RushHoster is live · free plan, paid from $99/yr · last verified 1 Sep 2026 · viability monitor
RushHoster
RushHoster was a free drag-and-drop static site host, shut down in December 2024 — no live product today
RushHoster is dead — shutdown announced December 2024, uploads and sign-ups closed. The drag-and-drop loop was about as little effort as putting a static page online ever took, but a discontinued host can't keep a site online. Don't start anything here; migrate legacy deployments to a supported drop-and-publish alternative.
Verdict generatedVerified 9/1/2026 · liveness 48/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/rushhoster
- Historical reference for the minimum viable static publishing workflow
- Benchmarking frictionless drop-and-publish expectations against live hosts
- Auditing a legacy RushHoster deployment before migrating off it
- Anyone launching a new site — uploads and sign-ups closed December 2024
- Dynamic sites needing server-side processing, PHP, or databases
- Teams requiring collaboration features
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip RushHoster entirely if you need a site that stays online — it announced shutdown in December 2024 and stopped accepting uploads and sign-ups, so no new project can start here.
Every site you built or linked to on RushHoster is at risk now that the service announced its shutdown in December 2024 — migrating means re-uploading files and re-issuing shareable links to anyone who had them.
Historical pricing only: a free Beta during the launch period, then Starter at $99/year billed annually and Pro at $129/year billed annually. Those tiers were never finalized and are no longer purchasable after the December 2024 shutdown. Compare current spend against still-operating free static hosts like Netlify Drop, Cloudflare Pages, and GitHub Pages, which cover the same drop-and-publish use case at no annual commitment.
In short
RushHoster — RushHoster was a free drag-and-drop static site host, shut down in December 2024 — no live product today. Best for Historical reference for the minimum viable static publishing workflow, Benchmarking frictionless drop-and-publish expectations against live hosts, Auditing a legacy RushHoster deployment before migrating off it. Free to start; paid plans from $99/yr.
What is RushHoster?
RushHoster — RushHoster was a free drag-and-drop static site host, shut down in December 2024 — no live product today. Best for Historical reference for the minimum viable static publishing workflow, Benchmarking frictionless drop-and-publish expectations against live hosts, Auditing a legacy RushHoster deployment before migrating off it. Free to start; paid plans from $99/yr.
RushHoster was a free static hosting service built around a single gesture: drop your files into a browser and get a live URL back. HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and ZIP archives were all accepted, and publishing didn't require an account — no CLI, no Git, no server configuration. The intended user was someone shipping a landing page, portfolio, or prototype in minutes, not a team running production infrastructure. The product stayed narrow on purpose. A drag-and-drop uploader, one-click publishing, and a shareable link formed the whole core loop, backed by a minimal dashboard for managing and deleting hosted files. Static-only was the design constraint, so there was no server-side processing, no PHP, and no databases. Paid tiers on file — Starter at $99/year and Pro at $129/year, both billed annually — sat alongside a free beta and never saw wide finalization. In December 2024 RushHoster announced its shutdown and stopped accepting new uploads and sign-ups. The site no longer serves a live product, so anyone researching it today is looking at a discontinued host rather than a candidate for a new deployment. For buyers, the positioning is simple: RushHoster set a low bar for frictionless static publishing that modern drop-and-publish hosts now fill. If you still have files there, treat them as material to migrate rather than infrastructure to build on.
Key features
- Drag-and-drop file upload directly in the browser
- One-click publish to a live URL
- Shareable link generation for published sites
- Accepts HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and ZIP archives
- Minimal dashboard for managing hosted files
- Delete hosted files from the dashboard
- Static site hosting only — no server-side processing
- No account required to publish
- No CLI, Git, or server configuration needed
- Free during the beta period
- Web-based publishing, no desktop or mobile app
- Service shut down in December 2024 — no new uploads or sign-ups
Behind the verdict
We'd only reach for RushHoster today in one scenario: you have an old deployment there and need to understand what it was before you move the files. As a hosting decision, it's off the table — the December 2024 shutdown closed uploads and sign-ups, so the product can't serve new work. The pitch that made it interesting was the total absence of setup. Drop HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, or a ZIP in the browser, click once, get a shareable link. No account required to publish, no Git, no CLI, no server config. That bar for friction is the thing worth benchmarking against whatever you pick next. The tradeoff was always the static-only ceiling. No server-side processing, no PHP, no databases — fine for a landing page or portfolio, useless the moment you need forms that do something, auth, or any dynamic backend. Even when it was live, teams needing collaboration would have looked elsewhere. Where it bites now: a discontinued host is an expiry date on your site. If a project still points at RushHoster, treat migration as overdue rather than optional. Audit what's there, pull the files down, and redeploy on a supported drop-and-publish host. Compared to a live alternative, the difference isn't features — it's whether the URL is still there next month. Price never really entered the picture either: the paid tiers on file, Starter at $99/year and Pro at $129/year billed annually, sat next to a free beta, but none of that matters for a product that stopped taking new projects. One caveat on the history: the record here is thin, and the vendor site doesn't resolve today, so treat details as archival rather than current. Anyone citing RushHoster as an option hasn't checked the date on the shutdown notice.
Limitations
- RushHoster supports only static files — HTML, CSS, JavaScript, images, and ZIP archives.
- Dynamic sites, PHP, and databases were never supported.
- The service announced its shutdown in December 2024 and no longer accepts uploads or sign-ups, so nothing new can be published and existing deployments should be treated as at risk.
- Pricing was never finalized, and the Starter and Pro tiers on file ($99/year and $129/year, both billed annually) are historical rather than purchasable.
- There are no integrations on record, no collaboration features, and no documented custom domain support.
as of 2026-10-03
Researching RushHoster? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is RushHoster still active?
RushHoster is live · free plan, paid from $99/yr · last verified 1 Sep 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is RushHoster? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: November 2026
How we score →What do users say about RushHoster?
What people actually say about RushHoster — is it worth it?
Our community sentiment research written Jul 26, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
How we verified this
Every listed fact about RushHoster — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 1 Sep 2026. Analysis is drafted with AI models and checked against our editorial standards before publishing; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified RushHoster 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed pricing tiers, description
- — changed pricing tiers, features, our verdict, description, who it suits, summary
- — changed our verdict, description
- — changed pricing fit, who it suits, description, our verdict, features, hidden costs, limitations, switching in, switching out, who should skip it, pricing tiers, setup time, summary, use cases
- — changed link health, website status
Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does RushHoster cost in 2026?
RushHoster: Free to start; paid plans from $99/yr. Pricing last verified 1 Sep 2026.
Plans compared
Every published RushHoster tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta | Free | — | Historically, anyone testing the drag-and-drop publishing flow during RushHoster's free beta period — a landing page, portfolio, or prototype at zero cost.Adds: Starting tier and free entry point: no cost during the beta, drag-and-drop upload, one-click publish, no account required. |
| Starter | $99/yrVendor: “$99/year” | yearly | Historical annual tier for individuals who wanted paid static hosting after the free beta period ended.Adds: Moved from free beta to a paid annual commitment at $99/year billed annually, keeping static hosting and dashboard file management. |
| Pro | $129/yrVendor: “$129/year” | yearly | Historical top annual tier for individuals wanting the same static hosting scope at the higher price point.Adds: Added nothing material over Starter beyond price — $129/year billed annually versus $99/year billed annually, with the same static-only hosting and shareable links. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where RushHoster's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Historical pricing only: a free Beta during the launch period, then Starter at $99/year billed annually and Pro at $129/year billed annually. Those tiers were never finalized and are no longer purchasable after the December 2024 shutdown. Compare current spend against still-operating free static hosts like Netlify Drop, Cloudflare Pages, and GitHub Pages, which cover the same drop-and-publish use case at no annual commitment.
Has RushHoster's pricing changed?
No plan price for RushHoster has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick RushHoster?
Pick RushHoster if you are Historical reference for the minimum viable static publishing workflow, Benchmarking frictionless drop-and-publish expectations against live hosts, Auditing a legacy RushHoster deployment before migrating off it.
Look elsewhere if you are Anyone launching a new site — uploads and sign-ups closed December 2024, Dynamic sites needing server-side processing, PHP, or databases, Teams requiring collaboration features, Long-term projects — the service is discontinued.
Skip it if Skip RushHoster entirely if you need a site that stays online — it announced shutdown in December 2024 and stopped accepting uploads and sign-ups, so no new project can start here.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas RushHoster actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You exported a static HTML/CSS/JS prototype and needed a link to send the client the same afternoon, without setting up a repo or buying a domain.
Outcome: The drag-and-drop upload and one-click publish got the files to a shareable URL within minutes. Today you would repeat that flow on a live host such as Netlify Drop, since RushHoster stopped accepting uploads in December 2024.
You discover a portfolio or landing page still pointing at RushHoster and need to know whether it is safe to leave alone.
Outcome: It is not — the service announced its shutdown in December 2024. Download the static files, re-upload them to a supported static host, and re-share the new URL with anyone who had the old link.
You want a single HTML page or presentation live for a class or a side project with zero configuration.
Outcome: RushHoster's no-account, no-CLI model was the reference for this, but sign-ups closed in December 2024. Use GitHub Pages or Cloudflare Pages instead for the same static-only scope with an ongoing hosting guarantee.
Use cases
- Publishing a one-page resume or portfolio instantly from a ZIP file (historical — service shut down December 2024).
- Hosting a landing page for a side project without buying a domain (historical).
- Sharing HTML prototypes with clients via a direct link (historical).
- Temporarily hosting files for a school project or presentation (historical).
- Auditing a legacy RushHoster deployment before migrating it to a live host.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of RushHoster — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Historically, RushHoster was one of the fastest publishing paths available — drag files into the browser, click publish, and share the URL, with no account, CLI, or Git required, so first value came in minutes. That workflow no longer exists: uploads and sign-ups closed in December 2024. Migrating an existing RushHoster site to a live host involves downloading your static files and re-uploading
Switching to or from RushHoster
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual file storage or email attachments: upload your HTML, CSS, JS, and images as a ZIP and publish to a shareable URL — the historical RushHoster flow, now closed.
- ↗To Netlify Drop: download your static files, drag the folder or ZIP onto the Netlify Drop page, and you get a published URL in minutes.
- ↗To GitHub Pages: put the files in a repository, enable Pages, and serve the same static site from a stable URL.
- ↗To Cloudflare Pages: upload the static build or connect a repo and get free static hosting with a lasting URL.
- ↗To Vercel: import the static project and publish, with serverless functions available later if the site outgrows static-only.
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “RushHoster”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “RushHoster” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about RushHoster.
Official links
What are the best RushHoster alternatives?
The closest alternatives to RushHoster we list are Vercel, Mintlify and Mux. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vercel | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Mintlify | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
| Mux | Freemium | Pricing not published | — |
Alternatives to RushHoster
View all
Tools that pair well with RushHoster
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside RushHoster, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Vercel
Vercel deploys web apps and AI agents from Git, with sandboxed VMs and a 400+ model AI Gateway.
Mintlify
Mintlify builds agent-native documentation sites that ship an MCP server with every plan, free Starter included.
Mux
Mux is a developer video API for encoding, live streaming, delivery, DRM, analytics and hosted AI video workflows.
RushHoster vs its closest rival
RushHoster's closest head-to-head is with Spider Cloud.
Our RushHoster vs Spider Cloud verdict written Jul 3, 2026 is more than 90 days old, so it is being re-reviewed against current data and is not shown.
Frequently asked questions
Categories
For makers of RushHoster
- Get a Verified Listing for RushHoster ($39): a written decision within 1 working day.
- Free listing for another tool: Free reviews are decided in order, within 3 weeks of the review starting.
Used RushHoster? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.