Helicone is live · free plan, paid from $79/mo · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy

Helicone

Helicone

Helicone is an AI gateway and LLM observability platform that routes, logs, and caches traffic across 100+ model providers.

87/100Safe BetFree · from $79/moFreemium

Buy Helicone when routing and the cost log should be one system, especially if a gateway taking a percentage of provider spend irritates you. The monitoring is competent and the pricing structure is honest. Skip it if deep eval and experiment tooling is your priority, and watch the ownership announcement before signing a multi-year Team deal.

Verdict generated

Verified 5d ago · liveness 87/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/helicone

Best for
  • Teams routing production traffic across three or more LLM providers
  • Companies that want routing, cost tracking, and alerts in one system
  • Teams migrating off a gateway that takes a percentage of provider spend
  • Engineering orgs enforcing rate limits and caching on every model call
Not ideal for
  • Teams needing a fully self-hosted stack — on-prem is Enterprise-only
  • Hobby users exceeding 10,000 requests/month or needing retention beyond 7 days
  • Projects prioritizing deep prompt evaluation and experiment tooling over gateway control
Visit Website

IntermediateOne line of integration gets a request logged, so an individual engineer can see traffic in the dashboard in under 15 minutes. Pro's HQL queries and alerts take an afternoon to wire into a review routine. Team-level work (SSO, compliance review, five organizations) is an IT project measured in days, not minutes.Web · APIAPI available2.6k viewsVerified 5d ago
Pricing
Free · from $79/mo
FreemiumFree tier4 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
One line of integration gets a request logged, so an individual engineer can see traffic in the dashboard in under 15 minutes. Pro's HQL queries and alerts take an afternoon to wire into a review routine. Team-level work (SSO, compliance review, five organizations) is an IT project measured in days, not minutes.
Runs on
WebAPI
API available · 11 integrations
Who it's for
Engineer at a 20-person AI startup running three providersPlatform lead at a scaling company with 40 engineersPrompt engineer iterating on a production assistant
Live sentiment
Is Helicone actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Helicone if your priority is systematic offline evaluation and experiment tracking rather than routing and cost visibility — its own comparison table marks that area limited against LangSmith and Braintrust.

Skip-it-if note generated
The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

Storage past the 1 GB free allowance is billed on usage — the calculator's 0.30 GB estimate runs $0.97/mo, so heavy log retention scales the bill

Price reality

Hobby is genuinely free at 10,000 requests/mo, and Pro at $79/mo undercuts heavier observability suites once you account for 0% passthrough markup on provider costs. Team at $799/mo is roughly ten times Pro for five organizations plus SOC-2 and HIPAA — a steep step if you only need compliance, not org count. Compare against LangSmith and Braintrust, which go deeper on evaluation but are not gateways.

Generated

In short

Helicone — Helicone is an AI gateway and LLM observability platform that routes, logs, and caches traffic across 100+ model providers. Best for Teams routing production traffic across three or more LLM providers, Companies that want routing, cost tracking, and alerts in one system, Teams migrating off a gateway that takes a percentage of provider spend. Free to start; paid plans from $79/mo.

No head-to-head comparison for Helicone yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.

Claim this listing

What is Helicone?

Helicone — Helicone is an AI gateway and LLM observability platform that routes, logs, and caches traffic across 100+ model providers. Best for Teams routing production traffic across three or more LLM providers, Companies that want routing, cost tracking, and alerts in one system, Teams migrating off a gateway that takes a percentage of provider spend. Free to start; paid plans from $79/mo.

FreemiumIntermediateAPI availableWeb · API

Helicone puts routing and monitoring in the same place. Point your code at its OpenAI-compatible endpoint and every request becomes a logged event you can query, cache, rate-limit, and fail over across providers. Passthrough billing keeps provider costs at 0% markup — the pricing calculator prices 10K requests at $0.00 in request fees, with storage driving the bill (about $0.97 for 0.30 GB). The daily surface is the observability side: request logs, segments, sessions, user analytics, custom properties, and HQL, a SQL-like language for slicing your own traffic. Alerts, reports, and webhooks push anomalies out; Playground and Datasets cover prompt iteration, and Prompt Management V2 lets you reference prompts by ID. The gateway adds caching, rate limits, and automatic fallbacks. Engineering teams running production traffic across several providers are the intended audience — the Pro tier adds unlimited seats, alerts, and HQL for $79/mo, Team $799/mo brings five organizations plus SOC-2 and HIPAA. The free Hobby tier is genuinely useful for a first project at 10,000 requests and 1 GB storage. Helicone's own comparison concedes that LangSmith and Braintrust go deeper on evaluation and experiments, while OpenRouter competes on routing alone. Note the ownership status: the site now states Helicone is no longer part of Mintlify, with details to come.

Key features

  • AI gateway routing across 100+ LLM providers
  • Passthrough billing at 0% markup on provider costs
  • OpenAI-compatible API endpoint for any model
  • Per-request LLM observability logging
  • Sessions and user analytics for journey reconstruction
  • Custom properties on request logs
  • HQL SQL-like query language over request logs
  • Playground with reasoning effort control
  • Visual display of the model's thinking process where available
  • Prompt Management V2 with version control
  • Prompt-by-ID deployment without code rebuilds
  • Datasets for versioning prompt data
  • Caching to cut latency and provider spend
  • Rate limits and automatic fallbacks on gateway traffic
  • Alerts, reports, and webhooks on production LLM traffic

Behind the verdict

The pitch here is narrow and real: combine the gateway with the observability layer so you are not stitching Datadog, a proxy, and a cost spreadsheet together. We'd reach for this when a team already runs three or more providers and wants one place to see spend, cache hits, and failures without changing application logic much beyond the endpoint. Where it bites is scope. Helicone is a strong monitoring and routing tool that happens to have prompts and a playground. If your week revolves around experiment tracking, dataset scoring, and offline evals, LangSmith or Braintrust will feel more purpose-built. The site's own table says as much. Pricing is straightforward in a way most gateways are not. Passthrough billing means 0% markup on provider costs, and you pay for the platform, not a cut of your spend. The jump from Hobby (10,000 requests, 1 GB, 7-day retention) to Pro at $79/mo is where most teams land once retention and alerts matter. On compliance, Team brings SOC-2 Type II and HIPAA, and Enterprise adds SAML SSO and on-prem deployment. If a fully self-hosted stack is a hard requirement, that's an Enterprise conversation — not a mid-tier option. One honest caveat: the site's banner says Helicone is no longer part of Mintlify, with details to come. That's a roadmap and continuity question, not a product-quality one, but it's worth asking about before you commit to a long Team contract. Compared with OpenRouter, the routing overlap is real but Helicone's advantage is the logging and HQL underneath it. Compared with Langfuse, the differentiator is the gateway and passthrough billing more than the tracing UI. In practice we'd start a new project on Hobby, confirm the logs are useful, then move to Pro the month you cross 10,000 requests or need more than a week of

Models under the hood

GPT-5GPT-5-MiniGPT-5-NanoGPT-5-Chat-LatestGPT-OSS 20BGPT-OSS 120BClaude Sonnet 4Claude Sonnet 4.5

as of 2026-11-08

Limitations

  • The free Hobby plan caps at 10,000 requests per month, 10 logs/min ingestion, 60 API calls/min, 1 GB storage, and 7-day data retention.
  • Pro ($79/mo) and Team ($799/mo) both carry usage-based pricing above the free allowance, so requests, storage, and ingestion can push the bill past the flat tier.
  • Team raises ingestion to 15,000 logs/min and API access to 1,000 calls/min; Enterprise is the only tier with configurable retention, SAML SSO, 30,000 logs/min ingestion, and on-prem deployment.
  • The site states Helicone is no longer part of Mintlify with details to come, so roadmap direction after the acquisition is unresolved.

as of 2026-10-21

Researching Helicone? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Is Helicone still active?

Helicone is live · free plan, paid from $79/mo · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy.

Viability score

87/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Helicone? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
not measured
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
55
What the vendor publishes
80

Last calculated: November 2026

How we score →

What do users say about Helicone?

What people actually say about Helicone — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

Researched

Discussed by users across 3 sources (Hacker News, GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Oct 16, 2026.

57% positive43% critical

Weighted by the 34 posts each of 3 sources contributed.

Recurring strengths
  • +Zero-markup passthrough billing means you pay provider rates, not a gateway tax
  • +Per-request logging plus sessions and user analytics reconstruct full request journeys
  • +Routing covers 100+ providers including Bedrock, Vertex, Groq, and OpenRouter
  • +HQL lets power users run SQL-like queries over their own request logs
  • +One-line integration is repeatedly cited as the fastest way to start monitoring
Recurring frustrations
  • −Now in maintenance mode after the Mintlify acquisition, so roadmap momentum is gone
  • −Model and provider price data reportedly lags behind provider updates
  • −No native per-feature cost rollups — trace-level data only, per community complaints
  • −Open issue overstates cost for OpenAI Predicted Outputs due to a token math bug
  • −170 open GitHub issues suggest a backlog larger than the team can clear
Patterns worth knowing
Helicone is a default answer for LLM cost and latency monitoring, often named alongside Langfuse
Seen on Hacker News
The Mintlify acquisition and 'maintenance mode' framing has cooled enthusiasm and raised longevity concerns
Seen on Hacker News
Cost tracking is retrospective — traces show what happened, not what a feature costs per invocation
Seen on Hacker News
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~5 minutes for basic logging, a few hours for routing and alerts
Hidden costs people mention
  • • Passthrough billing carries 0% gateway markup, but re-routing through Helicone still adds a network hop you must operate and monitor
  • • Self-hosting shifts hosting and maintenance cost onto your team, which is nontrivial for a ClickHouse-backed system

How we verified this

Every listed fact about Helicone — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 9 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.

Verification history

We have re-verified Helicone 24 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — changed SSL certificate
  2. — changed pricing page
  3. — changed description, who should skip it, features, pricing tiers, who it suits, summary, our verdict
  4. — changed SSL certificate
  5. — changed link health
  6. — changed SSL certificate, description, pricing tiers, who should skip it, who it suits, our verdict

Showing the 6 most recent of 24 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

Claim this listing

How much does Helicone cost in 2026?

Helicone: Free to start; paid plans from $79/mo. Pricing last verified 9 Nov 2026.

Plans compared

Every published Helicone tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.

Helicone pricing plans compared
PlanPriceBillingWho it's for
HobbyFree—A single engineer or side project making under 10,000 requests a month who wants logs and cost visibility without a credit cardAdds: Free entry point: 10,000 requests/mo, 1 GB storage, 1 seat, 7-day retention, community support
Pro$79/momonthlyA growing engineering team that needs unlimited seats, alerts, and HQL to investigate production traffic togetherAdds: Adds unlimited seats, alerts and reports, HQL, 1-month retention, 1,000 logs/min ingestion, and 60 API calls/min over Hobby, with usage-based pricing on top
Team$799/momonthlyA scaling company running several product lines that needs SOC-2 Type II and HIPAA coverage on its AI gatewayAdds: Adds 5 organizations, SOC-2 and HIPAA compliance, a private Slack channel, 3-month retention, and 15,000 logs/min ingestion over Pro
EnterpriseCustomquoteA regulated or on-prem-constrained enterprise that needs SSO, custom contracts, and dedicated supportAdds: Adds custom MSA, SAML SSO, on-prem deployment, bulk cloud discounts, forever retention, 30,000 logs/min, and a dedicated support engineer with SLAs

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • Storage past the 1 GB free allowance is billed on usage — the calculator's 0.30 GB estimate runs $0.97/mo, so heavy log retention scales the bill
  • Pro and Team are flat monthly prices with usage-based pricing on top, so request volume above the 10K free requests can push the bill past $79/mo or $799/mo
  • Hobby's 10 logs/min ingestion and 60 API calls/min throttle busy apps, forcing an upgrade to Pro just to keep up with traffic
  • SOC-2 Type II and HIPAA compliance sit at Team ($799/mo), so regulated teams cannot stay on Pro at $79/mo
  • Configurable retention, SAML SSO, and on-prem deployment are Enterprise-only, which means a custom contract to get them

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Helicone's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Hobby is genuinely free at 10,000 requests/mo, and Pro at $79/mo undercuts heavier observability suites once you account for 0% passthrough markup on provider costs. Team at $799/mo is roughly ten times Pro for five organizations plus SOC-2 and HIPAA — a steep step if you only need compliance, not org count. Compare against LangSmith and Braintrust, which go deeper on evaluation but are not gateways.

Hidden-cost and price-fit notes generated

Has Helicone's pricing changed?

No plan price for Helicone has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.

Who should pick Helicone?

Pick Helicone if you are Teams routing production traffic across three or more LLM providers, Companies that want routing, cost tracking, and alerts in one system, Teams migrating off a gateway that takes a percentage of provider spend, Engineering orgs enforcing rate limits and caching on every model call.

Look elsewhere if you are Teams needing a fully self-hosted stack — on-prem is Enterprise-only, Hobby users exceeding 10,000 requests/month or needing retention beyond 7 days, Projects prioritizing deep prompt evaluation and experiment tooling over gateway control, Buyers who need a settled ownership and roadmap picture before committing long-term.

Skip it if Skip Helicone if your priority is systematic offline evaluation and experiment tracking rather than routing and cost visibility — its own comparison table marks that area limited against LangSmith and Braintrust.

Generated

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Helicone actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Engineer at a 20-person AI startup running three providers

Point OpenAI-compatible requests at Helicone, turn on fallbacks so Anthropic picks up when OpenAI rate-limits, and watch per-request cost and latency in the dashboard

Outcome: One pane for routing and spend, with no percentage cut taken on provider costs and alerts firing when error rates spike

Platform lead at a scaling company with 40 engineers

Move from Hobby to Pro for unlimited seats and HQL, write queries over request logs to attribute spend per customer using custom properties, then set reports for weekly cost review

Outcome: Cost attribution that used to be spreadsheet guesswork, and a shared URL every engineer can open when something breaks

Prompt engineer iterating on a production assistant

Save a prompt with typed variables in the Playground, test reasoning effort at minimal versus high, version it, then reference the prompt ID through the gateway

Outcome: Prompt changes go live from the dashboard without a code deployment or rebuild

Workflow scenarios generated

Use cases

  • Monitor all LLM API calls in real time with detailed per-request logs and cost breakdowns
  • Route requests across multiple providers to optimize for latency, cost, or reliability
  • Debug failed requests and analyze user sessions to improve app performance
  • Test prompts and models in the Playground with reasoning effort control before deploying
  • Set alerts for rate limits, errors, or spending thresholds across your AI stack
  • Track GPT-5, GPT-OSS, or Claude Opus 4.1 costs across Fireworks, Groq, and OpenRouter in one dashboard
  • Ship prompt changes without code deployments using Prompt Management V2
  • Filter request volume by country of origin to see where API calls come from

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Helicone — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

One line of integration gets a request logged, so an individual engineer can see traffic in the dashboard in under 15 minutes. Pro's HQL queries and alerts take an afternoon to wire into a review routine. Team-level work (SSO, compliance review, five organizations) is an IT project measured in days, not minutes.

Switching to or from Helicone

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From OpenRouter: repoint your OpenAI-compatible base URL at Helicone's gateway and keep the same model strings, with 0% passthrough markup instead of a gateway cut
  • →From direct provider SDKs: swap the base URL for Helicone's OpenAI-compatible endpoint — the changelog's one-line integration keeps your existing call structure
  • →From LiteLLM: keep LiteLLM in the path as a documented integration and layer Helicone's logging and cost analytics on top
Migrating out
  • ↗To LangSmith: export request data via the dashboard's data export option and rebuild evaluation and experiment workflows there
  • ↗To Braintrust: move prompt iteration and scoring into Braintrust's experiment tooling, since Helicone's own comparison marks that area limited
  • ↗To a direct provider setup: drop the base URL override and lose gateway caching, fallbacks, and unified cost reporting with it

Integrations

OpenAIAnthropicAzureLiteLLMAnyscaleTogether AIOpenRouterAWS BedrockGoogle Vertex AIGroqFireworks

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Helicone”, and we withheld 5: 5 could not be judged, because “Helicone” is a single word that other videos use for other things. Showing the 1 we can prove is about Helicone.

What are the best Helicone alternatives?

The closest alternatives to Helicone we list are Braintrust, LangSmith and LiteLLM. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.

Closest alternatives to Helicone
AlternativePricingStarts atLast verified
BraintrustFreemiumPricing not published—
LangSmithFreemiumPricing not published—
LiteLLMFreemiumPricing not published—

Alternatives to Helicone

View all
Braintrust

Braintrust

Braintrust delivers agent observability with evals, pattern discovery, and trace-scale storage in one platform.

FreemiumTry
LangSmith

LangSmith

LangSmith agent observability: trace, monitor, and evaluate every LLM run with SmithDB-backed trace search.

FreemiumTry
LiteLLM

LiteLLM

LiteLLM is a self-hosted AI gateway that puts 140+ providers and 1,800+ models behind one OpenAI-compatible API.

FreemiumTry

Tools that pair well with Helicone

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Helicone, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Frequently asked questions

For makers of Helicone

Used Helicone? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.