Glama MCP is live · free plan, paid from $9/mo · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy
Glama MCP
Glama's MCP directory ranks thousands of Model Context Protocol servers by security, compatibility, and ease of use.
The directory is the reason to pick Glama — scanning, compatibility ranking, and tool-definition scoring replace a lot of manual vetting before you trust an MCP server. The open-sourced routing layer removes the lock-in objection for teams that only want the gateway. Come here when MCP discovery and ranking are the actual job; for a plain ChatGPT alternative, Claude or OpenAI's own workspace is simpler.
Verdict generatedVerified 4d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/glama-mcp
- Teams adopting MCP that want a pre-vetted server directory plus a managed gateway
- Developers building AI agents who need to discover and connect to MCP servers
- Security-conscious enterprises that want scanning and compatibility ranking before trusting a server
- Open-source MCP server maintainers who want free hosting and a public listing
- Buyers working exclusively with non-MCP protocols such as plain REST or gRPC tooling
- Teams that need model-call costs bundled into a flat subscription rather than metered credits
- Users who only want a general chat assistant — Claude and OpenAI ship simpler workspaces
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Glama if your tools are plain REST or gRPC rather than MCP, or if you need the directory's ranking criteria customized to your own threat model beyond the published defaults.
Model calls run on AI credits billed separately from your subscription tier, so a $26/mo Pro plan does not cap what you spend in a heavy month.
Free covers the directory and open-source hosting; the $9/mo Starter tier buys the chat workspace and gateway; $26/mo Pro adds Projects, memory, and code execution; $80/mo Business adds 180-day log retention, reasoning effort levels, and TDQS. All tiers are metered on AI credits, so compare against a flat-rate workspace from OpenAI or Anthropic only if you also need MCP discovery.
In short
Glama MCP — Glama's MCP directory ranks thousands of Model Context Protocol servers by security, compatibility, and ease of use. Best for Teams adopting MCP that want a pre-vetted server directory plus a managed gateway, Developers building AI agents who need to discover and connect to MCP servers, Security-conscious enterprises that want scanning and compatibility ranking before trusting a server. Free to start; paid plans from $9/mo.
No head-to-head comparison for Glama MCP yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.
What is Glama MCP?
Glama MCP — Glama's MCP directory ranks thousands of Model Context Protocol servers by security, compatibility, and ease of use. Best for Teams adopting MCP that want a pre-vetted server directory plus a managed gateway, Developers building AI agents who need to discover and connect to MCP servers, Security-conscious enterprises that want scanning and compatibility ranking before trusting a server. Free to start; paid plans from $9/mo.
Glama's MCP directory is a searchable index of Model Context Protocol servers, connectors, clients, and tools that the company scans and ranks on security, compatibility, and ease of use. That ranking layer is the practical pitch: before wiring an unfamiliar MCP server into an agent, you can see how it scored instead of trusting a README. A Tool Definition Quality Score grades whether a tool definition is clear enough for a model to actually invoke, useful when two servers claim the same capability. Above the directory sits a ChatGPT-like workspace with native MCP support across 5,000+ servers, custom-prompt agents, and Projects that carry shared memory, files, and connectors between sessions. The company says it is trusted by 50,000+ businesses and professionals, and the homepage lists Databricks, Accenture, Shopify, Cloudflare, UiPath, and Neo4j among them. Developers get a managed AI gateway that speaks the OpenAI SDK format, with built-in web search, web fetch, and code execution tools. In April 2026 Glama open-sourced the gateway's routing layer, so teams that want self-hosting can take it without the hosted dependency. Maintainers get free hosting for open-source MCP servers with a public listing, an MCP Inspector for testing a server before production, and usage analytics broken down per tool. If your stack is plain REST or gRPC, most of this is irrelevant.
Key features
- MCP server directory ranked by security, compatibility, and ease of use
- Managed AI gateway with OpenAI-compatible SDK at gateway.glama.ai/v1
- ChatGPT-like chat workspace with native MCP support for 5,000+ servers
- Multiple MCP transports for connecting servers, clients, and connectors
- Create specialized agents with custom prompts
- Projects with shared memory, files, and MCP connectors
- Tool Definition Quality Score grading for MCP tool definitions
- MCP Inspector for testing servers before production
- Web search tool for real-time information
- Web fetch tool for full pages and PDFs
- Code execution inside Glama's built-in MCP server
- MCP server usage analytics with 24h/7d windows and per-tool breakdown
- Free hosting for open-source MCP servers with a public listing
- Self-hostable AI gateway routing layer open-sourced as Lightport
Behind the verdict
MCP discovery is a mess right now. Servers appear faster than anyone can review them, and most are graded on a README and a few stars. Glama's answer is to rank them on security, compatibility, and ease of use, then add a score for whether a tool definition is legible enough for a model to invoke correctly. In practice that's the field we'd use first: a half-defined tool schema produces flaky agent calls, and catching that before it reaches production saves an afternoon of confused debugging. We'd reach for this when a team is adopting MCP and needs to shortlist servers without building a review process. The MCP Inspector handles the next step — test the server before it lands in a real agent. Maintainers get a decent deal too: free hosting for an open-source server with a public listing, plus usage analytics with 24-hour and 7-day windows broken down per tool. The chat workspace is the weaker half of the pitch. It works, it supports thousands of servers and multiple transports, and Projects carry memory and files across sessions — but if you only want a chat interface, Claude and OpenAI ship cleaner ones. Glama earns its place when the MCP directory and gateway are doing work you'd otherwise do yourself. Watch the metered side. Model calls run through the gateway on credits rather than a flat subscription, so a chatty agent can get expensive in ways a flat seat price hides. The gateway speaks the OpenAI SDK format, which means the swap is mostly a base URL change; if you'd rather not depend on the hosted route, the open-sourced Lightport release covers routing only, not the directory or the chat workspace.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-08
Limitations
- The directory ranks and indexes third-party MCP servers rather than providing its own AI models, so the underlying model used in the chat workspace isn't specified in the available evidence.
- Full feature details (credits, retention, server limits) are behind sign-up and not visible on the public pages.
- Community presence is modest (about 1,976 Discord and 216 Reddit members).
as of 2026-10-21
Researching Glama MCP? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Glama MCP still active?
Glama MCP is live · free plan, paid from $9/mo · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Glama MCP? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What do users say about Glama MCP?
What people actually say about Glama MCP — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
ResearchedDiscussed by users across 3 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Lemmy) · researched Oct 10, 2026.
Weighted by the 22 posts each of 3 sources contributed.
- +Glama A-tier listings are cited in launch posts as an actual credibility badge
- +Crawls and ranks thousands of MCP servers, saving hours of manual vetting
- +Gateway speaks the OpenAI SDK format, so provider swaps are mostly a base-URL change
- +Open-sourcing the gateway as Lightport lets teams self-host instead of trusting lock-in
- +Free hosting and public listing for open-source MCP servers lowers publishing friction
- −No community-verified uptime, latency, or incident data for the managed gateway anywhere
- −Support track record is invisible — not one post describes a real support interaction
- −Registry ranking methodology and TDQS scoring are opaque and effectively unauditable
- −Most community mentions are passing references, not deep hands-on reviews
- −Pricing tiers exist but the actual limits and costs did not surface in our data
- • Exact paid-tier pricing and usage limits are not publicly resolvable in our data — budget for a manual quote
- • Gateway compute and token costs sit on top of any Glama subscription and depend entirely on your model provider
- • Self-hosting Lightport trades license cost for your own infrastructure, monitoring, and on-call burden
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Glama MCP — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 9 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Glama MCP 19 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed limitations, pricing page
- — changed who it suits, description, our verdict, features, who should skip it, pricing tiers, summary
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed switching in, description, pricing fit, our verdict, setup time, summary, hidden costs, use cases, limitations, switching out, features, who should skip it
- — changed description, who should skip it, summary, features, who it suits, our verdict, pricing tiers
- — changed pricing fit, our verdict, description, features, summary, hidden costs, use cases, who it suits, limitations, switching in, switching out, who should skip it, setup time
Showing the 6 most recent of 19 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Glama MCP cost in 2026?
Glama MCP: Free to start; paid plans from $9/mo. Pricing last verified 9 Nov 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Glama MCP tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Developers evaluating MCP servers or open-source maintainers who want hosting and a public listing without paying.Adds: Starting tier: directory access and rankings, free hosting for open-source MCP servers, public listing, and MCP Inspector. |
| Starter | $9/mo | monthly | Individual developers who want to actually talk to models with MCP servers attached rather than just browse the directory.Adds: Adds the ChatGPT-like chat workspace, managed gateway access at gateway.glama.ai/v1, multiple MCP transports, and web search plus web fetch. |
| Pro | $26/mo | monthly | Builders running multi-step agents that need context carried between sessions with documents and connectors.Adds: Adds Projects with shared memory, files, and MCP connectors, per-project memory that learns preferences, code execution, and per-tool usage analytics. |
| Business | $80/mo | monthly | Teams standardizing on MCP across several people who need longer audit windows and graded tool definitions.Adds: Adds the 180-day log retention maximum, standardized low/medium/high reasoning effort levels, TDQS grading, and team use of the gateway and workspace. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Glama MCP's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Free covers the directory and open-source hosting; the $9/mo Starter tier buys the chat workspace and gateway; $26/mo Pro adds Projects, memory, and code execution; $80/mo Business adds 180-day log retention, reasoning effort levels, and TDQS. All tiers are metered on AI credits, so compare against a flat-rate workspace from OpenAI or Anthropic only if you also need MCP discovery.
Has Glama MCP's pricing changed?
No plan price for Glama MCP has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Glama MCP?
Pick Glama MCP if you are Teams adopting MCP that want a pre-vetted server directory plus a managed gateway, Developers building AI agents who need to discover and connect to MCP servers, Security-conscious enterprises that want scanning and compatibility ranking before trusting a server, Open-source MCP server maintainers who want free hosting and a public listing.
Look elsewhere if you are Buyers working exclusively with non-MCP protocols such as plain REST or gRPC tooling, Teams that need model-call costs bundled into a flat subscription rather than metered credits, Users who only want a general chat assistant — Claude and OpenAI ship simpler workspaces, Teams that need self-hosted directory and chat, not just the open-sourced routing layer.
Skip it if Skip Glama if your tools are plain REST or gRPC rather than MCP, or if you need the directory's ranking criteria customized to your own threat model beyond the published defaults.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Glama MCP actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You find a community MCP server on GitHub with a thin README and need to know whether it is safe and whether an agent can actually call it.
Outcome: You check its security scan, compatibility ranking, and TDQS score in the directory, load it into MCP Inspector to test, then connect it through the chat workspace or gateway.
You want distribution and a place to debug usage without standing up hosting.
Outcome: You host the server free on Glama, get a public listing in the directory, and read the 24-hour and 7-day per-tool usage analytics to see what callers actually hit.
Several internal agents each talk to a different model provider and you want one endpoint plus an exit path.
Outcome: You point everything at gateway.glama.ai/v1 using the OpenAI SDK format, then self-host the same routing layer via Lightport if you later need to own it.
Use cases
- Discover and connect to community MCP servers for AI agent tool integration
- Host your own open-source MCP server without managing infrastructure
- Build agents that use multiple MCP connectors and per-project memory
- Monitor MCP server usage and logs for debugging
- Access models from multiple providers through one gateway endpoint
- Test MCP servers with MCP Inspector before production deployment
- Maintain context across conversations with per-project memory and documents
- Self-host the routing layer via the open-source Lightport gateway
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Glama MCP — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
A developer can browse the directory and connect a first MCP server to the chat workspace in under an hour. Pointing an existing OpenAI SDK client at gateway.glama.ai/v1 is a base-URL change measured in minutes. Self-hosting Lightport is the long pole — plan on a day depending on your infrastructure.
Switching to or from Glama MCP
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a raw GitHub MCP server list: search the Glama directory instead, where each entry carries security, compatibility, and TDQS scores.
- →From direct provider SDKs: repoint your client at gateway.glama.ai/v1, which speaks the OpenAI SDK format, so most swaps are a base-URL change.
- →From your own MCP registry: publish or host servers on Glama for free and use the public listing plus analytics in place of a homegrown index.
- ↗To self-hosted routing: export the same gateway behavior by deploying the open-source Lightport gateway, though the directory and chat workspace do not come with it.
- ↗To a general AI workspace: Claude or ChatGPT replace the chat surface, but you lose the ranked MCP directory and per-tool usage analytics.
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 3 videos for “Glama MCP”, and we withheld 3: 3 did not mention Glama MCP. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Glama MCP.
Official links
What are the best Glama MCP alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Glama MCP we list are MCP Hub, Spanly and Mcp Scanner. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCP Hub | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Spanly | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Mcp Scanner | Free | Free | — |
Alternatives to Glama MCP
View all
MCP Hub
MCP Hub is an MCP server directory for finding, vetting, and one-click installing Model Context Protocol servers.
Spanly
Packet-level MCP observability and live prompt-injection screening for production Model Context Protocol servers.
Mcp Scanner
Cisco's open-source MCP Scanner audits Model Context Protocol servers for tool poisoning, rug pulls, and over-privileged permissions before
Tools that pair well with Glama MCP
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Glama MCP, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
MCP Hub
MCP Hub is an MCP server directory for finding, vetting, and one-click installing Model Context Protocol servers.
Spanly
Packet-level MCP observability and live prompt-injection screening for production Model Context Protocol servers.
Mcp Scanner
Cisco's open-source MCP Scanner audits Model Context Protocol servers for tool poisoning, rug pulls, and over-privileged permissions before
Frequently asked questions
For makers of Glama MCP
- Get a Verified Listing for Glama MCP ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used Glama MCP? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.