Dark Moon

Dark Moon

Darkmoon runs self-hosted autonomous penetration testing with 50 specialist AI agents and 142 allow-listed security tools

73/100Safe BetFree · from €149/moFreemium

Pick Darkmoon when self-hosting is a requirement, not a preference — the tokenizing Privacy Gateway and sealed runtime mean campaign data and credentials never leave your network, which is the whole reason a regulated team would choose it over Pentera. The three-level cascade cap is the honest limit: deep multi-hop AD pivots still need a human to continue, and the CLI/TUI is genuinely Linux-native. Prove it on the free Community build before paying.

Verified 3d ago · liveness 73/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/dark-moon

Best for
  • Red teams that must keep target data, credentials and hostnames inside their own network
  • DevSecOps teams wiring autonomous pentests into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD or Jenkins pipelines
  • Professional pentesters comfortable with Linux, local LLMs and BlackArch-style tooling
  • SOC teams that want pentest campaigns, findings and retest verdicts streaming into Splunk
Not ideal for
  • Teams without Linux or self-hosting experience who need a vendor-managed cloud console
  • Anyone expecting a run-and-read scanner rather than exploit chaining with real payloads
  • Engagements that hinge on attack chains deeper than the three-level cascade cap and no human available to continue
Visit Website

AdvancedCommunity (CLI/TUI): roughly an afternoon for a Linux-comfortable operator to install, supply a local or API LLM and run a first authorized campaign. Pro dashboard: same install plus licence sealing and SSO wiring, typically a day. Custom with dedicated onboarding: vendor-assisted, so timeline depends on your engagement.Web · CLIAPI availableVerified 3d ago
Pricing
Free · from €149/mo
FreemiumFree tier2 plans4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Advanced
Community (CLI/TUI): roughly an afternoon for a Linux-comfortable operator to install, supply a local or API LLM and run a first authorized campaign. Pro dashboard: same install plus licence sealing and SSO wiring, typically a day. Custom with dedicated onboarding: vendor-assisted, so timeline depends on your engagement.
Runs on
WebCLI
API available · 12 integrations
Who it's for
Red team lead at a mid-size enterpriseDevSecOps engineer wiring security into CISOC analyst at a regulated firm
Live sentiment
Is Dark Moon actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Darkmoon if you want a fully managed cloud scanner where the vendor runs everything for you — this is self-hosted and assumes Linux and local-LLM or API-key setup on your side.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

The Pro hardware-bound licence is derived from MAC address and CPU model, so ephemeral containers or autoscaled instances can invalidate the fingerprint and need re-licensing.

Price reality

Community at $0/mo self-hosted (GPLv3) is the cheapest credible entry into autonomous multi-agent pentesting — you supply the hardware and LLM. Pro at €149/mo adds the SSE dashboard, 3D orbital map, remediation PRs, REST API, SSO and the sealed runtime, which undercuts typical cloud-first autonomous scanner contracts aimed at mid-market security teams. Custom adds multi-seat and managed Pentest on Demand.

In short

Dark Moon — Darkmoon runs self-hosted autonomous penetration testing with 50 specialist AI agents and 142 allow-listed security tools. Best for Red teams that must keep target data, credentials and hostnames inside their own network, DevSecOps teams wiring autonomous pentests into GitHub Actions, GitLab CI/CD or Jenkins pipelines, Professional pentesters comfortable with Linux, local LLMs and BlackArch-style tooling. Free to start; paid plans from €149/mo.

What's new in Dark Moon

Checked yesterday

Across the latest 5 updates: 3 feature updates and 2 news mentions.

What people actually say about Dark Moon — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

61 mentions across 4 sources (YouTube, App Store, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Aug 21, 2026.

29% positive71% critical

Average across the 4 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.

Recurring strengths
  • +Autonomous orchestration with 33 specialized agents (Pro) covers full offensive security lifecycle.
  • +Privacy Gateway tokenizes sensitive data before LLM, adding strong privacy protection.
  • +Self-hosted, open-source with 80+ integrated tools for comprehensive testing.
  • +Cascade control with dynamic routing and 3-level depth cap gives targeted exploitation.
  • +Real-time SSE dashboard streams findings, infrastructure nodes, and agent events live.
Recurring frustrations
  • −Repeated GitHub complaints about installation failures, especially on ARM64.
  • −CLI mode often returns nothing without error, logs, or progress feedback.
  • −Missing authentication header and custom API provider configuration issues frustrate users.
  • −Limited documentation for troubleshooting common setup problems.
  • −Hardware-bound licensing can break in containerized or dynamic environments.
Patterns worth knowing
Installation and setup are the biggest pain point — numerous GitHub issues on missing assets, ARM64 incompatibility, and silent CLI failures.
Seen on GitHub
Privacy Gateway and autonomous agent orchestration are the standout features that attract security professionals.
Seen on GitHub
Lack of reliable support and slow issue resolution discourages enterprise adoption.
Seen on GitHub
Learning curve
advancedProductive in ~A few hours to a day of setup and configuration
Hidden costs people mention
  • • LLM API usage fees (e.g., Anthropic API) required to run the core engine, which can add up on large campaigns.
  • • Hardware requirements for self-hosting (CPU, RAM, storage) and possible AWS/GCP costs if run in cloud.

Viability Score

73/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Dark Moon? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
29
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Autonomous multi-agent pentesting: one orchestrator dispatching 50 specialist AI agents
  • 142 allow-listed security tools under MCP gatekeeping — the model never gets a shell
  • 14 technology signals fingerprinted to route each campaign to the right specialists
  • 18 agent families covering web, API, AD, cloud, Kubernetes, CI/CD, firmware and LLM targets
  • Findings qualified EXPLOITED, CONFIRMED or UNCONFIRMED against an adversarial rubric
  • CVSS 3.1 scoring and MITRE ATT&CK mapping on every finding
  • Live SSE command center streaming findings, infrastructure nodes and agent events in real time
  • Orbital attack-surface map visualising target infrastructure and campaign progress
  • Privacy Gateway tokenizes IPs, hostnames, URLs, emails and credentials before inference
  • Inference runs locally on Ollama or llama.cpp, or via Anthropic, OpenAI and OpenRouter
  • Remediation agent writes sandbox-validated fix pull requests for confirmed findings
  • Dedicated llm agent tests OpenAI-compatible, Ollama, vLLM and TGI endpoints against the OWASP LLM Top 10
  • MCP servers treated as a first-class attack surface
  • Campaigns run sequential or parallel with cascade depth capped at three levels
  • Export reports as Markdown, JSON, ISO 27001, HackerOne or Bugcrowd formats, or branded password-protected PDF

About Dark Moon

FreemiumAdvancedAPI availableWeb · CLI

Darkmoon is an autonomous penetration-testing platform you install on your own infrastructure. An orchestrator fingerprints 14 technology signals on the target, then dispatches specialist AI agents across web and API, Active Directory, cloud and identity, Kubernetes, CI/CD, firmware, and exposed AI/LLM endpoints. The vendor page counts 50 specialist AI agents plus one orchestrator, backed by 142 security tools — subfinder, httpx, naabu, katana, nuclei, ffuf, wpscan, sqlmap, hydra, hashcat, netexec, BloodHound, Impacket, Mimikatz, kubectl, Kubescape, WhatWeb, Wafw00f, Arjun, Playwright — every one behind a build-enforced allow-list, so the model never gets a shell. Findings come back graded, not dumped. Each issue is qualified EXPLOITED, CONFIRMED or UNCONFIRMED against an adversarial rubric, scored with CVSS 3.1 and mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, using real payloads rather than signature matching. Campaigns run sequential or parallel with cascade depth capped at three levels. A live SSE stream pushes every finding, infrastructure node and agent event to a command center that includes an orbital attack-surface map. A dedicated llm agent covers the OWASP LLM Top 10, and MCP servers are treated as a first-class target surface. Output reaches the stack your team already runs. The Splunk app streams four CIM-aligned sourcetypes over HEC with six SOC dashboards; Grafana pulls live posture views; a community n8n node and trigger launches campaigns and registers signed webhooks; Jenkins, GitLab CI/CD and the GitHub Action (SARIF upload to Code scanning, plus PR comments) run tests inside the pipeline. VS Code and JetBrains plugins surface findings in the editor. Reports export as Markdown, JSON, branded password-protected PDF, or ISO 27001, HackerOne and Bugcrowd formats. The trust side is architectural: a Privacy Gateway tokenizes IPs, hostnames, URLs, emails, credentials and internal paths before anything reaches the model, then re-injects real values locally before a tool

Behind the Verdict

The first question with any autonomous pentest platform is where your target data ends up. Darkmoon answers it in the architecture rather than the marketing copy: the Privacy Gateway swaps IPs, hostnames, URLs, emails, credentials and internal paths for tokens before the model sees them, then re-injects the real values locally just before a tool fires. Pro adds AES-256 sealed storage and a hardware-bound licence. If your security team cannot ship internal hostnames to a third-party cloud, that is the feature that decides the evaluation. Second question: does it actually exploit, or does it pattern-match? The agent families cover full-stack web (SQLi, XSS, SSRF, IDOR, RCE, SSTI, deserialization, JWT abuse, file upload, path traversal), Active Directory (AS-REP roasting, Kerberoasting, NTLM relay, DCSync, ADCS ESC1–ESC8), cloud and identity across AWS, Azure, GCP and Entra ID including IMDS token minting, Kubernetes RBAC and node escape, CI/CD and IaC, IoT firmware, and the LLM layer. Findings land as EXPLOITED, CONFIRMED or UNCONFIRMED — a distinction that matters when you hand a report to an engineering team that has to fix it. Where it bites: the cascade is capped at three levels. Deep multi-hop pivots — foothold to AD to cloud control plane — will stop and wait for a human to continue. That is a deliberate guard against runaway recursion, but if your engagements are defined by long lateral chains, budget for analyst time on top of the agents. We'd reach for Darkmoon on a Linux-native red team with an existing LLM endpoint, or inside a DevSecOps pipeline where the GitHub Action autodetects edition, launches a campaign and uploads SARIF to Code scanning on the pull request. Splunk shops get four CIM-aligned sourcetypes and six dashboards; n8n users can fire

Researching Dark Moon? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Dark Moon actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Red team lead at a mid-size enterprise

You point Darkmoon at an internet-facing estate, let the orchestrator fingerprint 14 signals and dispatch web, AD and cloud agents in parallel, and watch findings qualify live on the SSE dashboard.

Outcome: A graded, CVSS-scored and ATT&CK-mapped set of EXPLOITED findings with real payloads, produced without target data leaving your perimeter.

DevSecOps engineer wiring security into CI

You install the GitHub Actions integration, which autodetects your edition, launches a campaign on pull requests, uploads SARIF to Code scanning and comments results on the PR.

Outcome: Autonomous pentest results land next to code review, so exploitable regressions are visible before merge.

SOC analyst at a regulated firm

You stream campaign events, findings, remediation PRs and retest verdicts into Splunk over HEC as four CIM-aligned sourcetypes and view them on six SOC dashboards.

Outcome: Pentest evidence becomes a first-class SOC data source instead of a PDF in a shared drive.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

Claude

as of 2026-10-17

Limitations

  • Darkmoon runs autonomous offensive campaigns through 50 specialist AI agents and 142 build-enforced allow-listed security tools, so it is positioned as a continuous pentesting platform rather than a managed service.
  • Edition matters: the open-source CLI works from a local JSON report, while the live REST API, streaming and remediation surfaces are Pro-tier features.
  • The evidence names no underlying AI model, so the specific model powering the agents is not stated.
  • Beyond that, the live evidence does not detail deployment constraints, licensing or tier limits, so those cannot be confirmed from this data.

as of 2026-10-09

Verification history

We have re-verified Dark Moon 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
Free
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Dark Moon tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Community

$0/mo

Ideal for

Solo pentesters and security engineers with Linux skills who want the full autonomous engine without paying for a dashboard.

What this tier adds

Free entry point: GPLv3 self-hosted, CLI/TUI, 50 specialist agents, 142 tools, Privacy Gateway, Markdown/JSON reports.

Pro

€149/mo

Ideal for

Professional pentesters, red teams and DevSecOps groups who need a live dashboard, remediation PRs and SSO on a single seat.

What this tier adds

Adds the SSE command center, 3D orbital attack-surface map, remediation agent PRs, branded PDF reports, REST API, SSO and the sealed AES-256 runtime over Community.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • The Pro hardware-bound licence is derived from MAC address and CPU model, so ephemeral containers or autoscaled instances can invalidate the fingerprint and need re-licensing.
  • Running local inference for the agents means GPU or CPU capacity you pay for on your own infrastructure, on top of the licence.
  • Multi-seat shared workspaces and custom report branding only unlock at the Custom tier, so growing past single-seat Pro means a sales conversation.
  • A bounded garak pass is capped on purpose; if you want it run uncapped you must script around the platform yourself.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Dark Moon's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Community at $0/mo self-hosted (GPLv3) is the cheapest credible entry into autonomous multi-agent pentesting — you supply the hardware and LLM. Pro at €149/mo adds the SSE dashboard, 3D orbital map, remediation PRs, REST API, SSO and the sealed runtime, which undercuts typical cloud-first autonomous scanner contracts aimed at mid-market security teams. Custom adds multi-seat and managed Pentest on Demand.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Dark Moon — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Community (CLI/TUI): roughly an afternoon for a Linux-comfortable operator to install, supply a local or API LLM and run a first authorized campaign. Pro dashboard: same install plus licence sealing and SSO wiring, typically a day. Custom with dedicated onboarding: vendor-assisted, so timeline depends on your engagement.

Switching to or from Dark Moon

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a manual pentest toolchain: keep your existing tools, since Darkmoon's 142-tool allow-list already includes nuclei, sqlmap, bloodhound, impacket and netexec, and let the orchestrator dispatch them.
  • →From a signature-based scanner: replace pass/fail signature matching with EXPLOITED/CONFIRMED/UNCONFIRMED findings validated using real payloads.
  • →From a cloud pentest SaaS: move campaigns to infrastructure you control so target data never reaches a third party, using the Privacy Gateway for prompt tokenization.
  • →From ad-hoc LLM prompting: adopt the build-enforced MCP allow-list so your model never holds a shell.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a managed cloud scanner: you trade perimeter control and the sealed runtime for zero setup, and lose self-hosted data residency.
  • ↗To a manual pentest bench: you regain unlimited chain depth but lose autonomous dispatch, live SSE streaming and graded findings at scale.
  • ↗To a managed engagement: the Custom tier's Pentest on Demand covers teams that want humans running the campaign rather than your own operators.

Integrations

GitHubGitLabJenkinsVS CodeJetBrainsSplunkGrafanan8nOllamallama.cppAnthropicOpenAI

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

Official links

Tools that pair well with Dark Moon

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Dark Moon, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Dark Moon

View all
Mindgard

Mindgard

Mindgard automates AI red teaming — agent-native reconnaissance, exploit validation, and continuous AI security testing for production AI

Contact SalesTry
T3MP3ST

T3MP3ST

T3MP3ST is an open-source multi-agent offensive-security harness that turns the AI coding agent you already run into an autonomous vulnerability hunter.

FreeTry
Hex Security

Hex Security

AI-native container security and runtime threat detection for Kubernetes workloads

PaidTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Dark Moon? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.