 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified AMA 10 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed pricing page, limitations
- — changed features, hidden costs, use cases, description, our verdict, limitations, switching in, switching out, who should skip it, pricing tiers, pricing fit, setup time, summary, who it suits
- — changed pricing tiers, description, our verdict
- — changed pricing page, limitations, SSL certificate
- — changed setup time, pricing tiers, who should skip it, hidden costs, pricing fit, switching in, switching out
Showing the 6 most recent of 10 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does AMA cost in 2026?
AMA: Plans from $29/mo billed annually. Pricing last verified 26 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published AMA tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Launch | $29/mo billed annually | monthly, billed annually | A solo marketer or small business running one Google Ads or Meta Ads account who wants voice-driven performance answers.Adds: Starting tier: 50 AI credits per month, 1 ad account, 1 team member, weekly optimisations and tracking for 1 competitor. |
| Growth | $49/mo billed annually | monthly, billed annually | A small agency or in-house team juggling a handful of client or brand ad accounts.Adds: Adds capacity and cadence over Launch: 100 credits per month, 5 ad accounts, 5 team members, daily instead of weekly optimisations, and tracking for 3 competitors. |
| Enterprise | $249/mo billed annually | monthly, billed annually | An agency running a large client roster that needs most seats and ad accounts on a single plan.Adds: Tops out the metric: 200 credits per month, 20 ad accounts, 20 team members, daily optimisations and tracking for 5 competitors. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where AMA's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Launch at $29/mo (billed annually, or monthly at the same listed rate) with 50 credits and a single ad account is priced for a solo operator or one small account. Growth at $49/mo billed annually with 5 ad accounts and 5 seats is the realistic agency entry point. Enterprise at $249/mo billed annually for 20 ad accounts and 20 seats costs more than many general-purpose marketing suites, so weigh it against what you would spend on PPC labour instead.
Has AMA's pricing changed?
No plan price for AMA has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick AMA?
Pick AMA if you are Agencies managing several Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, Small businesses with limited marketing staff who want AI-assisted ad management, Startups launching paid campaigns without deep PPC expertise, Marketers who prefer voice or chat to clicking through dashboards.
Look elsewhere if you are Teams whose marketing budget is spent on SEO or organic channels rather than paid ads, Large in-house teams needing many seats and dozens of ad accounts on one plan, Buyers who need their marketing stack running on a mobile device rather than a Windows or Mac desktop.
Skip it if Skip AMA if you run paid campaigns mainly on ad networks other than Google and Meta, or if you need many seats and ad accounts on a plan cheaper than Enterprise.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas AMA actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Connect a client's Google Ads and Meta Ads accounts, ask the assistant by voice what underperformed last week, then pull the suggested keyword and budget changes into a client review.
Outcome: Weekly optimisation notes and a white-label client report without manually rebuilding dashboards.
Ask what the current Google Ads spend looks like, get the overspend alert and a rewritten headline and description set, then review the suggested search-term cleanups before applying them.
Outcome: Paid search kept on budget and ad copy refreshed between agency or consultant visits.
Use the guided campaign setup to draft a first Google Search campaign, generate keywords, and check funnel bottlenecks from Google Analytics and Search Console reports in the same conversation.
Outcome: First paid campaign live without deep PPC expertise, with a conversion-path fix identified early.
Use cases
- Ask by voice how your Google Ads campaigns are performing and get keyword and budget suggestions back
- Audience and budget optimisation for Facebook and Instagram campaigns based on AI insights
- Generate headlines and descriptions for new Google Search campaigns in minutes
- Monitor daily spend across campaigns and get alerts on overspend or underspend
- Produce white-label performance reports for client accounts
- Find funnel bottlenecks and get suggestions to refine conversion paths
- Get content ideas and posting-time suggestions for social channels
- Review email campaign performance and test better subject lines
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of AMA — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Allow roughly 15-30 minutes for a Launch or Growth setup: install the Windows or Mac desktop app, connect Google Ads plus whichever of Meta Ads, Google Analytics or Search Console you use, and ask your first question. Agency setups with several client accounts and white-label report templates take longer — budget half a day before the first client-ready report.
Switching to or from AMA
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual Google Ads and Meta Ads dashboards: connect the same ad accounts to AMA and route weekly performance questions through the assistant instead of rebuilding reports.
- →From spreadsheet reporting: replace the client report tabs with AMA's white-label reporting output on all three tiers.
- →From a general-purpose AI chatbot: keep the chat habit but point it at connected Google Ads, Meta Ads, Analytics and Search Console data, which a generic chatbot cannot read.
- ↗To a self-hosted analytics or BI stack: export your ad and analytics data and rebuild the reports where the AMA credit metering or plan caps start to bind.
- ↗To ad-platform-native optimisation tooling: if you mainly need the ad network's own automated bidding and recommendations, those remain inside Google Ads and Meta Ads.
- ↗To a broader marketing suite: if email, social and paid ads need to sit in one system of record rather than an assistant layer over them.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “AMA”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “AMA” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about AMA.
Official links
What are the best AMA alternatives?
The closest alternatives to AMA we list are Soku AI, kreado_AI video creation platform and UTM Mind. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Soku AI | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| kreado_AI video creation platform | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| UTM Mind | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to AMA
View all
Soku AI
Soku AI is a chat-driven AI marketing agent that runs your paid ads, SEO pages and social posts for you.
kreado_AI video creation platform
AI video ad creation that turns a product URL into publish-ready video and image ads in minutes.
Tools that pair well with AMA
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside AMA, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Soku AI
Soku AI is a chat-driven AI marketing agent that runs your paid ads, SEO pages and social posts for you.
kreado_AI video creation platform
AI video ad creation that turns a product URL into publish-ready video and image ads in minutes.
UTM Mind
AI agent that builds, validates, and syncs UTM links to Google Ads, Meta, TikTok and DV360 from plain-English chat.
AMA vs its closest rival
AMA's closest head-to-head is with Weglot — Choose Weglot if your priority is launching a multilingual website with brand-consistent translations and strong SEO. Pick AMA if you need a conversational AI assistant to optimize Google and Meta ad campaigns without deep PPC expertise. They solve different problems—translation vs. ad marketing. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Ama vs Weglot
Choose Weglot if your priority is launching a multilingual website with brand-consistent translations and strong SEO. Pick AMA if you need a conversational AI assistant to optimize Google and Meta ad campaigns without deep PPC expertise. They solve different problems—translation vs. ad marketing.
GeneratedAma vs Letterhead
Choose AMA if your priority is managing paid ad campaigns across Google and Meta with voice-powered AI insights; it's a freemium tool for agencies and SMBs. Pick Letterhead if you run multiple newsletters at scale and need portfolio analytics, revenue management, and AI agents—it's an enterprise-grade OS with custom pricing. They solve different problems; your choice depends on whether your core channel is ads or email newsletters.
GeneratedAma vs Chili Piper
AMA is a cost-effective voice AI for marketers who want to optimize Google and Meta ad performance quickly. Chili Piper is an enterprise-grade platform for converting high-intent B2B traffic into booked meetings, but comes with a steep price and requires a Salesforce backbone. If you need ad analysis, choose AMA; if you need to eliminate form friction and book meetings instantly from web traffic, Chili Piper is the clear winner.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Used AMA? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.