LLMWise

Buyers land here because their bill is two or three chat subscriptions and their tabs are the same. LLMWise collapses that: one chat, one monthly message count per model, switch mid-conversation and the next model reads the whole thread, memory and shared projects included. In practice the fast-model refill is what makes daily use feel unlimited-ish — 60 messages a day on Pro at 00:00 UTC, on Haiku 5.5, GPT-6 Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and GLM 5.3 Flash — and you dip into Fable 5.1 or GPT-6 Astra only when the answer really needs it. That mix is the whole trick. Where it bites is arithmetic. The monthly allowance is one pool quoted per model, so a Pro month at heavy Opus is 62 messages, and heavy Fable 5.1 is 31. If your habit is 200 Opus-grade questions a month, Pro is the wrong tier and you should price Max at $50 before signing up. There's also a monthly fair-use limit on AI cost — Pro $7.50 — and very large messages or heavy research burn through it faster than normal chatting. Creation is where the pricing gets legible. Every video, image, voice or music job shows its credit cost on the Create button, so a 5-second Wan 3.0 clip at 19 credits versus a 1-credit Nano Banana 2.1 image is a decision you see before spending. Pro's 250 credits is a month of mixed output: roughly 82 GPT Image 2.5 Sunburst images, or 6 Wan 3.0 clips, or 27 ElevenLabs voiceovers. That publication of every limit, including the fair-use cap, is rarer than it should be in this category. Pick it when you already pay for one or two $20 chat plans, want cited research reports and code runs in the same window, and prefer choosing the model yourself rather than trusting a router. Pass if you need an OpenAI-compatible API for your own agents — the docs say there isn't one — or if you depend on the