Intent is live · free · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy
Intent
Intent orchestrates fleets of AI coding agents, giving each parallel task its own git worktree and living spec.
Per-task git worktree isolation is what earns Intent its keep — a fleet of parallel agents each with a clean, auditable workspace beats five agents rewriting the same files. The coordinator/specialist split and per-role provider mixing go further than Cursor or Copilot do today. Know going in that you supply and pay for the model, and that Windows and Linux builds are alpha.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 71/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/intent
- Developers running several AI agents at once on feature-sized tasks
- Small engineering teams aligning human and AI work through a shared spec
- Developers already using CLI agent providers who want orchestration on top
- Teams wanting agent-assisted GitHub PR review and merge in one place
- Non-developers looking for a no-code AI tool
- Teams that want a single-assistant IDE with inline autocomplete
- Windows or Linux users who need a non-alpha build today
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Intent if you want a single assistant writing inline completions in one chat window, or if you're not willing to install, log in to, and pay a separate agent provider before Intent can do anything at all.
Intent itself is free, but every task burns tokens on your own agent provider account — Augment Auggie, Claude Code, Codex, or whichever you connect — and that bill arrives separately from the provider.
Intent is free to run, so the real cost comparison is against your agent provider rather than against another IDE. Set Intent beside a single-assistant subscription like Cursor or GitHub Copilot and the math is different in kind: you pay the provider per model per role, and you can mix a cheaper model for implementation with a stronger one for verification. Solo developers on one provider account stay cheap; teams running many parallel workspaces scale their provider bill, not their Intent bill.
In short
Intent — Intent orchestrates fleets of AI coding agents, giving each parallel task its own git worktree and living spec. Best for Developers running several AI agents at once on feature-sized tasks, Small engineering teams aligning human and AI work through a shared spec, Developers already using CLI agent providers who want orchestration on top. Free to use.
What is Intent?
Intent — Intent orchestrates fleets of AI coding agents, giving each parallel task its own git worktree and living spec. Best for Developers running several AI agents at once on feature-sized tasks, Small engineering teams aligning human and AI work through a shared spec, Developers already using CLI agent providers who want orchestration on top. Free to use.
Intent is a desktop app for developers who run several AI coding agents at the same time and don't want them stepping on each other. Every task gets a workspace with an isolated git worktree, so parallel agents can edit the same repository without colliding, plus a living spec that holds assumptions, requirements and design decisions the agents read as shared context. The orchestration runs through a coordinator agent that splits work into pieces and hands them to named specialists: implementer, verifier, UI designer, PR reviewer, plus custom specialists you write to encode your team's conventions. The vendor's own walkthrough shows the coordinator holding dependent tasks until prerequisites verify, then releasing them as a parallel wave. A built-in browser panel lets agents click through your running web app for end-to-end checks, with before-and-after screenshots attached to verification steps. The v2.212.1 release added a Home page for cross-project work: workspaces across repositories in list or board view, grouped by status or repository, with search, activity filters and pinned workspaces, and you can reply to agents or jump to linked Linear issues and GitHub PRs from there. Mobile v1.1.6 brought a redesigned iPad layout and iPhone Duo fold support. You bring the model — Claude Code, Codex, Antigravity, Auggie, Grok Build, OpenCode, Pi and Unsloth are mixable per role, so one provider coordinates and another verifies. Intent is macOS-first, with Windows and Linux labelled alpha. Pick it over single-assistant IDEs like Cursor or GitHub Copilot when orchestration across many tasks, not raw model intelligence, is the bottleneck.
Key features
- Coordinate fleets of AI coding agents from one desktop app
- Isolated git worktree per task so parallel agents never collide
- Living spec per workspace capturing assumptions and design decisions
- Coordinator agent decomposes work and delegates to specialist sub-agents
- Built-in specialists: implementer, verifier, UI designer, PR reviewer
- Custom specialist agents encoding team conventions and review standards
- Bring your own provider: Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Antigravity, Auggie, Grok Build, Pi, Unsloth
- Swap models per role and between sessions
- Home page shows workspaces across repositories in list or board views
- Group workspaces by status or repository with search and activity filters
- Pin workspaces and reply to agents from the Home page
- Start workspaces directly from Linear issues and GitHub PRs
- Built-in browser panel for autonomous end-to-end web app testing
- Before-and-after screenshots embedded in the spec's verification steps
- Integrated git: commits, reviews and merges next to files and diffs
Behind the verdict
Where Intent pays off is the moment you go past two concurrent agents. One agent on one task is a solved problem; six agents across three repos is where merge conflicts, duplicated setup and unclear handoffs start eating your day. Isolating each task in its own worktree, with a spec that carries the assumptions forward, is a structure that scales where a single chat window doesn't. We'd reach for it when the work is feature-sized and decomposable. The vendor's Mapbox example is the pattern to copy: scaffold first, hold the dependent endpoints, then fan out once the verifier signs off. Tasks that fit that shape — migrations, test suites, multi-endpoint API work — benefit most. Pass when the edit is a one-liner. Creating a workspace, writing a spec and waiting on a coordinator is more ceremony than the change deserves, and you'll resent the overhead. The per-role provider mix is the quieter win. Running Claude Code as coordinator with a different provider verifying gives you a second opinion built into the workflow rather than bolted on. That does mean you're paying two providers, and Intent itself has no cost attached in what we can confirm today. Closest alternative is Cursor or Copilot if you want one assistant with inline completion; Intent assumes you already have agent CLIs you like and want a layer above them. Also worth weighing against plain git worktrees and a shell script — Intent's value is the coordinator, spec and browser verification loop, not the isolation alone. Caveats: macOS-first with Windows and Linux in alpha, so check your platform before committing. The browser panel only helps web apps, and a fully autonomous coordinator still needs your review at the spec stage.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-10-24
Limitations
- Intent does not supply the underlying model — you bring your own agent provider (Augment Auggie, Anthropic Claude Code, Google Antigravity, Grok Build, OpenAI Codex, OpenCode, Pi, Unsloth) and pay that provider separately.
- It is built around workspaces rather than chat threads, with each task getting an isolated copy of your files, so a chat-first habit works against it.
- Download is offered for macOS, and the mobile app is a companion that lets you steer and monitor agents remotely rather than a standalone host.
as of 2026-10-09
Researching Intent? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Intent still active?
Intent is live · free · last verified 25 Oct 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Intent? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What's new in Intent
Checked 11 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 2 changelog entries.
Intent v2.212.1 introduces Home page for cross-project work
Home shows workspaces in list or board view grouped by status or repository, with search, activity filters and pinned workspaces. Users can reply to agents and open linked Linear issues or GitHub PRs.
Intent mobile v1.1.6 adds redesigned iPad experience, iPhone Duo support
iPad gets persistent nav bar, centered conversation column, focused search overlay. iPhone Duo adapts to folded, unfolded and half-open layouts. PDF viewer and fullscreen text/HTML viewer added.
What do users say about Intent?
What people actually say about Intent — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 4, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Intent— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 25 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Intent 12 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed who it suits, our verdict, pricing tiers, features, description, summary
- — changed pricing page
- — changed summary, features, our verdict, description, pricing tiers
- — changed pricing page
- — changed who it suits, who should skip it, description, pricing tiers, integrations, summary, our verdict, features
- — changed pricing page, platforms, limitations, models
Showing the 6 most recent of 12 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Intent cost in 2026?
Intent: Free to use. Pricing last verified 25 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Intent tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Solo developers and small teams who already pay for an agent provider and want multi-agent orchestration, worktree isolation, and PR review on top without a second software bill.Adds: Starting tier — Intent itself costs nothing; your spend goes to whichever agent provider you connect. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Intent's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Intent is free to run, so the real cost comparison is against your agent provider rather than against another IDE. Set Intent beside a single-assistant subscription like Cursor or GitHub Copilot and the math is different in kind: you pay the provider per model per role, and you can mix a cheaper model for implementation with a stronger one for verification. Solo developers on one provider account stay cheap; teams running many parallel workspaces scale their provider bill, not their Intent bill.
Has Intent's pricing changed?
No plan price for Intent has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Intent?
Pick Intent if you are Developers running several AI agents at once on feature-sized tasks, Small engineering teams aligning human and AI work through a shared spec, Developers already using CLI agent providers who want orchestration on top, Teams wanting agent-assisted GitHub PR review and merge in one place.
Look elsewhere if you are Non-developers looking for a no-code AI tool, Teams that want a single-assistant IDE with inline autocomplete, Windows or Linux users who need a non-alpha build today, Teams unwilling to install and pay for an external agent provider.
Skip it if Skip Intent if you want a single assistant writing inline completions in one chat window, or if you're not willing to install, log in to, and pay a separate agent provider before Intent can do anything at all.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Intent actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You point Intent at an existing repo, create one workspace per task, and write the spec before any code. The coordinator breaks the work into Wave 1, holds the Mapbox geocoding and directions tasks behind a scaffold plus a verifier, then releases them in parallel once the scaffold passes.
Outcome: Three tasks land without agents overwriting each other's files, and every decision is recorded in the spec rather than buried in a chat log.
You author custom specialist agents that encode your team's review standards, assign one provider to implement and a different one to verify, then let the PR reviewer specialist monitor an open pull request and respond to comments.
Outcome: Review conventions become reusable roles any agent can delegate to, and PR iteration happens without a human relaying every comment.
You offload a long test run to a remote machine, then start a workspace from the Intent mobile app on your iPhone, answer an agent's question, and check the browser preview and diffs.
Outcome: The task keeps moving while you're out, and a notification tells you when the agent finishes so you can pick the workspace back up locally.
Use cases
- Build a REST API by writing the spec first, letting the coordinator delegate implementation, and reviewing diffs before merge.
- Add a dark mode toggle to an existing web app and have agents run the end-to-end browser tests before marking the task done.
- Refactor a large codebase by splitting it into parallel task workspaces with isolated worktrees and monitoring them from the sidebar.
- Compare agent providers on the same feature — coordinate with one model and verify with another to judge code quality.
- Onboard a contributor by sharing a workspace whose spec and agent activity history carry the project context.
- Offload a long test run to a remote machine and pick the workspace back up locally when it finishes.
- Start a new workspace from your iPhone, answer an agent's question while away from the desk, and check diffs on return.
- Rebuild a Figma deliverable from live web-app imports, then promote repeated UI into real components and variants.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Intent — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Solo developer: an evening — install Intent, configure your provider under Settings → Providers (the first-run onboarding walks you through it with a default model), and create your first workspace off main in a new worktree. Small team: add time to write custom specialist prompts and reliable worktree setup scripts, which the docs recommend investing in early. Budget extra if you're on Windows
Switching to or from Intent
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From Cursor or GitHub Copilot: keep the repo, create an Intent workspace per task, and move the inline-assistant habit into a spec the coordinator delegates from.
- →From a single CLI agent in a terminal: map each recurring prompt into a specialist role, then let the coordinator decide when implementers act and when verifiers start.
- →From manual git branch juggling: replace per-feature branches with per-task workspaces, each getting its own worktree automatically.
- →From a chat-first assistant: write assumptions and requirements into the workspace spec first, then let agents read from it instead of restating context each turn.
- ↗To a single-assistant IDE like Cursor or GitHub Copilot: collapse workspaces back into one repo checkout and accept sequential rather than parallel agent work.
- ↗To raw CLI agents in one terminal: export the spec as project context and run agents manually, losing worktree isolation and PR monitoring.
- ↗To a CI-hosted agent service: move autonomous test runs into your pipeline, giving up the in-app browser panel's before-and-after screenshot evidence.
Integrations
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Intent”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Intent” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Intent.
Official links
What are the best Intent alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Intent we list are Cursor, Lanes and GitHub Copilot. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cursor | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Lanes | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| GitHub Copilot | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Intent
View allCursor
Cursor is an AI coding agent that plans, builds and ships features from your editor, CLI, Slack, GitHub and iOS.
Lanes
macOS desktop app that runs parallel AI coding agents on an issue board, each in its own git worktree, with a self-hostable MCP endpoint for governed access.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub's AI coding agent for inline completion, delegated pull requests, code review, and recurring agent tasks across your repos.
Tools that pair well with Intent
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Intent, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Cursor
Cursor is an AI coding agent that plans, builds and ships features from your editor, CLI, Slack, GitHub and iOS.
Lanes
macOS desktop app that runs parallel AI coding agents on an issue board, each in its own git worktree, with a self-hostable MCP endpoint for governed access.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub's AI coding agent for inline completion, delegated pull requests, code review, and recurring agent tasks across your repos.
Intent vs its closest rival
Intent's closest head-to-head is with Locus Robotics — These tools serve entirely different domains: Locus Robotics automates physical warehouse operations with AMRs, while Intent automates software development with AI agents. Choose based on your need: logistics vs. coding. No direct competition. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Intent vs Locus Robotics
These tools serve entirely different domains: Locus Robotics automates physical warehouse operations with AMRs, while Intent automates software development with AI agents. Choose based on your need: logistics vs. coding. No direct competition.
GeneratedIntent vs Presto Voice
Presto Voice and Intent are not competitors—they serve entirely different domains. Presto Voice is for QSR chains automating drive-thru orders to boost revenue and efficiency, while Intent is for developers using multi-agent orchestration to build software. Choose based on your industry: restaurants need Presto Voice; software teams need Intent.
GeneratedIntent vs Truleo
Truleo and Intent serve entirely different buyers. Truleo is a paid law enforcement analytics platform that connects siloed police data to automate intelligence and report writing. Intent is a free desktop IDE for developers to orchestrate multiple AI agents around a shared spec. Choose based on your domain—public safety or software development. Intent's latest open-source DAG compiler adds execution determinism for agent workflows.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Best-of guides
Used Intent? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.