Hubble
One API for EHR, payer, and lab patient data, built for AI agents.
Hubble is the pragmatic pick when you need HIPAA-compliant access to EHR and payer data for AI agents without months of integration work. The Data Infrastructure API is production-ready, and patient-mediated access is a real differentiator. Workflows is still beta, so treat it as a bonus. Contact pricing means it's not for hobbyists, so compare against direct FHIR APIs or Particle Health.
Verified 6d ago · liveness 70/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/hubble
- Healthcare AI startups building agent-based workflows for providers
- Health systems and hospitals deploying AI for prior authorization, patient navigation, or clinical decision support
- Digital health companies needing accelerated EHR/payer integration
- Ops teams automating manual administrative work with no-code workflows
- Non-healthcare use cases — Hubble is healthcare-only
- Teams wanting a free DIY AI app builder
- Organizations unwilling to implement patient/provider mediated access models
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Hubble if you are not in healthcare or if you expect instant self-serve signup with public pricing—this is a contact-sales, enterprise-focused platform.
Pricing is not publicly listed, so you must contact sales for a quote—enterprise contracts may include minimums and annual commitments.
Hubble targets digital health companies and health systems that value speed-to-market and compliance over low cost. It's more expensive than DIY FHIR APIs, but you save months of integration and get audit-readiness out of the box. Compared to larger vendors like Epic's own APIs or clearinghouse APIs, Hubble offers a unified layer for 40+ sources, which is a significant time saver.
In short
Hubble — One API for EHR, payer, and lab patient data, built for AI agents. Best for Healthcare AI startups building agent-based workflows for providers, Health systems and hospitals deploying AI for prior authorization, patient navigation, or clinical decision support, Digital health companies needing accelerated EHR/payer integration. Contact Sales pricing.
What's new in Hubble
Checked 3 days agoAcross the latest 3 updates: 3 feature updates.
What is the patient right of access?
Details the federal right for patients to obtain their records, underpinning patient-mediated access.
What is Individual Access Services (IAS) under TEFCA?
Explains IAS under TEFCA, the lane for patient-mediated access, and how it scales.
Introducing patient-mediated access: records that follow the patient
Announces patient-mediated access: one-time authorization yields consistent record shapes.
What people actually say about Hubble — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
45 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
- +Addresses a real pain point: weeks vs months integrating healthcare APIs.
- +Purpose-built for healthcare with HIPAA-compliant governance out of the box.
- +Supports multiple data sources: EHRs, payers, labs, pharmacy, clearinghouses.
- +Includes eval, observability, and trace features for AI agent reliability.
- +Offers both patient-mediated and provider-authorized access modes.
- −No community feedback exists to validate any of the claims.
- −Complete absence of user discussions on all major platforms.
- −Name collision with Hubble Space Telescope drowns out product search results.
- −Unclear how well it integrates with legacy EHR systems that lack modern APIs.
- −No independent security or compliance audits publicly available.
- • Possible per-integration or per-API-call pricing not disclosed
- • Potential fees for premium support or SLA guarantees
- • Costs for browser retrieval tier may exceed basic API pricing
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Hubble? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: August 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Single API for EHR, payer, lab, pharmacy, clearinghouse data
- Patient-mediated access (right of access) with one-time authorization
- Provider-mediated access with read/write permissions
- Normalized structured patient context: conditions, medications, claims, documents
- Every field traceable to its source system
- HIPAA-compliant permissions and audit trails on every call
- APIs, browser, and voice to reach every source
- Structured output with deterministic IDs
- No-code Workflows studio for composing agents in plain language
- AI Governance module: agent inventory, scoped permissions, human review queues
- Live dashboard with revenue recovered, actions, and failure rate
- Real-time agent tool call streaming dashboard
- Supports 40+ tools including Epic, Cerner, athenahealth, UnitedHealthcare, Aetna
About Hubble
Hubble is a healthcare data platform that gives AI agents and digital health products a single route to patient records locked inside EHRs, payers, clearinghouses, labs, and pharmacy networks. Rather than stitching together months of per-vendor integrations, teams connect once and get normalized, structured patient context: conditions, medications, claims, documents. Every field is traceable to its source system, and each call is permissioned and logged under HIPAA, so the audit trail is ready before compliance asks. Hubble operates in two modes: patient-mediated (right of access) for one-time authorization to pull records that follow the patient, and provider-mediated for read and write permissions. It reaches data through APIs, a browser, and voice, covering 40+ tools including Epic, Cerner, athenahealth, UnitedHealthcare, and Aetna. Two products sit on this data layer: Data Infrastructure for engineering teams shipping patient-facing features, and Workflows, a no-code studio where ops teams can compose operational agents in plain language and watch a live dashboard of revenue recovered, actions taken, and failure rate. There's also an AI Governance module to inventory, scope, and review every AI tool touching patient data. If you're building healthcare AI and don't want to own the plumbing, Hubble is the fastest on-ramp to compliant, traceable data access.
Behind the Verdict
Hubble is the answer for teams that would rather ship a patient-facing AI feature than negotiate with a hospital IT department for six months. The breadth of coverage matters less than the fact that every field comes tagged with its source system; when a physician asks where a value came from, you can point to Epic or athenahealth without scrambling. That traceability is the quiet advantage over a raw FHIR API, which hands you data but forces you to build the provenance layer yourself. The patient-mediated access model is a genuine shift: one-time authorization and records follow the patient, which unblocks use cases like a patient switching providers or a startup that can't get a hospital contract signed. In practice, that's the difference between waiting on a legal team and going live now. Where it bites: Workflows is still beta, so if you're betting your operations on no-code agent building, keep your expectations low. And there's no self-serve signup; you'll talk to sales and likely pay enterprise rates. If you're a startup with a narrow EHR integration need, a direct FHIR API might be cheaper, but you'll lose the payer coverage and the audit trail. Hubble's 40+ sources and dual-mediated access make it the strongest all-in-one.
Researching Hubble? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Hubble actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You need to build a symptom checker that accesses patient records from multiple EHRs.
Outcome: Integrate Hubble's API in a week, query patient data via a single call, and ship the MVP in weeks instead of months.
Your team manually handles prior authorization calls for thousands of patients.
Outcome: Use Hubble's Workflows studio to create a plain-language agent that pulls patient data and payer rules, reducing manual workload and improving turnaround time.
You need to ensure all patient data access is logged and auditable.
Outcome: With Hubble's audit trail on every call, you have a ready-made log for audits, satisfying HIPAA and internal governance requirements.
Use Cases
- Retrieve a patient's full record (conditions, medications) from an EHR in a single structured call
- Check insurance eligibility in real-time against a payer network (e.g., UnitedHealthcare)
- Build an AI agent that automates prior authorization by pulling patient data and payer rules
- Enable a chatbot to answer patient queries about their claims, labs, and pharmacy history
- Create a dashboard that monitors agent quality, surfacing hallucinations or data regressions
Limitations
- Pricing is not publicly listed; must contact sales for quotes.
- The Workflows studio is still in beta, so core value currently comes from the Data Infrastructure API.
- Hubble relies on mediated access models (patient right of access or provider authorization), which may add user-experience friction depending on the use case.
as of 2026-08-11
Verification history
We have re-verified Hubble 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Hubble's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Hubble targets digital health companies and health systems that value speed-to-market and compliance over low cost. It's more expensive than DIY FHIR APIs, but you save months of integration and get audit-readiness out of the box. Compared to larger vendors like Epic's own APIs or clearinghouse APIs, Hubble offers a unified layer for 40+ sources, which is a significant time saver.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Hubble — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For engineering teams, Hubble's API can be integrated and live in production within weeks—no per-vendor plumping. For ops teams using the Workflows studio, you can compose your first agent in a day (beta). Expect the demo-to-prod cycle to be around 2-4 weeks depending on your authorization flow design.
Switching to or from Hubble
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From point-to-point EHR integrations: Replace your custom code with Hubble's unified API, saving months of maintenance.
- →From manual prior authorization processes: Move to Hubble's Workflows to automate data retrieval and rules engine.
- ↗To a direct FHIR API: If you prefer to build and maintain your own integrations, you can migrate by exporting your data and rebuilding, though you lose Hubble's unified layer.
- ↗To a competitor like Particle Health: If pricing or feature set changes, you can port your agent logic while replacing the data layer.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Hubble
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Hubble, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Innovaccer
Agentic cloud platform for healthcare that unifies data and AI agents to automate revenue cycle, population health, and specialty care.
Mem0
Drop-in AI memory layer giving agents persistent, cross-session context.
Notable
Healthcare AI automation platform for patient access, RCM, and care operations
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Hubble vs Voyage Ai
Voyage AI and Hubble serve completely different markets. Choose Voyage AI if you need high-accuracy, domain-specific embedding models for RAG pipelines (especially in finance/legal/medical). Choose Hubble if you are building healthcare AI agents and need one API to connect to EHRs, payers, and labs with HIPAA compliance. They do not compete directly.
Hubble vs Temporal Ai
For building reliable, fault-tolerant AI agents and workflows across any industry, Temporal is the clear choice with its open-source durability, multiple SDKs, and usage-based pricing. However, if you are in healthcare and need plug-and-play HIPAA-compliant access to EHRs, payers, and labs, Hubble is purpose-built for that — but its contact-based pricing and lack of recent updates may be a concern. Choose based on your domain: infrastructure vs. healthcare specialization.
Hubble vs Spider Cloud
Hubble vs Reka
Choose Hubble if your AI product needs to tap into healthcare data (EHRs, payers, labs) without months of integration work — it’s purpose-built for regulated agent workflows. Choose Reka if you’re building real-time video intelligence for the edge, robotics, or public sector, where low-latency multimodal understanding on low-power devices matters. They serve completely different markets; your choice depends on whether your use case is healthcare data or physical world video.
Hubble vs Notable
If your priority is giving AI agents fast, HIPAA-compliant access to EHR and payer data across systems, choose Hubble. If you need an end-to-end automation platform for patient access, RCM, and care coordination workflows (with voice AI and natural language automation creation), Notable is the fit. Both target enterprise healthcare, but Hubble is a data layer while Notable is a workflow engine.
Alternatives to Hubble
View allInnovaccer
Agentic cloud platform for healthcare that unifies data and AI agents to automate revenue cycle, population health, and specialty care.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Hubble? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.