browser-use

browser-use

Anti-detect stealth browsers and hosted AI agents for undetected web automation.

87/100Safe BetFree · from $29/moFreemium

The most pragmatic choice for AI agent teams that need undetected browsing with CAPTCHA solving and custom LLMs. At $0.02/hr browser sessions and $5/GB proxy bandwidth, it beats rolling your own stealth infra. Lighter scraping jobs won't benefit from anti-detection; know when to pass.

Verified 7d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/browser-use

Best for
  • AI agents needing undetected web browsing with CAPTCHA solving
  • Teams scaling web automation with custom LLMs and hosted agents
  • Enterprises requiring SOC 2 compliant browsing infrastructure
  • Developers wanting a Python-first open-source library with cloud fallback
Not ideal for
  • Simple scraping tasks that don't need anti-detection
  • Users seeking a fully self-hosted free solution
  • Non-AI automation where Selenium or Playwright is sufficient
Visit Website

IntermediateFor developers: getting started takes minutes—install the SDK (pip install browser-use-sdk or npm), export your API key, and run a task with a few lines of code. Non-developers can use the hosted agents via the dashboard, but may need to learn the API model. The open-source library (pip install browser-use) is also quick to set up but requires your own proxy and handling for production.Web · API · CLIAPI available4.9k viewsVerified 7d ago
Pricing
Free · from $29/mo
FreemiumFree tier4 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
For developers: getting started takes minutes—install the SDK (pip install browser-use-sdk or npm), export your API key, and run a task with a few lines of code. Non-developers can use the hosted agents via the dashboard, but may need to learn the API model. The open-source library (pip install browser-use) is also quick to set up but requires your own proxy and handling for production.
Runs on
WebAPICLI
API available · 4 integrations
Who it's for
AI agent developerQA engineerData analyst
Live sentiment
Is browser-use actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Browser Use if you only need simple data scraping without anti-detection, if you prefer a fully self-hosted free solution, or if your automation doesn't require bypassing bot detection—simpler tools like Selenium or Playwright will suffice.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Usage costs add up: browser sessions run $0.02/hour and proxy bandwidth is $5/GB (or $4/GB on Scaleup), so heavy data extraction can rack up charges beyond your monthly credit.

Price reality

Pricing fits developer teams that need scalable, usage-based automation without a large upfront cost. At $0.02/browser-hour and $5/GB proxy, it's cheaper than Notte, Anchor, Kernel, Hyperbrowser, Steel, and Browserbase, per their comparison. For heavier workloads, Scaleup at $999/mo offers 500 concurrent sessions and discounted proxy. If your needs are simpler, free or low-cost alternatives like Selenium or Playwright (with your own infrastructure) may be more cost-effective.

In short

browser-use — Anti-detect stealth browsers and hosted AI agents for undetected web automation. Best for AI agents needing undetected web browsing with CAPTCHA solving, Teams scaling web automation with custom LLMs and hosted agents, Enterprises requiring SOC 2 compliant browsing infrastructure. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.

What's new in browser-use

Checked 7 days ago

Across the latest 4 updates: 2 feature updates, 1 launch and 1 changelog entry.

Viability Score

87/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is browser-use? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
not measured
Site health
95
User sentiment
not measured
What the vendor publishes
80

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Anti-detect stealth browsers with fingerprint masking (canvas, WebGL, audio)
  • Built-in CAPTCHA solving
  • 195+ country residential proxies
  • Fully hosted web agents (API V4) token-priced at 1.2x provider rates
  • Custom LLMs for browser automation (BU 2.0, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Sonnet 5, Grok 4.5, Kimi K3, MiniMax M3)
  • Bring Your Own Key for Anthropic, OpenAI, Google (0.2x orchestration fee)
  • Open-source Python library (pip install browser-use)
  • Browser Harness API with client-controlled recording
  • OAuth read access to browsers (v3:browsers:read scope)
  • CLI for scripted automation
  • Sub-second cold starts via Firecracker VMs
  • Code Mode to generate reusable Python scripts
  • Sensitive data passing with secure secrets
  • Browser Use Box (BUX) for 24/7 remote VM
  • Session sharing and public links (/share/v4)

About browser-use

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API · CLI

Browser Use is infrastructure for AI agents that need to browse the web without tripping anti-bot systems. It pairs anti-detect stealth browsers with built-in CAPTCHA solving and 195+ country residential proxies, so automation can pass as human. The platform targets developers and teams deploying agents at scale, offering a hosted cloud API, an open-source Python library (pip install browser-use), and a Browser Harness API for self-healing task execution. It's the go-to when standard tools like Puppeteer get blocked or flagged. Stealth Browsers cost $0.02/hour and mask fingerprints across canvas, WebGL, and audio for zero-config undetected browsing. Custom LLMs for browser automation (BU 2.0, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Sonnet 5, plus Grok 4.5, Kimi K3, MiniMax M3) start at $0.36/M tokens, while Fully Hosted Web Agents (API V4) price at 1.2× provider rates. You can bring your own keys for Anthropic, OpenAI, or Google and pay a 0.2× orchestration fee, or use the open-source library with just token costs. Recent updates add client-controlled recording on the Browser Harness API, OAuth read access to browsers, and new models like Grok 4.5 and Kimi K3 — with the PAYG minimum top-up lowered to $5. The free tier includes 10 agent tasks per month and 3 concurrent sessions; paid plans start at $29/mo for Dev with 25 concurrent sessions and advanced stealth. Compared to Puppeteer or Playwright, Browser Use is the dedicated pick when anti-detection is non-negotiable. It's not a general scraping tool — it's infrastructure for AI agents that need to act human online, with SOC 2 compliance and enterprise options for production workloads.

Behind the Verdict

Browser Use positions itself as the dedicated infrastructure for AI agents that need to browse the web undetected. It's not a general-purpose scraper; it's a suite of tools—stealth browsers, hosted agents, custom LLMs, and an open-source library—that together let you build and run agents that pass as human. The core value proposition is anti-detection: fingerprint masking across canvas, WebGL, and audio, plus CAPTCHA solving and residential proxies in 195+ countries. This is critical for tasks like form filling, login-gated data extraction, and QA testing where standard tools like Puppeteer or Playwright often get blocked. Strengths: The pricing is transparent and usage-based, which is good for scaling. Browser sessions at $0.02/hour are among the cheapest on the market (the site claims cheaper than Notte, Anchor, Kernel, Hyperbrowser, Steel, and Browserbase). Hosted agents are token-priced at 1.2× provider rates, with BYOK adding only a 0.2× orchestration fee, so you can control costs. The open-source library is widely adopted (111.7K GitHub stars, 46M downloads/month), which signals community trust and a low barrier to entry. The customizable LLM lineup (BU 2.0, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Sonnet 5, Grok 4.5, Kimi K3, MiniMax M3) lets you balance accuracy and cost per task. Weaknesses: The free tier is limited to 10 agent tasks/month and 3 concurrent sessions—fine for experimentation, not for serious use. Paying for credits means ongoing costs even on paid plans, and proxy bandwidth at $5/GB can add up for data-heavy tasks. There's no fully self-hosted free option; the open-source library still requires your own proxy and handling, and the cloud is the main path to production. Integration with common tools like Slack, Notion, or GitHub is thin—it's primarily API/SDK-driven, so non-developer teams may find it hard to adopt. Also, the platform's focus on anti-detection raises ethical considerations; it's designed to bypass bot detection, which could violate websites' ToS, so you need to ensure your use cases are compliant. Where it fits: It's excellent for AI agent teams, developers building automation, QA engineers testing web apps, and enterprises needing SOC 2 compliance. Where it doesn't: simple scraping tasks that don't need anti-detection (use a basic scraper), non-AI automation (use Selenium/Playwright), or teams needing deep native integrations with common SaaS tools.

Researching browser-use? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas browser-use actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

AI agent developer

You're building an agent that needs to check a competitor's pricing page daily, but the site blocks simple requests.

Outcome: You use Browser Use's stealth browser with residential proxy to scrape the page without being blocked, and schedule the agent to run daily via the API.

QA engineer

You need to run nightly regression tests on your web app's checkout flow, which requires logging in and filling forms.

Outcome: You deploy a Browser Use agent that navigates the UI, fills the form, and verifies the order confirmation, reporting failures via API.

Data analyst

You need to extract structured data from a login-gated dashboard for a report, but scraping is blocked.

Outcome: You use Browser Use's hosted agent with CAPTCHA solving to log in and pull the data, outputting it as JSON for your analysis pipeline.

Use Cases

  • Fill multi-step forms on SaaS admin panels with no public API
  • Run nightly QA passes against your own production web app
  • Extract structured data from login-gated dashboards
  • Prototype a customer-support agent that navigates your web UI
  • Automate e-commerce checkout flows for testing
  • Scrape job listings from sites that block simple requests
  • Enrich a CSV of contacts by crawling their LinkedIn profiles
  • Run a 24/7 remote agent (BUX) to monitor competitor sites

Models Under the Hood

BU 2.0Gemini 3.6 FlashSonnet 5Grok 4.5Kimi K3MiniMax M3bu-2-0-mini-previewClaude Opus 5GPT-5.6GPT-5.6 Luna

as of 2026-08-30

Limitations

  • Free tier includes 10 agent tasks/month and 3 concurrent sessions; advanced plans start at $29/month.
  • Usage-based costs apply: browser sessions at $0.02/hour and proxy bandwidth at $5/GB (or $4/GB on Scaleup).
  • Token-based pricing for hosted agents is 1.2× provider rates, with BYOK adding a 0.2× orchestration fee.
  • No fully self-hosted free option—open-source library still requires your own proxy and handling.
  • Limited native integrations with common SaaS tools; primarily API/SDK-driven.
  • Anti-detection features may violate website terms of service; ensure compliance.

as of 2026-08-30

Verification history

We have re-verified browser-use 20 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 20 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published browser-use tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo developers or students wanting to test Browser Use's capabilities without a credit card, with 3 concurrent sessions and 10 agent tasks per month.

What this tier adds

Entry tier with 3 concurrent sessions and 10 agent tasks a month, advanced stealth, and usage billed at standard rates—good for exploration.

Dev

$29/mo

Ideal for

Individual developers or small teams prototyping agents, needing 25 concurrent sessions and $29 in monthly credits to cover moderate usage.

What this tier adds

Adds 25 concurrent sessions, $29 in credits, top-ups, and bring-your-own-key options—a step up from the free tier.

Business

$299/mo

Ideal for

Growing teams running production automation with 200 concurrent sessions and $299 in credits, requiring advanced stealth and reliable scaling.

What this tier adds

Scales to 200 concurrent sessions and $299 in credits, with top-ups and BYOK, suitable for serious workloads.

Scaleup

$999/mo

Ideal for

Enterprises or high-volume operations needing 500 concurrent sessions and $999 in credits, with discounted proxy pricing for heavy data extraction.

What this tier adds

Highest tier: 500 concurrent sessions, $999 in credits, and $4/GB managed proxy (discounted from $5/GB), ideal for large-scale automation.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Usage costs add up: browser sessions run $0.02/hour and proxy bandwidth is $5/GB (or $4/GB on Scaleup), so heavy data extraction can rack up charges beyond your monthly credit.
  • Hosted agents are token-priced at 1.2× provider rates, so large tasks with long outputs can cost more than expected; BYOK reduces this to a 0.2× orchestration fee but you still pay your provider directly.
  • Free tier is limited to 10 agent tasks/month and 3 concurrent sessions; going past that requires a paid plan starting at $29/mo.
  • Proxyless or bring-your-own-proxy egress is billed at $0.20/GB, which can surprise you if you assume included proxy bandwidth.
  • Annual plans give 2 months free but require upfront credit payment, locking in cash flow.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where browser-use's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Pricing fits developer teams that need scalable, usage-based automation without a large upfront cost. At $0.02/browser-hour and $5/GB proxy, it's cheaper than Notte, Anchor, Kernel, Hyperbrowser, Steel, and Browserbase, per their comparison. For heavier workloads, Scaleup at $999/mo offers 500 concurrent sessions and discounted proxy. If your needs are simpler, free or low-cost alternatives like Selenium or Playwright (with your own infrastructure) may be more cost-effective.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of browser-use — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

For developers: getting started takes minutes—install the SDK (pip install browser-use-sdk or npm), export your API key, and run a task with a few lines of code. Non-developers can use the hosted agents via the dashboard, but may need to learn the API model. The open-source library (pip install browser-use) is also quick to set up but requires your own proxy and handling for production.

Switching to or from browser-use

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From Puppeteer/Playwright: Replace your browser automation scripts with Browser Use's cloud browsers or hosted agents, using the CDP URL to connect existing code.
  • From Browserbase/Steel: Switch to Browser Use for more competitive pricing and additional features like CAPTCHA solving; migrate your sessions via the API.
  • From manual QA: Automate your test scenarios with Browser Use agents instead of manual clicking, reducing time and errors.
Migrating out
  • To Selenium/Playwright: If you no longer need anti-detection, you can migrate to open-source tools, but you'll lose stealth features and managed proxies.
  • To Browserbase/Steel: If you prefer their ecosystem, you can port your API calls to their SDKs, but expect higher browser-hour costs.
  • To a custom solution: Build your own stealth infra (e.g., with Puppeteer + proxies) to have full control, but it will require more engineering effort.

Integrations

AnthropicOpenAIGoogleCoinbase

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Popular in Browser & Computer-Use Agents

Spider Cloud

Spider Cloud

AI web scraping API: crawl, scrape, search any site into markdown or JSON at 10k req/min.

FreemiumTry
OpenAgents

OpenAgents

Open-source platform for building, hosting, and running language agents in the wild

FreeTry
Zhipu GLM

Zhipu GLM

China's leading open-source LLM platform with agentic autonomy and full-stack MaaS APIs.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used browser-use? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.