ComplyDo
AI compliance platform that maps regulations, standards and policies to your controls and evidence in one graph.
ComplyDo earns a look if you are drowning in NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, or ISO mapping across more than one entity. The coverage-scoring view — 87% covered at 150 of 172 requirements, sliced by article number — and the questionnaire filling module are the parts that save real hours, and sovereign cloud hosting in your region by default is a genuine plus for European buyers. Product Compliance adds pre-market blocker detection via clarification mode. Compare against GRC suites that bundle integrations you already own; ComplyDo's scrape lists none yet. Small teams chasing a single SOC 2 need less platform.
Verified 5d ago · liveness 54/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/complydo
- Enterprise compliance teams mapping NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, or ISO
- Security managers who need audit evidence collected and assigned fast
- Multi-entity groups assigning obligations across legal entities
- Teams answering vendor and security questionnaires at volume
- Small teams with one simple framework and no dedicated compliance owner
- Organizations without internal policies, controls, or evidence to map
- Teams that need a pre-built library of tool integrations on day one
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip ComplyDo if you have a single framework to satisfy, no written policies or evidence to map, and no dedicated compliance owner — the platform's value depends on documents and multi-framework obligations to work against.
Getting value requires upfront work loading policies, controls, and evidence documents, which is internal effort that shows up before any coverage score does.
ComplyDo is enterprise-shaped software sold through a demo conversation, so budget for a platform licence rather than a per-seat SaaS fee. It competes with large GRC suites that typically bundle a wide connector catalog; the trade-off is that ComplyDo's sovereign-region hosting and multi-entity requirement graph are aimed squarely at European groups addressing NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, and CRA at once. Small teams with one framework should price lighter compliance tools first.
In short
ComplyDo — AI compliance platform that maps regulations, standards and policies to your controls and evidence in one graph. Best for Enterprise compliance teams mapping NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, or ISO, Security managers who need audit evidence collected and assigned fast, Multi-entity groups assigning obligations across legal entities. Contact Sales pricing.
What people actually say about ComplyDo — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
3 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Automates requirement extraction from regulations like NIS2 and DORA.
- +Maps requirements to internal controls and policies automatically.
- +Real-time coverage visibility with percentage and gap identification.
- +Automated questionnaire filling saves hours for vendor assessments.
- +Horizon scanning monitors regulatory changes continuously.
- −No independent user reviews or long-term reliability data available.
- −Pricing is contact-only, creating uncertainty for budget planning.
- −Limited regulatory coverage may not suit niche local requirements.
- −Potential vendor lock-in due to centralized compliance graph.
- −Ease of use unverified; onboarding could be complex for large teams.
- • Potential per-entity or per-regulation licensing fees
- • Implementation services may be extra
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is ComplyDo? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI requirement mapping against NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, and 50+ other regulations
- Automatic coverage scoring per article and per requirement
- Gap identification with recommended next steps and potential evidence
- Evidence collection, categorization, and assignment to requirements
- Automated vendor and security questionnaire filling from existing documents
- Horizon scanning that flags regulatory changes against your profile
- Product compliance scans mapping product specs to market regulations
- Clarification mode for requirements needing product or business input
- Multi-entity management with obligation assignment across the group
- Processes requirement files in any language
- Review and approve mappings with match scoring
- Upload internal policies, controls, evidence, and product documentation
- Sovereign cloud hosting in your region by default
- Web interface for creating and running targeted compliance analyses
- Savings calculator estimating consulting fees avoided from headcount
About ComplyDo
ComplyDo is an AI compliance automation platform that turns regulations, standards, internal policies, and evidence into a single compliance graph, so AI agents can keep you audit ready, customer ready, and market ready. It is built for compliance and security teams at large enterprises running requirement mapping against frameworks such as NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, and ISO. The vendor page shows six modules covering the whole loop: Requirement Mapping, Evidence Collection, Questionnaire Filling, Horizon Scanning, Product Compliance, and Multi-Entity management. Requirement Mapping reads requirement files in any language and scores coverage; the NIS2 sample reports 87% covered at 150 of 172 requirements, broken down by article number (Article 21 at 38/38 for 100%, Article 22 at 15/20 for 75%, Article 23 at 7/15 for 47%). Evidence Collection gathers and categorizes documents and assigns them to requirements. Questionnaire Filling drafts answers for vendor and security questionnaires from material you already have. Horizon Scanning watches the regulatory landscape and flags changes against your profile. Product Compliance maps technical specifications against regulations, traces features to requirements, and resolves ambiguities in a workflow that includes clarification mode. Multi-Entity maps obligations across the legal entities in a group. ComplyDo reports eliminating 50-60% of manual compliance work on average and processing more than 50,000 pages automatically, is backed by Y Combinator and Telekom hubraum, and runs on a sovereign cloud in your region by default. It suits organizations that already have controls and evidence in place. Smaller teams with a single framework to satisfy will usually be better served by a lighter tool.
Behind the Verdict
ComplyDo is best understood as a requirement-mapping engine, not a general-purpose GRC suite. The unit of work is a requirement file — a regulation, a standard, a contract, a customer demand — which the platform maps against your internal policies, controls, evidence, and product documentation, scoring coverage and separating what is mapped from what is a gap. That is why the NIS2 sample matters: it reports 87% covered, 150 of 172 requirements, with a per-article breakdown (Article 21 at 38/38, Article 22 at 15/20, Article 23 at 7/15). A coverage number you can drill into is far more useful than a dashboard that only says you are compliant. The second real strength is the agentic loop around that graph. Evidence Collection gathers and categorizes documents and assigns them to requirements. Questionnaire Filling drafts vendor and security questionnaire answers from policies, controls, and evidence you already hold. Horizon Scanning watches the regulatory landscape and flags changes against your profile. Product Compliance runs the same logic forward — extracting obligations from technical specifications, tracing features to specific requirements, and using clarification mode to surface requirements that need product or business input before you finalize applicability. Multi-Entity extends the graph across a group so obligations can be assigned per legal entity. The honest constraints. First, ComplyDo needs your documents. If you have not written policies, controls, and evidence down, there is nothing to map; this is a structuring and gap-closing engine, not a documentation authoring service. Second, custom frameworks outside the supported set (the vendor cites 50+ regulations including NIS2, DORA, and eIDAS) may need manual upload. Third, this is platform-scale software: the effort of loading entities, policies, and evidence is real, and a five-person startup chasing one SOC 2 will feel that overhead without the offsetting multi-framework or multi-entity benefit. Where it fits well: a European enterprise or group with NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, and CRA exposure, an existing security documentation baseline, and more than one legal entity to manage. Where it fits poorly: a small team with a single framework and no dedicated compliance owner. ComplyDo is backed by Y Combinator and Telekom hubraum and is operated by Complydo Solutions GmbH in Berlin, which matters if you want a European vendor, sovereign-region hosting by default, and a Trust Center rather than an offshore data path.
Researching ComplyDo? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas ComplyDo actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Uploads the NIS2 directive and the group's internal information security policies, controls, and evidence, then runs a requirement-mapping analysis per legal entity.
Outcome: Gets a coverage score per article (the vendor's NIS2 sample shows 87% covered, 150 of 172 requirements), reviews and approves mappings, and turns open requirements into assigned actions across entities.
Points Evidence Collection at existing audit documents so they are categorized and assigned to the DORA requirements they satisfy.
Outcome: Evidence is attached to requirements instead of tracked in spreadsheets, and gap items become a prioritized list before the auditor asks.
Runs a Product Compliance scan that maps the product's technical specification against the relevant regulations and uses clarification mode where product input is needed.
Outcome: Triggered requirements are traced back to the product attributes that caused them, so go-to-market blockers surface before launch rather than after.
Use Cases
- Map NIS2 requirements to your existing information security policies and controls
- Automatically collect and categorize audit evidence for DORA compliance
- Fill vendor security questionnaires by pulling answers from internal documentation
- Monitor regulatory changes and receive alerts relevant to your compliance profile
- Identify go-to-market blockers by comparing product specs against market regulations
- Manage compliance obligations across multiple legal entities in one platform
- Trace product features to specific requirements and resolve applicability ambiguities
Limitations
- ComplyDo requires you to upload your internal policies, controls, and evidence documents before it can analyze anything, so it is not a substitute for having a baseline of security documentation.
- The platform covers 50+ regulations including NIS2, DORA, and eIDAS, but custom frameworks may need manual upload.
- The vendor's site shows an Integrations section but does not yet name specific connectors, so heavy workflow automation into other tools is not something the public content documents.
- Scope is enterprise-shaped: loading entities, policies, and evidence takes real effort that a single-framework small team will feel without the offsetting multi-entity benefit.
as of 2026-10-03
Verification history
We have re-verified ComplyDo 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where ComplyDo's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
ComplyDo is enterprise-shaped software sold through a demo conversation, so budget for a platform licence rather than a per-seat SaaS fee. It competes with large GRC suites that typically bundle a wide connector catalog; the trade-off is that ComplyDo's sovereign-region hosting and multi-entity requirement graph are aimed squarely at European groups addressing NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, and CRA at once. Small teams with one framework should price lighter compliance tools first.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of ComplyDo — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For an enterprise with existing policies and evidence: expect days, not minutes — you load internal policies, controls, evidence, and product documentation, then configure and run the first analysis. For a multi-entity group, add time per legal entity to map obligations. Teams without written controls should treat documentation work as a prerequisite, not part of setup.
Switching to or from ComplyDo
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From spreadsheets: upload policies, controls, and evidence, then run Requirement Mapping to replace manual article-by-article tracking.
- →From a generic GRC suite: re-map your existing control set against NIS2, DORA, eIDAS, C5, CRA, or ISO using the same documents and compare coverage scores.
- →From consultant-led gap analyses: import the requirement files the consultants worked from and let ComplyDo score coverage and generate next steps.
- →From a single-framework tool: add the additional frameworks your group faces and manage them in one multi-entity graph.
- ↗To a lighter compliance tool: export your mapped requirement and evidence sets before switching to a single-framework product.
- ↗To a full GRC suite: bring your coverage-scored requirement map across as the baseline control set.
- ↗To an internal build: retain the requirement-to-evidence mappings as the specification for your own tracking system.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “ComplyDo”, and we withheld 5: 5 could not be judged, because “ComplyDo” is a single word that other videos use for other things. Showing the 1 we can prove is about ComplyDo.
Official links
Tools that pair well with ComplyDo
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside ComplyDo, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Vanta
Compliance automation that pulls audit evidence continuously from 400+ connected tools across 35+ frameworks.
Cleo Labs
Automated product compliance for global brands: maps each SKU to the rules of every market it sells into, reviewed by an expert.
Readily
AI compliance platform for healthcare that links regulatory change to the policies and documents it touches.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Complydo vs Sublime Security
ComplyDo and Sublime Security address completely different domains: compliance automation vs email security. Your choice depends on your pain point. If you're an enterprise struggling to map regulations like NIS2 to internal controls and prepare audit evidence, ComplyDo is purpose-built. If you're a security team drowning in BEC and phishing threats and frustrated by false positives from legacy gateways, Sublime Security offers AI-driven detection with custom rules. There is no overlap in functionality.
Complydo vs Push Security
Choose Push Security if your immediate pain point is browser-based attacks, AI tool misuse, and unmanaged identities — it delivers real-time detection and enforcement across all browsers today. Choose ComplyDo if your organization is drowning in regulatory requirements (NIS2, DORA) and needs automated compliance mapping, though it requires existing internal policies and paid contact pricing. They address entirely different problems: attack prevention vs. compliance automation.
Complydo vs Audioeye
ComplyDo and AudioEye serve entirely different compliance domains—one manages regulatory frameworks like NIS2/DORA, the other focuses on web accessibility (ADA/WCAG). Choose ComplyDo if you're an enterprise needing automated regulatory mapping and audit evidence; pick AudioEye if your priority is digital accessibility compliance with overlay and remediation support.
Alternatives to ComplyDo
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Used ComplyDo? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.