browser-use — The way AI uses the internet – undetectable browser automation at scale. Best for Developers needing undetectable web scraping with CAPTCHA solving, Teams running AI agents for data extraction at scale, Organizations requiring residential proxies across many countries. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.
Developers needing undetectable web scraping with CAPTCHA solvingTeams running AI agents for data extraction at scaleOrganizations requiring residential proxies across many countriesUsers who want a fully hosted browser automation service with custom LLMs
Not ideal for
General web testing or debugging (stealth features overkill)Low-budget projects (paid service with per-hour pricing)Teams needing native integrations with Slack, Notion, etc.Users who prefer self-hosted, open-source-only solutions
A strong pick for teams that need undetectable browser automation at scale, especially with residential proxies and CAPTCHA solving baked in. The pricing at $0.02/hr is competitive, but limited integrations may require custom scripting.
Last verified: June 2026
Behind the Verdict
Browser Use stands out for its anti-detect browser infrastructure, which is critical for tasks like web scraping, data extraction, and automation on sites with heavy bot detection. The fully hosted web agents and custom LLM support (Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5) make it easy to deploy without managing browser profiles. However, the platform currently lacks native integrations with common tools like Slack or Notion, which means teams may need to build their own workflow connectors. The open-source library is a plus for devs who want to extend functionality, but the documentation seems minimal based on the page. Compared to alternatives like Playwright or Puppeteer, Browser Use offers a higher level of stealth and proxy support out of the box, but at the cost of tighter vendor lock-in. If your core need is scaling undetectable browser automation without worrying about fingerprints, this is a solid choice. For general testing or non-stealth tasks, simpler headless browsers may be more cost-effective.
Skip browser-use if Skip Browser Use if you need no-code browser automation or enterprise-grade support with SLAs and SSO.
Latest from browser-use
Updated 4 days ago
Across the latest 10 updates: 4 feature updates, 1 launch, 1 pricing change and 4 news mentions.
How likely is browser-use to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 6 signals including funding, development activity, and platform risk.
funding runway
60
website health
90
github activity
50
category mortality
70
wrapper dependency
100
hyperscaler overlap
80
About browser-use
Browser Use provides a cloud-based infrastructure for running AI web agents with undetectable, anti-detect browsers. It offers fully hosted web agents that can extract data, fill forms, and navigate CAPTCHAs across 195+ countries via residential proxies. The platform includes a self-healing open-source library (pip install browser-use), customizable LLMs for browser automation (e.g., Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5), and a cloud API for task, browser, and session management. With 97% accuracy benchmarks and sub-second cold starts at $0.02/hr, it's 3x cheaper than alternatives. Positioned as a full-stack solution for developers needing scalable, stealthy browser automation without fingerprint detection.
Researching browser-use? Skip the guesswork.
Tell us what you want to build — we'll match the AI tools that fit your goal, budget & existing stack.
Key Features
Undetectable stealth browsers with anti-detect fingerprints
CAPTCHA solving built-in
Residential proxies across 195+ countries
Fully hosted web agents for AI browser automation
Custom LLMs for browser automation (Gemini Flash, Sonnet 4.5)
Open-source library: pip install browser-use
Cloud API with endpoints for tasks, browsers, sessions
Sub-second cold starts at $0.02/hr
Self-healing browser harness for agent tasks
Browser Use Box – 24/7 Claude agent in a remote box
Proxies rotating, undetected
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas browser-use actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
DevOps engineer
Nightly QA for a web app with changing UI
Outcome: Self-healing harness adapts to UI changes; bugs caught before production.
Data analyst
Extract competitor pricing from a login-gated dashboard
Outcome: Script runs daily with stealth proxies; data delivered to CSV.
AI agent builder
Build a customer support agent that navigates internal tools
Outcome: Agent uses BUX 24/7, handles multi-step workflows via Claude.
Use Cases
Fill multi-step forms on SaaS admin panels that have no public API.
Run nightly QA passes against your own production web app.
Extract structured data from dashboards that require login.
Prototype a customer-support agent that navigates your web UI.
Enrich a CSV of contacts by crawling their LinkedIn profiles in batch.
Run a 24/7 remote agent (BUX) to monitor competitor sites.
Models Under the Hood
GPT-5.4 MiniClaude Sonnet 4.6Claude Opus 4.6Claude Opus 4.7Gemini FlashGemini 2.5 Pro (coming soon)
Limitations
Requires a capable LLM (GPT-4-class or better) for complex flows — Haiku-tier models drift. Playwright overhead means each action costs ~1–3s wall-time. Sites with aggressive bot detection (Cloudflare Turnstile, Datadome) still block browser-use sessions unless you pair it with a proxy/stealth layer (available as paid add-ons). The free tier is limited to 10 tasks/mo; beyond that, costs add up (browser sessions at $0.06/hour, proxy bandwidth at $5/GB). No no-code interface — all interaction is via CLI, SDK, or cloud API.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published browser-use tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo developer evaluating Browser Use for a small project or proof-of-concept
•LLM orchestration fee: 0.2x your provider costs when using BYOK
•V3 agent token costs at 1.2x provider rates
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where browser-use's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Browser Use offers a generous free tier (10 tasks/mo, 3 concurrent sessions) ideal for evaluation. The Dev plan at $29/mo is cheap for heavy users but costs can escalate with high proxy bandwidth and browser hours. Compared to Apify (which has a free tier with 10,000 compute units) or Browse AI (starts at $49/mo), Browser Use is competitive for developer-centric teams but less predictable due to usage-based billing.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of browser-use — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Developers: <5 minutes via pip install browser-use; CLI 2.0 setup in under 1 minute with cloud signin. Non-technical users: not applicable — requires coding. Cloud API: 10 minutes to generate API key and run first task.
Switching to or from browser-use
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
Migrating in
→From Playwright/Puppeteer: swap your scripts to use browser-use's high-level agent with minimal refactoring
→From Selenium: leverage the self-healing harness and stealth layers for undetectable automation
Migrating out
↗To Apify: export your agents as Python scripts; Apify's platform offers a visual editor
↗To Browse AI: no-code migration; manually configure extractors based on known workflows
Recent material changes
Pricing, brand, ownership, or deprecation changes worth knowing before you commit. Most-recent first.
•2026-04-12: BYOK, Code Mode, and Sensitive Data handling launched
•2026-04-03: Free tier introduced; proxy data cost cut from $10/GB to $5/GB
•2026-03-22: CLI 2.0 with browser profile sync; hCaptcha solver added
