ScreenplayIQ
AI screenplay analysis that returns a logline, comps, character arcs, and proofed fixes on your draft
Per-script pricing is the real draw: buy the tier you need, no seat to cancel. The character emotional journey charts and a proofreader that attaches a fix to every flag perform work a human reader bills far more for. Where it stops is taste — it won't rewrite a scene or tell you who to pitch.
Verified 9h ago · liveness 61/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/screenplayiq
- Screenwriters wanting an objective structural read before committing to a rewrite
- Producers triaging a stack of submissions for market potential
- Directors and executives needing a fast, presentable read on a draft
- Agents checking whether a client's script is ready to send out
- Writers who need line-by-line editing or a development partner to rewrite scenes
- Creatives who want human taste and career guidance rather than structured data
- Anyone wanting a flat monthly rate to cover unpredictable script volume
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip ScreenplayIQ if you want a rewrite partner or line-level editing rather than a diagnostic read — every package tells you what the script is and how it works, not what to change.
The Proofread report is a separate add-on (~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature) rather than included in the analysis packages, so a full pass costs the analysis price plus the proofread price.
ScreenplayIQ is priced per script, with Story at ~$24 for TV and ~$38 for feature, Story + Character at ~$48 TV / ~$78 Feature, and Full Evaluation at ~$60 TV / ~$98 Feature, plus a Proofread add-on at ~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature — all based on page length. That structure fits occasional users and small teams who analyze in bursts; a shop reading scripts continuously may want to compare total volume spend against a flat-rate alternative.
In short
ScreenplayIQ — AI screenplay analysis that returns a logline, comps, character arcs, and proofed fixes on your draft. Best for Screenwriters wanting an objective structural read before committing to a rewrite, Producers triaging a stack of submissions for market potential, Directors and executives needing a fast, presentable read on a draft. Plans from $24.
What people actually say about ScreenplayIQ — is it worth it?
We scanned public community sources for ScreenplayIQ on Oct 14, 2026 and could not establish that the discussion we found is about this tool rather than something else sharing its name. Only 0 of the posts we fetched could be positively tied to ScreenplayIQ. Rather than publish a sentiment score built on the wrong subject, we publish nothing here and re-run the scan.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is ScreenplayIQ? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Generate a logline from a full screenplay draft
- Surface comparable films and TV shows for market framing
- Break a script into structured story points
- Produce a full synopsis without reading the whole draft
- Write character synopses for the full cast
- Create visual representations of characters
- Chart each character's emotional journey across the script
- Deliver a full assessment analysis of the draft
- Break down the story's themes
- Proofread report with inline highlights on every issue
- Recommend a fix for each flagged issue
- Build a custom analysis package outside the presets
- Price analysis by page length, quoted separately for TV and features
- Store uploaded scripts in encrypted, siloed storage
- WGA-compliant handling of submitted scripts
About ScreenplayIQ
ScreenplayIQ is an AI screenplay analysis service from WriterDuet Inc. that reads a draft and hands back the coverage package an agent or producer tends to open first. Upload a script and the Story tier returns a logline, comparable films and TV shows for market framing, structured story points, and a full synopsis. That is enough to triage a submission without paying a human reader just to summarize it. The packages stack rather than replace each other. Story + Character adds character synopses, visual representations of each character, and emotional journey charts that map how an arc moves across the script. Full Evaluation layers a full assessment analysis plus theme breakdowns on top of that. Proofread sits outside the ladder as an optional add-on: a report on all issues, inline highlights, and a recommended fix attached to each flagged item. A custom analysis option covers cases where the presets don't fit. Pricing runs per script and scales with page length, quoted separately for TV and features: Story at roughly $24 TV / $38 feature, Story + Character at ~$48 / ~$78, Full Evaluation at ~$60 / ~$98, and Proofread around $24 / $38 on top. Scripts sit in encrypted, siloed storage, handling is WGA compliant, and WriterDuet says analyzed stories aren't used to train any LLM models. A First Look community with weekly meetups rounds out the offer. Read honestly, this is a diagnostic layer, not a development partner. It competes with human coverage on speed and repeatability, since the same draft gets the same read twice, and it won't tell you which producer to send to. Most writers use it as a first pass before spending on a person.
Behind the Verdict
ScreenplayIQ earns a place when you need a structured read fast and don't want to buy a human coverage report to get it. The Story tier alone — logline, comparable films and TV shows, story points, synopsis — gives a producer a presentable one-pager on a submission in minutes. For a writer, paying roughly $48 TV / $78 feature for Story + Character gets you the emotional journey charts, which are the genuinely harder thing to eyeball yourself: you can feel when an arc sags, but seeing it plotted across the script is a different read. We'd reach for the Full Evaluation when a draft is close to being sent out and you want theme breakdowns alongside the assessment. The Proofread add-on at ~$24 / ~38 is the sleeper, because a report with inline highlights and a recommended fix on each issue is closer to what a line editor does than what a coverage reader does. Where it bites: pricing is by page length, quoted separately for TV and features, so a 120-page feature costs noticeably more than a pilot — and writers with unpredictable volume never get a flat monthly rate. The custom analysis option exists for the presets that don't fit, but you're paying to configure it. Pass if what you actually want is taste and career judgment. This returns structured data and patterns; it will not rewrite a scene, argue with you about a choice, or tell you which producer to pitch. Human coverage still owns that, and the honest comparison is speed and repeatability versus a reader's instinct. The fact that the same draft gets the same read twice is an advantage when you're diffing two revisions — run the prior version, run the new one, compare the charts. Storage is encrypted and siloed, handling is WGA compliant, and WriterDuet says analyzed stories aren't used to train LLM models — worth
Researching ScreenplayIQ? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas ScreenplayIQ actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
A producer has five specs in the queue and needs a market read on each before deciding which to take to partners. They run the Story package on each script to get the logline, comparable films and TV shows, story points, and a full synopsis.
Outcome: The producer has a consistent one-page comparable set per script to compare against the market, and only spends reading time on the scripts whose comparables actually fit the slate.
A writer has finished a second draft and suspects the midpoint character arc isn't landing. They order Story + Character to get character synopses, visual representations of characters, and character emotional journey charts, then add Proofread to get inline highlights with a recommended fix for each flagged issue.
Outcome: The writer walks into the next revision with a chart showing where the arc flattens and a marked-up draft listing each issue beside a suggested fix, rather than a stack of subjective notes.
An agent wants to know whether a client's script is ready to send out before spending submission capital. They order Full Evaluation for the full assessment analysis and theme breakdowns.
Outcome: The agent either confirms the script is ready to submit or has a concrete assessment and theme breakdown to hand the client for one more pass.
Use Cases
- A screenwriter gets a logline and full synopsis back to check whether the script's premise reads the way they intended.
- A producer compares a submission's comparable films and TV shows against the market before deciding to read further.
- A director uses a character emotional journey chart to see whether an arc actually moves across the script.
- An agent adds a Proofread report to a client's draft so every flagged issue comes with a recommended fix.
- A studio executive orders a Full Evaluation to get an assessment and theme breakdown before greenlight discussions.
- A writer pairs the Story + Character output with the Proofread add-on before sending a draft out to collaborators.
- A team builds a custom analysis bundle to fit how they review incoming scripts.
Limitations
- ScreenplayIQ produces analysis and diagnosis, not development: nothing in the packages rewrites a scene or mentors the writer, so plan on pairing the output with a human editor.
- Pricing is per script and based on page length, quoted separately for TV and feature scripts, so a team processing a continuous stream of scripts has to price each one rather than budget a flat monthly figure.
- The Proofread report is a separate add-on from the analysis packages rather than included.
- The public site describes the packages, secure storage, WGA compliance, and the no-training guarantee, but does not publish turnaround times, revision counts, or error rates, so those numbers can't be confirmed from the vendor's own pages.
as of 2026-09-30
Verification history
We have re-verified ScreenplayIQ 100 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 100 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published ScreenplayIQ tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Story
~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature
Story + Character
~$48 TV / ~$78 Feature
Full Evaluation
~$60 TV / ~$98 Feature
Ideal for
An agent or executive who needs a presentable overall verdict on a draft before it goes out — assessment and themes, not just structure and characters.
What this tier adds
Adds full assessment analysis and theme breakdowns on top of everything in Story + Character, at ~$60 TV / ~$98 Feature based on page length.
Proofread (optional add-on)
~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature
Custom Analysis
Custom
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where ScreenplayIQ's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
ScreenplayIQ is priced per script, with Story at ~$24 for TV and ~$38 for feature, Story + Character at ~$48 TV / ~$78 Feature, and Full Evaluation at ~$60 TV / ~$98 Feature, plus a Proofread add-on at ~$24 TV / ~$38 Feature — all based on page length. That structure fits occasional users and small teams who analyze in bursts; a shop reading scripts continuously may want to compare total volume spend against a flat-rate alternative.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of ScreenplayIQ — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
ScreenplayIQ is a web service, so most of the setup is account creation and upload: sign up, pick a package (Story, Story + Character, or Full Evaluation), or build a custom bundle, upload the script, and the analysis comes back as a report you can review and share. Realistically budget a few minutes for signup and upload, then the wait is the analysis itself. Adding the Proofread add-on to an
Switching to or from ScreenplayIQ
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From human coverage services: keep the human read for line-level editing and use ScreenplayIQ for the fast structural pass — logline, comparables, story points, and character arc charts — before you pay for coverage.
- →From free AI reviewers: move across when you need structured, presentable output (character emotional journey charts, theme breakdowns, PDF-style reports) rather than a chat transcript.
- →From a spreadsheet triage of submissions: replace the manual comparables column with the Story package's comparable films and TV shows per script.
- ↗To a human editor or script consultant: when you need rewrites, scene-level development, or career guidance rather than diagnosis, take the ScreenplayIQ report as the brief for that conversation.
- ↗To WriterDuet-based drafting tools: ScreenplayIQ is owned by WriterDuet Inc., so moving drafting and analysis into the same family is a straightforward path if you want one vendor for both.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “ScreenplayIQ”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “ScreenplayIQ” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about ScreenplayIQ.
Official links
Tools that pair well with ScreenplayIQ
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside ScreenplayIQ, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Final Draft
Final Draft auto-formats screenplays to industry standards so film and TV writers can focus on the story.
Lewis
Lewis turns a single logline into a full script with AI character portraits and scene images, right in your browser.
Type
AI book writer and long-form editor that remembers your characters, settings, and scenes as you draft.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Tableau vs Screenplayiq
These aren't competitors — they're two different jobs. If you're a screenwriter, producer, or agent who wants objective, data-backed notes on a draft before committing months to it, ScreenplayIQ is the buy: per-script pricing, character emotional journey charts, comparable films and TV shows, and a page-length-based cost that scales with the script. If your problem is understanding business data, Tableau is the platform — freemium, with Tableau Agent, Pulse, Explain Data, and the new agentic Tableau Next. Don't try to use one as the other.
Amplitude vs Screenplayiq
These aren't competitors — the honest answer is that no buyer weighs one against the other. If you have a screenplay draft and want objective structural and market notes before a rewrite or a shopping round, ScreenplayIQ is the product: you pay per script by page length, pick Story Analysis, Story + Character, or Full Evaluation, and add proofreading if you want inline fixes. If you run a web or mobile product and need behavioral cohorts, funnels, A/B tests, feature flags, and an AI agent that answers questions in natural language — including inside Claude, Cursor, or Discord — Amplitude is the platform, with a Free tier that scales into event-based Growth and Enterprise pricing. Pick based on which problem you actually have; there is no trade-off between them.
Looker vs Screenplayiq
These aren't competitors, and nobody should be choosing between them. If you're a screenwriter or producer who wants structured, data-backed notes on a draft before a rewrite or a shopping decision, ScreenplayIQ is the relevant purchase — you pay per script and get loglines, comps, character emotional journey charts, and theme breakdowns. If you're a data team on Google Cloud trying to stop metric drift across dashboards and AI answers, Looker is the relevant purchase, and its cost is a sales conversation, not a page-length fee. Buying either one tells you nothing about whether you need the other.
Power Bi vs Screenplayiq
These two tools are not competitors and no rational buyer chooses between them — they solve completely different problems. Pick Power BI if you need governed, Copilot-assisted dashboards across a Microsoft 365/Azure organization, and budget for per-user licenses or a Fabric capacity rather than expecting pure per-seat predictability at scale. Pick ScreenplayIQ only if you are a screenwriter, producer, or executive who wants quantitative script coverage — structural analysis, box office prediction, and a PDF report priced per analysis (~$24–$198). If you were searching for an alternative to one of these, the other is not it.
Neon vs Screenplayiq
These two tools don't belong in the same buying conversation — Neon is infrastructure for developers building serverless apps and AI agents, and ScreenplayIQ is a per-script analysis service for film and TV professionals. If you're shipping a Postgres-backed product, buy Neon. If you've got a stack of scripts to triage or a draft to evaluate before a rewrite, buy ScreenplayIQ. There is no overlap to arbitrate.
Datadog vs Screenplayiq
These two tools should never appear on the same buyer's shortlist. Datadog is a heavyweight observability and security platform for engineering teams paying usage-based subscriptions to run cloud infrastructure; ScreenplayIQ is a niche script-analysis tool charging per report to help writers and producers judge a screenplay's market potential. If you are an SRE or platform engineer, choose Datadog. If you are evaluating a feature script, choose ScreenplayIQ. There is no scenario where one substitutes for the other.
Adobe Express vs Screenplayiq
These tools do not compete — a buyer with a budget and a problem would never shortlist both. If you have a screenplay draft and need objective structural notes, comparable-title positioning, or a presentable read before a rewrite or option decision, ScreenplayIQ is purpose-built and priced per script. If you need to produce social posts, flyers, or short videos with generative AI and templates, Adobe Express is the freemium design tool, with Firefly and the newer AI Assistant 2 (beta) plus a social content scheduler (beta). Pick by task, not by comparison.
Lift vs Screenplayiq
These aren't competitors — they don't belong on the same shortlist. ScreenplayIQ is coverage software for a screenplay: it produces a logline, comps, character emotional journey charts, and proofread fixes for writers, producers, and agents. Lift (Datalab) turns PDFs, scans, and slides into structured markdown, JSON, or HTML for AI labs, financial services, and clinical teams. If you have a draft to assess, pick ScreenplayIQ. If you have documents to parse, pick lift. Buying either to do the other's job is a waste.
Cloudflare vs Screenplayiq
Do not treat this as a head-to-head. ScreenplayIQ is a niche tool for one job: turning a script into structured notes with comparable titles, character charts, and market read — purchased per script with page-length pricing, siloed storage, and no LLM training on your work. Cloudflare is infrastructure: Workers compute billed at 1ms CPU (no wall-clock charge during LLM waits), AI Gateway spend limits, Workers AI edge inference, R2 with no egress fees, and Zero Trust free for the first 50 employees. If you are a writer or producer evaluating a draft, buy ScreenplayIQ. If you are a developer or security team, use Cloudflare. There is no realistic shortlist where one replaces the other.
Clawx vs Screenplayiq
For screenwriters and film execs needing data-driven script feedback and ROI forecasting, ScreenplayIQ is the clear choice. For data analysts and researchers requiring autonomous, local web monitoring across multiple sources, ClawX is a powerful free tool—but beware the security risk of third-party skills on ClawHub.
Planetscale vs Screenplayiq
These are not competitors and no buyer should be choosing between them. PlanetScale is production database infrastructure — branch-per-environment Postgres/Vitess on NVMe, automated failover across three AZs, a 99.99% single-region SLA — sold as freemium to engineering teams running high-traffic workloads. ScreenplayIQ is a per-script analysis service for the film and TV industry: loglines, character emotional journey charts, comparable films, WGA-compliant script handling, priced by page length with no subscription. The only shared trait is the word 'AI.' Pick PlanetScale if you're migrating off Aurora or need reversible schema deploys; pick ScreenplayIQ if you have a draft to evaluate before a rewrite or a stack of scripts to triage.
Scouts vs Screenplayiq
Choose ScreenplayIQ if you're a screenwriter or producer needing data-driven script feedback with box office predictions. Choose Scouts if you need an always-on web agent to monitor, research, and automate tasks across the web—especially with the latest Navigator n1.5 and Delegate features. These tools serve completely different needs, so your choice depends on whether your priority is script analysis or web automation.
Alternatives to ScreenplayIQ
View all
Final Draft
Final Draft auto-formats screenplays to industry standards so film and TV writers can focus on the story.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used ScreenplayIQ? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.