browser-use

browser-use

Undetectable AI browser automation API for agents at scale.

95/100Safe BetFree · from $29/moFreemium

Best for AI agent teams needing undetected web browsing with CAPTCHA solving and custom LLMs. At $0.02/hr browser sessions and $5/GB proxy bandwidth, it's a pragmatic choice over Puppeteer/Playwright for stealth tasks. Lighter scraping jobs won't benefit from anti-detection.

Verified 17d ago · liveness 95/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/browser-use

Best for
  • AI agents needing undetected web browsing with CAPTCHA solving
  • Developers requiring stealth browser infra with proxy management
  • Teams building LLM-based web automation with custom models
  • Enterprise users needing SOC 2 compliant managed browser automation
Not ideal for
  • Simple web scraping without anti-detection needs
  • Users wanting a free self-hosted solution with no API costs
  • Non-AI automation where Selenium or Playwright suffices
Visit Website

IntermediateSolo developer: pip install browser-use and run a basic script in 10 minutes. Cloud signup: with free tier, get first agent running in 5 minutes. CLI 3.0: install via uv tool and paste one prompt into Claude Code/Cursor to start immediately.API · CLIAPI available4.9k viewsVerified 17d ago
Pricing
Free · from $29/mo
FreemiumFree tier5 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Solo developer: pip install browser-use and run a basic script in 10 minutes. Cloud signup: with free tier, get first agent running in 5 minutes. CLI 3.0: install via uv tool and paste one prompt into Claude Code/Cursor to start immediately.
Runs on
APICLI
API available · 8 integrations
Who it's for
Solo developer building an AI agentQA engineer at a SaaS companyData analyst scraping job listings
Live sentiment
Is browser-use actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Browser Use if you only need basic headless browsing without anti-detection — cheaper tools like Playwright or Browserless will suffice.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Going past 10 tasks/month on free tier requires a subscription starting at $29/mo for Dev plan.

Price reality

The free tier is best for prototyping; Dev at $29/mo fits solo developers. Business at $299/mo suits small teams, Scaleup at $999/mo for larger operations. Cheaper than Browserless's equivalent managed offering at similar scale, but more expensive than self-hosting Playwright. Enterprise is custom.

In short

browser-use — Undetectable AI browser automation API for agents at scale. Best for AI agents needing undetected web browsing with CAPTCHA solving, Developers requiring stealth browser infra with proxy management, Teams building LLM-based web automation with custom models. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.

What's new in browser-use

Checked 16 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 3 feature updates, 1 pricing change and 1 changelog entry.

Viability Score

95/100
Safe Bet

How likely is browser-use to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.

momentum
100
funding runway
80
website health
90
wrapper dependency
100

Last calculated: July 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Undetectable stealth browsers with fingerprint masking (canvas, WebGL, audio)
  • CAPTCHA solving (reCAPTCHA, hCaptcha) built-in
  • 195+ country rotating residential proxies
  • Cloud API (/api/tasks, /api/browsers, /api/sessions)
  • Open-source Python library (pip install browser-use)
  • Browser Harness for self-healing web automation
  • Custom LLMs (BU 2.0, Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5) for browser tasks
  • Sub-second cold starts via Firecracker VMs
  • BYOK (bring your own Anthropic, OpenAI, Google keys)
  • Code Mode to generate reusable Python scripts
  • CLI 3.0 with Python execution directly in browser
  • Sensitive data passing with secure secrets
  • Browser Use Box (BUX) 24/7 remote VM
  • V3 agent with token-based pricing at 1.2x provider rates
  • Proxy bandwidth at $5/GB

About browser-use

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableAPI · CLI

Browser Use provides the infrastructure for AI agents to browse the web undetected. It offers anti-detect stealth browsers, CAPTCHA solving, and 195+ country residential proxies. The platform includes a fully hosted cloud API, an open-source Python library (pip install browser-use), and the Browser Harness for self-healing web task automation. Custom LLMs (BU 2.0, Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5) are purpose-built for browser automation. Cloud browser sessions cost $0.02/hr, proxy bandwidth $5/GB. The free tier starts with 3 concurrent sessions and 10 agent tasks per month. Browser Use targets developers and teams building AI agents that need stealth web automation, with recent updates including CLI 3.0, BYOK, Code Mode, and the Browser Use Box (BUX).

Behind the Verdict

Browser Use is the most specialized tool we've seen for AI agents that need to browse like a human. Its stealth browsers—with fingerprinting for canvas, WebGL, and audio—plus built-in CAPTCHA solving make it a strong choice for scraping tough sites. The new CLI 3.0 lets coding agents execute Python directly in the browser, which we think is a big improvement over rigid action lists. The free tier is generous enough to test, but real usage burns credits fast on proxy bandwidth ($5/GB). We'd reach for this when building agents that must pass as real users on sites with strong bot detection. It's less useful for simple scraping where Playwright or Selenium suffice. Compared to Browserless, Browser Use offers deeper anti-detection but is pricier per session. The custom LLMs (BU 2.0, Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5) are a nice touch, but BYOK is available if you prefer your own model provider. One caveat: the pricing page uses model names like 'GPT-5.4 Mini' that may be typos or future versions—confirm with vendor. Overall, a solid bet if your agents need to stay undetected.

Researching browser-use? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas browser-use actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Solo developer building an AI agent

You want to automate filling a multi-step form on a third-party site that requires login and CAPTCHA.

Outcome: Install browser-use via pip, write a Python script using Browser Harness, and run it against the site. The agent handles login, solves hCaptcha, and completes the form in under 30 seconds.

QA engineer at a SaaS company

You need nightly regression tests on your production web app, which includes dynamic content and occasional CAPTCHAs.

Outcome: Set up scheduled tasks in Browser Use Cloud with the free tier (1-hour min interval). The agent navigates your app, checks critical flows, and reports failures. Cost: $0 for initial testing.

Data analyst scraping job listings

You want to extract structured data from job boards that block simple requests and employ anti-bot measures.

Outcome: Use Browser Use's stealth browsers with rotating residential proxies. The agent scrapes 500 listings in 10 minutes, costing ~$0.50 in browser time and $2 in proxy bandwidth.

Use Cases

  • Fill multi-step forms on SaaS admin panels with no public API
  • Run nightly QA passes against your own production web app
  • Extract structured data from login-gated dashboards
  • Prototype a customer-support agent that navigates your web UI
  • Automate e-commerce checkout flows for testing
  • Scrape job listings from sites that block simple requests
  • Enrich a CSV of contacts by crawling their LinkedIn profiles
  • Run a 24/7 remote agent (BUX) to monitor competitor sites

Models Under the Hood

BU 2.0Gemini FlashSonnet 4.5

as of 2026-07-06

Limitations

  • Requires a capable LLM (GPT-4-class or better) for complex flows — Haiku-tier models drift.
  • Playwright overhead means each action costs ~1–3s wall-time.
  • Sites with aggressive bot detection (Cloudflare Turnstile, Datadome) still block sessions unless you pair it with a proxy/stealth layer.
  • Free tier limited to 10 tasks/mo; beyond that, costs add up (browser $0.02/hr, proxy $5/GB).
  • No no-code interface — all interaction via CLI, SDK, or cloud API.

as of 2026-07-02

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published browser-use tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo developers prototyping an AI agent or running occasional tasks — limited to 10 tasks/mo and 3 concurrent sessions.

What this tier adds

Starting tier with free browser credits but capped at 3 sessions and 10 tasks per month.

Dev

$29/mo

Ideal for

Individual developers or small projects needing 25 concurrent sessions and advanced stealth features with $29 in monthly credits.

What this tier adds

Adds 25 concurrent sessions, $29 credits, advanced stealth, and BYOK/top-ups over Free tier.

Business

$299/mo

Ideal for

Growing teams with higher volume — 200 concurrent sessions and $299 credits for scaling automation workflows.

What this tier adds

Increases to 200 concurrent sessions and $299 credits, includes all Dev features.

Scaleup

$999/mo

Ideal for

Large teams or companies needing 500 concurrent sessions and $999 credits for heavy automation loads.

What this tier adds

Scales to 500 concurrent sessions and $999 credits, includes all Business features.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Organizations requiring custom SLAs, data retention terms, annual credit pools, and dedicated support.

What this tier adds

Custom pricing with annual credit pool, SLAs, data retention, and dedicated support.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Going past 10 tasks/month on free tier requires a subscription starting at $29/mo for Dev plan.
  • Proxy bandwidth at $5/GB can add up for large scraping jobs; proxyless egress is $0.20/GB.
  • V3 agent has a 0.2× orchestration fee on top of provider costs if you bring your own LLM keys.
  • Browser Use Box pricing is per hour running ($1-$4/day depending on specs), so it's not a flat monthly fee.
  • Custom LLM usage for BU 2.0 has per-token pricing ($0.60/M input, $3.50/M output) that may exceed flat-rate plans at high volume.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where browser-use's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

The free tier is best for prototyping; Dev at $29/mo fits solo developers. Business at $299/mo suits small teams, Scaleup at $999/mo for larger operations. Cheaper than Browserless's equivalent managed offering at similar scale, but more expensive than self-hosting Playwright. Enterprise is custom.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of browser-use — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Solo developer: pip install browser-use and run a basic script in 10 minutes. Cloud signup: with free tier, get first agent running in 5 minutes. CLI 3.0: install via uv tool and paste one prompt into Claude Code/Cursor to start immediately.

Switching to or from browser-use

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From Playwright: Replace action calls with Browser Harness API; proxy/stealth config is a config file change.
  • From Puppeteer: Similar refactor; you'll use browser-use's Python SDK instead of Node.js.
  • From Selenium: Full rewrite — Browser Use is agent-native, not a direct Selenium replacement.
Migrating out
  • To Playwright: Export Browser Use scripts as plain Playwright if you don't need stealth; manual refactor required.
  • To Browserless: If you don't need anti-detection, Browserless is a simpler paid alternative with a similar pricing model.

Integrations

Python SDKCLITelegramSSHWeb UIOpenAIAnthropicGoogle

Resources & Guides

Popular in Developer Infrastructure

Temporal AI

Temporal AI

Durable execution for AI agents and workflows that never lose progress.

FreemiumTry
Spider Cloud

Spider Cloud

Fast web crawling, scraping & search API for AI agents

FreemiumTry
Presto Voice

Presto Voice

Drive-thru voice AI automation for QSR chains to boost revenue and efficiency.

Contact SalesTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used browser-use? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.