
Run persistent AI coding agents on your own server.
By Tanmay Verma, Founder · Last verified 03 Jul 2026
In short
Sandboxed.Sh — Run persistent AI coding agents on your own server. Best for Developers running multi-hour code refactors or migrations, Teams handling sensitive code that cannot leave their infrastructure, DevOps engineers automating complex, multi-project tasks. Free to start; paid plans from $19/mo.
See what real users actually say. We scan live discussions, reviews and complaints across the web and hand you an honest verdict — in under a minute.
3 free scans · no card needed · downloadable report
If you need AI agents that run all night on sensitive code, sandboxed.sh is your only real option. It demands server ops know-how, but the container isolation and git-synced skills library justify the overhead.
Compare with: Sandboxed.Sh vs Bito, Sandboxed.Sh vs OpenHands, Sandboxed.Sh vs Draftbit
Last verified: July 2026
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
1 mentions across 1 source (GitHub).
How likely is Sandboxed.Sh to still be operational in 12 months? Based on 4 signals — momentum (how recently it shipped), wrapper dependency, revenue model, and web presence.
Last calculated: July 2026
How we score →sandboxed.sh is a self-hosted orchestrator for long-running AI coding agents. It runs on your server (≈$30/mo), managing containerized workspaces, streaming progress, and syncing skills from a git repo. Agents can work unattended for 10 minutes to 10 hours, completing GitHub issues or refactors while you sleep. Built for developers with sensitive codebases (healthcare, finance, defense) or multiple projects requiring isolated environments. You connect via web dashboard (hosted on Vercel), iOS app, or CLI. The platform doesn't do AI itself; it orchestrates runtimes like Claude Code, OpenCode, Codex, Gemini, or Grok. Each project runs in its own Docker container with separate tools, rules, and secrets. Key features: no session timeouts, data sovereignty (code stays on your machine), and fully customizable agent behavior through a version-controlled skills library. Setup takes about 5 minutes if you have a server and domain. The dashboard can be deployed on Vercel for free or run locally. Compared to alternatives like Cursor or Claude Code alone, sandboxed.sh excels at persistence and isolation. It's a niche tool for power users who need to automate complex, multi-hour tasks on code that can't leave their infrastructure.
sandboxed.sh tackles a specific pain: AI coding sessions that time out after 30 minutes. For anyone doing multi-hour refactors or migrations, that's a dealbreaker. This tool lets you fire off a task and walk away. The container isolation is the standout feature. Each project gets its own Docker environment with its own runtime, dependencies, and secrets. You can run Claude Code on your Node project and Codex on your Python project simultaneously without cross-contamination. The skills library stored in git is clever but incomplete. You define agent behaviors as version-controlled commands and rules. In practice, writing good skills takes iteration. Expect to spend time crafting prompts that encode your team's patterns. Setup is about 5 minutes if you're comfortable with Docker, nginx, and a domain. The docs are clean and Claude/Cursor can auto-deploy. But you still need a server (≈$30/mo) and basic ops skills. Non-technical users should look elsewhere. Where it bites: the dashboard is a Next.js app you deploy yourself (Vercel is free, but still extra steps). No managed cloud version exists. If your server goes down, agents stop. There's no built-in load balancing or high availability. Compared to just running Claude Code locally with nohup, sandboxed.sh gives you a proper dashboard, mobile monitoring, and structured skill management. Compared to Cursor's agent mode, it trades convenience for control and persistence. We'd reach for this when code sovereignty is non-negotiable and tasks run longer than an hour. For quick debugging or one-shot codegen, simpler tools win. On balance, sandboxed.sh fills a genuine gap—just be ready to babysit a server.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Sandboxed.Sh, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Used Sandboxed.Sh? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.