CLODO
Natural-language people search across 1.5B+ profiles, with contact enrichment and outbound sequences in one workflow.
Clodo earns a seat when your search describes a person rather than a job title. Filters can't easily express "left Exact Sciences two months ago and maintains an ML-adjacent GitHub repo," but a paragraph can, and Clodo scores the result with Bullseye/High Fit labels and signal cards. The live API, with documented /v1/search and sequences endpoints and an explicitly agent-ready pitch, closes the biggest gap the earlier version had. It's a poor fit for high-volume, low-nuance list building where cheaper enrichment wins — the description-driven model is the whole point, and generic input produces generic lists.
Verified 16d ago · liveness 72/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/clodo
- Recruiters sourcing niche talent in biotech, fintech, manufacturing, and RL research
- Expert networks needing sector veterans for expert calls and diligence
- GTM and placement teams prospecting personas filters can't express
- RL data producers sourcing domain experts to produce and verify training data
- High-volume, low-complexity contact list-building where cheaper enrichment wins
- Simple contact lookups that Apollo or ZoomInfo already handle adequately
- Buyers who won't write a detailed persona brief — vague input returns vague lists
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Clodo if your sourcing is high-volume and low-nuance — where cheap bulk enrichment wins and you don't need to write a detailed persona brief — because the description-driven model is the entire value proposition.
Clodo is a paid product with an Individual plan at $125/mo, so there's a monthly commitment before you see payoff on occasional searches.
At $125/mo for Individual, Clodo sits above entry-level sourcing tools and below enterprise data platforms like ZoomInfo, priced for teams that value precision over seat count. The pricing fits small-to-mid sourcing, recruiting, and GTM teams where a wrong list is expensive. Enterprise is custom-quoted for teams needing shared pipelines, custom data sources, CRM/ATS integrations, and API access. High-volume list builders will find cheaper bulk-enrichment alternatives.
In short
CLODO — Natural-language people search across 1.5B+ profiles, with contact enrichment and outbound sequences in one workflow. Best for Recruiters sourcing niche talent in biotech, fintech, manufacturing, and RL research, Expert networks needing sector veterans for expert calls and diligence, GTM and placement teams prospecting personas filters can't express. Plans from $125/mo.
What people actually say about CLODO — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
62 mentions across 6 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, App Store, Bluesky, Lemmy) · researched Jul 26, 2026.
Average across the 6 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Natural language search eliminates complex Boolean filters for sourcing.
- +Database spans 1.3B profiles across LinkedIn, GitHub, bioRxiv, PubMed.
- +Real-time intent signals help find prospects actively evaluating solutions.
- +Credit-based billing keeps costs predictable for occasional use.
- +Y Combinator backing suggests product-market fit investment.
- −Very limited community feedback makes reliability hard to gauge.
- −Manual email sending required per one user — not fully automated.
- −Name confusion with anarchist group clutters search results.
- −No public case studies or long-term user reviews available.
- −Credits model may become expensive for high-volume users.
- • Credits burn quickly per discovery run (150 credits/run) — high use may require early upgrade
- • Email enrichment and signal monitoring likely consume credits too
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is CLODO? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Natural-language persona search across 1.5B+ profiles
- Searches LinkedIn, GitHub, bioRxiv, and PubMed in one query
- Fit scoring with Bullseye and High Fit match labels
- Signal monitoring: active hiring, tool evaluation, budget authority
- Crunchbase funding signals including founders raising now
- Filter candidates open to work or open to contracting
- Email enrichment for matched contacts
- Phone enrichment for matched contacts
- Address enrichment for matched contacts
- Bulk CSV/XLSX upload for batch enrichment
- Outbound email sequences with open and reply tracking
- Clodo API for agents — POST /v1/search endpoint
- Clodo API sequences endpoint for agent-driven outreach
- Webhooks with signing secrets and signature verification
- Team collaboration on shared sourcing pipelines (Enterprise)
About CLODO
Clodo is AI people search for the sourcing problems keyword filters struggle to express. Instead of assembling Boolean strings, you describe the person you want in plain English. Clodo's own example is a full brief: senior bench scientists with wet lab experience and exposure to machine learning, who have published experiment verification research, are open to part-time contracting, and are currently at or left Lilly, Novo, or Exact Sciences in the last 8 months. Clodo returns a ranked shortlist drawn from LinkedIn, GitHub, bioRxiv, and PubMed, layered over a profile pool the company puts at 1.5B+ people. The product runs in four named stages: Search, Understand, Enrich, and Source. Search returns matches with fit labels such as Bullseye and High Fit plus signal cards — active tool evaluation, budget authority, hiring activity, Crunchbase funding, recent conference talks. Understand attaches the context that tells you whether to reach out now. Enrich fills in verified email, phone, and address details, and Source pushes contacts into outbound mailboxes with open and reply tracking (the site shows one campaign at 127 sent, 68% opened, 15% replied). Recruiting and sourcing teams are the obvious buyers, but Clodo also targets expert networks sourcing sector veterans for calls, GTM and placement teams, and reinforcement learning labs that need domain experts to produce and verify training data. A public Clodo API is live and marketed as agent-ready, with documented search endpoints (POST /v1/search), enrichment, and sequences, so teams can wire people discovery into their own apps and agents.
Behind the Verdict
Clodo's core bet is that the bottleneck in sourcing isn't data coverage but query expression. Sales Navigator, ZoomInfo, and Apollo are filter-first: they reward users who already know how to build precise Boolean logic, and penalize everyone else. Clodo inverts that. You write a persona brief the way you'd describe a candidate to a colleague — including messy criteria like stage, product stack, timing, and prior employers — and it returns a ranked shortlist with fit labels (Bullseye, High Fit) and supporting signal cards such as active tool evaluation, budget authority, hiring activity, Crunchbase funding, and recent conference talks. Strengths: the multi-source search (LinkedIn, GitHub, bioRxiv, PubMed) is genuinely useful for science and technical roles where publication or code history matters more than a title; the Understand and Enrich stages attach verified email, phone, and address details so you're not stitching tools together; and the Source stage runs outbound mailboxes with open and reply tracking. The API — POST /v1/search plus sequences and enrichment endpoints, with webhooks, async polling, credits, and error handling documented — matters most for teams that want people discovery inside their own product or agent. Weaknesses: the natural-language model trades speed for precision, so vague briefs return vague lists. It's less of an enrichment canvas than Clay — Clodo is a find-the-person engine that happens to enrich, not a general enrichment-and-orchestration workspace. And it's a monthly commitment, so one-off or purely high-volume lookups are better served by cheaper tools. Where it fits: niche technical and scientific sourcing (biotech bench scientists, compliance leaders at Series A–C fintechs, manufacturing and procurement leads), expert networks assembling sector veterans, GTM teams prospecting personas filters can't express, and RL labs sourcing domain experts to produce and verify training data. Where it doesn't: high-volume contact list building, simple lookups Apollo or ZoomInfo already handle, and buyers unwilling to invest in a detailed brief.
Researching CLODO? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas CLODO actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You need senior bench scientists with wet lab experience and ML exposure who are open to part-time contracting and recently left Lilly, Novo, or Exact Sciences. You write that as a plain-English brief in Clodo, review the Bullseye and High Fit matches with their publication and GitHub evidence, and enrich verified emails.
Outcome: A ranked shortlist of exactly the researchers you described, with contact details ready, replacing days of manual LinkedIn, bioRxiv, and GitHub cross-referencing.
You want compliance leaders at Series A–C fintechs nearing SEC requirements who are actively hiring. You search by persona, scan signal cards for hiring activity and budget authority, then push the enriched contacts into a Clodo outbound mailbox with open and reply tracking.
Outcome: A targeted sequence sent to decision-makers who are actually in-market, with open and reply rates tracked in the same tool.
You need domain experts to produce and verify reinforcement learning data. You search for practitioners by research area, review their evidence in the Understand stage, and wire the same queries into your own pipeline via the Clodo API's /v1/search endpoint.
Outcome: A repeatable, agent-driven expert-sourcing workflow rather than manual one-off outreach.
Use Cases
- Find senior bench scientists with wet lab experience and ML exposure for part-time contracting.
- Identify compliance leaders at Series A–C fintechs nearing SEC requirements who are actively hiring.
- Source plant managers and procurement leads for manufacturing outreach.
- Discover domain experts for reinforcement learning data verification.
- Enrich CSV lists with email, phone, and address data for outbound campaigns.
- Monitor signals like active tool evaluation and budget authority to time outreach.
- Find founders raising now for VC deal sourcing.
- Source sector veterans for expert network calls.
Limitations
- Clodo's precision depends on how well you write the brief: vague input returns vague lists, so the tool rewards sourcing teams willing to spell out person-level criteria.
- Clodo is a find-the-person engine that happens to enrich — it's less of an enrichment canvas than Clay, so teams wanting a general enrichment-and-orchestration workspace may need a second tool.
- Team collaboration, custom data sources, and API access are positioned at the Enterprise tier.
- The exact published rate limits and usage caps aren't spelled out on the marketing pages; the developer docs cover error handling and rate limits for API consumers.
as of 2026-09-22
Verification history
We have re-verified CLODO 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published CLODO tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Individual
$125/mo
Ideal for
Solo recruiters, sourcing specialists, and GTM operators who need precise persona search plus enrichment and outbound in one tool.
What this tier adds
Starting tier: natural-language persona search, fit scoring, signal monitoring, email/phone/address enrichment, bulk CSV/XLSX, and outbound mailboxes with tracking.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Teams running shared sourcing pipelines across recruiting, GTM, or RL data work that need integrations and API access.
What this tier adds
Adds team collaboration on shared pipelines, custom data sources beyond defaults, CRM/ATS/database integrations, and Clodo API access for agent workflows.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where CLODO's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
At $125/mo for Individual, Clodo sits above entry-level sourcing tools and below enterprise data platforms like ZoomInfo, priced for teams that value precision over seat count. The pricing fits small-to-mid sourcing, recruiting, and GTM teams where a wrong list is expensive. Enterprise is custom-quoted for teams needing shared pipelines, custom data sources, CRM/ATS integrations, and API access. High-volume list builders will find cheaper bulk-enrichment alternatives.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of CLODO — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Individual users can write a first persona brief and see matches in a single session — the search and Understand stages return preliminary results immediately. Full value comes once you add enrichment and connect an outbound mailbox, typically within a day. Teams wiring the API get to a first successful /v1/search call in minutes using the docs' Get an API Key and Quickstart guides; production
Switching to or from CLODO
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From LinkedIn Sales Navigator: move person-level briefs that filters can't express into Clodo's natural-language search.
- →From Clay: use Clodo as a find-the-person engine, then enrich and sequence in one place instead of stitching tools.
- →From ZoomInfo: replace rigid filter building with plain-English persona briefs plus fit labels and signal cards.
- →From Apollo: route the niche personas Apollo handles poorly to Clodo's multi-source search (LinkedIn, GitHub, bioRxiv, PubMed).
- →From manual sourcing: import CSV/XLSX lists and bulk-enrich them with email, phone, and address data.
- ↗To Clay: if you mainly need a general enrichment-and-orchestration canvas rather than people discovery.
- ↗To Apollo or ZoomInfo: for simple, high-volume contact lookups where cheaper bulk enrichment wins.
- ↗To a dedicated sequencing tool: if you want deeper outbound orchestration than Clodo's mailboxes provide.
- ↗To an in-house stack: if you'd rather own search and enrichment entirely behind your own API.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “CLODO”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “CLODO” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about CLODO.
Official links
Tools that pair well with CLODO
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside CLODO, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Juicebox PeopleGPT
AI recruiting platform whose PeopleGPT natural-language search scans 800M+ profiles and whose agents source and email candidates for you.
Persana AI
Persana AI runs AI sales prospecting agents over 100+ data sources and 75+ live intent signals, with enrichment and outreach in one subscription.
Clay
Clay is a go-to-market data and AI research platform for teams that want to build their own enrichment, signal, and outbound workflows instead of renting a
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Clodo vs Geologicai
GeologicAI and CLODO serve entirely different domains. GeologicAI is purpose-built for mining companies needing rapid, sensor-rich core analysis to accelerate project timelines by over 400%, while CLODO helps talent and sales teams discover and reach specific experts using natural language. Choose GeologicAI if you're in critical minerals exploration; choose CLODO if you need to find and contact niche professionals at scale.
Clodo vs Screenplayiq
If you're a screenwriter or producer seeking data-driven script feedback and box office potential, ScreenplayIQ is the only choice. For recruiters or GTM teams needing to find niche experts, Clodo is unmatched. These tools serve completely different needs—choose based on your role.
Clodo vs Bitsgap
These tools serve completely different needs. If you want to automate crypto trading across multiple exchanges with ready-made bots and a demo mode, Bitsgap is the obvious choice. If you're a recruiter or prospector needing to find niche professionals via natural language queries and access over a billion profiles, CLODO is unmatched. No overlap in use cases.
Alternatives to CLODO
View all
Juicebox PeopleGPT
AI recruiting platform whose PeopleGPT natural-language search scans 800M+ profiles and whose agents source and email candidates for you.
Persana AI
Persana AI runs AI sales prospecting agents over 100+ data sources and 75+ live intent signals, with enrichment and outreach in one subscription.
Frequently Asked Questions
Used CLODO? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.