Genei

Genei

Genei summarises PDFs and webpages, extracts keywords, generates references and answers your questions about uploaded documents.

66/100MonitorFrom £4.99/moPaid

Genei is a genuinely useful solo research assistant: summarisation, keyword extraction, in-document note linking and automatic reference generation all address real work, and PRO adds multi-document analysis plus GPT3 expand/paraphrase/rephrase. It is not a general chatbot and it is not a team tool, so judge it against your actual task. If your day is literature review and citation grinding, genei earns its £9.99 per month Basic (or £7.99 per month billed annually); if you need multi-document work, PRO at £29.99 per month (or £24.99 per month billed annually) is the tier that matters. Compare against ChatPDF and general AI note-takers before committing, and note genei's own site points

Verified 5d ago · liveness 66/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/genei

Best for
  • Academic researchers working through large PDF reading lists
  • Graduate students doing literature reviews
  • Content writers summarising source material
  • Analysts reviewing long reports
Not ideal for
  • Teams that need shared workspaces, comments and collaborative editing
  • Readers who mainly want a general-purpose AI chatbot
  • Qualitative researchers doing interview coding (genei points to CoLoop)
Visit Website

IntermediateSolo readers get first value in minutes: start the 14 day free trial, upload a PDF or save a page via the Chrome extension, and the summary and keyword extraction land straight away. Students and academics should register the Student Beans or 40% academic discount before subscribing. Decide on PRO only after testing multi-document analysis on your own reading list.Web · PluginNo public APIVerified 5d ago
Pricing
From £4.99/mo
Paid3 plans3 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Solo readers get first value in minutes: start the 14 day free trial, upload a PDF or save a page via the Chrome extension, and the summary and keyword extraction land straight away. Students and academics should register the Student Beans or 40% academic discount before subscribing. Decide on PRO only after testing multi-document analysis on your own reading list.
Runs on
WebPlugin
No public API
Who it's for
Graduate student starting a literature reviewContent writer working from source materialAnalyst reviewing long reports
Live sentiment
Is Genei actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip genei if you need shared team workspaces and collaborative commenting, or if you only want a general AI chatbot rather than a document summariser with citations.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

PRO-gated functionality means a Basic plan leaves multi-document analysis, GPT3 summaries and question mode switched off, so the upgrade decision comes fast once you work across more than one paper.

Price reality

Basic is priced for solo students and writers at £9.99 per month (£7.99 per month billed annually), and PRO at £29.99 per month (£24.99 per month billed annually) is aimed at people running multi-document analysis all day — roughly triple the entry rate. Students and academics qualify for a Student Beans discount and a stated 40% professional/academic discount, which is the cheapest route in. Cheaper per-document readers such as ChatPDF undercut it; general AI note-takers bundle broader

In short

Genei — Genei summarises PDFs and webpages, extracts keywords, generates references and answers your questions about uploaded documents. Best for Academic researchers working through large PDF reading lists, Graduate students doing literature reviews, Content writers summarising source material. Plans from £4.99/mo.

What people actually say about Genei — is it worth it?

We scanned public community sources for Genei on Jul 3, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.

Viability Score

66/100
Monitor

How well maintained and how widely used is Genei? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
not measured
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
50
What the vendor publishes
20

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • AI-powered summarisation of PDFs and webpages
  • AI-generated keywords
  • Multi-document summarisation (PRO)
  • AI-powered search and question answering over documents
  • Multi-document analysis (PRO)
  • GPT3 summaries (PRO)
  • GPT3 expand, paraphrase and rephrase (PRO)
  • Cloud-based notes and annotations
  • Note linking to any part of a document
  • Automatic reference generation and citation management
  • Document management with customisable projects and folders
  • Graph, figure and table extraction
  • Chrome extension to summarise or save webpages while browsing
  • Export functionality
  • Customisable keywords

About Genei

PaidIntermediateNo APIWeb · Plugin

Genei is a research and reading tool for people who work through a lot of PDFs and webpages. You upload files or save pages with the Chrome extension, and genei produces AI-powered summaries and keyword extraction across a group of documents. Documents live in customisable projects and folders, you can take cloud-based notes and annotations inside a document, link notes to any part of it, and genei generates references and citations automatically. Paid plans add AI-powered search and question answering, multi-document analysis, graph, figure and table extraction, and GPT3-backed expand, paraphrase and rephrase. Pricing runs from £9.99 per month (or £7.99 per month billed annually) on Basic up to £29.99 per month (or £24.99 per month billed annually) on PRO, with a cheaper £4.99 per month tier also listed on the pricing page and a 14 day free trial. It suits solo academics, students, analysts and writers rather than teams.

Behind the Verdict

Genei's core value is the combination of reading speed and citation discipline. Summarisation and keyword extraction work across a group of PDFs or webpages, and because documents sit in customisable projects and folders with note linking, your annotations stay attached to the passage they came from rather than floating in a separate app. Reference generation and management is built in, which is the part most general AI assistants make you do by hand. The tiering is where you need to read carefully. Basic lists a 5GB maximum individual file upload on the £9.99 per month plan and a 15MB maximum on one of the £9.99 per month listings, so check your file sizes before choosing — the pricing page shows several plan tables and they are not identical. PRO lifts the upload cap to unlimited and unlocks GPT3 summaries, multi-document analysis, and GPT3-backed search and question mode, which is the real dividing line: on Basic you summarise one document at a time, on PRO you work across a set. Extra AI features are locked to PRO, not merely metered. The website bundles a free-hosting deal with Student Beans and a stated 40% professional/academic discount, which materially changes the cost for students and academics. There is a 14 day free trial and cancel-any-time messaging on every tier. A few edges are honest to state. Collaboration and sharing are not part of what genei advertises; the pages describe individual projects and personal notes. The homepage advertises a Chrome extension for summarising or saving webpages as you browse. And genei's own site now points qualitative researchers to CoLoop, a separate analysis tool, so if your work is interview coding rather than document summarisation, genei is steering you elsewhere. Start on the trial, upload a real reading list, and decide on PRO versus Basic by whether you actually need cross-document analysis.

Researching Genei? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Genei actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Graduate student starting a literature review

Uploads twenty papers into a project with folders, reads the AI-powered summaries first, then opens the papers that matter and annotates passages with linked notes.

Outcome: Reaches the relevant papers faster and has citations generated as they read, leaving more time for the actual analysis.

Content writer working from source material

Saves reference articles with the Chrome extension, extracts keywords to check topic coverage, and uses paraphrase and rephrase on dense paragraphs (PRO).

Outcome: Builds an outline grounded in the sources without re-reading every article in full.

Analyst reviewing long reports

Uploads PDFs, uses question answering to locate a specific figure, and pulls graphs, figures and tables out of the document set.

Outcome: Finds the numbers they need in minutes instead of scrolling through a hundred pages.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

GPT3

as of 2026-10-15

Limitations

  • Genei's pricing page shows more than one plan table with conflicting file limits: one Basic listing caps uploads at 5GB per file and another at 15MB, so confirm the limit that applies to the plan you buy before uploading large PDFs.
  • Multi-document analysis, GPT3 summaries, GPT3-backed search and question mode, and rephrasing/paraphrasing are all PRO-only, so a Basic subscriber summarises one document at a time.
  • Paid plans additionally advertise extras: the pricing page lists email support, chatbot support, priority server access and customisable keywords as plan features, while priority server access, priority support and troubleshooting appear as paid add-ons.
  • The pages describe individual projects, notes and references rather than shared team workspaces.
  • Genei's own site directs qualitative research work to its separate tool, CoLoop.

as of 2026-10-02

Verification history

We have re-verified Genei 8 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  2. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  3. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  4. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  5. — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 8 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
—
Contact sales for a quote
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Genei tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Basic

£4.99/mo

Ideal for

Solo students, writers and analysts who mainly summarise and annotate one document at a time

What this tier adds

Starting tier: AI-powered summaries, keyword extraction, notes and reference generation, with a 5GB (or 15MB, depending on the plan table) individual file upload cap.

Basic

£9.99/mo

Ideal for

Solo students, writers and analysts who mainly summarise and annotate one document at a time

What this tier adds

Starting tier: AI-powered summaries, keyword extraction, notes and reference generation, with a 5GB (or 15MB, depending on the plan table) individual file upload cap.

PRO

£29.99/mo

Ideal for

Researchers running multi-document work and heavier AI features daily rather than occasionally

What this tier adds

Adds multi-document analysis, GPT3 summaries, GPT3 search and question mode, rephrasing and paraphrasing, and unlimited individual file upload.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • PRO-gated functionality means a Basic plan leaves multi-document analysis, GPT3 summaries and question mode switched off, so the upgrade decision comes fast once you work across more than one paper.
  • File upload limits change between plan listings (5GB versus 15MB on Basic variants), so an oversized PDF can force a tier upgrade mid-project.
  • Priority server access, priority support and troubleshooting are listed as paid additions on the pricing page rather than included in the plan price.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Genei's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Basic is priced for solo students and writers at £9.99 per month (£7.99 per month billed annually), and PRO at £29.99 per month (£24.99 per month billed annually) is aimed at people running multi-document analysis all day — roughly triple the entry rate. Students and academics qualify for a Student Beans discount and a stated 40% professional/academic discount, which is the cheapest route in. Cheaper per-document readers such as ChatPDF undercut it; general AI note-takers bundle broader

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Genei — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Solo readers get first value in minutes: start the 14 day free trial, upload a PDF or save a page via the Chrome extension, and the summary and keyword extraction land straight away. Students and academics should register the Student Beans or 40% academic discount before subscribing. Decide on PRO only after testing multi-document analysis on your own reading list.

Switching to or from Genei

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From manual PDF reading and a separate reference manager: upload your reading list into genei projects and use built-in reference generation instead of maintaining two tools.
  • →From a general AI chatbot: move your source documents into genei so summaries, keywords and citations stay attached to the files.
  • →From browser bookmarks: use the Chrome extension to save and summarise webpages rather than stockpiling unread links.
Migrating out
  • ↗To ChatPDF or another per-document reader: export your documents and notes before cancelling, since summaries sit inside genei projects.
  • ↗To an AI note-taking app: export notes and references, then re-create document folders in the new tool.
  • ↗To CoLoop for qualitative research: genei's own site directs interview-coding work there.

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Genei”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Genei” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Genei.

Official links

Tools that pair well with Genei

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Genei, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Genei

View all
YouMind

YouMind

YouMind turns saved articles, videos, and notes into finished articles, slides, images, videos, and webpages with AI.

FreemiumTry
Humata AI

Humata AI

Humata AI is a PDF AI that answers questions across your documents with cited links into the exact source section — citations you can trace

FreemiumTry
Paxton AI

Paxton AI

Paxton AI is a legal AI assistant that grounds litigation research and drafting in your case's matter record.

PaidTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Genei? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.