MajorGen

What MajorGen actually sells is throughput with a brake pedal. The strongest part of the product is the handoff between agents: Sourcer surfaces only roles above a fit threshold you set (the site's example run found 142 roles for Senior PM, remote, with 82% flagged high-fit), Tailor rewrites each application in your register, Pipeline keeps stages and follow-ups current, and Coach turns the night before a call into a rehearsal. The 30-seconds-per-tailored-application figure and the hourly rescan are the numbers to judge it on, because that's what replaces your evenings. The control layer is unusually explicit for this category — per-agent approval gates, a log of exactly what was sent and to whom, and an instant pause for the whole desk. That matters if you're wary of software applying in your name. The honest weaknesses: design control is limited compared to template-driven builders, so anyone who cares about resume typography will feel boxed in; interview prep is drills and a briefing, not the sustained judgment a human coach brings; and the marketing leans on a single testimonial rather than published outcome data. The vendor also does not disclose which underlying AI model powers generation, which makes it hard to reason about output quality drift over time. Where it fits: high-volume applicants sending 20+ applications a month, career changers re-angling one body of experience across many postings, and intermittent job hunters who want the search to keep running between bursts of effort. Where it doesn't: designers and anyone whose bottleneck is positioning rather than volume, people who want to hand-review every word before submission, and applicants targeting non-English job markets.