Curiso
Curiso is an AI infinite canvas where you connect nodes and AI services to explore ideas spatially with your own API keys.
Curiso's draw is spatial AI reasoning with bring-your-own-model flexibility: node-based chat that shares context, RAG over your documents and websites, and your own keys across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI, OpenRouter, xAI, Groq and DeepSeek. If you already pay for several providers and think in maps rather than docs, the Bronze tier at $10/mo (or $100/yr) is cheap to test. The catches are real: subscriptions are paid in CUR on Solana, so your finance team needs a crypto workflow, and image, video and audio nodes sit on the $100/mo Gold tier. Compare against Miro, Obsidian, and a plain Claude or ChatGPT subscription before committing a team.
Verified 12d ago · liveness 48/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/curiso
- Solo researchers and visual thinkers who already hold API keys for several AI providers
- Writers and strategists mapping nonlinear structures
- Developers who want to inspect or self-host the open-source v1
- Small teams comfortable paying a subscription in crypto
- Teams that need dollar-denominated invoicing and standard procurement
- Teams wanting project management features such as tasks, dependencies, or Gantt charts
- Anyone who wants a native iOS or Android app rather than a mobile-compatible web app
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Curiso if your finance or procurement process can't pay a subscription in the CUR token on Solana, or if your workflow depends on tasks, dependencies, and Gantt-style project management rather than a spatial idea canvas.
Your AI provider bills are separate — Curiso uses your own API keys, so OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google charges land outside your Curiso subscription.
Bronze at $10/mo (or $100/yr in CUR) is priced like a single-seat research tool and undercuts a comparable Miro seat plus a separate AI subscription. Silver at $40/mo (or $400/yr) puts it near a small-team whiteboard plan. Gold at $100/mo (or $1000/yr) is where image, video, and audio nodes live, so multimodal users pay enterprise-whiteboard money — all denominated in CUR rather than dollars.
In short
Curiso — Curiso is an AI infinite canvas where you connect nodes and AI services to explore ideas spatially with your own API keys. Best for Solo researchers and visual thinkers who already hold API keys for several AI providers, Writers and strategists mapping nonlinear structures, Developers who want to inspect or self-host the open-source v1. Free to start; paid plans from $10/mo.
What people actually say about Curiso — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Curiso on Jul 3, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Curiso? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Infinite canvas for spatial thought mapping
- Node system that shares context between connected nodes and AI services
- Chat nodes for AI conversations on the board
- Notes nodes that capture ideas and share into chat nodes
- Text, note, and link nodes on the base canvas
- Image, video, and audio nodes on the Gold tier
- RAG support: add and configure documents and websites as AI context
- Deep research across complex topics
- Local AI embedding models plus OpenAI embedding models
- Bring your own API keys across OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI, OpenRouter, xAI, Groq, DeepSeek and others
- Local inference option alongside hosted providers
- Encrypted storage of API keys and sensitive data
- Share boards publicly or invite others to collaborate
- Customizable themes, models, and setup
- Mobile-compatible web app
About Curiso
Curiso is an infinite canvas web app for spatial thinking. Instead of a linear doc, you place text, note, link, and chat nodes on a boundless board and share context between connected nodes and AI services. Chat nodes run on your own API keys, and the site lists supported providers including OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI, OpenRouter, xAI, Groq, DeepSeek, W.ai, Inference.net, Fal, and Alibaba, plus local inference and local embedding models alongside OpenAI embeddings. RAG support lets you add and configure documents and websites so the AI reasons over your own material. Boards can be shared publicly or with others, and higher plans add image, video, and audio nodes. API keys and sensitive data sit in encrypted storage, and Curiso v1 is open source on GitHub under the MIT license while v2 is the subscription web app at app.curiso.ai. Subscriptions are paid in the CUR token on Solana, with 33% of subscription CUR burned from total supply, and a referral program pays 14 free days for monthly referrals or 90 days for yearly ones. Expect an early-stage product with a crypto billing rail.
Behind the Verdict
Curiso positions itself as an infinite canvas for your thoughts, and the mechanics match that pitch. You place nodes on an unlimited workspace, and the node system shares context between connected nodes and AI services — so a note node can feed a chat node, and a chat node can pull from RAG documents and websites you configure. That combination is the reason to look at it: most AI chat products give you a linear thread with no spatial memory, and most whiteboards give you a canvas with no model behind it. The bring-your-own-key model is the second differentiator. The site lists OpenAI, Anthropic, Google AI, OpenRouter, xAI, Groq, DeepSeek, W.ai, Inference.net, Fal and Alibaba as supported providers, plus local inference options and local embedding models alongside OpenAI embeddings. You pay those providers directly at their rates and Curiso charges for the canvas, which keeps model costs visible instead of bundled into a subscription markup. Encrypted storage holds your API keys and sensitive data. Where it gets complicated is billing. Subscriptions are paid in Curiso's own CUR token on Solana, with 33% of the CUR from subscription payments burned from total supply. The token carries an explicit disclaimer from the vendor that no guarantees are made about future utility or value. Whatever you think of that, it is a genuine operational hurdle: a team with a normal corporate card and dollar-denominated accounting cannot just expense this. The referral program (14 free days for monthly referrals, 90 for yearly) is generous but also runs through the same token-linked subscription. Tier structure: Bronze at $10/mo or $100/yr gives the infinite canvas, standard RAG, sharing, and early access to the web app. Silver at $40/mo or $400/yr adds data backup and recovery and early access features. Gold at $100/mo or $1000/yr is where image, video and audio nodes arrive — those modalities are genuinely gated behind the top tier, which is worth knowing before you plan a video-heavy workflow. Early-stage is the honest framing. Curiso v1 is open source under MIT on GitHub, so developers can inspect or self-host it; v2 is the premium subscription app. The web app is mobile compatible but there is no separate native mobile app described. The site lists no third-party integrations, so treat the canvas as the integration surface. For solo researchers, writers mapping nonlinear storylines, and strategists who already hold multiple API keys, it is a reasonable trial. For teams that need task management, Gantt charts, or dollar-denominated procurement, it is not.
Researching Curiso? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Curiso actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You paste source links and PDFs into RAG documents, drop note nodes for each finding, then wire them into a chat node and ask it to reconcile the sources using your own OpenAI key.
Outcome: A single board that holds your sources, your notes, and the AI's synthesis in one spatial view instead of scattered across tabs.
You sketch a framework as link and note nodes, then connect a chat node with a Claude key to expand each branch and challenge the weak ones.
Outcome: A map of the argument where you can see which claims depend on which evidence before you write.
You clone Curiso v1 from GitHub under the MIT license, run it locally, and point it at a local inference endpoint and a local embedding model.
Outcome: A working canvas you control end to end without a paid subscription, and a clear read on whether v2's extra features justify the CUR-priced plan.
Use Cases
- Map a business strategy by wiring nodes and letting chat nodes reason across the linked context
- Organize research documents and websites with RAG so AI answers reference your own sources
- Plan nonlinear storylines or frameworks where the connections between ideas matter more than the order
- Stand up a visual knowledge base with note nodes that feed chat nodes as you learn
- Explore a complex topic through deep research with multiple linked sources on one board
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-08
Limitations
- Subscriptions are paid in CUR on Solana, so a team with normal corporate accounting cannot simply expense a plan — and the vendor's own legal disclaimer states no guarantees are made about current or future token utility, value, or platform integration.
- Image, video, and audio nodes are gated to the Gold tier at $100/mo or $1000/yr (in CUR), so multimodal work costs the top plan.
- The site's supported provider list is long but you supply and pay for your own API keys, which means model costs land on separate provider bills.
- The web app is mobile compatible rather than a native app.
- Curiso v2 is subscription-only, while v1 is the open-source release under MIT.
- The vendor publishes no third-party integration directory, so the canvas itself is the surface you work in.
as of 2026-09-27
Verification history
We have re-verified Curiso 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Curiso tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free Trial
$0
Ideal for
Anyone who wants to test the canvas and bring-your-own-key chat before committing to a CUR-paid plan
What this tier adds
Starting free entry point: full access to core features for 3 days, no credit card required
Bronze
$10/mo or $100/yr (in CUR)
Ideal for
Solo researcher or writer with their own API keys who mainly needs canvas, chat nodes, and standard RAG
What this tier adds
First paid tier at $10/mo or $100/yr in CUR — adds standard RAG and public board sharing on top of the trial
Silver
$40/mo or $400/yr (in CUR)
Ideal for
Small teams or heavy users who need their boards backed up and want early access to new features
What this tier adds
Adds data backup and recovery and early access features over Bronze, at $40/mo or $400/yr in CUR
Gold
$100/mo or $1000/yr (in CUR)
Ideal for
Multimodal creators running image, video, and audio work across a board, plus deep multi-source research
What this tier adds
Adds image, video, and audio nodes on top of Silver, at $100/mo or $1000/yr in CUR
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Curiso's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Bronze at $10/mo (or $100/yr in CUR) is priced like a single-seat research tool and undercuts a comparable Miro seat plus a separate AI subscription. Silver at $40/mo (or $400/yr) puts it near a small-team whiteboard plan. Gold at $100/mo (or $1000/yr) is where image, video, and audio nodes live, so multimodal users pay enterprise-whiteboard money — all denominated in CUR rather than dollars.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Curiso — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Solo users: about 15–30 minutes, mostly pasting your own API key and adding a first RAG document before your first chat node answers. Writers and strategists: under an hour to a first useful board, since node placement is the whole workflow. Developers self-hosting v1: an afternoon, depending on how you run local inference and embedding models.
Switching to or from Curiso
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Miro: rebuild your board with note and link nodes, then add chat nodes where you previously used sticky-note brainstorming.
- →From Obsidian: export notes as documents into RAG so chat nodes can reason over your existing vault.
- →From ChatGPT or Claude chat history: recreate the key threads as chat nodes and connect them to the note nodes they informed.
- →From a linear research doc: split each section into a note node and wire the dependencies you had only implied in prose.
- ↗To Miro: export your board structure and rebuild it as a static whiteboard, losing the AI chat nodes.
- ↗To Obsidian: move note node text into markdown files and keep your RAG documents as a local vault.
- ↗To a plain ChatGPT or Claude subscription: copy chat node transcripts out and continue in a linear thread.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Curiso”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Curiso” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Curiso.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Curiso
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Curiso, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Grantable
AI grant writing software that finds funders, drafts proposals in your voice, and tracks every deadline
Felo
Felo is a free multilingual AI search and creation workspace that answers in your language, then turns the answer into a doc, deck, or clip.
Mem
Mem is an AI knowledge base that captures your notes, meetings, and research and keeps a living picture of your work current in the background.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Curiso vs Surge Ai
Buy Curiso if you need an AI-powered infinite canvas for flexible idea mapping and brainstorming. Choose Surge AI if you are building frontier AI models and require expert human feedback for RLHF, red teaming, or custom evaluation benchmarks.
Curiso vs Praktika
For a language learner aiming to improve spoken fluency, Praktika is the clear choice with AI tutors and real-time corrections. Curiso serves a completely different need—visual mapping and brainstorming. Choose based on your primary goal: speaking practice vs. idea organization.
Curiso vs Undermind
If you need exhaustive, citation-traced literature reviews for academic or R&D work, Undermind's deep paper analysis is unmatched. For visual thinkers who want a spatial canvas to connect ideas, notes, and AI from multiple providers, Curiso's infinite board offers more flexibility. Choose based on whether your primary need is structured research output or freeform idea mapping.
Curiso vs Gitbook
If you’re a visual thinker who wants to connect research, notes, and AI conversations on an infinite canvas, choose Curiso. If you need a product documentation hub that stays accurate via proactive AI and syncs with your code repositories, pick GitBook. Curiso is early-stage and crypto‑adjacent; GitBook is enterprise‑ready with AI agent support and certifications.
Alternatives to Curiso
View all
Frequently Asked Questions
Used Curiso? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.