
Forensic AI audit: see why competitors get recommended over you.
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 06 Jul 2026
In short
Loamly — Forensic AI audit: see why competitors get recommended over you. Best for B2B SaaS companies losing AI referral traffic to competitors, E-commerce brands wanting to appear in ChatGPT product recommendations, Agencies offering AI visibility audits as a service. Free to start; paid plans from $29/mo.
See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
Loamly fills a genuine gap by diagnosing why AI platforms recommend competitors—not just a vanity score. The Intelligence Report is expensive but uniquely actionable; the monitoring plan offers good value for teams with existing AI traffic. Skip it if you lack a web presence or budget for the $89/month tier.
Compare with: Loamly vs EverBee, Loamly vs Mangools, Loamly vs Hostinger Reach
Last verified: July 2026
Across the latest 10 updates: 5 feature updates and 5 news mentions.
Analysis of 2,089 brands shows brand authority predicts AI visibility 3.1x more than GEO optimization.
Comparison of Profound (200M+ prompts, $1B valuation) and Loamly (traffic detection, one-time audits).
Comprehensive guide on optimizing content for AI search engines in 2026.
Actionable steps for appearing in AI chat responses across major platforms.
Data showing YouTube presence as the strongest predictor of AI visibility.
Explains how older content becomes less visible to AI search engines.
Industry-wide AI visibility benchmark showing most brands score poorly.
Guide on llms.txt file adoption and its role in AI discoverability.
Sector-level analysis of AI visibility across industries.
Data showing divergent recommendations across AI platforms.
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
16 mentions across 3 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt).
How likely is Loamly to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →Loamly is an AI recommendation intelligence platform that diagnoses why AI systems like ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Perplexity recommend certain brands over others. Designed for B2B SaaS companies, e-commerce brands, and agencies, it combines a one-time deep-dive Intelligence Report (from $990) with ongoing platform monitoring (starting at $29/month). The platform maps every citation to its source, distinguishes training data (Brain 1) from real-time search (Brain 2), and delivers a prioritized engineering playbook with projected visibility impact. Key features include forensic analysis across 6 AI platforms, citation source chain tracing (identifying the 3-5 driving sources), a GEO score, and AI visitor detection that catches traffic traditional analytics miss. The Intelligence Report runs 11 phases across 50+ buyer queries, tracing 2,000+ citations. The monitoring platform offers real-time dashboards, revenue attribution via Stripe integration, and a natural language query tool called Ask Loamly. Loamly positions itself as an unbiased alternative to VC-funded monitoring tools, emphasizing root-cause analysis over vanity scores. Its methodology is backed by a 2,089-brand study and ongoing research. The platform is GDPR compliant, with EU hosting available, and uses an open-source tracker that requires no cookies. What sets Loamly apart is its focus on actionable diagnostics: instead of a generic visibility score, it ranks actions by projected impact and provides a category window forecast predicting when positions harden. The company offers a guarantee: if the report doesn't surface at least 5 unknown findings, they refund the investment.
When to pick this: If you're a B2B SaaS or e-commerce brand losing AI referral traffic to competitors, Loamly provides the only tool we've seen that traces exactly which third-party sources drive AI recommendations. The Intelligence Report's 90-day action playbook is genuinely actionable, not generic tips. When to pass: If your brand has no web presence or minimal third-party citations, the report will likely find little to fix. Also, if you're on a tight budget, the $89/month Grow tier is the minimum for cross-platform visibility—Starter covers only ChatGPT. Comparison: Profound is a bigger player (200M+ prompts, $1B valuation) but focuses on prompt-level optimization. Loamly focuses on root-cause diagnosis of why others win, which is more strategic. Monitoring tools like BrightEdge or Conductor offer AI visibility scores, but Loamly uniquely traces each citation to its source. Real-world caveats: The Intelligence Report is a one-time deep dive; ongoing monitoring is separate. The free check is very basic—just a category snapshot. Implementation of the playbook is on you; Loamly doesn't offer consulting. The platform tracks only 4 AI platforms (ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity) on the Grow plan, not 6 as advertised for the report.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Loamly, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Used Loamly? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.