Komos AI is live · custom pricing · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy
Komos AI
Komos automates background screening portals your researchers still copy by hand — with an FCRA-auditable trail.
If your researchers still hand-copy court hits into case files, Komos is aimed squarely at that job — audit trail, exception queues, and a credential vault answer the objections compliance will actually raise. It is not a quick win: budget roughly 30 days of joint build before the first flow runs on real volume. Pass if you only need generic workflow automation or a pure API-first product.
Verdict generatedVerified 5d ago · liveness 76/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/komos-ai
- Background screening companies (CRAs) automating court record searches across thousands of portals
- Compliance and QC teams that need an exportable FCRA-auditable record of every verification step
- Screening ops managers replacing manual portal data entry without adding headcount
- Teams running Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI that want to trigger screening automations via MCP
- Non-regulated teams that only need generic no-code or workflow automation
- Operations that need a first workflow live in days rather than a ~30-day joint build
- Companies without IT or security staff to provision and manage self-hosted runners
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Komos if you need generic no-code automation outside a regulated screening workflow, or if your team wants a first flow live in days rather than the ~30-day joint build Komos runs with new CRAs.
The free trial stops at 1,000 AI actions over 14 days, so any pilot that runs real case volume will need a paid Enterprise agreement before it finishes.
Komos fits mid-size and large CRAs whose screening volume justifies a custom Enterprise contract and a 30-day joint build; the $0 14-day trial with 1,000 AI actions is sized for validating one flow, not for budgeting production. Compare against generic browser-automation platforms that publish per-seat or per-task rates but carry no FCRA audit trail, role separation, or KMS-backed credential vault — Komos costs more to stand up and less to defend in a dispute.
In short
Komos AI — Komos automates background screening portals your researchers still copy by hand — with an FCRA-auditable trail. Best for Background screening companies (CRAs) automating court record searches across thousands of portals, Compliance and QC teams that need an exportable FCRA-auditable record of every verification step, Screening ops managers replacing manual portal data entry without adding headcount. Pricing is on request (custom quotes).
What is Komos AI?
Komos AI — Komos automates background screening portals your researchers still copy by hand — with an FCRA-auditable trail. Best for Background screening companies (CRAs) automating court record searches across thousands of portals, Compliance and QC teams that need an exportable FCRA-auditable record of every verification step, Screening ops managers replacing manual portal data entry without adding headcount. Pricing is on request (custom quotes).
Komos is an operations layer for background screening companies (CRAs). You walk through a court lookup, DMV check, or employer verification once on your screen; Komos converts that session into an editable workflow and runs it against real case volume. The vendor reports 15,000+ automated runs and 300,000+ automated actions per month across 1,000+ portals, with a 30-day path to first flow live. The product exists because the APIs don't. County and state court portals, PACER, USCIS, DMVs, credit bureaus, sanctions and watchlist sources, and case management systems mostly lack programmatic access, so Komos drives them at the browser level — logins, dropdowns, CAPTCHAs — and parses results into structured fields. Runners can sit behind your own SSO and network controls, including self-hosted Windows and macOS machines for intranet portals and legacy desktop apps. Compliance work is the differentiator. Every verification produces step-by-step logs, screenshots, and the source material behind each result, exportable for FCRA disputes and QC. Role separation across researcher, QC, and reviewer is built in; possible hits and errors route to exception queues for human adjudication. Credentials live in a KMS-backed encrypted vault with per-org and per-flow scopes, MFA runs during live sessions, and PII is redacted in stored run logs. SOC 2 is cited on the site. Moss, the embedded AI engineer, builds flows from plain language, video walkthroughs, or process documents, monitors runs across your operation, and patches flows when a portal redesigns. Compare it to offshore BPO and scripted RPA: Komos keeps the work inside your perimeter and version-controlled rather than shipping PII out or maintaining brittle scripts.
Key features
- Screen recording to workflow: walk through a task once and Komos builds the automation
- Moss AI engineer builds flows from plain language, video walkthroughs, or process documents
- Moss monitors every run and patches flows when a court portal or form redesigns
- Visual builder to drag, edit, and reorder verification steps
- Control flow with If/Else branching, loops, and wait-for early-exit guards
- Versioning and rollback for safe workflow changes
- Exception queues route possible hits and errors to researchers for adjudication
- Role-based access separation between researcher, QC, and reviewer
- FCRA-auditable trail with step-by-step logs, screenshots, and exportable records
- Browser automation for portals with no API: county and state courts, PACER, USCIS, DMVs
- MFA (TOTP, SMS, email) supported during production runs
- KMS-backed credential vault with per-org and per-flow scopes, plus PII redaction in run logs
- Self-hosted desktop runner for Windows and macOS behind your SSO and network controls
- MCP server connects Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, Gemini CLI via 5 tools
- Runs triggered by CSV upload, email, or webhook
Behind the verdict
Most CRAs we talk to clear verification volume by hiring or outsourcing. Komos takes the third route: automate the portal work itself and keep the judgment calls with your researchers. We'd reach for it when court record search is your highest-volume pain and your compliance team is the real gatekeeper — because the step-by-step logs, screenshots, and exportable records are what gets a security review signed off. Where it bites is time-to-value. The vendor's own number is 30 days to first flow live, and that is a joint build with your team, not a trial you spin up alone. Plan a named ops owner and an IT contact for runner provisioning before you start. Teams that expect a first workflow in a week will be disappointed. Compare it to traditional RPA. Scripted RPA breaks the moment a county court redesigns its search form, and maintenance quietly becomes its own headcount line. Komos leans on Moss to diagnose and patch broken flows, and it routes exceptions to humans instead of failing silently or stalling the queue. That maintenance story is the honest reason to pay for this over a cheaper scripting shop. Compare it to offshore BPO and to growing your ops team. Headcount scales cost linearly and takes weeks to ramp per researcher; BPO trades control for cost and moves PII outside your perimeter. Komos keeps data in your controls and runs the same flow the same way each time. If your volume is low or your workflows are genuinely one-off, none of those tradeoffs are worth the setup. One caveat on scope: this is built for regulated screening. If you need generic no-code automation for marketing ops or finance, you are paying for compliance machinery you will never use — pick a mainstream workflow tool instead. The 14-day free trial includes 1,000 AI actions and
Models under the hood
as of 2026-11-09
Limitations
- The free trial is capped at 1,000 AI actions over 14 days, which validates a flow but will not cover a month of production volume.
- Komos deliberately routes possible hits, errors, and edge cases to human researchers for adjudication, so runs are not fully straight-through by design — that is FCRA-correct, but it means the platform reduces data entry rather than eliminating the human.
- First production flow takes roughly 30 days of joint build time, and self-hosted runners require IT or security staff to provision.
- Published pricing stops at the free trial and a Custom Enterprise tier, so there is no public per-seat or per-action rate to budget against without contacting the vendor.
as of 2026-10-09
Researching Komos AI? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Komos AI still active?
Komos AI is live · custom pricing · last verified 9 Nov 2026 · viability healthy.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Komos AI? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What's new in Komos AI
Checked 6 days agoAcross the latest 1 update: 1 news mention.
What do users say about Komos AI?
What people actually say about Komos AI — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for Komos AI on Oct 25, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Only 0 of the posts we fetched could be positively tied to Komos AI. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Komos AI — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 9 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Komos AI 13 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed features, pricing tiers, our verdict, summary, description
- — changed limitations
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed pricing tiers, our verdict, features, description, who should skip it, who it suits
- — changed switching out, hidden costs, features, pricing fit, switching in, who should skip it, limitations, setup time, who it suits, our verdict, description
- — changed setup time, pricing fit, description, use cases, our verdict, who it suits, features, hidden costs, who should skip it, integrations, limitations, switching in, switching out, pricing tiers
Showing the 6 most recent of 13 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Komos AI cost in 2026?
Komos AI: Pricing is on request (custom quotes). Pricing last verified 9 Nov 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Komos AI tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free Trial | Free trialVendor: “$0 for 14 days” | trial | A CRA validating one high-volume verification flow before committing — typically an ops lead who needs to prove the court-record search works on real portals.Adds: Starting tier: $0 for 14 days with 1,000 AI actions, the Moss AI assistant, 100+ integrations, all triggers, API and webhook access, team collaboration, self-hosted runners, and priority support. |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | CRAs running production screening volume across many portals, with compliance, QC, and reviewer roles that need the audit trail and on-prem runners in place.Adds: Replaces the trial's 1,000-action cap with unlimited AI actions at a Custom price, keeping the same core feature list of Moss, 100+ integrations, all triggers, API and webhook access, self-hosted runners, and priority support. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Komos AI's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Komos fits mid-size and large CRAs whose screening volume justifies a custom Enterprise contract and a 30-day joint build; the $0 14-day trial with 1,000 AI actions is sized for validating one flow, not for budgeting production. Compare against generic browser-automation platforms that publish per-seat or per-task rates but carry no FCRA audit trail, role separation, or KMS-backed credential vault — Komos costs more to stand up and less to defend in a dispute.
Has Komos AI's pricing changed?
No plan price for Komos AI has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Komos AI?
Pick Komos AI if you are Background screening companies (CRAs) automating court record searches across thousands of portals, Compliance and QC teams that need an exportable FCRA-auditable record of every verification step, Screening ops managers replacing manual portal data entry without adding headcount, Teams running Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI that want to trigger screening automations via MCP.
Look elsewhere if you are Non-regulated teams that only need generic no-code or workflow automation, Operations that need a first workflow live in days rather than a ~30-day joint build, Companies without IT or security staff to provision and manage self-hosted runners, Buyers wanting a pure API-first tool with no browser automation layer.
Skip it if Skip Komos if you need generic no-code automation outside a regulated screening workflow, or if your team wants a first flow live in days rather than the ~30-day joint build Komos runs with new CRAs.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Komos AI actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You pick your highest-volume verification flow — criminal court record search across county and state portals — and walk a researcher through it once on screen during the Week 1 joint build, with portal credentials provisioned through your security review.
Outcome: Komos turns the session into an editable flow with branch and loop logic, and by Week 4 it runs on real case volume with possible matches routed to your researchers and screenshots plus structured fields captured at each step.
An FCRA dispute lands and you need to show exactly what the researcher-driven search did on that candidate's file, across every jurisdiction searched.
Outcome: You pull the step-by-step run log with screenshots and the source material behind each result, review it against the role-separated researcher/QC/reviewer trail, and export the record without reconstructing anything by hand.
You connect your editor to Komos through the MCP server and call list_tasks, then run_task with candidate inputs from your own agent workflow.
Outcome: Your coding agent triggers the screening automation directly, then polls get_run and list_runs for status and results, so Komos becomes a callable backend rather than a separate UI.
Use cases
- Automate county and state court record searches across thousands of portals in parallel
- Pull credit bureau reports and extract results into structured outputs
- Verify employment and education history across fragmented portals without manual entry
- Schedule recurring sanctions and watchlist monitoring
- Run identity verification with deterministic, screenshot-backed workflows
- Route possible hits and portal errors to researchers for adjudication with a full audit trail
- Give Claude Code, Codex, or Gemini CLI agents the ability to trigger screening automations via MCP
- Run automations on intranet and legacy desktop apps from a self-hosted runner
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Komos AI — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Free trial signup to a working sandbox flow: same day, with 1,000 AI actions to spend. First production verification flow on real case volume: roughly 30 days of joint build time, with discovery and go/no-go up front, flow recording alongside your researchers in Week 1, and first runs on real cases before Week 4. Self-hosted runners add IT and security provisioning time on top, since they
Switching to or from Komos AI
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual portal research: record one existing researcher walkthrough and Komos converts it into an editable flow that runs the same steps at volume.
- →From generic RPA or browser-automation tools: rebuild the flow in the visual builder with If/Else and early-exit guards, then layer exception queues and the FCRA audit trail on top.
- →From an agentic editor workflow: connect Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Codex, or Gemini CLI over the MCP server and call Komos tasks in place of scripted clicks.
- ↗To a generic RPA platform: export your process documentation and rebuild flows without the FCRA role separation, adjudication queues, or screenshot audit trail.
- ↗To in-house scripts: recreate the portal steps yourself, accepting that selector healing, credential vaulting, and run logging become your team's maintenance burden.
- ↗To another screening automation vendor: expect to re-record each flow, since the recorded step graph and Skills are Komos-specific artifacts.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Komos AI”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Komos AI” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Komos AI.
What are the best Komos AI alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Komos AI we list are Factory AI, Tulip and Bika.ai. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Factory AI | Contact Sales | Custom pricing | — |
| Tulip | Paid | Pricing not published | — |
| Bika.ai | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Komos AI
View all
Factory AI
No-code AI agent builder with approval gates, role-based access, audit trails, and SOC 2 compliance for regulated back-office workflows
Tools that pair well with Komos AI
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Komos AI, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Factory AI
No-code AI agent builder with approval gates, role-based access, audit trails, and SOC 2 compliance for regulated back-office workflows
Tulip
Tulip is a composable frontline operations platform for regulated manufacturing, where you build your own MES-shaped apps, agents, and automations.
Bika.ai
Bika.ai turns a spreadsheet database into an AI automation engine with cloneable agent app templates
Komos AI vs its closest rival
Komos AI's closest head-to-head is with Truleo.
Our Komos AI vs Truleo verdict written Jul 3, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
Frequently asked questions
Categories
Best-of guides
For makers of Komos AI
- Get a Verified Listing for Komos AI ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used Komos AI? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.