HomeToolsPlan StackBest ForCompare
RightAIChoice
CompareBlog
Submit a ToolSign inSign upPlan Your Stack
RightAIChoice

The decision-making engine for discovering AI tools.

One AI tool every Friday

A 60-second editorial pick. No filler, no funnel — unsubscribe anytime.

Product

  • Browse tools
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Plan my stack
  • Find my AI tool
  • AI chat
  • Compare
  • Submit your tool

Resources

  • Best AI guides
  • Stacks
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Viability scoring

Company

  • About
  • Team
  • Press & brand kit
  • Contact

Your account

  • Dashboard
  • Saved tools
  • Settings
  • Sign in
  • Create account

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Affiliate disclosure
  • Unsubscribe

© 2026 RightAIChoice. All rights reserved.

Built for the AI community.

RightAIChoice
CompareBlog
Submit a ToolSign inSign upPlan Your Stack
Tools🔬 Research & EducationClawBench
ClawBench

ClawBench

Free

Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on real live websites.

By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 06 Jul 2026

0 views
Added 7d ago
69/100Monitor
Visit Website

In short

ClawBench — Open-source benchmark for browser AI agents on real live websites. Best for AI benchmarking researchers, Browser agent developers, Model evaluation teams. Free to use.

Compared withvs Truleovs Presto Voicevs Praktika

Is ClawBench actually worth it?

Live

See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.

3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report

Run a free scan

Editorial Verdict

Best for
AI benchmarking researchersBrowser agent developersModel evaluation teamsOpen-source AI enthusiasts
Not ideal for
Casual users seeking a ready-to-use browser agentNon-technical users without CLI experienceUsers needing managed API for internal evaluations

ClawBench is the most rigorous open benchmark for browser agents today, thanks to its live website tasks and two-stage scoring. It's a must-use for any serious agent evaluation, though it requires technical setup. The gap between best model and human-level performance is stark—making it a valuable reality check for the field.

Compare with: ClawBench vs Persana AI, ClawBench vs Aithor, ClawBench vs Reach Best

Last verified: July 2026

What independent users actually report about ClawBench

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

29 mentions across 4 sources (YouTube, Bluesky, GitHub, Lemmy).

61% positive39% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +Two-stage scoring (HTTP interception + LLM judge) adds honesty.
  • +130+ real live tasks across diverse platforms.
  • +Public leaderboard with cost/task metrics for model comparison.
  • +Open-source dataset and traces on Hugging Face.
  • +CLI tool (pip install clawbench-eval) for easy local runs.
Recurring frustrations
  • −Very little community discussion to validate ease of use.
  • −Some test cases have instruction conflicts and placeholder bugs.
  • −No pre-built Docker containers; must build locally.
  • −Running local models requires expensive hardware.
  • −Documentation on recommended model/harness pairings is unclear.
Patterns worth knowing
ClawBench is a valuable but niche benchmark for AI agent research, praised for its realistic live tasks and honest scoring.
Seen on Bluesky, YouTube, Lemmy
Users want better onboarding: pre-built containers, clearer model-harness guidance, and resolved test case bugs.
Seen on GitHub
Hardware cost and speed for local model evaluation is a concern, limiting accessibility for hobbyists.
Seen on YouTube, Lemmy
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • • Requires cloud API keys or local GPU hardware for model inference
  • • Computational cost of running LLM judge and tasks adds up

Viability Score

69/100
Monitor

How likely is ClawBench to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.

momentum
55
funding runway
40
website health
90
wrapper dependency
100

Last calculated: July 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Two-stage scoring: HTTP interception + LLM judge
  • 283 live tasks across 163 live platforms
  • Public leaderboard with cost/task metrics
  • Multiple evaluation harnesses (Claw-Eval, WildClawBench, ClawMark)
  • Open-source dataset and traces on Hugging Face
  • CLI tool: pip install clawbench-eval
  • Supports V1 and V2 corpora
  • Scoring rubrics: lenient and strict reward
  • Gradio Space for interactive leaderboard browsing
  • Model submission and comparison support
  • Task gallery and trace visualization
  • Integration with other benchmarks (WebVoyager, OSWorld)
  • 5-layer trace bundles with video, HAR, agent reasoning
  • JSONL-native dataset for SFT/DPO/PRM-ready fine-tuning
  • Weekly refreshed traces with 283+ tasks

About ClawBench

FreeAdvancedNo APIWeb · CLI

ClawBench is an open-source benchmark that evaluates browser-based AI agents by tasking them with real online activities—booking flights, ordering food, applying for jobs—on live websites. Unlike static or simulated benchmarks, ClawBench uses a two-stage scoring system: first, HTTP interception checks if the final request matches the expected URL/method; second, an LLM judge (currently deepseek-v4-pro) evaluates whether the agent actually fulfilled the instruction. The platform currently includes 283 tasks across 163 live platforms and supports multiple evaluation harnesses (claw-eval, WildClawBench, ClawMark) from a single CLI. ClawBench is designed for AI researchers, developers, and model builders who need a rigorous, real-world test of autonomous web agents. It provides a public leaderboard with metrics for both open-source and frontier closed-source models, with detailed traces for each run. The benchmark is built around "scoring rubrics" that separate deterministic interception from subjective reward, offering granular insight into agent performance. What makes ClawBench different is its commitment to live, dynamic tasks—no static snapshots or sandboxed environments. The benchmark is fully open-source, with the dataset, evaluation scripts, and traces available on GitHub and Hugging Face. It also fosters model submissions via a quickstart CLI and a Gradio Space leaderboard. With over 1,724 judge-verified runs across 13 frontier models and 283 tasks, ClawBench reveals that even the best model (claude-opus-4-7) achieves only 44.6% reward on V2, leaving a 55-point gap to human-level performance. This makes it a valuable reality check for the field.

Behind the Verdict

We'd reach for ClawBench when we need to evaluate a browser agent on tasks that mirror real user behavior—ordering food, shopping, booking travel—on actual live sites. The two-stage scoring (HTTP interception + LLM judge) catches both the technical success of the HTTP request and the semantic fulfillment of the instruction. That's a huge step up from sandboxed benchmarks that can't test real-world edge cases. Where it bites: the setup requires comfort with a CLI, and the heavy reliance on third-party websites means tasks can break if those sites change their UI. Also, the LLM judge itself isn't perfect—it's a model evaluating a model, which can introduce bias. But the transparency (traces are public, rubrics are documented) lets you audit those judgments. Compared to alternatives like WebVoyager or OSWorld, ClawBench stands out because it integrates those very benchmarks as harnesses in its own CLI—you can run everything from one command. It's more comprehensive and better maintained, though the learning curve is real. In practice, ClawBench is for teams building autonomous agents, not casual users. If you're shipping a consumer-facing browser assistant, you need to know how it performs on live sites—ClawBench gives you that data. The fact that even claude-opus-4-7 only hits 44.6% reward on V2 shows we're far from agentic nirvana, but at least we have a honest measuring stick.

Researching ClawBench? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Use Cases

  • Evaluate your browser agent on 130+ real live tasks like booking flights and ordering food.
  • Compare agent performance using deterministic interception and LLM-based reward scoring.
  • Submit your model to the public leaderboard and get cost-per-task metrics.
  • Download traces for V1 and V2 corpora to analyze agent behavior.
  • Use the CLI to run ClawBench, WildClawBench, or scope-peers in one command.
  • Contribute new tasks or harnesses to the open-source benchmark.

Models Under the Hood

claude-opus-4-7gpt-5.5glm-5.1deepseek-v4-prodeepseek-v4-flash:freez-ai/glm-4.5-air:freeminimax-m2.5:freeopenrouter-owl-alpha

Limitations

  • Pricing is free and open-source, but the benchmark requires CLI installation and familiarity with Python.
  • The LLM judge (deepseek-v4-pro) may introduce bias; live websites can change, affecting reproducibility.
  • No managed evaluation API is available.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Integrations

GitHubHugging FacePyPIGradioOpenRouterWebVoyagerOSWorld

Resources & Guides

  • Resourceclaw-bench.com

    Home · ClawBench

    Helpful link from claw-bench.com

  • Resourcehuggingface.co

    ClawBench · ClawBench

    Helpful link from huggingface.co

Frequently Asked Questions

Tools that pair well with ClawBench

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside ClawBench, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

P

Persana AI

AI sales prospecting with 100+ data sources and automation agents

Aithor

Aithor

Undetectable AI essay writer with 10M+ real academic sources

R

Reach Best

AI college matching and admission prediction for high school students.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Clawbench vs Truleo

Clawbench vs Presto Voice

Clawbench vs Praktika

Alternatives to ClawBench

View all
Persana AI

Persana AI

AI sales prospecting with 100+ data sources and automation agents

FreemiumTry
Aithor

Aithor

Undetectable AI essay writer with 10M+ real academic sources

FreemiumTry
Reach Best

Reach Best

AI college matching and admission prediction for high school students.

FreemiumTry

Used ClawBench? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.

Sign in to share

Details

Pricing
Free
Skill Level
Advanced
Platforms
Web, CLI
API Available
No
Content updated
4d ago
Pricing & overview verified
4d ago

Categories

🔬 Research & Education🤖 Automation & Agents

Best-of guides

Best AI Tools for Research & LearningBest AI Workflow Automation & Agent Tools

Topics

AutomationAgentResearch

Resources

Official Website
Visit Website
RightAIChoice

The decision-making engine for discovering AI tools.

One AI tool every Friday

A 60-second editorial pick. No filler, no funnel — unsubscribe anytime.

Product

  • Browse tools
  • Categories
  • Search
  • Plan my stack
  • Find my AI tool
  • AI chat
  • Compare
  • Submit your tool

Resources

  • Best AI guides
  • Stacks
  • Blog
  • Methodology
  • Viability scoring

Company

  • About
  • Team
  • Press & brand kit
  • Contact

Your account

  • Dashboard
  • Saved tools
  • Settings
  • Sign in
  • Create account

Legal

  • Privacy
  • Terms
  • Affiliate disclosure
  • Unsubscribe

© 2026 RightAIChoice. All rights reserved.

Built for the AI community.