Conveyor
AI security questionnaire automation that answers with citations, fills Trust Center requests, and drafts RFP responses.
Buy Conveyor for questionnaire throughput where accuracy is auditable, not for compliance posture. The cited-answer engine is the reason to pick it: when a prospect can inspect provenance, the citation matters more than the raw speed. Named outcomes back it up — Sumo Logic automated 100% of customer security requests, Lucid Software cut questionnaire time 91%. Be aware the free tier is a Trust Center and nothing more, and Enterprise pricing is a conversation.
Verified 15h ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/conveyor
- Security, GRC, and compliance teams at B2B software companies fielding high volumes of customer security reviews
- Presales and sales engineering teams who need questionnaire answers turned around in days, not weeks
- Organizations that want a Trust Center prospects can self-serve instead of emailing document requests
- Teams that need AI answers with citations they can verify before sending to a prospect
- Companies that need compliance evidence collection and control monitoring (Vanta or Drata is the fit)
- Organizations requiring on-premise, air-gapped, or self-hosted deployment
- Teams with no maintained knowledge base willing to invest weeks ingesting and cleaning content
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Conveyor if you need compliance evidence collection and control monitoring rather than a trust conversation — Vanta or Drata covers that ground — or if you require on-premise or air-gapped deployment.
Business includes 100 Trust Center, 20 questionnaire, and 10 RFP credits per year — a heavy RFP quarter can exhaust the 10 RFP projects long before the year is out.
Conveyor's Business tier starts at $9,600/year billed annually with unlimited seats, which undercuts per-seat competitors once your review team grows past a handful of people, since Loopio and Responsive typically charge per user. It sits below enterprise trust platforms on price but above a generic questionnaire tool: you are paying for cited, security-specific answers plus a Trust Center. Solo teams under 10 credits/month can stay free, but that tier won't run automation.
In short
Conveyor — AI security questionnaire automation that answers with citations, fills Trust Center requests, and drafts RFP responses. Best for Security, GRC, and compliance teams at B2B software companies fielding high volumes of customer security reviews, Presales and sales engineering teams who need questionnaire answers turned around in days, not weeks, Organizations that want a Trust Center prospects can self-serve instead of emailing document requests. Free to use.
No head-to-head comparison for Conveyor yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.
What's new in Conveyor
Checked 8 days agoAcross the latest 10 updates: 3 feature updates, 1 launch, 1 changelog entry, 4 community discussions and 1 news mention.
Ask ConveyorAI in Cmd+K now shows its work and reasoning, step by step
Agentic Cmd+K search now displays live steps, matched sources, and answer reasoning, with a 'How this answer was put together' audit view.
5 Best Loopio Alternatives for Answering RFPs and Security Questionnaires in 2026
Conveyor publishes a comparison of Loopio alternatives for RFP and security questionnaire response in 2026.
How to choose a tool that can answer both RFPs and security questionnaires
Conveyor guide on evaluating tools that handle both RFP responses and security questionnaires.
How to Build a Customer Trust program for Fintech and What FinServ buyers ask in 2026
Conveyor outlines building a customer trust program for fintech and the security questions FinServ buyers ask in 2026.
Refreshed Launchpad: Jump back into your work in one click
Launchpad redesign adds shortcuts to recent questionnaires and projects, plus more prominent Add Questionnaire and Add RFP buttons.
Work on Non-English Word Questionnaires in English
Import a non-English Word questionnaire and work on it entirely in English inside Conveyor.
Why We Rebuilt an Answer Engine That Was Already 95% Accurate
Conveyor explains the rebuild of its answer engine despite existing 95% accuracy.
August 2026 Product Updates
Conveyor recaps its August 2026 product updates.
Introducing the New Conveyor AI RFP Software: Intelligence, Not Just Speed
Conveyor launches a new AI RFP software product positioned around answer intelligence rather than raw speed.
FedRAMP Now Requires a Trust Center and It Has to Be Machine-Readable
Conveyor notes FedRAMP now requires a machine-readable Trust Center, a change affecting compliance workflows.
What people actually say about Conveyor — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Conveyor on Aug 18, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Conveyor? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI security questionnaire automation that fills out responses and cites its sources
- 95% first-pass answer accuracy per Conveyor's measured RAG engine
- Work on non-English Word questionnaires in English, then export in the original language
- Agentic Trust Center for customer self-service document access and NDA-gated Q&A
- Trust Center AI Connector (MCP server) so a prospect's own AI assistant can run a vendor review
- Ask ConveyorAI in Cmd+K shows live steps, matched sources, and a 'How this answer was put together' audit view
- Agentic document auto-mapping across any format or template
- AI RFP software that drafts from briefs, deal docs, and win themes instead of keyword matching
- Go/no-go and red flag identification on RFP opportunities
- In-document Word editing with AI-drafted answers
- AI Librarian and Knowledge Explorer for centralized knowledge management
- AI knowledge management that monitors accuracy and flags stale answers
- Browser extension for portal-based and one-off questionnaire search
- Rules-based SME auto-assignment with AI suggestions and notifications
- Clickwrap NDA with auto-watermarking of downloaded documents
About Conveyor
Conveyor is an AI-native customer trust platform for the questions buyers ask before they sign: security questionnaires, Trust Center document requests, and RFPs. The engine behind it is a RAG answer pipeline the vendor measures at 95% first-pass accuracy, and every answer ships with citations so a reviewer can verify the claim instead of rewriting it. Zapier's GRC lead put it plainly in a case study: the comfort is that the AI won't hand back answers that don't make sense. The platform runs three connected workflows. Security questionnaire automation ingests a questionnaire in any format and fills it out, including non-English Word files you can now work on in English and export back in the original language. The Agentic Trust Center lets prospects self-serve NDA-gated documents and answers, and its AI Connector is an MCP server that lets a prospect's own AI assistant pull documents and run a vendor review programmatically — a direction Conveyor tied to FedRAMP's shift toward machine-readable Trust Centers. AI RFP software drafts from the brief, deal documents, and win themes rather than keyword matching, with go/no-go and red-flag triage on top. Pricing is metered on usage: no per-user fees and no charges for integrations. The Free tier is a real Trust Center capped at 10 credits per month and up to 15 documents, but it excludes questionnaire automation and integrations entirely. Enterprise is custom and unlocks the full platform, unlimited seats, RBAC, SSO with SCIM, custom domain hosting, and a public API. It is built for security, GRC, and presales teams at B2B software companies drowning in customer reviews. If what you actually need is control monitoring and evidence collection, Vanta or Drata is the fit. Conveyor assumes you have answers worth citing.
Behind the Verdict
We'd reach for Conveyor when a security or presales team is fielding a steady queue of customer questionnaires and RFPs and the bottleneck is drafting, not deciding. The workflow it replaces is a spreadsheet and a shared drive, and the metric to hold it to is first-pass accuracy plus reviewer time — Lucid's case study claims 4 minutes per question dropping to 22 seconds after automation, Temporal reports $100K+ in annual savings. Those are vendor-published case studies, so read them as directional. Where it bites: the Free tier is a Trust Center with 10 credits a month, up to 15 documents, and no questionnaire automation or integrations. That's a trial, not a plan for a security team with real volume. Enterprise is custom, so budget conversations happen before you see a number, and credits are metered — expect to model your actual questionnaire and RFP volume before signing. The closest alternative depends on what you're replacing. If your pain is RFP response across every proposal type, Loopio and Responsive cover broader bid management; Conveyor's own 2026 comparison positions itself specifically for teams answering both RFPs and security questionnaires in one place. If your pain is evidence collection and control monitoring, this is the wrong category — Vanta or Drata. A real caveat: Conveyor is only as good as your knowledge base. The AI Librarian and AI knowledge management features flag stale answers, but somebody has to maintain the source content. Teams unwilling to spend the first weeks cleaning and ingesting content will get cited answers that are confidently outdated, which is worse than no automation at all. Recent product movement is worth noting if you're evaluating now. The answer engine was rebuilt in September 2026 despite already hitting 95%, AI
Researching Conveyor? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Conveyor actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
A prospect sends a 300-question vendor security questionnaire in Excel two days before contract signature. You import it, let Conveyor's RAG engine draft answers with citations from your knowledge base, route the flagged gaps to the right SME, and review in-app.
Outcome: Draft answers arrive with citations you can verify instead of rewrite, cutting days of manual work down to a review pass.
A customer portal requires answers entered directly, not uploaded. You switch on the Conveyor browser extension, search approved answers while in the portal, and paste the cited response.
Outcome: Portal-only questionnaires stop being a copy-paste job, and reviewers can still trace each answer back to its source.
A prospect's AI assistant queries your Trust Center through the MCP-based AI Connector to run its own vendor review, and a second prospect submits an access request through the form that now lists your product lines.
Outcome: The buyer self-serves documents and answers without emailing your team, and approvers see which product line each visitor wants before granting access.
Use Cases
- Automatically respond to customer security questionnaires in any format, including portal-based ones.
- Import a German or other non-English Word questionnaire, answer it in English, and export in the original language.
- Set up a branded Trust Center with NDA-gated document access and AI chat for prospect self-service.
- Let Trust Center visitors select product lines on the access request form so approvers know which access group fits.
- Use the AI Agent to triage RFP responses, flag red flags, and collaborate with SMEs.
- Integrate with Salesforce to automate trust center access approvals based on CRM data.
- Monitor and export analytics on trust center interactions and questionnaire turnaround times.
- Let customers' AI agents run their own vendor review via the Trust Center AI Connector (MCP server), meeting FedRAMP 20x programmatic access.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-15
Limitations
- Pricing is usage-based rather than per-seat, so cost scales with AI work performed.
- The free plan is limited to 10 credits/month for the Trust Center and excludes questionnaire automation and integrations, making it unsuitable for running an actual review program.
- Enterprise plan pricing is custom and requires talking to sales, with specifics not published on the page.
as of 2026-09-30
Verification history
We have re-verified Conveyor 21 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 21 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Conveyor tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0
Ideal for
A team that only needs a simple public Trust Center to show security posture and share documents, with no questionnaire automation.
What this tier adds
Starting tier — 10 Trust Center credits/month, no questionnaire automation and no integrations.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
A company automating customer trust across multiple product lines and workflows, with procurement and security review requirements.
What this tier adds
Adds RBAC roles and permissions, SSO with SCIM, custom domain hosting for the Trust Center, public API, and a dedicated customer success manager.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Conveyor's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Conveyor's Business tier starts at $9,600/year billed annually with unlimited seats, which undercuts per-seat competitors once your review team grows past a handful of people, since Loopio and Responsive typically charge per user. It sits below enterprise trust platforms on price but above a generic questionnaire tool: you are paying for cited, security-specific answers plus a Trust Center. Solo teams under 10 credits/month can stay free, but that tier won't run automation.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Conveyor — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Trust Center only: under an hour — the free tier gives you 10 credits/month to publish documents and a branded page. Full platform on Business: roughly one to three weeks, dominated by ingesting and cleaning your knowledge base (SharePoint sync, Q&A imports) before questionnaire automation produces answers you'd send. Enterprise adds SSO with SCIM, RBAC, and custom domain setup once procurement
Switching to or from Conveyor
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Loopio or Responsive: import your existing answer library into Conveyor's knowledge base, then let AI Librarian flag stale or contradictory entries before you turn on automation.
- →From spreadsheet-based questionnaire tracking: upload past completed questionnaires as source answers so the RAG engine has real precedent to cite.
- →From manual Trust Center document emails: stand up the Trust Center with NDA-gated access and clickwrap so prospects self-serve instead of requesting files.
- →From Vanta or Drata: keep those for evidence collection and control monitoring; move only the trust conversation and questionnaire layer to Conveyor.
- ↗To Loopio or Responsive: export your answer library for broader proposal coverage across marketing, legal, and sales bid types Conveyor doesn't target.
- ↗To Vanta or Drata: move compliance evidence collection and control monitoring there, keeping Conveyor or a questionnaire tool for the prospect-facing trust layer.
- ↗To in-house tooling: export answers, documents, and Trust Center data via the Enterprise public API before sunsetting the subscription.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Conveyor”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Conveyor” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Conveyor.
Tools that pair well with Conveyor
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Conveyor, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Vendict
Vendict automates third-party risk management and security questionnaire responses with AI agents plus GRC experts.
Securiti
Securiti unifies DSPM, privacy automation, and AI security for enterprises on its DataAI Command Platform.
Thoropass
Thoropass pairs AI-powered compliance automation with in-house auditors for SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA and HITRUST audits
Alternatives to Conveyor
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Best-of guides
Used Conveyor? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.