Solve Intelligence
Enterprise AI for patent drafting, prosecution, claim charts, and invention harvesting.
For enterprise patent teams that need security, customization, and full lifecycle support, Solve Intelligence is a top-tier choice—its attorney-in-control model and certifications make it a standout. But the contact-only pricing and attorney oversight requirement mean it's not for solo inventors or budget-constrained firms. If you need a secure, high-volume patent workflow, it's the most capable option we've evaluated.
Verified 5d ago · liveness 63/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/solve-intelligence
- Patent attorneys in law firms handling high-volume drafting and prosecution
- Corporate IP teams managing invention disclosures and portfolio analytics
- Litigation support teams needing invalidity or SEP claim charts
- Practitioners requiring enterprise-grade security and confidentiality
- Inventors seeking a do-it-yourself patent tool (requires attorney oversight)
- Teams needing a free or low-cost solution
- Non-patent legal work (trademarks, contracts, etc.)
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Solve Intelligence if you're a solo inventor wanting a self-service tool, a low-budget team, or need non-patent legal support—it requires attorney oversight, has contact-only pricing, and focuses exclusively on patents.
Pricing is not public—you must request a demo, and costs likely scale with usage, seats, and features, potentially running high for smaller firms.
Pricing is contact-based, reflecting its enterprise positioning. It's best for established firms and corporate IP teams with budget for premium security and customization. Compared to generic AI writing tools that are cheaper but lack patent-specific features, Solve delivers high value for high-volume patent work. There's no public pricing, so you'll need to negotiate; for cost-sensitive teams, alternatives like PatentPal or Spaulding might be cheaper but less comprehensive.
In short
Solve Intelligence — Enterprise AI for patent drafting, prosecution, claim charts, and invention harvesting. Best for Patent attorneys in law firms handling high-volume drafting and prosecution, Corporate IP teams managing invention disclosures and portfolio analytics, Litigation support teams needing invalidity or SEP claim charts. Contact Sales pricing.
What's new in Solve Intelligence
Checked 5 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 2 news mentions.
Maiwald Chooses Solve Intelligence for Selected AI-Supported IP Workflows
Maiwald, a large German IP firm, formed an enterprise partnership, including EU server processing and security certifications.
Page White Farrer Adopts Solve Intelligence for AI-Assisted Patent Drafting
UK IP firm Page White Farrer deploys Solve Intelligence in tech-focused teams, using custom templates to speed first drafts while maintaining accuracy.
What people actually say about Solve Intelligence — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
21 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
- +Purpose-built for patent professionals covering the full IP lifecycle.
- +Enterprise security: SOC 2, ISO 27001/42001, GDPR, and CCPA compliant.
- +Customizable drafting styles for different jurisdictions, clients, and technologies.
- +Handles non-text elements like figures, chemical structures, and sequences.
- +No AI training on customer data, sandboxed per customer environment.
- −Extremely limited independent user feedback available publicly.
- −Pricing not transparent; likely expensive for indie practitioners.
- −No integration with common tools like Slack, Zapier, or Office 365.
- −Narrowly focused on patents; not suitable for other legal areas.
- −Learning curve for customizing drafting styles may be steep.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Solve Intelligence? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: August 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI-assisted drafting of patent applications (full and partial)
- Support for continuation, divisional, and design applications
- Customizable drafting styles per jurisdiction, client, and attorney
- Automated office action response drafting with citations
- Claim chart generation: invalidity, SEP, and FTO
- Invention harvesting and disclosure form management
- Figure Builder for creating and editing patent figures
- Automated proofreading for §112 compliance
- Multi-source citations from file wrappers and case law
- Handles figures, chemical structures, biological sequences
- Data residency choice: US or Europe
- No AI training on customer data, sandboxed environment
- SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, CCPA compliant
- iManage integration for client disclosures and prosecution histories
- LexisNexis Global Patent Litigation integration
About Solve Intelligence
Solve Intelligence is an enterprise-grade AI platform built specifically for patent professionals, covering the full patent lifecycle from invention harvesting to prosecution and claim charts. Trusted by 700+ IP teams across six continents, it's designed for law firms, corporate IP departments, and litigation teams that handle high-volume, complex patent work and need AI that ensures attorney control and confidentiality. The platform supports all application types—standalone, continuation, divisional, continuation-in-part, and design—and handles non-text elements like figures, chemical structures, and biological sequences. With Figure Builder, you can create and edit figures directly, while an automated proofreading framework checks for §112 compliance before filing, a critical safeguard for quality. Security is a core differentiator: no customer data is used for AI training, everything is sandboxed per customer, and encryption uses AES-256 and TLS 1.3. The platform holds SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and CCPA certifications, and lets you choose data residency in the US or Europe. It also integrates with LexisNexis Global Patent Litigation and iManage, so attorneys can access client disclosures and prosecution histories without switching tools. Solve Intelligence reports efficiency gains of 50% or more, with some users citing 60-80% time savings on drafting. It's a premium, security-first option for firms that prioritize confidentiality and quality over cost. Compared to generic AI writing tools, it's purpose-built for patents, with customizable drafting styles per jurisdiction, technology, and client, plus multi-source citations for claim charts and office action responses. The platform is continuously evolving, with recent enterprise adoptions by German firm Maiwald and UK firm Page White Farrer, confirming its traction in the market.
Behind the Verdict
Solve Intelligence delivers strong value for patent teams that handle high-volume drafting, prosecution, and litigation support. Its key strengths are its security posture—no AI training on your data, sandboxed environments, AES-256/TLS 1.3 encryption, and certifications across SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR, and CCPA—and its deep feature set covering the entire patent lifecycle. The ability to customize drafting styles per jurisdiction, client, and attorney is critical for firms with diverse practices. Claim chart generation with multi-source citations and transparent logic is a standout for litigation teams. Recent enterprise partnerships with Maiwald and Page White Farrer show real market traction. However, the platform requires attorney oversight, so it's not for inventors seeking a DIY tool. Pricing is contact-only, which can be a hurdle for smaller firms. Non-patent legal work is out of scope. If your firm prioritizes confidentiality and quality over cost, it's a top contender; otherwise, a generic drafting assistant or internal workflows may suffice.
Researching Solve Intelligence? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Solve Intelligence actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Automatically draft a continuation application from a parent case, using custom style templates and citing relevant prior art.
Outcome: Draft ready in hours instead of days, with attorney control and compliance checks built in.
Deploy the platform to standardize invention disclosures across R&D teams, with configurable forms and status tracking.
Outcome: Streamlined disclosure pipeline, increasing invention capture and reducing admin overhead.
Generate an invalidity claim chart by mapping product features against patent claims, with multi-source citations.
Outcome: Accurate, transparent claim chart prepared in minutes, ready for court submission.
Use Cases
- Draft a complete patent application from a set of claims and specifications interactively with AI guidance.
- Generate claim charts for litigation by mapping product features against patent claims using AI.
- Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on a new product by automatically identifying relevant patents and mapping claims.
- Manage invention disclosures by standardizing submission forms and tracking status across inventor teams.
- Perform patent landscape analysis to identify whitespace in a technology field using agentic search.
- Analyze patent portfolios for licensing negotiations or IP-backed finance using AI-driven claim mapping.
Limitations
- The platform is tailored for legal professionals with patent law knowledge, emphasizing data security with no AI training on customer data, sandboxing, AES-256 and TLS 1.3 encryption, and compliance with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, and ISO 42001.
- Data residency is limited to chosen jurisdictions such as the US or Europe.
- Pricing and API availability are not publicly disclosed, with access typically initiated through a demo request.
as of 2026-08-18
Verification history
We have re-verified Solve Intelligence 6 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Solve Intelligence's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Pricing is contact-based, reflecting its enterprise positioning. It's best for established firms and corporate IP teams with budget for premium security and customization. Compared to generic AI writing tools that are cheaper but lack patent-specific features, Solve delivers high value for high-volume patent work. There's no public pricing, so you'll need to negotiate; for cost-sensitive teams, alternatives like PatentPal or Spaulding might be cheaper but less comprehensive.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Solve Intelligence — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For enterprise teams, initial setup may take a few weeks to configure custom styles, integrations, and security settings. Individual attorneys can get drafting assistance within days, but full deployment with data residency and compliance may require more time. Demo request initiates onboarding.
Switching to or from Solve Intelligence
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From generic AI tools: Switch from ChatGPT or similar by importing your existing drafting templates and style guides into Solve's customization engine.
- →From manual processes: Replace manual drafting with Solve's AI-assisted workflows, starting with a pilot on a single practice group.
- ↗To other patent tools: Export your claim charts and drafts as standard document formats, then import into any major IP management system.
- ↗To in-house workflows: Use the platform's templates and styles as a reference for building your own, but be aware of format dependencies.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Solve Intelligence
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Solve Intelligence, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Solve Intelligence vs Surge Ai
For patent professionals needing an AI-assisted drafting and prosecution platform with enterprise security and jurisdiction customization, Solve Intelligence is the clear choice. For AI labs and safety teams requiring expert human feedback for RLHF and red teaming on frontier models, Surge AI is the unmatched leader. These tools serve entirely distinct markets — choose based on whether your domain is intellectual property law or frontier AI alignment.
Solve Intelligence vs Praktika
These tools serve entirely different purposes. Solve Intelligence is a must-consider for patent professionals needing AI-driven drafting and prosecution with enterprise security, while Praktika is best for language learners wanting mobile conversation practice. Choose based on your role and workflow, as they don't overlap in functionality.
Alternatives to Solve Intelligence
View all
&AI (YC S24)
AI workspace for patent litigators: prior art search, claim charts, infringement detection, and BD.
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Solve Intelligence? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.