Lawglance is live · free · last verified 24 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
Lawglance
LawGlance is an agentic AI legal assistant for Indian law that answers in plain language with citations to statutes and Supreme Court
The citation discipline is what earns LawGlance a place in your tabs: no claim without a marker back to the judgment or provision, and an explicit unchecked-not-clean status on contract clauses it couldn't verify. For Indian statutes and Supreme Court research on a free account, that's a genuinely useful first pass. Just don't mistake it for a case-management system or a filing-grade citation trail.
Verdict generatedVerified 6d ago · liveness 60/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/lawglance
- Law students researching Indian statutes and Supreme Court judgments with citations
- Laypeople who need a plain-language answer about Indian law and want to see the source
- Practitioners wanting a fast cited first pass on a provision or judgment
- Anyone doing a quick first read of a short Indian-law contract before sending it to a lawyer
- Users who need US, Canadian or other non-Indian law today — those corpora are in preparation, not live
- Teams that need to archive or revisit contracts — uploads are deleted after 24 hours
- Anyone reviewing long agreements — PDFs are capped at 30 pages with a required text layer
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip LawGlance if you need US, Canadian or other non-Indian law today, or if you need a clause review of a contract longer than 30 pages — the corpus is Indian Supreme Court judgments and central Acts only, with US and Canada listed as in preparation.
Lawglance's pricing fits teams whose volume aligns with the published tiers. Compare against the alternatives listed below for stage-specific value.
In short
Lawglance — LawGlance is an agentic AI legal assistant for Indian law that answers in plain language with citations to statutes and Supreme Court. Best for Law students researching Indian statutes and Supreme Court judgments with citations, Laypeople who need a plain-language answer about Indian law and want to see the source, Practitioners wanting a fast cited first pass on a provision or judgment. Free to use.
What is Lawglance?
Lawglance — LawGlance is an agentic AI legal assistant for Indian law that answers in plain language with citations to statutes and Supreme Court. Best for Law students researching Indian statutes and Supreme Court judgments with citations, Laypeople who need a plain-language answer about Indian law and want to see the source, Practitioners wanting a fast cited first pass on a provision or judgment. Free to use.
LawGlance is a hosted AI legal research platform for Indian law, built on top of a free, open-source assistant developed in public on GitHub. You ask a question the way you'd ask a person, and an agentic retrieval loop reads the governing statute or judgment before it composes an answer, attaching a citation marker to every sentence and listing the sources underneath. When it can't cite, it doesn't claim. The research engine indexes 5,168 Supreme Court of India judgments (2017 and 2021–2026) and 9 central Acts, with 4,807 judgments carrying AI summaries. Four-leg hybrid search fuses exact citation matching, provision lookup, semantic search and a keyword backstop, so inputs as different as "2017 INSC 801", "Article 21" and "can police search my phone" each resolve to something usable. A corpus browser shows exactly what's indexed, year by year, before you trust an empty result. Agreement Intelligence handles contract review: upload a PDF (up to 30 pages, text layer required, deleted after 24 hours), name the two sides and get a five-step favourability heatmap per sentence. It flags restraint of trade, penalty clauses, one-sided arbitrator appointment and personal data processing, explains each from the governing Act and quotes the section, and runs a missing-clause checklist over termination, liability caps, indemnity, confidentiality, dispute resolution and governing law. Clauses it couldn't verify show as unchecked rather than clean. Coverage is Indian law today, with United States and Canadian corpora described as in preparation. The conversational assistant answers from the listed central Acts while the research view draws on the larger judgment corpus. It suits students, laypeople checking their rights and practitioners wanting a fast cited first pass. Against paid Indian research databases, the trade is depth and jurisdiction range for free access and open citation discipline.
Key features
- Agentic retrieval loop reads the governing provision or judgment before answering
- Citation marker on every generated sentence, listed beneath the answer
- Four-leg hybrid search: exact citation, provision lookup, semantic, keyword backstop
- Case-law research view with full, unedited Supreme Court of India judgment text
- 5,168 Supreme Court of India judgments indexed (2017, 2021–2026)
- 4,807 judgments carrying AI summaries
- 9 central Acts indexed for statute search and provision lookup
- Bench, issues, holding and outcome metadata on each judgment result
- Corpus browser with a year-by-year catalog of what is indexed
- Agreement Intelligence: clause-by-clause PDF contract review against Indian law
- Five-step favourability heatmap switchable per contracting party
- Clause flags explained from the governing Act, quoting the section relied on
- Missing-clause checklist covering termination, liability caps, indemnity, confidentiality, dispute resolution and
- Unverified clauses shown as unchecked rather than clean
- Conversational assistant in plain language with no account required
Behind the verdict
Most legal AI tools ask you to trust the answer. LawGlance asks you to check it, which is a lower bar to clear and a more honest one. Every sentence in a generated answer carries a marker back to the judgment or provision, and the research view opens the full unedited text with bench, issues, holding and outcome attached. We'd reach for this when a student or a non-lawyer needs to establish what a provision actually says before spending money on counsel. Pick LawGlance if your question lands inside Indian Supreme Court case law from 2017 or 2021 through 2026, or inside one of the 9 indexed central Acts. The four-leg search is the practical reason it works: typing a neutral citation, an article number or a plain-language complaint all land somewhere sensible, which is more than most free tools manage. The corpus browser is a nice touch too, because it tells you what isn't there rather than letting an empty result look like an answer. Pass if you need anything outside Indian law today. The US Supreme Court and federal statutes are described as built and indexed internally, with Canada in preparation, but neither is live, so treat the roadmap as intent rather than coverage. Subscriber databases still win on breadth of High Court and tribunal material, citator history and the workflow scaffolding around a matter. Agreement Intelligence is the newer, more opinionated piece. It gives a clause-by-clause read of a short contract, explains flagged clauses from the governing Act and quotes the section it relies on, and lists what standard protections are missing. Where it bites: PDFs only, 30-page ceiling, text layer required, and uploads deleted after 24 hours, so it's a first read before your lawyer, not an archive or a redlining workspace. In practice the accountability
Models under the hood
as of 2026-09-02
Limitations
- Jurisdiction is India only: Supreme Court judgments and central Acts are searchable now, with United States and Canada described as in preparation.
- The conversational assistant answers from a nine-Act statute list, so it is narrower than the 5,168-judgment research corpus; the two indexes are maintained independently.
- Agreement Intelligence accepts only text-layer PDFs up to 30 pages, and uploads are deleted automatically after 24 hours, so it cannot serve as a document store.
- Clause review is limited to what the corpus covers — if a governing Act has not been indexed, the card says so rather than assessing the clause.
- Every output is legal information, not legal advice, and requires verification against the primary source before you act on it.
as of 2026-10-03
Researching Lawglance? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Lawglance still active?
Lawglance is live · free · last verified 24 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Lawglance? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Lawglance?
What people actually say about Lawglance — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
Researched28 mentions across 2 sources (YouTube, GitHub) · researched Aug 12, 2026.
Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Free with no usage limits, making it accessible to all.
- +Privacy-friendly via local Ollama deployment, keeping data on-device.
- +Open-source (MIT license) allows customization and community contributions.
- +Covers 15+ Indian statutes including the Constitution and BNS 2023.
- +Natural language chat interface simplifies legal queries for non-lawyers.
- −Setup can hit API quota errors without clear troubleshooting guidance.
- −Lack of guardrails risks potentially harmful or misleading answers.
- −Demo video outdated, causing confusion with old project name.
- −Documentation incomplete, missing uv installation steps for newcomers.
- −YouTube community discussion is largely off-topic or not about the tool.
- • If not self-hosting, users may incur API costs (e.g., OpenAI charges) after trial quotas are exhausted.
- • Setup requires some technical knowledge; hiring help could add indirect costs.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Lawglance— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 24 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Lawglance 12 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed summary, description, features, pricing tiers, who should skip it, who it suits, our verdict
- — changed pricing tiers, description, our verdict, who should skip it
- — changed pricing tiers, summary, who should skip it, our verdict, features, description, who it suits
- — changed who should skip it, who it suits, description, our verdict, features, hidden costs, limitations, switching in, switching out, pricing tiers, pricing fit, setup time, summary, use cases
- — changed domain expiry
- — changed domain expiry
Showing the 6 most recent of 12 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Lawglance cost in 2026?
Lawglance: Free to use. Pricing last verified 24 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Lawglance tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Law students, laypeople and practitioners who want cited answers on Indian law and a first-pass contract review without paying for a legal database.Adds: Starting tier: assistant answers with citation markers, the 5,168-judgment research corpus, and Agreement Intelligence for text-layer PDFs up to 30 pages. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Lawglance's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Lawglance's pricing fits teams whose volume aligns with the published tiers. Compare against the alternatives listed below for stage-specific value.
Has Lawglance's pricing changed?
No plan price for Lawglance has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Lawglance?
Pick Lawglance if you are Law students researching Indian statutes and Supreme Court judgments with citations, Laypeople who need a plain-language answer about Indian law and want to see the source, Practitioners wanting a fast cited first pass on a provision or judgment, Anyone doing a quick first read of a short Indian-law contract before sending it to a lawyer.
Look elsewhere if you are Users who need US, Canadian or other non-Indian law today — those corpora are in preparation, not live, Teams that need to archive or revisit contracts — uploads are deleted after 24 hours, Anyone reviewing long agreements — PDFs are capped at 30 pages with a required text layer, Proceedings where you need a court-validated citation trail rather than a research starting point.
Skip it if Skip LawGlance if you need US, Canadian or other non-Indian law today, or if you need a clause review of a contract longer than 30 pages — the corpus is Indian Supreme Court judgments and central Acts only, with US and Canada listed as in preparation.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Lawglance actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Types 'is privacy a fundamental right' into the assistant, reads the cited answer, then opens the research view to read the judgment's bench, issues and holding in full.
Outcome: A grounded answer with the provision it came from, plus the unedited primary source to cross-check — in one session, without a legal database subscription.
Asks 'punishment for cyber fraud IT Act' in plain language and follows each citation marker down to the statute text rather than trusting the summary.
Outcome: A plain-English answer they can verify themselves, with a clear reminder to consult a qualified lawyer for their own situation.
Uploads a 12-page text-layer PDF, names the two sides, and reads the favourability heatmap, the flags for restraint of trade and one-sided arbitrator appointment, and the missing-clause checklist.
Outcome: A pre-signature list of what the contract covers and what it leaves out — including clauses explained from the Indian Contract Act — to take to a lawyer.
Use cases
- A law student looks up a Supreme Court judgment from 2017–2026 and reads the bench, issues, holding and outcome.
- A non-lawyer asks 'can police search my phone' in plain language and gets an answer linked to the provision behind it.
- A practitioner searches '2017 INSC 801' or 'Article 21' and jumps straight to the primary source.
- Someone reviewing a vendor contract uploads the PDF, names the two sides, and sees which sentences favour which party.
- A buyer checks a draft agreement against the Indian Contract Act and DPDP Act before signing.
- A founder uses the missing-clause checklist to spot absent termination, indemnity or dispute-resolution terms.
- A researcher browses the corpus catalog before trusting an empty search result.
- A developer follows the separate MIT-licensed open-source LawGlance assistant on GitHub.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Lawglance — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a student or layperson, no setup at all: open the assistant, type a question, and you have a cited answer plus the research view in minutes. Agreement Intelligence needs a free account and a text-layer PDF under 30 pages, so figure on roughly ten minutes to first clause review — including naming both parties so the heatmap scores the right side. Practitioners searching by citation ('2017 INSC
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 5 videos for “Lawglance”, and we withheld 5: 5 could not be judged, because “Lawglance” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Lawglance.
Official links
What are the best Lawglance alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Lawglance we list are AskYourPdf, BLUF and Humata AI. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| AskYourPdf | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| BLUF | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Humata AI | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Lawglance
View all
AskYourPdf
Chat with PDFs in plain language, auto-fill any PDF form from your own documents, and embed a website AI agent trained on your content.
Tools that pair well with Lawglance
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Lawglance, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
AskYourPdf
Chat with PDFs in plain language, auto-fill any PDF form from your own documents, and embed a website AI agent trained on your content.
BLUF
BLUF is a Chrome and Firefox extension that summarizes, explains, and answers questions about any page, PDF, or YouTube video without leaving the tab.
Humata AI
Humata AI is a PDF AI that answers questions across your documents with citations linking back to the exact source passage
Lawglance vs its closest rival
Lawglance's closest head-to-head is with Praktika — Lawglance and Praktika solve entirely different problems and are not direct competitors. Choose Lawglance if you need a free, private legal document Q&A tool. Opt for Praktika if you want AI-powered speaking practice for language learning. Your decision hinges on whether you need legal assistance or language fluency. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Lawglance vs Praktika
Lawglance and Praktika solve entirely different problems and are not direct competitors. Choose Lawglance if you need a free, private legal document Q&A tool. Opt for Praktika if you want AI-powered speaking practice for language learning. Your decision hinges on whether you need legal assistance or language fluency.
GeneratedLawglance vs Push Security
Choose Push Security if you need enterprise-grade browser security to defend against sophisticated attacks and govern AI tool usage. Choose Lawglance if you are a student or individual needing a free, private legal assistant for understanding documents. They serve entirely different needs—do not cross-shop.
GeneratedLawglance vs Audioeye
Choose Lawglance if you need a free, privacy-focused tool to understand legal documents via Q&A — perfect for students and solo practitioners. Choose AudioEye if your priority is web accessibility compliance to avoid lawsuits, with automated scanning and expert audits. They solve entirely different problems.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Lawglance? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.