Harvested Robotics — Autonomous greenhouse robots for precise harvesting, trimming, and data collection. Best for Large greenhouse growers facing labor shortages who need to automate repetitive tasks like de-leafing and trimming., Operations seeking real-time crop data and yield forecasting to optimize production decisions., Growers aiming to reduce labor costs and increase operational consistency in greenhouse environments.. Contact Sales pricing.
Large greenhouse growers facing labor shortages who need to automate repetitive tasks like de-leafing and trimming.Operations seeking real-time crop data and yield forecasting to optimize production decisions.Growers aiming to reduce labor costs and increase operational consistency in greenhouse environments.Sustainable farms prioritizing zero-emission, electric automation solutions.
Not ideal for
Small-scale growers or hobbyists due to high upfront investment and robotics complexity.Outdoor or open-field farms where robots are not designed to operate.Growers who prefer manual control or low-tech solutions for flexibility.Operations with low labor costs where automation ROI is not justified.
A specialized solution for greenhouse growers struggling with labor scarcity — Harvested Robotics automates repetitive tasks with precision, but the high cost and greenhouse-specific design limit its appeal for small farms or outdoor agriculture.
Harvested Robotics is a strong option for large-scale greenhouse operations facing persistent labor shortages. Its robots handle de-leafing, trimming, and data collection with consistency and zero emissions, providing a clear ROI through reduced labor costs and improved yield forecasting. However, the upfront investment is significant, and the robots are not suited for outdoor farming or small greenhouses. The AI-powered vision and real-time data are impressive, but integration with existing operations may require custom setup. If you need autonomous greenhouse labor and have the budget, this is a compelling choice; for smaller growers or open-field farms, alternative solutions like simple mechanization or manual work might be more practical. The lack of detailed pricing on the site means potential buyers should request a quote for accurate cost analysis.
Skip Harvested Robotics if Skip Harvested Robotics if you have extremely dense weed populations that require broad-spectrum treatment, or if you are not willing to invest in tractor-mounted hardware and ongoing maintenance.
Latest from Harvested Robotics
We're gathering recent updates for Harvested Robotics from changelogs, press, Hacker News, and social. Check back in a day or two.
Viability Score
76/100
Safe Bet
How likely is Harvested Robotics to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 6 signals including funding, development activity, and platform risk.
funding runway
60
website health
90
github activity
50
category mortality
70
wrapper dependency
100
hyperscaler overlap
80
About Harvested Robotics
Harvested Robotics offers autonomous robots that perform repetitive tasks in greenhouses, eliminating the need for human labor in harvesting, trimming, and data collection. The primary targeting is growers facing labor shortages and seeking operational efficiency. With zero-emission electric operation and AI-powered vision, these robots provide real-time crop health tracking and yield forecasts. Key features include high-volume de-leafing, leaf trimming, data collection for plant health and harvest forecasting, and customizable software for integration into existing greenhouse workflows. Compared to manual methods, Harvested Robotics reduces labor costs and increases consistency, though it requires upfront investment and is designed specifically for greenhouse environments.
Researching Harvested Robotics? Skip the guesswork.
Tell us what you want to build — we'll match the AI tools that fit your goal, budget & existing stack.
Key Features
Autonomous harvesting and trimming
AI-powered plant health monitoring
Real-time yield forecasting
Zero-emission electric operation
High-volume de-leafing
Leaf trimming automation
Data collection for crop insights
Customizable software integration
Labor reduction in greenhouses
Consistent, precise operations
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Harvested Robotics actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Organic vegetable farmer
You have a 50-acre organic broccoli field with pigweed and nightshade in-row. You mount the Harvested Robotics unit on your tractor and calibrate for 30-inch row spacing.
Outcome: The system identifies and lasers weeds at >90% accuracy, eliminating manual hoeing labor for that field. You save $12,000 in labor over the season.
Conventional corn-soy farmer reducing glyphosate
You attach the unit to your Case IH tractor and run a night pass during a dry spell when glyphosate is less effective.
Outcome: Weed escapes are zapped without drift concerns, and your herbicide bill drops by 40% as you only spot-spray dense patches.
Use Cases
Eliminate weeds in-row between corn plants without damaging the crop.
Replace manual hoeing crews in organic vegetable production.
Reduce glyphosate use by targeting non-resistant weed escapes.
Map weed hot spots across a field using GPS-tagged laser events.
Operate night-time weeding passes during hot spells to save daytime labor.
Models Under the Hood
proprietary AI vision model
Limitations
Laser weeding is less effective against very dense weed populations due to per-weed processing time. The system requires clear visibility between crop rows; narrow row spacings or intercropping can reduce accuracy. Hardware maintenance (laser calibration, camera cleaning) is needed for optimal performance. Not suitable for cover crop termination or broadcast weeding.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Annual total
—
Contact sales for a quote
Effective monthly
—
—
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Harvested Robotics tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Subscription
Pay per acre
Ideal for
Row crop farmers with existing tractors who want to trial laser weeding without a large upfront purchase. Best for fields under 500 acres where per-acre cost is easy to track.
What this tier adds
Starting tier — you buy the hardware kit (laser array + cameras) at a one-time cost and pay per acre for AI software updates and support. No free entry point.
Hidden costs & gotchas
What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.
•Hardware kit cost not disclosed publicly (likely thousands of dollars)
•Pay-per-acre pricing may become expensive for high-acreage operations with moderate weed pressure
•Potential downtime costs for laser calibration or camera cleaning
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Harvested Robotics's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Harvested Robotics uses a pay-per-acre subscription model with hardware purchase, which suits medium-to-large farms that can absorb upfront equipment cost. Compared to manual labor rates ($20-30/acre) or herbicide costs ($10-20/acre), laser weeding can be competitive over time—especially if herbicide resistance is a concern. Smaller farms may find the hardware investment prohibitive, and there is no free tier or trial.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Harvested Robotics — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a row crop farmer with a compatible tractor, hardware installation takes 4-6 hours (mounting, wiring, calibration). AI training on your specific crops and local weeds adds another 1-2 hours via the dashboard. You can expect first productive passes within a day.
Switching to or from Harvested Robotics
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
Migrating in
→From manual hoeing: Eliminate labor scheduling; one tractor pass replaces 10-15 workers per field.
→From herbicide-only regimen: No change to sprayer; use laser as a supplement for in-row escapes.
Migrating out
↗To mechanical cultivation: Revert to harrows or cultivators; sold hardware retains some resale value.
↗To full herbicide program: Simply stop using the laser; no data lock-in (weed maps exportable).
