Onshore is live · pricing not published · last verified 4 Nov 2026 · viability healthy

Onshore

Onshore

AI-powered R&D tax credit studies for farms, A&E, manufacturing, and oil & gas — filed in 2-3 weeks.

71/100Safe BetPricing not publishedPaid

Onshore earns a serious look when your R&D is agricultural, A&E, manufacturing, or oil & gas — the industry-specific models and the Section 180 farm deduction do work generic credit platforms can't. The contingency fee means you pay a share of what's recovered and nothing if nothing is found, so the free assessment is genuinely low-risk. If you have unclaimed 2022-2024 spend, the July 6, 2026 amendment window makes the timing argument for you.

Verdict generated

Verified 9d ago · liveness 71/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/onshore

Best for
  • CFOs and tax directors at mid-market companies with multiple years of unclaimed R&D spend
  • Agriculture operations claiming Section 41 R&D credits or the Section 180 soil deduction
  • Architecture, engineering, and manufacturing firms whose R&D isn't software development
  • Oil & gas companies with drilling, recovery, or operations research activity
Not ideal for
  • Individual taxpayers or businesses with minimal qualifying R&D spend
  • Teams that need a published per-credit rate before speaking with anyone
  • Organizations needing international tax incentive support outside the US
Visit Website

IntermediateThe initial assessment is free with no obligation. For an R&D credit engagement, expect the stated 2-3 week average turnaround from document handoff to delivered packet — one manufacturing customer cited about 10 days. Cost segregation studies begin with a free estimate on whether the study pencils out before you commit.WebNo public APIVerified 9d ago
Pricing
Pricing not published
Paid2 plans4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
The initial assessment is free with no obligation. For an R&D credit engagement, expect the stated 2-3 week average turnaround from document handoff to delivered packet — one manufacturing customer cited about 10 days. Cost segregation studies begin with a free estimate on whether the study pencils out before you commit.
Runs on
Web
No public API · 4 integrations
Who it's for
CFO at a mid-market manufacturing firmFarm owner in the MidwestOwner of a commercial property bought years ago
Live sentiment
Is Onshore actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Onshore if your qualifying R&D is exclusively software engineering, or if you need a claim filed in under two weeks — its models and staff are built for physical-world industries and its stated turnaround averages 2-3 weeks.

Skip-it-if note generated
The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

The fee is a share of what's recovered, so the dollar amount scales with your credit — a bigger recovery means a bigger fee.

Price reality

Onshore prices on a contingency basis — a share of the credits and deductions recovered, with nothing owed if nothing is found — so the cash outlay sits between a fixed-fee CPA firm engagement and DIY credit software. For mid-market operations with multi-year unclaimed spend, a percentage-of-recovery fee is often cheaper in absolute dollars than a fixed study fee; for smaller claims the percentage can feel steep against a flat-rate generalist tool.

Generated

In short

Onshore — AI-powered R&D tax credit studies for farms, A&E, manufacturing, and oil & gas — filed in 2-3 weeks. Best for CFOs and tax directors at mid-market companies with multiple years of unclaimed R&D spend, Agriculture operations claiming Section 41 R&D credits or the Section 180 soil deduction, Architecture, engineering, and manufacturing firms whose R&D isn't software development. Pricing not published.

Claim this listing

What is Onshore?

Onshore — AI-powered R&D tax credit studies for farms, A&E, manufacturing, and oil & gas — filed in 2-3 weeks. Best for CFOs and tax directors at mid-market companies with multiple years of unclaimed R&D spend, Agriculture operations claiming Section 41 R&D credits or the Section 180 soil deduction, Architecture, engineering, and manufacturing firms whose R&D isn't software development. Pricing not published.

PaidIntermediateNo APIWeb

Onshore runs AI-powered R&D tax credit studies and specialty deductions for companies that build physical things: farms, architecture and engineering firms, manufacturers, and oil & gas operators. The pitch is straightforward — your qualifying research doesn't look like software development, so generic credit software misses it. Onshore staffs industry-specific AI models and tax professionals for each of those four verticals. The process is three steps. Connect a system you already run (John Deere Climate FieldView, Deltek, QuickBooks, ConnectWise) or drag-and-drop documents as-is, with no formatting or spreadsheets required. AI agents then read everything against the full tax code and surface qualifying spend. Finally, a credentialed tax professional verifies every number, amends your returns, and delivers an audit-ready packet with a sealed Form 6765, calculations, and source files. Beyond Section 41 R&D credits, Onshore covers the 179D energy-efficient commercial building deduction, cost segregation studies, amended returns, corporate return filing, and the Section 180 soil deduction for farms. The company reports 500+ companies served, $600M+ in tax incentives delivered, and a 2-3 week average turnaround; one manufacturing customer cited about 10 days. On February 2026 Onshore announced its new name alongside a $31M Series B led by FPV Ventures. Positioning-wise, Onshore lands between a traditional CPA firm and DIY credit software: AI speed plus a contingency-based fee, but a credentialed human signs off — which matters if an audit ever comes. Security is SOC 2 Type II with US-resident data and a stated commitment never to sell your data or train models on it.

Key features

  • AI agents read uploaded records against the full tax code to surface qualifying R&D spend
  • Credentialed tax professional verifies every number and signs off before filing
  • Drag-and-drop document upload with no prep, formatting, or spreadsheets required
  • Connects to John Deere Climate FieldView, Deltek, QuickBooks, and ConnectWise
  • Industry-specific AI models and tax professionals for agriculture, A&E, manufacturing, and oil & gas
  • Sealed Form 6765 delivered with forms, calculations, and source files in an audit-ready packet
  • Free initial assessment with no cost and no obligation
  • Contingency-based fee: a share of what's recovered, nothing if nothing is found
  • Amended return preparation for retroactive R&D credit claims through the July 6, 2026 window
  • Corporate return filing alongside credit work in one place
  • 179D energy-efficient commercial building deduction support
  • Cost segregation studies including look-back catch-up via accounting-method change, no amended return
  • Section 180 soil deduction support for farms using the agriculture model
  • 100% audit support included with every engagement
  • SOC 2 Type II compliance, end-to-end encryption, US-resident data, never sold or used to train models

Behind the verdict

Where Onshore earns its keep is in the verticals most credit software treats as an afterthought. Qualifying research on a farm — crop trials, equipment modification, soil management — looks nothing like a software sprint, and Onshore built separate AI models and staffed professionals for agriculture, A&E, manufacturing, and oil & gas. That specificity is the product. The workflow is the second reason to consider it. You connect Deltek, QuickBooks, ConnectWise, or John Deere Climate FieldView, or you drag documents over as-is. No spreadsheet reconstruction, no interview marathon. AI agents read the records against the tax code, then a credentialed professional verifies every figure before anything is filed. In practice, that split — machine speed, human signature — is what most mid-market CFOs actually want. Watch the calendar. Onshore published guidance in April 2026 on the 2022-2024 R&D refund window closing July 6, 2026. If you have retrospective spend sitting unclaimed, the deadline is doing your urgency for you. The stated 2-3 week average turnaround (one manufacturer reported about 10 days) is fast for this category, but don't expect same-week filing. We'd pass if you're an individual filer or a business with negligible qualifying spend — the contingency model only makes sense when there's real money to recover. Nor is this built for international incentive work; it's US-focused. And if you need a published per-credit rate before you'll even take a call, you'll be waiting: Onshore quotes after a free assessment scopes your operation. The closest alternative is a traditional CPA firm running R&D studies by hand — slower, usually a fixed fee, and often thin on farm or oil & gas expertise. DIY credit software is the other pole: cheaper upfront, but you own the

Limitations

  • This is a done-with-you tax credit service rather than a self-serve tool: AI agents do the document analysis, but a credentialed tax professional verifies every number and owns the filing.
  • Scope is US-focused, centered on Section 41 R&D credits, the 179D deduction, and cost segregation.
  • Stated turnaround averages 2-3 weeks, and fees are contingency-based (a share of what's recovered) rather than a fixed price.
  • Performance figures (500+ companies, $600M+ delivered) are vendor-reported rather than audited statistics.

as of 2026-10-10

Researching Onshore? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Is Onshore still active?

Onshore is live · pricing not published · last verified 4 Nov 2026 · viability healthy.

Viability score

71/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Onshore? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
not measured
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
30
What the vendor publishes
40

Last calculated: November 2026

How we score →

What do users say about Onshore?

What people actually say about Onshore — is it worth it?

We scanned public community sources for Onshore on Aug 30, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Our own analysis of that scan says the posts were off-subject. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.

How we verified this

Every listed fact about Onshore — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 4 Nov 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.

Verification history

We have re-verified Onshore 13 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — changed limitations
  2. — changed summary, pricing tiers, our verdict, description, pricing model
  3. — changed switching out, who should skip it, description, setup time, our verdict, switching in, pricing fit, hidden costs, limitations, features
  4. — changed summary, who it suits, who should skip it, our verdict, features, description
  5. — changed SSL certificate
  6. — changed who should skip it, who it suits, description, our verdict, features, hidden costs, integrations, limitations, switching in, switching out, pricing fit, setup time, summary, use cases

Showing the 6 most recent of 13 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

Claim this listing

How much does Onshore cost in 2026?

Onshore: Pricing not published. Pricing last verified 4 Nov 2026.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
—
Contact sales for a quote
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • The fee is a share of what's recovered, so the dollar amount scales with your credit — a bigger recovery means a bigger fee.
  • Filing a corporate return through Onshore alongside the credit work pulls that return into the same engagement rather than leaving it with your existing preparer.
  • Amended returns for 2022-2024 must be filed before the July 6, 2026 window closes, and compressed timelines on that deadline can push the engagement past the stated 2-3 week average.
  • Cost segregation accelerates deductions rather than creating them, so faster depreciation can mean more recapture at sale if you sell sooner than modeled.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Onshore's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Onshore prices on a contingency basis — a share of the credits and deductions recovered, with nothing owed if nothing is found — so the cash outlay sits between a fixed-fee CPA firm engagement and DIY credit software. For mid-market operations with multi-year unclaimed spend, a percentage-of-recovery fee is often cheaper in absolute dollars than a fixed study fee; for smaller claims the percentage can feel steep against a flat-rate generalist tool.

Hidden-cost and price-fit notes generated

Has Onshore's pricing changed?

No plan price for Onshore has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.

Who should pick Onshore?

Pick Onshore if you are CFOs and tax directors at mid-market companies with multiple years of unclaimed R&D spend, Agriculture operations claiming Section 41 R&D credits or the Section 180 soil deduction, Architecture, engineering, and manufacturing firms whose R&D isn't software development, Oil & gas companies with drilling, recovery, or operations research activity.

Look elsewhere if you are Individual taxpayers or businesses with minimal qualifying R&D spend, Teams that need a published per-credit rate before speaking with anyone, Organizations needing international tax incentive support outside the US, Anyone who needs a credit filed in under two weeks.

Skip it if Skip Onshore if your qualifying R&D is exclusively software engineering, or if you need a claim filed in under two weeks — its models and staff are built for physical-world industries and its stated turnaround averages 2-3 weeks.

Generated

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Onshore actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

CFO at a mid-market manufacturing firm

You connect QuickBooks and upload tooling, process, and new-product records from the last three years. Onshore's agents read everything against the tax code, surface qualifying Section 41 spend, and a credentialed pro verifies the numbers and files the credit alongside amended returns for 2022-2024.

Outcome: An audit-ready packet with a sealed Form 6765, calculations, and source files, delivered on the stated 2-3 week average with 100% audit support included.

Farm owner in the Midwest

You drag in the records you already keep and Onshore's agriculture model evaluates your season-by-season problem-solving work for Section 41 R&D credits and the Section 180 soil deduction.

Outcome: A verified claim filed by a credentialed professional, with the credit reinvested back into the operation.

Owner of a commercial property bought years ago

You share the closing statement, cost basis, and drawings. Onshore's engineers and agents reclassify building components into 5-, 7-, and 15-year property and, if you've owned it for years, run a look-back study via accounting-method change.

Outcome: Missed depreciation caught up in a single year with no amended returns, and a plain answer on whether the study pencils out.

Workflow scenarios generated

Use cases

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Onshore — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

The initial assessment is free with no obligation. For an R&D credit engagement, expect the stated 2-3 week average turnaround from document handoff to delivered packet — one manufacturing customer cited about 10 days. Cost segregation studies begin with a free estimate on whether the study pencils out before you commit.

Switching to or from Onshore

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a traditional CPA firm study: send the records you already keep, and Onshore's agents rebuild the qualifying spend without the interview-and-spreadsheet reconstruction.
  • →From DIY credit software: connect QuickBooks or Deltek so data flows directly rather than through manual exports.
  • →From unclaimed years: amended returns for 2022-2024 can be filed before the July 6, 2026 window closes.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a fixed-fee CPA firm: request your audit-ready packet with calculations and source files, which is designed to stand on its own.
  • ↗To a generalist credit platform: export the source files and Form 6765 documentation from your packet as the starting record.

Integrations

John Deere Climate FieldViewDeltekQuickBooksConnectWise

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Onshore”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Onshore” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Onshore.

Official links

What are the best Onshore alternatives?

The closest alternatives to Onshore we list are Brex, Ramp and Mercury Treasury AI. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.

Closest alternatives to Onshore
AlternativePricingStarts atLast verified
BrexFreemiumPricing not published—
RampFreemiumPricing not published—
Mercury Treasury AIFreemiumPricing not published—

Alternatives to Onshore

View all
Brex

Brex

Brex pairs corporate cards and spend management with AI that automates expense reports, budgets and accounting.

FreemiumTry
Ramp

Ramp

Ramp is AI spend management software for corporate cards, expense, AP, travel, and accounting automation

FreemiumTry
Mercury Treasury AI

Mercury Treasury AI

Mercury Treasury AI automates idle business cash into money market funds and a U.S. Treasury ladder with yields up to 4.21%.

FreemiumTry

Tools that pair well with Onshore

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Onshore, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Onshore vs its closest rival

Onshore's closest head-to-head is with Transfix.

Our Onshore vs Transfix verdict written Jul 3, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.

Frequently asked questions

For makers of Onshore

Used Onshore? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.