Solve Intelligence
AI platform for patent drafting, prosecution, and litigation work, used by 700+ IP teams and law firms.
Worth shortlisting if your patent practice is under fixed-fee or budget pressure and you want drafting, prosecution and charting in one platform rather than three point tools. The LexisNexis Global Patent Litigation data and iManage integrations matter more than the feature list for firms with established document workflows, and Solve's own numbers (433K+ applications, 103K+ office action responses, 6.5K+ claim charts) show the workflows get real volume. Pass if you are a solo inventor, or if you want a cheap drafting assistant with no attorney in the loop — review of AI output remains mandatory here, and the buyer profile is teams. Competing premium options include PatentPal and Specifio.
Verified 4d ago · liveness 69/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/solve-intelligence
- Patent attorneys at law firms handling high-volume drafting and prosecution
- Corporate IP departments managing invention disclosures and portfolio analytics
- Litigation teams building invalidity, FTO or SEP claim charts at scale
- Life sciences IP teams working with biological sequences and chemical structures
- Solo inventors looking for a free or low-cost patent tool
- Trademark, contract or other non-patent legal work
- Practices unwilling to invest attorney time reviewing AI output
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Solve Intelligence if your patent work is occasional, you want a cheap drafting assistant with no attorney in the loop, or your practice is trademark and general commercial rather than patents.
Custom templates and firm-specific drafting styles are part of the pitch, but scoping and building them takes attorney and vendor time before you see the reported 50% workload reduction.
Premium enterprise tier alongside PatentPal and Specifio, which cost less but cover narrower ground. The economics work for firms and in-house teams running high patent volume where 50% workload reduction on drafting, prosecution and charting pays for the platform — BCLP's framing is fixed-fee and budget-constrained work product. Solo practitioners and low-volume filers are priced out of the target segment.
In short
Solve Intelligence — AI platform for patent drafting, prosecution, and litigation work, used by 700+ IP teams and law firms. Best for Patent attorneys at law firms handling high-volume drafting and prosecution, Corporate IP departments managing invention disclosures and portfolio analytics, Litigation teams building invalidity, FTO or SEP claim charts at scale. Contact Sales pricing.
What's new in Solve Intelligence
Checked 4 days agoAcross the latest 5 updates: 5 news mentions.
How to Draft Patent Applications for AI-Enabled Medical Devices
Solve argues that mapping the sensor-to-output chain, rather than the AI label, is what makes AI medical-device claims hold up at the USPTO and EPO.
What Your Patent Must Disclose When AI Predicts the Molecule
Outlines USPTO and EPO disclosure requirements for AI-discovered drug candidates, where confidence scores replace proof of binding.
Inside Our IPWatchdog AI Webinar for Life Sciences Patents
Recap of an IPWatchdog webinar on chemical structures, antibody sequences and AI life-sciences patent workflows, flagging where human review stays essential.
Solve Intelligence Partners with Juristat for Examiner Analytics
Juristat examiner analytics and USPTO prosecution history now sit inside Solve prosecution workflows, covering two decades of examiner and art unit data.
Welcoming Jack Kraynak to the Solve Intelligence Team
Registered U.S. patent agent and former USPTO examiner Jack Kraynak joins Solve Intelligence as a Legal & Product Engineer.
What people actually say about Solve Intelligence — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
21 mentions across 2 sources (Hacker News, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
Average across the 2 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Purpose-built for patent professionals covering the full IP lifecycle.
- +Enterprise security: SOC 2, ISO 27001/42001, GDPR, and CCPA compliant.
- +Customizable drafting styles for different jurisdictions, clients, and technologies.
- +Handles non-text elements like figures, chemical structures, and sequences.
- +No AI training on customer data, sandboxed per customer environment.
- −Extremely limited independent user feedback available publicly.
- −Pricing not transparent; likely expensive for indie practitioners.
- −No integration with common tools like Slack, Zapier, or Office 365.
- −Narrowly focused on patents; not suitable for other legal areas.
- −Learning curve for customizing drafting styles may be steep.
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Solve Intelligence? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- AI agents that take on entire patent workflows
- Application drafting for any technology or practice group
- Figure Builder converts any file type into patent figures in seconds
- Chemical structure generation for genus compounds and Markush claims
- Biological sequence analysis and sequence listing generation
- Drafting review that catches errors and anticipates §112 issues
- Response drafting with arguments and amendments for any patent office
- Office action analysis that spots errors in rejections and objections
- Prosecution strategy informed by examiner statistics
- Invalidity claim charts with evidence, built in minutes
- Freedom-to-operate risk reviews accelerated by AI
- Infringement detection and monitoring across a patent portfolio
- Portfolio review and analysis in seconds
- Search across patents, literature and case law from one interface
- Cross-jurisdiction patent law research
About Solve Intelligence
Solve Intelligence is an AI platform built for patent work rather than general legal drafting. You use it to produce complete patent applications across any technology area, generate figures from any file type, build chemical structures for genus compounds and Markush claims, and analyse biological sequences with sequence listing generation. Review tools catch drafting errors and flag §112-style issues before you file. On the prosecution side you draft responses, arguments and amendments for any patent office, analyse office actions to spot errors in rejections and objections, and lean on examiner statistics for strategy. Litigation and analytics run through claim charts: evidence-backed invalidity charts, freedom-to-operate reviews, infringement detection across a portfolio, and portfolio reviews that return in seconds. Search spans patents, literature and case law, and Research covers patent law across jurisdictions. It is aimed at patent attorneys, in-house IP departments and litigation teams handling high-volume technical work. Named users include DLA Piper, Intel, Amgen, Siemens, Fish, Quinn Emanuel, BCLP and Banner Witcoff, and the platform reports 433K+ patent applications, 103K+ office action responses and 6.5K+ claim charts created. Customers cite roughly 50% workload reduction. Security is part of the pitch to risk-averse buyers: no customer data used for AI training, per-customer sandboxing, AES-256 and TLS 1.3 encryption, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR and CCPA, with US or EU data residency.
Behind the Verdict
Solve Intelligence sits in the premium enterprise tier of patent AI, and the evidence for that positioning is volume rather than adjectives: 433K+ patent applications created, 103K+ office action responses, 6.5K+ claim charts, across 700+ in-house IP teams and law firms. The customer list is unusually senior — DLA Piper, Intel, Amgen, Siemens, Fish, Quinn Emanuel, BCLP, Finnegan, Foley Hoag, Banner Witcoff — and the quotable reasons are practical: BCLP's George Chen describes using it to deliver better work product inside fixed-fee and budget constraints, and Quarles' Raye Daugherty describes comparing the claims of a hundred patents against six competitor products to produce infringement charts. The genuine differentiators are breadth and the technical edges. Breadth: drafting, prosecution and charting are one product, with agents you can delegate whole workflows to, plus search across patents, literature and case law and cross-jurisdiction legal research. Technical edges: Figure Builder converts any file type into patent figures; chemical structure generation handles genus compounds and Markush claims; biological sequence analysis and listing generation matter to life-sciences teams. Prosecution adds office action analysis that spots errors in rejections and objections, plus examiner statistics. Review catches drafting errors and anticipates §112 exposure before filing. Weaknesses are mostly fit rather than function. Everything assumes a licensed attorney reviewing output — the site itself frames attorney judgment and human review as part of the workflow, so it is not a set-and-forget drafting bot for inventors. The interface is web-first; buyers whose primary requirement is a mobile app or browser extension are outside the target. It is patent-only: trademark, contract and other legal work are not covered. Budget-conscious solo practices and anyone wanting a free or low-cost tool are the wrong audience. Note also that no underlying model names or versions are disclosed on the scraped pages, and access runs through a demo request. Where it fits: law firm patent groups doing high-volume drafting and prosecution, corporate IP departments running invention disclosures and portfolio analytics, litigation teams building invalidity, FTO or SEP charts at scale, and life-sciences teams working with sequences and chemical structures. Security-conscious enterprises get no-training-on-customer-data, per-customer sandboxing, AES-256/TLS 1.3, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, GDPR/CCPA and US or EU residency. Where it doesn't: solo inventors, trademark and general commercial practice, and any workflow where nobody will review the AI output.
Researching Solve Intelligence? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Solve Intelligence actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Invention disclosure arrives with rough claims; you draft the full application interactively, generate figures from the inventor's PDF and CAD files with Figure Builder, and run Review to catch §112 exposure before sending to the client.
Outcome: A first draft with figures and a flagged-issues list reaches the client faster, leaving attorney time for claim strategy rather than formatting and figure cleanup.
A new biologic disclosure needs sequence analysis and a listing; you run biological sequence analysis in Solve, generate the listing, and cross-check chemical structures for a companion genus claim.
Outcome: Sequences and structures that would normally route through specialists are handled in the same system as the application, reducing handoffs.
You load the asserted patent and prior art, generate evidence-backed invalidity charts, then run infringement detection across the competitor portfolio and search case law in the same interface.
Outcome: Charts that would take weeks of associate time exist in minutes with cited logic, leaving review and argument strategy as the attorney's job.
Use Cases
- Draft a complete patent application from claims and specifications interactively with AI guidance.
- Build invalidity claim charts by mapping product features against patent claims with cited evidence.
- Run a freedom-to-operate analysis on a new product by identifying relevant patents and mapping claims.
- Manage invention disclosures by standardising submission forms and tracking status across inventor teams.
- Perform landscape analysis to find whitespace in a technology field using agentic search.
- Analyse a portfolio for licensing negotiations or IP-backed finance using AI-driven claim mapping.
- Respond to office actions with drafted arguments and amendments informed by examiner statistics.
- Prepare EPO oppositions with validity charts across novelty, inventive step and added matter.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-09-22
Limitations
- The platform is built for legal professionals and IP teams, not general consumers, and the site frames attorney judgment and human review as part of every workflow — you are not buying an unattended drafting bot.
- Scope is patent-only: trademark, contract and other legal work fall outside it.
- The interface is web-first, so buyers whose primary requirement is a mobile app or browser extension should look elsewhere.
- No underlying model names or version details are disclosed in the scraped pages beyond partnership and integration announcements, so you cannot audit which models process your matter data from the public site alone.
- Access runs through a demo request rather than a published tier list on the pages we reached.
as of 2026-10-03
Verification history
We have re-verified Solve Intelligence 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Solve Intelligence's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Premium enterprise tier alongside PatentPal and Specifio, which cost less but cover narrower ground. The economics work for firms and in-house teams running high patent volume where 50% workload reduction on drafting, prosecution and charting pays for the platform — BCLP's framing is fixed-fee and budget-constrained work product. Solo practitioners and low-volume filers are priced out of the target segment.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Solve Intelligence — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
For a single attorney: first useful draft within a working session, since the drafting flow is interactive from claims and specifications. For a firm: expect days to weeks, because customising templates to match house drafting style and wiring up iManage or LexisNexis is where the reported efficiency gains come from. Litigation teams see value fastest on a live matter with charts already in scope.
Switching to or from Solve Intelligence
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From manual Word drafting: import claims and specifications and draft interactively with AI, keeping house templates via custom template setup.
- →From general-purpose LLM chat: move from pasted prompts to a patent-specific workflow with figure generation, sequence listings and §112 review built in.
- →From a DMS-only review process: connect iManage so drafting and review happen against the same document store.
- →From spreadsheet examiner tracking: examiner statistics are surfaced inside prosecution workflows, so strategy data sits with the response draft.
- ↗To PatentPal or Specifio: cheaper drafting-focused tools, but you give up the prosecution, claim chart and portfolio analysis breadth.
- ↗To a general-purpose LLM: export drafted text, but you lose figure generation, sequence listings and cited chart logic.
- ↗To a point-tool charting product: export claim mappings, but freedom-to-operate, infringement detection and portfolio review stop being one interface.
- ↗To in-house custom tooling: patent workflows are heavily document- and citation-driven, so rebuilding the chart evidence trail is the hard part.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Introducing Solve Review: A Practical Guide to AI-Powered Patent Review
Solve Intelligence
Solve Intelligence | Intel Ignite London
Intel Ignite
Solve Intelligence & IP Watchdog Webinar: Masterclass – AI Prompt Engineering for Patent Workflows
Solve Intelligence
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Solve Intelligence”, and we withheld 1: 1 did not mention Solve Intelligence. Showing the 5 we can prove are about Solve Intelligence.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Solve Intelligence
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Solve Intelligence, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Paxton AI
Paxton AI is a legal AI assistant for litigation teams — tied to a matter record, research, and drafting across all 50 states.
&AI (YC S24)
AI workspace for patent litigation: prior art search, claim charts, invalidity analysis, and infringement detection
Alexi
Private, single-tenant legal AI for research memos, drafting, and contract comparison — built for law firms.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Solve Intelligence vs Surge Ai
For patent professionals needing an AI-assisted drafting and prosecution platform with enterprise security and jurisdiction customization, Solve Intelligence is the clear choice. For AI labs and safety teams requiring expert human feedback for RLHF and red teaming on frontier models, Surge AI is the unmatched leader. These tools serve entirely distinct markets — choose based on whether your domain is intellectual property law or frontier AI alignment.
Solve Intelligence vs Praktika
These tools serve entirely different purposes. Solve Intelligence is a must-consider for patent professionals needing AI-driven drafting and prosecution with enterprise security, while Praktika is best for language learners wanting mobile conversation practice. Choose based on your role and workflow, as they don't overlap in functionality.
Alternatives to Solve Intelligence
View all
Paxton AI
Paxton AI is a legal AI assistant for litigation teams — tied to a matter record, research, and drafting across all 50 states.
&AI (YC S24)
AI workspace for patent litigation: prior art search, claim charts, invalidity analysis, and infringement detection
Frequently Asked Questions
Categories
Best-of guides
Used Solve Intelligence? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.