Opencode Bar is live · free · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
Opencode Bar
OpenCode Bar tracks AI coding quota windows, spend, and burn pace from your macOS menu bar
If two or more AI coding subscriptions hit your card and you work on a Mac, OpenCode Bar answers what billing pages can't: how fast is this window burning, and when does it run out. Pace & Predict's On Track / Slightly Fast / Too Fast grading plus the confidence-gated end-of-month forecast aren't things a spreadsheet can replicate, because they read live provider data. The CLI's JSON mode and exit codes 0-4 make it cron-job ready. Free and MIT-licensed, so the only cost is the Keychain
Verdict generatedVerified 8d ago · liveness 63/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/opencode-bar
- Mac developers paying for several AI coding assistants who want one combined quota and spend view
- Freelancers who rebill clients for AI usage and need exportable JSON logs from the CLI
- Ops teams piping quota and spend data into their own dashboards via the CLI and exit codes
- Teams sharing API keys that want an alert before a shared quota window runs dry
- Windows or Linux users — this is a macOS 13 Sonoma or newer app only
- Developers running a single provider with generous limits, where the vendor dashboard is enough
- Teams needing per-editor or per-project token attribution rather than per-provider totals
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip OpenCode Bar if you develop on Windows or Linux, or you run a single AI provider with limits you never approach — there is no non-Mac build and no cap enforcement, only reporting.
OpenCode Bar itself costs nothing and is MIT-licensed, so the real budget question is the subscriptions it watches: Claude Pro at $20/mo, Team at $25/mo, MAX at $100 or $200/mo; Codex Go at $8/mo, Pro at $200/mo; Copilot Individual at $10/mo, Business at $19/mo, Enterprise at $39/mo. Those presets exist so metered pay-as-you-go spend lands in one monthly total instead of surprising you. If you pay for three or more of these, the combined view earns its keep immediately; if you pay for one, your
In short
Opencode Bar — OpenCode Bar tracks AI coding quota windows, spend, and burn pace from your macOS menu bar. Best for Mac developers paying for several AI coding assistants who want one combined quota and spend view, Freelancers who rebill clients for AI usage and need exportable JSON logs from the CLI, Ops teams piping quota and spend data into their own dashboards via the CLI and exit codes. Free to use.
What is Opencode Bar?
Opencode Bar — OpenCode Bar tracks AI coding quota windows, spend, and burn pace from your macOS menu bar. Best for Mac developers paying for several AI coding assistants who want one combined quota and spend view, Freelancers who rebill clients for AI usage and need exportable JSON logs from the CLI, Ops teams piping quota and spend data into their own dashboards via the CLI and exit codes. Free to use.
OpenCode Bar is a free, MIT-licensed macOS menu bar utility from OP.GG that puts quota windows, pay-as-you-go spend, and a monthly cost projection for your AI coding assistants into one panel. It is built for Mac developers and small teams juggling several coding subscriptions, where the real question is whether a quota window will run dry mid-session. The app covers 13 providers per the vendor page, including Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI, GitHub Copilot, OpenRouter, OpenCode Zen, Kimi for Coding, and Synthetic, so you stop hopping between dashboards. Setup is zero-config. It reads your existing OpenCode auth files on install, with no API key entry and no password prompt. Credentials from config files, macOS Keychain, and optional browser cookie storage for GitHub Copilot token discovery get merged with priority deduplication and account labels, so multi-profile setups stay auditable. Provider calls go out directly from your machine with no relay service in between. The measurement layer is the reason to install it. Pace & Predict grades each quota window On Track, Slightly Fast, or Too Fast and projects depletion before a reset wall. A header snapshot keeps one monthly figure with 7/14/21-day lookback options and a confidence signal so you don't over-trust thin data. Subscription presets (Claude Pro $20, Team $25, MAX $100/$200; Codex Go $8, Pro $200; Copilot Individual $10, Business $19, Enterprise $39) fold quota plans and metered spend into one realistic total. Thirty-day usage history is cached locally. Automation is handled by a CLI that mirrors the menu bar data model: `opencodebar status` prints a readable provider table, `opencodebar status --json` stays stable for scripts, and exit codes 0-4 support alerting. Against vendor dashboards or a spreadsheet, the difference is live per-window burn data plus machine-readable export; against broader AI observability platforms, it's narrower but installs in a minute and costs nothing.
Key features
- Unified usage board across 13 AI providers in one macOS menu bar panel
- Window-level remaining quota and reset timing per provider
- Pay-as-you-go cumulative spend tracking alongside quota plans
- Pace & Predict burn pace status: On Track / Slightly Fast / Too Fast
- Projected quota depletion before the reset wall hits
- End-of-month spend projection with a confidence signal
- 7/14/21-day lookback options for end-of-month forecasts
- 30-day usage history with local caching
- `opencodebar status` CLI producing a readable provider table
- `opencodebar status --json` machine-readable output for scripts and CI
- CLI exit codes 0-4 covering success, general, auth, and network errors
- Subscription presets for Claude, Codex, and Copilot plans
- Multi-account provider support with custom account labels
- Priority deduplication across config files, Keychain, and optional browser cookies
- Zero-config setup reading existing OpenCode auth files, no password input
Behind the verdict
We'd reach for OpenCode Bar the moment a second coding subscription lands on the same card. The failure mode it prevents is boring and expensive: a quota window quietly burns at 3x your usual pace, the reset wall arrives, and you're either blocked or paying overage. Seeing On Track / Slightly Fast / Too Fast per window is the whole product, and it's the part a spreadsheet can't do without live provider data. When to pick it: you run Claude, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot or a mix, on Apple Silicon or Intel running macOS 13 or newer, and you want one header number for the month. The subscription presets matter more than they sound. Claude Pro at $20 versus MAX at $200 is a decision people make badly, and folding quota plans plus metered OpenRouter spend into one realistic total makes that comparison honest. When to pass: you're on Windows or Linux, full stop. Also pass if you have a single provider with generous limits where the vendor dashboard already tells you what you need. Teams wanting per-editor or per-project token attribution should look at a broader observability platform instead; OpenCode Bar reports per-provider totals, not per-repo spend. In practice the friction is macOS permissions. Keychain access is required to read Claude Code auth entries, and Full Disk Access is optional but needed for GitHub Copilot token discovery via browser cookies. If your security posture won't allow a menu bar utility that, skip it. There's no microphone, camera, or location access, which helps the conversation internally. The automation story is underrated. `opencodebar status --json` with a stable schema and exit codes 0-4 means you can wire quota alerts into an existing cron or CI check in an afternoon. For freelancers rebilling AI usage, exporting usage logs for client
Limitations
- Platform lock is absolute: macOS 13 Sonoma or newer, Apple Silicon and Intel, with no Windows or Linux build.
- Keychain access is required — the app reads Claude Code authentication entries — and Full Disk Access is optional, used only for GitHub Copilot token discovery through browser cookie storage, so it cannot run without granting a menu bar utility access to macOS credential storage.
- Attribution stops at the provider and account level, so it will not tell you which project or editor burned the tokens.
- It reports and warns rather than enforces: there is no cap, throttle, or automatic provider switching.
- Provider coverage shifts with open pull requests and upstream API changes — the vendor page says coverage expands through contributions, and community discussion in August 2026 questioned whether OpenCode still includes DeepSeek, with no official confirmation from the maintainers either way.
as of 2026-10-18
Researching Opencode Bar? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is Opencode Bar still active?
Opencode Bar is live · free · last verified 22 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is Opencode Bar? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about Opencode Bar?
What people actually say about Opencode Bar — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 5, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about Opencode Bar— pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 22 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified Opencode Bar 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed who should skip it, pricing tiers, description, who it suits, summary, our verdict, features
- — changed pricing page, pricing fit, our verdict, limitations, pricing tiers, summary, who should skip it, integrations, features, setup time, hidden costs, use cases, switching out, switching in, description
- — changed who should skip it, pricing tiers, summary, our verdict, who it suits, integrations, description
- — changed pricing page
- — changed our verdict, summary, who should skip it, integrations, who it suits, description, pricing tiers, features
- — changed pricing page
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does Opencode Bar cost in 2026?
Opencode Bar: Free to use. Pricing last verified 22 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published Opencode Bar tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Free | Free | — | Mac developers juggling two or more AI coding subscriptions who need one combined quota and spend view without paying for another toolAdds: Starting tier — the whole app is free and MIT-licensed: 13 providers, Pace & Predict, end-of-month forecast, 30-day history, CLI table and JSON output, and CSV export |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Opencode Bar's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
OpenCode Bar itself costs nothing and is MIT-licensed, so the real budget question is the subscriptions it watches: Claude Pro at $20/mo, Team at $25/mo, MAX at $100 or $200/mo; Codex Go at $8/mo, Pro at $200/mo; Copilot Individual at $10/mo, Business at $19/mo, Enterprise at $39/mo. Those presets exist so metered pay-as-you-go spend lands in one monthly total instead of surprising you. If you pay for three or more of these, the combined view earns its keep immediately; if you pay for one, your
Has Opencode Bar's pricing changed?
No plan price for Opencode Bar has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick Opencode Bar?
Pick Opencode Bar if you are Mac developers paying for several AI coding assistants who want one combined quota and spend view, Freelancers who rebill clients for AI usage and need exportable JSON logs from the CLI, Ops teams piping quota and spend data into their own dashboards via the CLI and exit codes, Teams sharing API keys that want an alert before a shared quota window runs dry.
Look elsewhere if you are Windows or Linux users — this is a macOS 13 Sonoma or newer app only, Developers running a single provider with generous limits, where the vendor dashboard is enough, Teams needing per-editor or per-project token attribution rather than per-provider totals, Anyone unwilling to grant a menu bar utility macOS Keychain access, which is required.
Skip it if Skip OpenCode Bar if you develop on Windows or Linux, or you run a single AI provider with limits you never approach — there is no non-Mac build and no cap enforcement, only reporting.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Opencode Bar actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You run Claude and OpenRouter for client work and need a defensible monthly number. You export the 30-day usage log to CSV, combine the OpenRouter pay-as-you-go spend with the Claude Pro $20/mo preset, and attach the total to the invoice.
Outcome: A per-client AI cost line backed by exported logs instead of a guess, produced from the menu bar rather than four separate billing pages.
Mid-afternoon your Codex window reads 99% used with 1/100 remaining. Pace & Predict flags the window as Too Fast and projects depletion before the reset, so you move the next batch of agent work to Gemini CLI, which still shows 100% remaining.
Outcome: You finish the session without a hard stop, because the burn-pace grade surfaced the depletion hours before the limit did.
A cron job runs `opencodebar status --json`, parses `billingType`, `usagePercent`, and `spentUsd` per provider, and pushes them into the team dashboard. Exit code 2 triggers an auth-failure page; exit code 3 flags a network problem.
Outcome: Team-wide quota visibility in the tool the team already watches, with alerting that distinguishes a broken credential from a provider outage.
Use cases
- Watch token consumption during a long coding session so you switch providers before a quota window depletes.
- Export weekly usage logs to CSV to see which providers consume the most of your budget.
- Set quota alerts so a warning lands before a hard limit interrupts a task mid-flight.
- Track multiple OpenCode profiles with account labels and see aggregated usage per profile.
- Pipe monthly AI spend into your own dashboard with `opencodebar status --json` from a cron job.
- Bill clients for AI consumption using exported CSV or JSON usage logs.
- Estimate a realistic monthly total by combining subscription presets with metered pay-as-you-go spend.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Opencode Bar — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Mac developers: about five minutes. Install with `brew install --cask opgginc/tap/opencode-bar`, launch it, and it reads your existing OpenCode auth files with no API key or password entry. Expect one extra prompt to grant mandatory Keychain access (and optionally Full Disk Access for Copilot cookie discovery). Freelancers exporting CSV and ops engineers wiring the JSON CLI are productive on the
Switching to or from Opencode Bar
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From vendor dashboards: install the Homebrew cask; it reads your existing auth files, so there are no keys to re-enter.
- →From a spend spreadsheet: replace manual entry with the Pace & Predict end-of-month forecast and CSV export of the 30-day log.
- ↗To a vendor dashboard: nothing to migrate — the app reads provider APIs and stores no server-side data.
- ↗To a custom script: export CSV or parse `opencodebar status --json` before uninstalling.
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Opencode Bar”, and we withheld 6: 6 did not mention Opencode Bar. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Opencode Bar.
Official links
What are the best Opencode Bar alternatives?
The closest alternatives to Opencode Bar we list are Synth, Conan and Tokentelemetry. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synth | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Conan | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Tokentelemetry | Free | Free | — |
Alternatives to Opencode Bar
View allSynth
Synth is a research workbench and hosted compute for optimizing coding agents with reproducible, evidence-backed evals.
Conan
Conan is a native macOS HUD for Claude Code that streams every prompt, tool call, skill and token live as the session runs.
Tokentelemetry
Local, MIT-licensed token usage and cost tracking for AI coding agents — reads the logs your agents already write.
Tools that pair well with Opencode Bar
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Opencode Bar, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Synth
Synth is a research workbench and hosted compute for optimizing coding agents with reproducible, evidence-backed evals.
Conan
Conan is a native macOS HUD for Claude Code that streams every prompt, tool call, skill and token live as the session runs.
Tokentelemetry
Local, MIT-licensed token usage and cost tracking for AI coding agents — reads the logs your agents already write.
Opencode Bar vs its closest rival
Opencode Bar's closest head-to-head is with Spider Cloud — Spider Cloud and Opencode Bar serve completely different needs. Spider Cloud is a feature-rich web scraping API for AI agents and RAG, with pay-as-you-go pricing and a Rust engine for speed. Opencode Bar is a free, lightweight token tracker for OpenCode users. Choose Spider Cloud if you need to feed fresh web data into AI workflows; choose Opencode Bar if you solely need to monitor OpenCode API usage. They are not direct competitors. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Opencode Bar vs Spider Cloud
Spider Cloud and Opencode Bar serve completely different needs. Spider Cloud is a feature-rich web scraping API for AI agents and RAG, with pay-as-you-go pricing and a Rust engine for speed. Opencode Bar is a free, lightweight token tracker for OpenCode users. Choose Spider Cloud if you need to feed fresh web data into AI workflows; choose Opencode Bar if you solely need to monitor OpenCode API usage. They are not direct competitors.
GeneratedOpencode Bar vs Temporal Ai
These tools serve completely different purposes. Temporal is a heavy-duty durable execution platform for building reliable AI agents and workflows, trusted by OpenAI and Cursor. Opencode Bar is a lightweight, free token usage tracker for OpenCode only. Choose Temporal if you need fault-tolerant orchestration; choose Opencode Bar if you're an OpenCode user wanting real-time cost tracking. They are not direct competitors.
GeneratedOpencode Bar vs Voyage Ai
Voyage AI and Opencode Bar serve entirely different purposes. Voyage AI is a high-end embedding/reranker platform for enterprise RAG, offering domain-specific models and long-context support, but requires contacting sales for pricing. Opencode Bar is a free, lightweight token tracker for OpenCode users. Choose Voyage if you need advanced retrieval accuracy; choose Opencode Bar if you're an OpenCode developer wanting cost visibility.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Topics
Used Opencode Bar? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.