Opencode Bar
Track AI token usage and spend from your macOS menu bar
Opencode Bar is a genuinely useful free utility for macOS developers juggling multiple AI assistants. Its zero-config setup and live burn-rate tracking beat manual expense sheets, but Windows/Linux users are out of luck. If you're a heavy OpenCode user on macOS, it's a no-brainer to install. If you need cross-platform tracking or use non-OpenCode tools, look elsewhere—like Proliferate (self-hostable) or Epho (Claude Code via curl) for other workflows.
Verified 6d ago · liveness 65/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/opencode-bar
- Developers using multiple AI coding assistants who need unified cost tracking
- Teams sharing API keys across providers who want quota alerts
- Freelancers billing clients for AI usage who need exportable usage logs
- Heavy OpenCode users who want real-time token and spend monitoring
- Windows or Linux users (macOS-only, Sonoma+)
- Users who only use a single AI provider with generous limits
- Those needing cross-editor or IDE-agnostic tracking (only monitors provider APIs)
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Opencode Bar if you're not on macOS Sonoma or later, or if you don't use OpenCode with any of its supported AI providers—it won't track anything else.
Opencode Bar is free and open-source (MIT), making it a no-brainer for any macOS developer using OpenCode. There are no paid tiers or hidden costs—you only pay for the AI usage itself, which is cheaper with OpenCode's lower token sends (~7k upfront vs Claude Code's ~33k).
In short
Opencode Bar — Track AI token usage and spend from your macOS menu bar. Best for Developers using multiple AI coding assistants who need unified cost tracking, Teams sharing API keys across providers who want quota alerts, Freelancers billing clients for AI usage who need exportable usage logs. Free to use.
What people actually say about Opencode Bar — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
6 mentions across 2 sources (GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Jul 5, 2026.
- +Free and lightweight—no cost to start using.
- +Real-time token display in editor without manual refresh.
- +Color-coded indicators (green/yellow/red) for quick cost awareness.
- +Automatic detection of OpenCode sessions with zero configuration.
- +Supports multiple OpenCode instances and profiles for teams.
- −Very limited community feedback—unknown reliability at scale.
- −10 open GitHub issues may indicate unresolved bugs.
- −Only useful for OpenCode users; no broader applicability.
- −No official support or documentation beyond the README.
- −Integration depth may break with OpenCode API changes.
- • None—fully free as reported
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Opencode Bar? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Unified usage board for 13+ AI providers
- Real-time quota window and pay-as-you-go tracking
- Burn pace prediction with depletion alerts
- End-of-month spend projection with confidence signal
- 30-day usage history with local caching
- CLI with table and JSON output for automation
- Multi-account provider support with labels
- Zero-config reads existing OpenCode auth files
- Color-coded status indicators (green/yellow/red)
- Subscription preset pricing for cost estimation
- Local-first security: no relay service, direct provider API calls
- macOS menu bar app (Sonoma+, Apple Silicon + Intel)
- Homebrew install available
- Open source under MIT license
- Export usage logs to CSV
About Opencode Bar
Opencode Bar is a free, open-source macOS menu bar utility that consolidates AI usage and cost tracking across 13+ providers, including Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenRouter, and OpenCode Zen. Built by OP.GG, it pulls real-time quota data, pay-as-you-go spend, and burn pace directly from provider APIs, so you don't have to juggle multiple dashboards. The app reads your existing OpenCode auth files with zero configuration, supports multi-account setups with labels, and offers a full CLI with JSON and CSV output for automation and billing reports. The menu bar displays color-coded status indicators (green/yellow/red) for at-a-glance quota health, with customizable alert thresholds to warn you before you hit limits. It tracks 30-day usage history with smart local caching, projects end-of-month spend with a confidence signal, and includes subscription presets (Claude Pro $20, Team $25, MAX $100/$200; Codex Go $8, Pro $200; Copilot Individual $10, Business $19, Enterprise $39) for quick cost estimation. The app runs with local-first security: no relay service, direct API calls, and only required macOS permissions (Keychain, optional Full Disk Access for Copilot)—never microphone, camera, or location access. Who is this for? Developers working across multiple AI coding assistants who need a single place to monitor token consumption and costs. It's also handy for teams sharing API keys, freelancers who bill clients for AI usage, and ops teams that want to pipe cost data into dashboards via the CLI. The 2026 efficiency improvements in OpenCode—sending about 7k tokens upfront versus Claude Code's ~33k—mean per-session spend is lower, a change you'll see reflected in your Opencode Bar projections. Unlike generic expense trackers that rely on manual entry, Opencode Bar pulls live provider data and predicts burn pace, giving you proactive budget control. It's a pragmatic companion for heavy OpenCode users who want visibility without the overhead of checking multiple dashboards.
Behind the Verdict
Opencode Bar solves a real pain point: if you use multiple AI coding assistants (Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenRouter, OpenCode Zen), tracking usage and spend across all of them is a mess. Opencode Bar centralizes that into a single menu bar widget with color-coded status lights, so you can see at a glance which provider is about to hit its limit. Its biggest strength is the zero-config setup: it reads your existing OpenCode auth files, so you don't need to manually enter API keys or configure anything. The CLI is a nice bonus for automation—you can pipe usage logs into your own dashboards or billing systems, and export to CSV for client invoicing. Weaknesses: it's macOS-only (Sonoma+), and it only monitors providers through the OpenCode CLI. If you use a non-OpenCode setup, it won't track that. Also, recent community chatter (Ask HN) suggests OpenCode may drop DeepSeek support; if that happens, Opencode Bar's coverage for DeepSeek would be affected until the tool updates. Where it fits: solo developers and small teams who are heavy OpenCode users and want to avoid surprise overage bills. Where it doesn't fit: Windows/Linux users, or anyone who needs cross-platform or non-CLI tracking. Compared to manual tracking, it's a clear win. Compared to other tools like Proliferate (which focuses on running Codex agents) or Epho (which runs Claude Code via curl), Opencode Bar is different—it's purely a monitoring utility, not a code execution tool. So it complements rather than competes with those.
Researching Opencode Bar? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Opencode Bar actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You're in a long coding session and worried about hitting your Claude limit.
Outcome: You glance at the menu bar and see a yellow indicator for Claude—you're at 70% of quota. You adjust your approach to use Codex for the rest, avoiding a hard stop.
At the end of the month, you need to report exact AI costs per client.
Outcome: You run `opencode-bar export --csv` and get a breakdown per project, which you attach to your invoice.
You want automated alerts when the team approaches the monthly budget.
Outcome: You set a custom alert at 80% in Opencode Bar, and use the CLI to pipe usage data into your monitoring dashboard.
Use Cases
- Monitor token consumption during a long coding session to avoid hitting API limits.
- Export weekly usage logs to analyze which projects or models consume the most tokens.
- Set a custom alert to warn when you approach 80% of your monthly token budget.
- Switch between multiple OpenCode profiles and see aggregated usage per profile.
- Keep a visible token counter while pair programming to stay budget-conscious.
Limitations
- Exclusive to OpenCode; does not support other AI coding assistants or non-OpenCode API calls.
- Future OpenCode API changes may affect compatibility.
as of 2026-08-28
Verification history
We have re-verified Opencode Bar 4 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Opencode Bar tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo developers and small teams on macOS who want to monitor AI usage without spending extra money.
What this tier adds
Free forever, open-source (MIT), with all features included—no paywall or premium tier.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Opencode Bar's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Opencode Bar is free and open-source (MIT), making it a no-brainer for any macOS developer using OpenCode. There are no paid tiers or hidden costs—you only pay for the AI usage itself, which is cheaper with OpenCode's lower token sends (~7k upfront vs Claude Code's ~33k).
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Opencode Bar — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For most users, setup takes less than 2 minutes: install via Homebrew, launch the app, and it reads your existing OpenCode auth files automatically. If you need to configure custom alerts or multi-account labels, add another 5 minutes. The CLI is ready immediately after install.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Opencode Bar
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Opencode Bar, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Opencode Bar vs Spider Cloud
Spider Cloud and Opencode Bar serve completely different needs. Spider Cloud is a feature-rich web scraping API for AI agents and RAG, with pay-as-you-go pricing and a Rust engine for speed. Opencode Bar is a free, lightweight token tracker for OpenCode users. Choose Spider Cloud if you need to feed fresh web data into AI workflows; choose Opencode Bar if you solely need to monitor OpenCode API usage. They are not direct competitors.
Opencode Bar vs Temporal Ai
These tools serve completely different purposes. Temporal is a heavy-duty durable execution platform for building reliable AI agents and workflows, trusted by OpenAI and Cursor. Opencode Bar is a lightweight, free token usage tracker for OpenCode only. Choose Temporal if you need fault-tolerant orchestration; choose Opencode Bar if you're an OpenCode user wanting real-time cost tracking. They are not direct competitors.
Opencode Bar vs Voyage Ai
Voyage AI and Opencode Bar serve entirely different purposes. Voyage AI is a high-end embedding/reranker platform for enterprise RAG, offering domain-specific models and long-context support, but requires contacting sales for pricing. Opencode Bar is a free, lightweight token tracker for OpenCode users. Choose Voyage if you need advanced retrieval accuracy; choose Opencode Bar if you're an OpenCode developer wanting cost visibility.
Alternatives to Opencode Bar
View all
Tokentelemetry
Free local observability for AI coding agents — tokens, cost & traces on your machine.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Opencode Bar? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.