Conveyor

Conveyor

Automate security reviews & questionnaires with AI-native trust platform.

87/100Safe BetFree · from $9,600/year startingFreemium

Conveyor is our top pick for B2B teams drowning in security questionnaires and trust center requests. It delivers cited, accurate AI answers and genuinely automates the workflow—not just a chatbot bolted onto a file drawer. But the free tier is a teaser, not a real solution, and it won't replace Vanta for evidence collection itself.

Verified 4d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/conveyor

Best for
  • Security and compliance teams at B2B companies handling high volumes of customer security reviews
  • Sales and presales teams needing to unblock deals with fast, accurate security questionnaire responses
  • Organizations scaling trust center self-service to reduce manual security requests
  • Enterprises aiming to automate RFP and security questionnaire workflows with high accuracy
Not ideal for
  • Small teams needing a free or low-cost solution (free tier is very limited)
  • Companies requiring deep compliance evidence collection (use Vanta instead)
  • Organizations needing on-premise or air-gapped deployment
Visit Website

IntermediateFree tier: under an hour to set up a basic Trust Center with up to 15 documents. Business: 1–2 weeks to ingest knowledge base, set up integrations (Salesforce, Slack, Jira), and configure automation rules. Enterprise: 2–4 weeks for SSO, RBAC, custom setup, and multi-product support, with a dedicated CSM and quick-start onboarding.Web · API · PluginAPI available6.7k viewsVerified 4d ago
Pricing
Free · from $9,600/year starting
FreemiumFree tier3 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Free tier: under an hour to set up a basic Trust Center with up to 15 documents. Business: 1–2 weeks to ingest knowledge base, set up integrations (Salesforce, Slack, Jira), and configure automation rules. Enterprise: 2–4 weeks for SSO, RBAC, custom setup, and multi-product support, with a dedicated CSM and quick-start onboarding.
Runs on
WebAPIPlugin
API available · 13 integrations
Who it's for
Security engineer at a mid-size B2B SaaSSales presales lead at an enterprise vendor
Live sentiment
Is Conveyor actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Conveyor if you need deep compliance evidence collection (use Vanta), require on-premise or air-gapped deployment, or want a genuinely free solution for more than a basic trust center.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Usage-based pricing can scale with AI usage; going beyond 100 Trust Center Credits or 20 Questionnaire Credits on the Business plan adds costs, so monitor your volume.

Price reality

Conveyor's usage-based pricing (no per-user fees) fits growing B2B teams that want to scale trust center self-service without headcount. At $9,600/year starting for Business, it's more affordable than enterprise compliance suites like Vanta, but pricier than lightweight RFP tools like Loopio at lower volumes. Volume discounts on Enterprise make it cost-effective for high questionnaire volumes, and the free tier is a low-risk entry.

In short

Conveyor — Automate security reviews & questionnaires with AI-native trust platform. Best for Security and compliance teams at B2B companies handling high volumes of customer security reviews, Sales and presales teams needing to unblock deals with fast, accurate security questionnaire responses, Organizations scaling trust center self-service to reduce manual security requests. Free to start; paid plans from $9600/mo.

What's new in Conveyor

Checked 4 days ago

Across the latest 5 updates: 3 feature updates and 2 launches.

What people actually say about Conveyor — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

67 mentions across 5 sources (Hacker News, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy) · researched Aug 18, 2026.

50% positive50% critical
Recurring strengths
  • +Feature-rich platform: auto questionnaire answers, trust center, RAG engine.
  • +Supports multi-source intake: Salesforce, Jira, Slack, Zendesk, HubSpot.
  • +Browser extension automates portal-based questionnaires.
  • +AI Connector integrates with Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini via MCP.
  • +Smart Documents auto-generate bridge letters on demand.
Recurring frustrations
  • No real community reviews or user feedback anywhere.
  • Name collision causes confusion with unrelated products.
  • 96% accuracy claim is unverified in public discussions.
  • High annual cost for a tool without proven track record.
  • Limited learning-resources or community tutorials found.
Patterns worth knowing
Name collision causes confusion — posts about conveyor belts, games, and packaging tools dominate the data.
Seen on Hacker News, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
No real user discussion of Conveyor's actual trust platform appears anywhere.
Seen on Hacker News, Product Hunt, App Store, Stack Overflow, Lemmy
If it's about software distribution (a different Conveyor), users appreciate it for being a tool, not a service.
Seen on Hacker News
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • Potential costs for exceeding usage limits
  • No clear per-user fee, but AI usage might be metered
  • Possible add-on fees for Enterprise-level integrations

Viability Score

87/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Conveyor? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
50
What the vendor publishes
80

Last calculated: September 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • AI questionnaire automation with cited answers at 96% accuracy
  • Agentic trust center for customer self-service
  • AI-powered knowledge management that monitors data accuracy
  • Browser extension for portal-based questionnaires
  • AI Connector (MCP server) for ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and assistants
  • Smart Documents for auto-generating bridge letters on demand
  • RFP automation with go/no-go and red flag identification
  • Clickwrap NDA with auto-watermarking of downloaded documents
  • Auto-assign questions to the right SME group
  • Sync SharePoint docs into knowledge base
  • Portals auto-export answers when auto-complete rules are met
  • Download signed NDAs through the API
  • Search knowledge library via API
  • List trust center subscribers via API
  • Trust Center feedback data in API and MCP

About Conveyor

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API · Plugin

Conveyor is an AI-native customer trust platform that automates the entire security review workflow, from questionnaire responses to an agentic trust center. Built for security, compliance, and presales teams at B2B companies drowning in SOC 2 requests and security questionnaires, Conveyor uses a proprietary RAG engine to deliver cited answers with 96% accuracy, so you can trust and verify AI output. The platform includes an agentic trust center for customer self-service, AI-powered knowledge management that monitors data accuracy, a browser extension for portal-based questionnaires, and deep integrations with Salesforce, Jira, Slack, and more. Recent additions include the Trust Center AI Connector, an MCP server that lets your customers' AI agents run their own vendor review—meeting FedRAMP 20x programmatic access requirements—plus Smart Documents and a rebuilt Word experience with editable question outlines and instant export. Conveyor also covers RFP automation, clickwrap NDAs, and analytics on revenue impact. Pricing is usage-based with no per-user fees: a free tier for a simple trust center, Business at $9,600/year, and Enterprise with custom volume discounts. Conveyor positions itself as an alternative to generic RFP tools like Loopio or Responsive and compliance platforms like Vanta, focusing specifically on the trust workflow rather than evidence collection.

Behind the Verdict

Conveyor shines where security questionnaires and trust center requests pile up. Its RAG engine returns cited answers with a claimed 96% accuracy, and the agentic trust center lets prospects self-serve documents and AI answers, cutting your team's manual work. The platform automates the whole review loop: it ingests questionnaires in any format (including portal-based ones via browser extension), drafts answers with citations, routes flagged questions to the right SMEs, and tracks analytics on turnaround and revenue impact. Recent 2026 additions make it even more agent-forward: the Trust Center AI Connector (an MCP server) lets your customers' AI agents query your trust center directly, which also positions you for FedRAMP 20x programmatic access requirements landing January 1, 2027. A rebuilt Word experience (in Labs) offers editable question outlines and instant export. Where it falls short: the free tier is a teaser—10 credits a month, no questionnaire automation, no integrations. The Business plan starts at $9,600/year, which is a real line item for smaller teams. It's cloud-hosted only, so air-gapped environments are out. And it's not a compliance evidence platform: if you need to collect and manage evidence for SOC 2 or ISO 27001, pair it with something like Vanta rather than expecting Conveyor to do that job. For teams whose bottleneck is answering security reviews, Conveyor is a strong fit; for those needing broad compliance automation, it's a piece of the puzzle.

Researching Conveyor? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Conveyor actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Security engineer at a mid-size B2B SaaS

Receives a SOC 2 questionnaire from a prospect's procurement portal.

Outcome: Uses the browser extension to pull questions into Conveyor, which auto-fills answers with citations from the knowledge base, flags any gaps, and routes them to the right SME — cutting turnaround from days to hours.

Sales presales lead at an enterprise vendor

Prospect asks for access to security docs but wants to use their AI agent for review.

Outcome: Enables the Trust Center AI Connector (MCP server), so the prospect's AI agent authenticates via email, pulls documents, and gets answers — all while NDA and access rules are enforced, saving your team manual back-and-forth.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

ClaudeChatGPTGemini

as of 2026-08-30

Limitations

  • Pricing is usage-based and can scale with AI usage, though volume discounts are available.
  • The free tier provides only 10 credits per month and is limited to Trust Center functionality without questionnaire automation or integrations.
  • The Business plan starts at $9,600 per year, which may be significant for smaller teams.
  • The platform is cloud-hosted only, which may not suit air-gapped environments.

as of 2026-08-29

Verification history

We have re-verified Conveyor 18 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 18 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Conveyor tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Free

$0

Ideal for

Teams that just need a simple, Conveyor-branded Trust Center to share security documents and start building trust with prospects.

What this tier adds

Entry point with 10 Trust Center Credits/month, up to 15 documents, 15 Q&As, and hosted-by-Conveyor — no questionnaire automation or integrations.

Business

$9,600/year starting

Ideal for

Growing B2B teams handling multiple security questionnaires per month who need automation, integrations, and unlimited seats.

What this tier adds

Adds full platform: 100 Trust Center Credits, 20 Questionnaire Credits, 10 RFP Projects, integrations (Salesforce, Slack, Jira), AI knowledge management, and custom URL.

Enterprise

Custom

Ideal for

Large enterprises automating customer trust across multiple workflows with high volume and enterprise security needs.

What this tier adds

Unlimited users and credits (volume-discounted), SSO with SCIM, public API, RBAC, dedicated CSM, and custom domain hosting.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Usage-based pricing can scale with AI usage; going beyond 100 Trust Center Credits or 20 Questionnaire Credits on the Business plan adds costs, so monitor your volume.
  • The free tier's 10 credits per month means you'll hit limits quickly if you have more than a handful of trust center visitors.
  • The Business plan's $9,600/year starting price excludes volume discounts that only come with Enterprise, so high-volume teams may pay more per credit.
  • SSO with SCIM provisioning, public API, and enterprise roles/permissions are locked to the Enterprise tier, so larger teams can't stay on Business if they need those.
  • Custom domain hosting for the Trust Center is only available on Enterprise, while the free tier is Conveyor-branded.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Conveyor's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Conveyor's usage-based pricing (no per-user fees) fits growing B2B teams that want to scale trust center self-service without headcount. At $9,600/year starting for Business, it's more affordable than enterprise compliance suites like Vanta, but pricier than lightweight RFP tools like Loopio at lower volumes. Volume discounts on Enterprise make it cost-effective for high questionnaire volumes, and the free tier is a low-risk entry.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Conveyor — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Free tier: under an hour to set up a basic Trust Center with up to 15 documents. Business: 1–2 weeks to ingest knowledge base, set up integrations (Salesforce, Slack, Jira), and configure automation rules. Enterprise: 2–4 weeks for SSO, RBAC, custom setup, and multi-product support, with a dedicated CSM and quick-start onboarding.

Switching to or from Conveyor

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • From spreadsheets/manual workflows: import your Q&A knowledge base as CSV or via API, and connect your document sources (SharePoint, Google Drive).
  • From a legacy trust center: upload existing documents and Q&As, and map your access groups and NDA gates in Conveyor.
  • From a generic RFP tool like Loopio or Responsive: migrate your Q&A library and templates, then set up Conveyor's specialized security review workflows.
Migrating out
  • To Vanta for compliance evidence: export your answered questionnaires and security documentation to support your audit evidence collection.
  • To another trust center: export documents and Q&As via the API, then re-create access groups in the new platform.

Integrations

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Tools that pair well with Conveyor

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Conveyor, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Alternatives to Conveyor

View all
Vendict

Vendict

AI-native TPRM platform that automates vendor risk assessments and security questionnaires end-to-end.

Contact SalesTry
Cyera

Cyera

AI-native data security platform uniting DSPM, DLP, and agent governance

Contact SalesTry
Lacework

Lacework

Automated cloud security with machine learning anomaly detection for multi-cloud and containerized environments.

PaidTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Conveyor? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.