OpenAI o
OpenAI o1: a reasoning model for complex science, math, and coding, now superseded by newer models in ChatGPT.
o1 is a solid choice if you need a reasoning model for hard math, science, or coding via the API and can tolerate slower inference. For most ChatGPT users, newer models like GPT-5.6 offer better speed and usability. Only pick o1 when measured accuracy on complex benchmarks outweighs the cost and latency.
Verified 18h ago · liveness 61/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/openai-o
- Competitive programmers needing top-tier Codeforces and AIME performance
- Researchers in physics, chemistry, and biology tackling GPQA-diamond problems
- Developers building reasoning-heavy APIs with accuracy-critical outputs
- Teams using majority vote or re-ranking to maximize correctness on multi-step tasks
- Real-time or low-latency applications---o1 is deliberately slow
- General conversational AI, where GPT-5.6 in ChatGPT is faster and cheaper
- Users on ChatGPT Free or Go tiers, which don't expose o1
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip OpenAI o1 if you need real-time responses or general conversational AI, as newer models like GPT-5.6 offer faster and more cost-effective solutions for everyday tasks.
OpenAI o1 is priced via API usage, with costs varying based on input/output tokens and reasoning effort. It may be more expensive than GPT-4o for equivalent tasks due to higher computational demands. As of 2026, it has been superseded by GPT-5.6 models in ChatGPT, which are included in subscription plans like Plus and Pro. For developers, o1's API pricing is competitive for high-accuracy reasoning tasks, but newer models may offer better cost-performance trade-offs.
In short
OpenAI o — OpenAI o1: a reasoning model for complex science, math, and coding, now superseded by newer models in ChatGPT. Best for Competitive programmers needing top-tier Codeforces and AIME performance, Researchers in physics, chemistry, and biology tackling GPQA-diamond problems, Developers building reasoning-heavy APIs with accuracy-critical outputs. Contact Sales pricing.
What's new in OpenAI o
Checked todayAcross the latest 4 updates: 1 feature update, 2 launches and 1 news mention.
Previewing Ultrafast mode: GPT-5.6 Sol at up to 14X the speed
OpenAI previews Ultrafast mode for GPT-5.6 Sol, offering up to 14x faster inference, likely reducing latency for high-demand applications.
The builder's guide to GPT-5.6
A comprehensive guide for developers on GPT-5.6's capabilities, integrations, and best practices, signaling the primary model for new projects.
Daybreak models are now available on AWS
Daybreak AI models become accessible on Amazon Web Services, expanding deployment options for enterprise customers.
Testing ads in ChatGPT
OpenAI begins testing advertisements within ChatGPT interfaces, potentially affecting the Free tier experience.
What people actually say about OpenAI o — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
17 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
- +PhD-level accuracy on science benchmarks like GPQA-diamond.
- +Top 500 US rank on AIME math exam with 93% accuracy.
- +89th percentile on Codeforces competitive programming.
- +Performance scales with more thinking time and compute.
- +Reinforcement learning chain-of-thought for deliberate reasoning.
- −Tokenizer groups digits in threes, causing number errors.
- −Hidden chain-of-thought reduces transparency and trust.
- −Superseded by GPT-5.5, making it outdated for new users.
- −High cost per token compared to competitors.
- −OpenAI's controversial deals and finances hurt brand trust.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is OpenAI o? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: August 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Chain-of-thought reasoning trained with reinforcement learning
- Hidden internal chain of thought for safety
- 89th percentile on Codeforces competitive programming
- 93% accuracy on 2024 AIME math exam with re-ranking
- Surpasses PhD-level accuracy on GPQA-diamond (physics, chemistry, biology)
- Vision perception capabilities (MMMU 78.2%)
- Improves over GPT-4o on 54/57 MMLU subcategories
- Performance scales with test-time compute (more thinking time)
- Supports majority vote (consensus) with multiple samples
- Supports re-ranking with learned scoring function
- Available via API for trusted developers
- Early preview status (o1-preview)
About OpenAI o
OpenAI o1 is a reasoning model that thinks before it answers. Trained with large-scale reinforcement learning, it uses a hidden chain of thought to break down tricky problems, correct its own mistakes, and try new strategies when one isn't working. Released as an early preview in September 2024, it was built for professionals who need verifiable accuracy over raw speed—competitive programmers, researchers in physics and chemistry, and developers integrating reasoning into their apps. In benchmarks, o1 scored in the 89th percentile on Codeforces, averaged 74% on the 2024 AIME math exam with a single sample, and surpassed PhD-level accuracy on GPQA-diamond (chemistry, physics, biology). With vision enabled, it hit 78.2% on MMMU and beat GPT-4o on 54 of 57 MMLU subcategories. Performance scales with test-time compute: more thinking time means better results, and you can push accuracy further with majority vote across 64 samples or re-ranking 1000 samples with a learned scoring function. What sets o1 apart is its ability to handle multi-step, reasoning-heavy tasks where GPT-4o and earlier models plateau. It's not a general-purpose chatbot—it's a specialized workhorse for problems that reward deliberate, step-by-step reasoning. The trade-off is slower responses and higher computational cost, which is why it's best suited for API use cases that can wait for a thorough answer. As of 2026, o1 has been superseded in ChatGPT by newer models like GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT-5.6 Sol, so it's no longer the default for everyday users. OpenAI has also introduced Ultrafast mode for GPT-5.6 Sol, delivering up to 14x faster inference. For developers who need deterministic, high-accuracy reasoning via the API, o1 remains a viable option—especially when you can architect around its deliberate pace.
Behind the Verdict
OpenAI o1 marked a significant step in AI reasoning, introducing a hidden chain of thought that enables step-by-step problem solving. Its benchmark performance is impressive: 89th percentile on Codeforces, 93% on AIME with re-ranking, and surpassing PhD-level accuracy on GPQA-diamond. However, its deliberate pace and computational cost make it less practical for real-time applications. As of 2026, o1 has been largely superseded in ChatGPT by newer models like GPT-5.6 Luna and GPT-5.6 Sol, which offer faster responses and broader capabilities. For developers, o1 remains useful via the API for tasks where accuracy on complex reasoning outweighs speed, such as competitive programming, advanced math, and scientific research. But for general chat or everyday tasks, the newer models are more efficient and cost-effective.
Researching OpenAI o? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas OpenAI o actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Uses o1 to solve algorithmic problems on Codeforces, leveraging its chain-of-thought to break down complex problems and optimize solutions.
Outcome: Achieves top percentile rankings and improves problem-solving speed by relying on o1's reasoning to identify edge cases and efficient algorithms.
Uses o1 to answer advanced questions in physics, chemistry, and biology, drawing on its ability to reason through multi-step problems.
Outcome: Gets accurate, well-justified answers that often surpass human PhD-level accuracy, saving time in literature review and hypothesis generation.
Integrates o1 via the API to handle tasks like code review or complex data analysis, where correctness is paramount.
Outcome: Delivers reliable outputs with lower error rates, using techniques like majority vote or re-ranking to maximize accuracy on high-stakes problems.
Use Cases
- Solve competitive programming problems on Codeforces with 89th percentile accuracy
- Tackle AIME-level math challenges and achieve scores in the top 500 nationally
- Answer advanced PhD-level questions in physics, chemistry, and biology
- Generate step-by-step proofs and logical deductions for research papers
- Write complex code with reasoning about edge cases and performance
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-08-18
Limitations
- As an early preview, OpenAI o1-preview is not yet as easy to use as current models.
- It is slower due to its chain-of-thought reasoning process and may not be suitable for real-time applications.
- Performance improves with additional reinforcement learning and test-time compute, which can increase latency.
as of 2026-08-23
Verification history
We have re-verified OpenAI o 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where OpenAI o's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
OpenAI o1 is priced via API usage, with costs varying based on input/output tokens and reasoning effort. It may be more expensive than GPT-4o for equivalent tasks due to higher computational demands. As of 2026, it has been superseded by GPT-5.6 models in ChatGPT, which are included in subscription plans like Plus and Pro. For developers, o1's API pricing is competitive for high-accuracy reasoning tasks, but newer models may offer better cost-performance trade-offs.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of OpenAI o — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For API users, you can start using o1 within minutes by making a request to the OpenAI API—just set the model parameter to 'o1-preview' or 'o1-mini'. There's no additional setup beyond your existing OpenAI account and API key. For ChatGPT users, o1-preview was available in the model picker, but as of 2026 it has been replaced by newer models, so you may need to look under 'Legacy models' if you
Switching to or from OpenAI o
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- ↗To GPT-5.6 Luna: Newer ChatGPT models are faster and cheaper, and available in all plans including Free, Go, Plus, and Pro. You can switch models in the ChatGPT interface.
Resources & Guides
- Guideopenai.com
Reasoning · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Documentationopenai.com
Api Reference · OpenAI o
Full product docs from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Rate Limits · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Conceptsopenai.com
Models · OpenAI o
Core ideas explained from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Production Best Practices · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Resourceopenai.com
Resources · OpenAI o
Helpful link from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Prompting · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Safety Best Practices · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Cost Optimization · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
- Guideopenai.com
Latency Optimization · OpenAI o
In-depth how-to from openai.com
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with OpenAI o
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside OpenAI o, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Openai O vs Praktika
Choose Praktika if you're a language learner seeking conversational immersion with AI tutor guidance. Choose OpenAI o1 for hard math/coding/reasoning tasks where careful step-by-step thinking is critical — but be aware that as of mid-2026, o1 is being superseded by GPT-5.6 Sol, so you may want to evaluate that newer model instead.
Openai O vs Surge Ai
Choose OpenAI o1 if you need a ready-to-use reasoning model for math/coding/science and can accept higher latency. Choose Surge AI if you need expert human feedback to train or evaluate your own AI systems, especially for complex reasoning benchmarks. For most builders, Surge complements o1 rather than replaces it.
Alternatives to OpenAI o
View allFrequently Asked Questions
Used OpenAI o? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.


