Mammouth is live · pricing from $12/mo · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
Mammouth
One €10-plus subscription that gives you Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek and Kimi in a single interface.
Breadth is the pitch, and at $12/mo (excl. VAT) Starter it's hard to argue with the maths if you genuinely hop between Claude, GPT and Gemini. The real constraint is usage, not model count: Starter is sized for daily use, and the pricing page only expresses Standard and Expert as relative multipliers (3x and 10x Starter) rather than published token limits, so price out $24/mo Standard (excl. VAT) or $72/mo Expert (excl. VAT) before assuming the cheap tier holds. Single-model loyalists should pay their vendor directly; API-first developers wanting raw endpoints are better served elsewhere.
Verdict generatedVerified 8d ago · liveness 57/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/mammouth
- Knowledge workers who rotate between Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok
- Creatives who want image and video generation under one AI subscription
- Small teams that need an admin console, shared projects and centralized billing
- Developers who want bundled API credits and Mammouth Code alongside a chat UI
- Users who only ever need one model — a direct subscription to that vendor is usually cheaper
- Enterprises requiring on-premise deployment or custom model fine-tuning
- Heavy reasoning or media users who will outgrow Starter's daily-use allowance
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Mammouth if you only ever use one model — subscribing to that vendor directly is cheaper than carrying a multi-model bundle you won't switch.
Prices are quoted excluding VAT, so the €10-entry tier and the $12, $24 and $72 tiers land higher at checkout for EU buyers depending on local VAT.
At $12/mo (excl. VAT) Starter, Mammouth undercuts stacking even two vendor subscriptions; $24/mo (excl. VAT) Standard and $72/mo (excl. VAT) Expert sit closer to what two or three premium AI plans cost. Team seats at $24/user/mo (excl. VAT) are priced flat per user, so small teams pay list price rather than haggling per seat.
In short
Mammouth — One €10-plus subscription that gives you Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek and Kimi in a single interface. Best for Knowledge workers who rotate between Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok, Creatives who want image and video generation under one AI subscription, Small teams that need an admin console, shared projects and centralized billing. Plans from $12/mo.
What is Mammouth?
Mammouth — One €10-plus subscription that gives you Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek and Kimi in a single interface. Best for Knowledge workers who rotate between Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok, Creatives who want image and video generation under one AI subscription, Small teams that need an admin console, shared projects and centralized billing. Plans from $12/mo.
Mammouth is a French multi-model AI subscription: instead of paying for separate Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok plans, you log in once and pick the model from a single dropdown. The current roster covers GPT-6 Luna, GPT-6.1 Sol and GPT-6 Astra, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5 and Fable 5.1, Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 3.8 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Grok 4.7 and Grok 4.7 Reasoning, Mistral Large 4 (plus a Reasoning variant), DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Qwen 3.8 27B and Reasoning, Kimi K2.6 and K3, GLM 5.3 Flash, and Perplexity Sonar Pro and Deep Research for web answers. Image generation runs on GPT Image 2.5, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo, Recraft V4.1, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Nano Banana 2.1; video on Grok Imagine Video, Veo 3.1 Lite and Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro. Around the model picker sits a workflow layer: one-click reprompting resends the same prompt to a different model, Projects keep documents, images and chats together, and voice chat plus dictation cover hands-free prompting. Mammouth Code ships bundled API credits that scale by tier ($2, $4 or $10). Team seats cost the same per user as individual plans, with an admin console for invites and licence management and a single invoice. The audience is people who rotate between models rather than commit to one vendor, plus creatives who'd otherwise hold three or four image and video subscriptions, and small teams that want one bill. If you genuinely use one model, buying that vendor direct is usually cheaper.
Key features
- One subscription covering Claude, GPT, Gemini, Grok, Mistral, DeepSeek, Qwen, Kimi and Llama
- Reasoning (chain-of-thought) models including Grok 4.7 Reasoning, Mistral Large 4 Reasoning and Qwen 3.8 Reasoning
- One-click reprompting sends your prompt to another model for comparison
- AI web search and Deep Research via Perplexity Sonar Pro
- Image generation: Nano Banana 2.1, GPT Image 2.5, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo, Recraft V4.1, FLUX, Grok Imagine Image 2.0
- Video generation: Grok Imagine Video, Veo 3.1 Lite, Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro
- Projects organise documents, images, files and chats in one workspace
- Voice chat and dictation for hands-free prompting
- Mammouth Code with bundled API credits ($2, $4 or $10 by tier)
- Model selection lets you pick the right model per task from one picker
- Multi-device access via web, mobile and downloadable desktop app
- Team admin console to invite members and manage licences
- Centralized billing and shared projects for teams
- GDPR-compliant processing with data minimisation
- No model training on your content; history deletable from account settings
Behind the verdict
Mammouth's value proposition is unusually easy to state: one login, one bill, and a dropdown that switches between the current frontier models. The picker is genuinely broad. The vendor's own Q&A lists GPT-6 Luna, GPT-6.1 Sol, GPT-6 Astra, Claude Sonnet 5.5, Opus 5.5, Fable 5.1, Gemini 4 Argon, Gemini 3.8 Flash, Grok 4.7 and Grok 4.7 Reasoning, Mistral Large 4 and its Reasoning variant, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Qwen 3.8 27B and Reasoning, Kimi K2.6 and K3, GLM 5.3 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, plus Perplexity Sonar Pro and Deep Research. Media generation is covered too: GPT Image 2.5, Stable Diffusion 3.5 Large Turbo, Recraft V4.1, Grok Imagine Image 2.0 and Nano Banana 2.1 for images, and Grok Imagine Video, Veo 3.1 Lite and Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro for video. The workflow layer matters more than the headcount of models. One-click reprompting is the standout: it sends the prompt you just wrote to a different model so you can compare answers without retyping, which is exactly the behaviour a multi-model switcher is for. Projects keep documents, images, files and chats in one workspace, so context survives a model swap. Voice chat and dictation cover hands-free prompting. Where it gets murky is usage. The pricing page names relative multipliers rather than absolute allowances: Standard is 3x Starter and Expert is 10x Starter, and the page notes that if you hit a limit a lighter model remains available. There are no published per-model token or generation caps. That means a heavy reasoning or media user should budget for the $24/mo (excl. VAT) Standard or $72/mo (excl. VAT) Expert tier from the start rather than assuming Starter holds. The privacy story is aimed squarely at EU buyers: GDPR-aligned processing with data minimisation, no training on your content, and, per the vendor, providers retaining no prompts. Data is processed under EU GDPR per the site, and you can delete history from account settings. Where it fits less well: single-model loyalists (buy that vendor direct), API-first developers wanting raw endpoints, and enterprises needing on-prem deployment or custom fine-tuning. Team seats cost the same per user as individual plans, which is a fair structure for a small team that wants one invoice and an admin console.
Models under the hood
as of 2026-10-22
Limitations
- Mammouth bundles third-party models behind a flat subscription at $12/mo (excl.
- VAT) Starter, $24/mo (excl.
- VAT) Standard and $72/mo (excl.
- VAT) Expert, with bundled API credits of $2, $4 and $10 by tier.
- Usage is expressed only as relative multipliers (Standard 3x Starter, Expert 10x Starter); the pricing page does not publish exact per-model token or generation limits, and notes that if you hit a limit a lighter model remains available.
- Team seats cost the same per user as individual plans at $24/user/mo (excl.
- VAT), with Enterprise requiring more than 100 licences.
- Model names are listed at family level on the site (e.g.
- Claude, GPT, Gemini) without specific version numbers.
as of 2026-10-17
Researching Mammouth? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Mammouth still active?
Mammouth is live · pricing from $12/mo · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Mammouth? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Mammouth?
What people actually say about Mammouth — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 3, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Mammouth— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 22 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Mammouth 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed limitations, models, pricing page
- — changed description, switching out, switching in, use cases, summary, who should skip it, setup time, our verdict, pricing fit, features, pricing tiers, who it suits, hidden costs, models, limitations
- — changed pricing tiers, our verdict, who it suits, description, features, summary, who should skip it
- — changed models, limitations, pricing page
- — changed pricing model
- — changed pricing fit, our verdict, who it suits, switching out, description, who should skip it, limitations, features, pricing tiers, setup time, use cases, hidden costs, summary, models, switching in
Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Mammouth cost in 2026?
Mammouth: Plans from $12/mo. Pricing last verified 22 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Mammouth tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Starter | $12/moVendor: “$12/mo (excl. VAT)” | monthly | Solo daily user who hops between Claude, GPT and Gemini for a few chats a dayAdds: Entry point at $12/mo (excl. VAT): full model roster, image and video generation, voice, Projects, and $2 Mammouth Code API credits |
| Standard | $24/moVendor: “$24/mo (excl. VAT)” | monthly | Regular user running reasoning models, documents or image generation most daysAdds: 3x more usage than Starter and $4 in Mammouth Code API credits, at $24/mo (excl. VAT) |
| Expert | $72/moVendor: “$72/mo (excl. VAT)” | monthly | Power user pushing reasoning models, documents or media generation hardAdds: 10x more usage than Starter and $10 in Mammouth Code API credits, at $72/mo (excl. VAT) |
| Team | $24/user/moVendor: “$24/user/mo (excl. VAT)” | monthly, per seat | Small businesses that need one invoice, shared Projects and licence controlAdds: Same per-user price as individual plans ($24/user/mo excl. VAT), adds admin console, centralized billing and shared Projects |
| Enterprise | Custom | quote | Organisations needing more than 100 licences, SSO and flexible paymentAdds: Adds smart onboarding, SSO, wire transfer and Chorus payment options, and a custom quote |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Mammouth's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
At $12/mo (excl. VAT) Starter, Mammouth undercuts stacking even two vendor subscriptions; $24/mo (excl. VAT) Standard and $72/mo (excl. VAT) Expert sit closer to what two or three premium AI plans cost. Team seats at $24/user/mo (excl. VAT) are priced flat per user, so small teams pay list price rather than haggling per seat.
Has Mammouth's pricing changed?
No plan price for Mammouth has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Mammouth?
Pick Mammouth if you are Knowledge workers who rotate between Claude, GPT, Gemini and Grok, Creatives who want image and video generation under one AI subscription, Small teams that need an admin console, shared projects and centralized billing, Developers who want bundled API credits and Mammouth Code alongside a chat UI.
Look elsewhere if you are Users who only ever need one model — a direct subscription to that vendor is usually cheaper, Enterprises requiring on-premise deployment or custom model fine-tuning, Heavy reasoning or media users who will outgrow Starter's daily-use allowance, API-first developers who want raw endpoints rather than a chat-first interface.
Skip it if Skip Mammouth if you only ever use one model — subscribing to that vendor directly is cheaper than carrying a multi-model bundle you won't switch.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Mammouth actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You draft a client memo with Claude Sonnet 5.5, hit one-click reprompt to see GPT-6.1 Sol's version, then route the winning draft into a Project alongside the research docs.
Outcome: One bill and one workspace replace four vendor tabs, and you keep the version that reads best.
You generate a hero image in FLUX, iterate in Recraft V4.1, then animate a version with Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro — without opening three separate tools.
Outcome: Media output comes out of a single subscription instead of three image and video invoices.
You pick a plan mix per member, invite the team from the admin console, and share Projects so research stays in one place.
Outcome: One centralized invoice and licence control replace scattered individual subscriptions.
Use cases
- Compare GPT-6, Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Gemini 4 Argon answers on the same prompt in seconds
- Generate images with GPT Image 2.5, FLUX, Stable Diffusion or Recraft without separate accounts
- Repurpose one chat context across multiple models for different creative angles
- Dictate emails or documents by voice and route them to the best available model
- Manage team access to premium models with an admin console and centralized billing
- Fold Perplexity web search and Deep Research into one workflow without switching tabs
- Generate video with Veo 3.1 Lite or Kling 2.5 Turbo Pro without leaving the platform
- Use bundled API credits and Mammouth Code for quick coding experiments
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Mammouth — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Individual: sign-up and model selection take a few minutes to first answer. Team: add the admin console invite and licence assignment, so an hour or so for a small workspace. Enterprise onboarding with SSO is handled with the vendor.
Switching to or from Mammouth
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From separate ChatGPT Plus / Claude Pro / Gemini subscriptions: point your existing prompts at Mammouth's picker and cancel the redundant plans
- →From a single-vendor chat UI: recreate your recurring context as a Project, then use one-click reprompting to compare the model you came from against its alternatives
- ↗To a single vendor direct subscription: export the chats you need from your account history before cancelling
- ↗To a raw API aggregator: move coding and automation workloads to the provider's own API if you need raw endpoints
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
Mammouth: このAIチャットプラットフォームには、たった10ドルで20以上のAIモデルが揃っています！これはすごい！
AICodeKing
I Tested Mammouth - GPT, Claude, Gemini & More AI Models in One Place
BMF MEDIA
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Mammouth”, and we withheld 4: 4 could not be judged, because “Mammouth” is a single word that other videos use for other things. Showing the 2 we can prove are about Mammouth.
Official links
What are the best Mammouth alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Mammouth we list are Chatbot AI Assistant, ChatPlayground AI and AI Fiesta. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chatbot AI Assistant | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| ChatPlayground AI | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| AI Fiesta | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to Mammouth
View all
Chatbot AI Assistant
Mobile AI chat app that puts ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini and Grok in one phone interface from AppNation.
ChatPlayground AI
Compare ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok side-by-side from one prompt in a browser workspace.
Tools that pair well with Mammouth
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Mammouth, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Chatbot AI Assistant
Mobile AI chat app that puts ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini and Grok in one phone interface from AppNation.
ChatPlayground AI
Compare ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Grok side-by-side from one prompt in a browser workspace.
AI Fiesta
One AI subscription with 100+ models — compare ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini answers side by side for $12/mo.
Mammouth vs its closest rival
Mammouth's closest head-to-head is with Gem — If you're a recruiting team needing an all-in-one ATS/CRM with cutting-edge AI agents, Gem is the clear choice — it's built for your workflow, integrates with major HR tools, and recently added AI fraud detection. But if you simply want broad access to 20+ top AI models for general tasks at a low monthly price, Mammouth is a cost-effective alternative. These tools serve completely different use cases; pick based on your primary need: hiring or multi-model access. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Mammouth vs Gem
If you're a recruiting team needing an all-in-one ATS/CRM with cutting-edge AI agents, Gem is the clear choice — it's built for your workflow, integrates with major HR tools, and recently added AI fraud detection. But if you simply want broad access to 20+ top AI models for general tasks at a low monthly price, Mammouth is a cost-effective alternative. These tools serve completely different use cases; pick based on your primary need: hiring or multi-model access.
GeneratedMammouth vs The New Black
If you're a fashion brand needing AI-generated apparel designs with tech pack exports, choose The New Black's specialized tools. If you need broad access to multiple top AI models (text + image) for varied tasks, Mammouth's single subscription is more cost-effective. They serve entirely different needs.
GeneratedMammouth vs Poke Interaction Co
Choose Poke if you want an AI assistant that lives inside your messaging apps to automate email, calendar, and health tracking with proactive automations. Choose Mammouth if you need a cost-effective multi-model hub to compare outputs from 20+ leading AI models for text and image generation. Poke is for personal productivity via chat; Mammouth is for model-agnostic power users.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Categories
Used Mammouth? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.