Mentioned

Mentioned starts from a premise worth taking seriously: AI answers are assembled from a handful of pages, so the way to move the answer is to move those pages. Monitoring tools report your share of voice but nothing about the underlying pages changes, so next month's report says the same thing. Mentioned instead crawls the listicles, comparisons and threads in your category, reads each candidate page in full, and checks the claims that decide a pitch against current reality rather than the article. Its ranked angle list puts 'a listed product is dead, acquired or renamed' first, followed by a dead link, stale pricing, the article's own inclusion criteria being met, a missing category leader, and a genuinely useful offer — and where none is supported, no pitch is written and the opportunity simply waits for the next crawl. That is a more honest funnel than most outreach tooling. Where it earns trust: you send from your own mailbox under your own name, it never asks for inbox access, named competitors are excluded from pitch and result sets, and affiliate listicles are routed rather than pitched because they want a rate card. The console quantifies each opportunity with a score, traffic estimate, supportability angle and contact-confidence rating, and the contact ladder stops at the first address that survives the filters — the free author-page source costs nothing, and the only paid rung is used when nothing cheaper works. Published addresses are taken from the page, never guessed from a pattern. Where it does not fit: the whole model assumes a category where listicles and comparison posts drive discovery, and assumes you are willing to write to people. Agencies running several brands get per-brand tiers rather than a single pooled account. It is currently in waitlist early access rather than publicly launched, and causal reporting builds over months because it depends on a control group — if you need a share-of-voice number on day one, that is a different product.