Signetai

Signetai

Local-first agent memory and secrets layer that gives Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode one shared context on your own machine.

60/100MonitorFreeFree

If you hop between Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode and keep re-explaining your codebase to each one, Signet is the memory layer worth installing — the same context and secrets follow you across harnesses and stay on your disk. Recall-with-receipts is the feature that matters: you can open the source line behind a claim before you trust it, which cloud memory services rarely let you do. Just budget for real ops — a daemon to keep running, a workspace to back up.

Verified 4d ago · liveness 60/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/signetai

Best for
  • Developers running several agent harnesses who want one context to follow them across all of them
  • Privacy-conscious teams that need agent memory and credentials to stay on their own hardware
  • Self-hosters who want source-backed recall they can verify line by line instead of trusting a black box
  • Solo devs and small teams that want encrypted credential storage agents can use without seeing plaintext
Not ideal for
  • Developers running a single agent harness who gain nothing from cross-harness portability
  • Teams that want agent memory working with no install, daemon, or maintenance overhead
  • Non-technical users uncomfortable with CLI, PowerShell, or managing a self-hosted workspace
Visit Website

AdvancedOne command (curl or PowerShell) plus one guided signet setup pass gets most developers to a working remember/recall loop in a few minutes; the interactive setup walks provider connection, harness choice, and a first-memory test. Connecting multiple harnesses, importing an Obsidian vault or transcript exports, and configuring identity presets add time on top. Backing up ~/.agents/signet is worthCLI · API · WebAPI availableVerified 4d ago
Pricing
Free
FreeFree tier4 hidden costs
Learning curve
Advanced
One command (curl or PowerShell) plus one guided signet setup pass gets most developers to a working remember/recall loop in a few minutes; the interactive setup walks provider connection, harness choice, and a first-memory test. Connecting multiple harnesses, importing an Obsidian vault or transcript exports, and configuring identity presets add time on top. Backing up ~/.agents/signet is worth
Runs on
CLIAPIWeb
API available · 15 integrations
Who it's for
Developer switching between Claude Code and OpenCode on one projectPrivacy-conscious engineer on a small teamBuilder running a multi-agent setup
Live sentiment
Is Signetai actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Signet if you only ever run one agent harness and don't need memory to travel — the daemon and workspace maintenance buy you portability you'll never use.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

You supply the model and provider for dreaming, so your existing API spend grows as Signet turns idle sessions into memory.

Price reality

Signet is free and open source, so the comparison is against paid cloud memory services that bundle hosting and convenience into a subscription, and against the cost of rolling your own SQLite-and-embeddings memory layer. The real budget line isn't a license — it's the provider tokens dreaming consumes and the time you spend running a daemon.

In short

Signetai — Local-first agent memory and secrets layer that gives Claude Code, Codex, and OpenCode one shared context on your own machine. Best for Developers running several agent harnesses who want one context to follow them across all of them, Privacy-conscious teams that need agent memory and credentials to stay on their own hardware, Self-hosters who want source-backed recall they can verify line by line instead of trusting a black box. Free to use.

What's new in Signetai

Checked 3 days ago

Across the latest 4 updates: 4 news mentions.

What people actually say about Signetai — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

3 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, GitHub) · researched Jul 3, 2026.

70% positive30% critical

Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.

Recurring strengths
  • +Local-first: data never leaves your machine.
  • +Portable memory and identity across multiple AI agents.
  • +Automatic session distillation into structured knowledge graph.
  • +Encrypted secrets management keeps credentials secure.
  • +Free and open-source (Apache 2.0).
Recurring frustrations
  • −Tiny community and minimal support available.
  • −Early-stage project with only 5 open issues but unknown bugs.
  • −Limited agent framework integrations (Claude Code, OpenCode, etc.)
  • −Setup requires running a daemon and CLI—not beginner-friendly.
  • −Documentation is sparse and lacks tutorials.
Patterns worth knowing
Local-first, model-agnostic memory is a welcome innovation.
Seen on Hacker News, GitHub
Community and support are too small for production use.
Seen on GitHub, Hacker News
Automated memory and knowledge graph reduce manual work.
Seen on Hacker News
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • • Self-hosting hardware and maintenance
  • • Time investment in setup and integration

Viability Score

60/100
Monitor

How well maintained and how widely used is Signetai? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
55
Site health
95
User sentiment
70
What the vendor publishes
20

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • Local-first memory and secrets layer that sits under your agent harness
  • One-command install via curl (macOS/Linux) or PowerShell (Windows)
  • One static binary plus a local daemon; workspace at ~/.agents/
  • Dreaming pass turns idle or closed session transcripts into entities and claims
  • Receipt-backed recall: every claim links to the transcript, note, or file it cites
  • Inspectable local dashboard for graph traversal, recall, and repair
  • Encrypted secrets on disk with the master key held in the OS keyring
  • Sources connected read-only: Obsidian, Notion, GitHub, Discord, web pages, files, transcripts
  • Local on-device retrieval and ranking with no LLM called at search time
  • Unified memory store for curated knowledge and structured data (May 2026)
  • Source material kept distinct from synthesized output so context stays auditable
  • Workspace split into authored, evidence, data, secrets, and runtime/cache drawers
  • Authored Markdown and YAML files (AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, IDENTITY.md, USER.md, MEMORY.md, agent.yaml) kept in their own
  • Per-harness connectors via session hooks, runtime plugins, runtime adapters, MCP, and skills
  • Snapshots verified before they count; imports retain original bytes

About Signetai

FreeAdvancedAPI availableCLI · API · Web

Signet is a self-hosted memory layer that sits underneath whichever AI coding agent harness you already run — Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Gemini CLI, and a growing list of others. One command installs a static binary and a local daemon; your context lives in a single workspace folder at ~/.agents/, structured like a five-drawer cabinet so you always know what to back up and what Signet can rebuild. There's no cloud account and no subscription. The point is that a new session shouldn't start cold. Hooks capture every session as raw evidence — transcripts kept exactly as received — and a "Dreaming" pass, which runs while you're away or when a session closes, turns that evidence into entities and claims. Every claim keeps a thread back up to the transcript or file it came from, so recall comes with receipts rather than a black box. A May 2026 update unified curated knowledge and structured data into one memory store instead of a wiki-plus-database split, and a companion May post separated raw source material from synthesized output so you can tell a source from an interpretation. Retrieval and ranking run on-device with no LLM called at search time; the vendor reports 97.6% LongMemEval answer accuracy under a rules profile, tracked locally and against a canary score set with methodology published. Secrets live in the same workspace: credentials are encrypted on disk with the master key held in your OS keyring, not in the folder, so agents can use them without reading plaintext. Sources like Obsidian, Notion, GitHub, Discord, web pages, files, and agent transcripts connect read-only, and every answer cites the exact page, path, or line. Against cloud memory services, Signet trades convenience for ownership and a verifiable audit trail — and it assumes you're willing to run a daemon.

Behind the Verdict

Pick Signet when your problem is portability across harnesses, not memory within one. If you run three or four agent shells and each session starts cold, the value is immediate: one workspace under ~/.agents/, one SQLite database as the authority, and the same context showing up in whichever tool you open next. The provenance design is the part I'd weigh most. Every claim carries a thread back to the transcript, note, or file it cites, and the retrieval layer runs on-device with no model at search time. That means a wrong answer is usually traceable to a wrong source rather than mysterious. For anyone who has tried to audit a black-box memory service, that's the difference. We'd also reach for it on the secrets side. Encrypting credentials on disk with the master key in the OS keyring — not in the workspace folder — lets agents use keys without ever holding plaintext. That's a sensible model for solo devs and small teams that don't want a secrets manager bolted on separately. Where it bites: you own the operational surface. There's a daemon to keep running, a workspace to back up, and setup that centers on CLI, MCP, and connector configuration. None of that is unusual for self-hosters, but it's friction a cloud service simply doesn't have. Pass when you run a single harness. The whole pitch is one context across every agent you use; if you only ever open Codex, you're paying maintenance for a benefit you won't collect. Also pass if you want memory with zero install, or if you need Signet to supply a model — it doesn't; you bring the harness and the model. The closest alternatives are cloud memory services that memory-enable agents from a hosted backend. They win on setup and on nothing-else-to-run. Signet wins on ownership, cross-harness portability, and an audit

Researching Signetai? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Signetai actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Developer switching between Claude Code and OpenCode on one project

Install Signet with curl, run signet setup to create the workspace and dashboard, connect both harnesses' hooks, then have a session in Claude Code about the auth refactor.

Outcome: When the session closes, dreaming distills the decisions into memory. Opening OpenCode the next morning, recall surfaces the same decisions with a link back to the transcript line, so you don't re-explain the refactor.

Privacy-conscious engineer on a small team

Set up an encrypted secrets drawer so agents can read a database credential, then add read-only Obsidian and GitHub sources.

Outcome: The agent uses the credential without plaintext ever appearing in the conversation, and answers about your notes cite the exact page and path they came from.

Builder running a multi-agent setup

Configure two agents with isolated memory scopes and one shared scope, then run a collaborative workflow across Codex and Hermes Agent.

Outcome: Each agent keeps its own working notes while the shared scope holds the project-wide decisions, so coordination doesn't require pasting context between sessions.

Use Cases

Limitations

  • Signet is local-first and self-hosted: you run a daemon on your own machine and keep a SQLite workspace at ~/.agents/ that you are responsible for backing up and moving.
  • Installation is one command via curl on macOS/Linux or PowerShell on Windows x64, then setup and configuration run through the CLI, local dashboard, hooks, MCP, and harness connectors.
  • There is no hosted/SaaS version of the service — Signet sits under your existing agent harnesses (Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, and others) rather than providing its own model or chat interface.

as of 2026-10-07

Verification history

We have re-verified Signetai 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
Free
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
—
—

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Signetai tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Open source

$0

Ideal for

Developers and teams who want to self-host agent memory and secrets with no license fee and are prepared to run a daemon and back up a local workspace.

What this tier adds

Starting tier: the full local memory and secrets stack at no cost, with your own provider tokens and infrastructure time as the actual expense.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • You supply the model and provider for dreaming, so your existing API spend grows as Signet turns idle sessions into memory.
  • The daemon is always-on infrastructure you maintain — updates, logs, locks, and troubleshooting are your job, not a vendor's.
  • Secrets, transcripts, and the SQLite database live on your disk, so backup discipline is on you; a lost ~/.agents/signet folder is a lost memory.
  • Dreaming defaults to on in fresh workspaces, meaning provider calls may start as soon as you connect and test a model unless you turn it off.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Signetai's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Signet is free and open source, so the comparison is against paid cloud memory services that bundle hosting and convenience into a subscription, and against the cost of rolling your own SQLite-and-embeddings memory layer. The real budget line isn't a license — it's the provider tokens dreaming consumes and the time you spend running a daemon.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Signetai — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

One command (curl or PowerShell) plus one guided signet setup pass gets most developers to a working remember/recall loop in a few minutes; the interactive setup walks provider connection, harness choice, and a first-memory test. Connecting multiple harnesses, importing an Obsidian vault or transcript exports, and configuring identity presets add time on top. Backing up ~/.agents/signet is worth

Switching to or from Signetai

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From ChatGPT or other built-in agent memory: connect your harness, export transcripts, and drop them into the files/ import inbox so Signet captures them as evidence.
  • →From a cloud memory service: run signet setup, point the workspace at your existing notes and repos as read-only sources, and let dreaming rebuild claims locally.
  • →From ad-hoc AGENTS.md files: Signet reads your existing AGENTS.md, SOUL.md, IDENTITY.md, USER.md, and MEMORY.md as authored files in the workspace's own Git repository.
Migrating out
  • ↗To another harness: your memory is already portable — the same Signet workspace follows you to any of the eleven documented connectors.
  • ↗To a rolling-your-own setup: data/signet.db is a plain SQLite database and transcripts are canonical JSONL, so your durable state is readable without Signet.
  • ↗To a clean machine: back up ~/.agents/signet and restore it, since runtime and cache drawers are derived and rebuildable.

Integrations

Claude CodeOpenCodeOpenClawCodexHermes AgentGemini CLIPiOh My PiForgeCodeMuse CodeKimi CLIObsidianNotionGitHubDiscord

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 3 videos for “Signetai”, and we withheld 3: 3 could not be judged, because “Signetai” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Signetai.

Official links

Tools that pair well with Signetai

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Signetai, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Signetai

View all
MemoryLake

MemoryLake

MemoryLake is portable AI memory for ChatGPT, Claude, Codex and Gemini — encrypted, exportable, and shared across every agent you run.

FreemiumTry
Mem0

Mem0

Mem0 is an AI memory layer that gives agents and apps persistent context across sessions

FreemiumTry
Memoryport

Memoryport

Memoryport is a local-first memory layer that gives Claude Code, Cursor, Ollama and OpenAI persistent context across every session.

FreemiumTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Signetai? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.