Sourcery
AI code review and security scanning that reviews every pull request and posts fixes you can commit.
Buy Sourcery if your bottleneck is PR volume, not deep static analysis. Review and security in one bot, a two-minute install, IDE feedback in Cursor and VS Code, and an API for findings mean you get value without re-architecting your pipeline. Pro at $12/seat/month billed annually ($15 month-to-month) covers private-repo review; Team at $24/seat/month billed annually ($30 month-to-month) adds nightly scans of 50 repos and the full issues dashboard. Open source is free forever. Don't buy it as a Semgrep or SonarQube replacement — it is not built for exhaustive taint analysis.
Verified 2d ago · liveness 84/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/sourcery
- Teams whose AI coding agents open PRs faster than humans can review them
- Security-conscious orgs wanting review plus SAST/SCA/secrets/IaC/license in one bot
- Developers who want feedback inside Cursor, VS Code or JetBrains
- Engineering managers trying to cut PR cycle time
- Teams that need a dedicated SAST engine with deep taint analysis and no interest in PR review
- Small teams whose PR volume is low enough that a $24/seat/month Team plan billed annually doesn't pay for itself
- Security teams that need exhaustive dataflow tracing or blast-radius reporting
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Sourcery if you need a dedicated SAST engine with exhaustive taint analysis and blast-radius reporting — it's built to sit alongside your PR flow, not to replace a Semgrep or SonarQube benchmark.
Pro's biweekly security scans cap at 10 repos — if codebase-wide scanning is the reason you're buying, you're upgrading to Team at $24/seat/month billed annually ($30 month-to-month).
The pricing ladder is honest and shallow. Free for public repos, $12/seat/month billed annually ($15 month-to-month) for private-repo review on Pro, $24 ($30 monthly) for Team with nightly scanning and the issues dashboard. That's mid-market territory: cheaper than enterprise review platforms bundled with an appsec suite, more than a bare PR-comment bot. Small teams should budget for Team, not Pro, once scanning matters.
In short
Sourcery — AI code review and security scanning that reviews every pull request and posts fixes you can commit. Best for Teams whose AI coding agents open PRs faster than humans can review them, Security-conscious orgs wanting review plus SAST/SCA/secrets/IaC/license in one bot, Developers who want feedback inside Cursor, VS Code or JetBrains. Free to start; paid plans from $12/mo.
No head-to-head comparison for Sourcery yet — the alternatives below are the closest matches we list.
What's new in Sourcery
Checked 2 days agoAcross the latest 4 updates: 4 feature updates.
Comprehensive security scanning — SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC and license detection
Sourcery's security scanning expanded to cover SAST, software composition analysis, exposed secrets, infrastructure-as-code and license detection in a single scanning pass.
Improved AI models, custom prompts and IDE chat improvements
Sourcery upgraded the AI models behind its reviews, added custom prompts for those models, and improved the in-editor chat experience.
New-style chat in IDE with one-click apply
The IDE chat was redesigned so suggested changes can be applied to your code with a single click.
Major IDE chat improvements, self-hosted GitLab and GitHub support
Sourcery improved the in-editor chat experience and added support for self-hosted GitLab and GitHub installations.
What people actually say about Sourcery — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
12 mentions across 5 sources (Hacker News, YouTube, Product Hunt, GitHub, Lemmy), 57 more we could not attribute · researched Oct 14, 2026.
Weighted by the 69 posts each of 5 sources contributed.
- +Maintainers close reported bugs fast — PyCharm, spurious-PR-issue, and subscription bugs all fixed within days of report
- +Combines PR review and security scanning (SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC, license) in one gate instead of two vendors
- +One-click suggested fixes, including multi-file resolution, let you commit review changes straight from the PR
- +Nightly scheduled and on-demand scans cover the existing codebase, not just the diff
- +Documented API and Jira integration pull findings into existing pipelines and project tracking
- −Files with PEP 695/PEP 758 syntax are silently skipped and reported as 'No issues detected' — a false all-clear
- −Some reported bugs sit open for over a year with zero maintainer comments (pre-commit EOFError, since Aug 2024)
- −The 'Triplecheck' author groups Sourcery with single-pass bots that 'drop comments' versus a reviewer/coder loop
- −Nightly scheduled scans cap at 50 repos on Team, which tightens fast for mid-size orgs
- −GitHub Enterprise Server and self-hosting are Enterprise-only, leaving smaller self-hosted teams out
- • The 50-repo cap on Team-tier scheduled scans forces an upgrade as your org grows
- • Self-hosting and GitHub Enterprise Server support sit behind Enterprise, so 'self-managed' options on cheaper plans don't cover GHES
- • The public tier structure was not clearly surfaced in the scraped data, so exact seat or repo pricing must be confirmed with the vendor directly
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Sourcery? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Line-by-line code review posted on every pull request
- PR summaries with Mermaid diagrams of code changes
- One-click suggested fixes, including multi-file resolution
- Batch-apply suggested changes to a PR
- Auto-approve low-risk PRs with no blocking findings
- Security scanning in one pass: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC and license detection
- Nightly scheduled scans across repos (50 repos on Team)
- On-demand scans of your existing codebase
- Findings dashboard with Critical/High/Medium/Low severity triage
- Per-repository risk profiles
- IDE review and one-click apply in VS Code, PyCharm, JetBrains, Cursor and Windsurf
- IDE chat for on-demand review with one-click apply
- Custom review rules and custom prompts for the review models
- Coding-agent integration so agents can fix Sourcery findings
- Sourcery API for pulling security findings into your own pipelines
About Sourcery
Sourcery reviews every pull request on GitHub, GitLab.com, self-managed GitLab, and GitHub Enterprise Server within minutes, posting a PR summary with Mermaid diagrams, inline review comments, and suggested fixes you can commit straight from the PR or batch-apply. It catches logic errors, missed edge cases and security issues — the vendor's open-source examples include a misspelled Jackson @JsonProperty in prestodb/presto that would have broken wire compatibility, and a missing import in Nuitka that raised NameError on any recognized module candidate. It also does codebase-wide security. The December 2025 release brought the full scanner stack — SAST, SCA, exposed secrets, infrastructure-as-code and license detection — into one scanning pass, so the same bot that reviews your diff also flags an eval-based RCE, a dependency with a known CVE, or a misconfigured IaC file. Scheduled scans surface issues outside the diff, and findings land in a dashboard triaged Critical/High/Medium/Low with per-repository risk profiles. Coding agents can consume the findings to fix issues directly, and a documented API pulls security findings into your own pipelines. It is built for teams whose AI coding agents open pull requests faster than humans can read them, and who would rather have review and security behind one gate than bolt a review vendor onto a separate SAST tool. Review rules and custom prompts let you enforce your own style guide rather than argue about it in the PR. Review also lives inside VS Code, PyCharm, JetBrains IDEs, Cursor and Windsurf, so feedback arrives before you commit. Privacy posture is explicit: Sourcery states it keeps no copy of your code after a review, never trains models on it, and is SOC 2 Type II compliant. The vendor says it reviews every language GitHub recognizes, including Python, TypeScript, Java, Go and Rust. Where it does not compete is exhaustive taint analysis — if your security team benchmarks scanners against Semgrep or SonarQube for dataflow tracing, this is the wrong tool for that job.
Behind the Verdict
Sourcery's pitch is consolidation, and the product backs it up on paper. One install gives you inline review comments, PR summaries with Mermaid diagrams, one-click suggested fixes (including multi-file), and auto-approve for low-risk PRs with no blocking findings. The step that matters commercially is the December 2025 scanner expansion: SAST, SCA, secrets, IaC and license detection now run in a single scanning pass. For a team already paying for a review bot, folding a secrets scanner and a dependency-CVE check into the same gate removes a vendor and a workflow. The tier structure is the honest part of the story and the thing most buyers get wrong. Security scan frequency and repo coverage are tiered, not flat. Open Source and Pro scan biweekly, capped at 3 and 10 repos respectively; only Team moves to nightly scans, and Team covers 50 repos rather than an unlimited number. Review rate limits jump at Team too, so an unusually busy repo can sit below the ceiling on Pro and still hit it. If codebase-wide continuous scanning is why you're buying, Team is the floor, not Pro. Where Sourcery fits best: mid-size engineering orgs adopting Cursor, Windsurf or coding agents that generate PRs faster than reviewers can read them. The IDE surface — VS Code, PyCharm, JetBrains, Cursor, Windsurf, with a rebuilt chat and one-click apply — means the same review rules apply before commit and after push. Custom prompts for the review models and custom review rules give you a way to enforce a style guide mechanically instead of in review threads. Where it doesn't fit: security teams that benchmark scanners on dataflow tracing and blast-radius reporting will find Sourcery shallower than Semgrep or SonarQube, and should keep their dedicated SAST. Small teams with low PR volume will struggle to justify $24/seat/month billed annually. Organizations that need self-hosting, SSO or bring-your-own LLM keys should know those are Enterprise-only, alongside GitHub Enterprise Server support — everyone else gets GitHub, GitLab.com and self-managed GitLab on every plan. One thing to clear with your security team regardless of tier: Sourcery routes code through third-party LLM providers — Microsoft Azure OpenAI, Anthropic, and OpenAI per the vendor's docs. The vendor states it retains no copy after a review and never trains on your code, and it is SOC 2 Type II compliant, but that data path belongs in your own review.
Researching Sourcery? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Sourcery actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You install Sourcery on GitHub in about two minutes, let it review every incoming pull request, and start with auto-approve enabled for low-risk PRs with no blocking findings so trivial agent-generated changes merge as soon as CI passes.
Outcome: Reviewer attention shifts to PRs that actually carry risk, and agent-generated volume stops queueing behind humans.
You install the IDE extension alongside the PR bot, review changes in the editor before committing, and use the rebuilt chat to apply suggested fixes with one click.
Outcome: Issues get caught before the push instead of in review, and your review rules apply the same way in the editor and on the PR.
You enable nightly scheduled scans, work the findings dashboard by Critical and High severity, set per-repository risk profiles, and expose findings to your own tooling through the Sourcery API.
Outcome: Exposed secrets, vulnerable dependencies and misconfigured IaC surface outside the diff instead of waiting for a PR that touches them.
Use Cases
- Review every pull request automatically and post inline comments, a summary and a status check within minutes.
- Catch logic errors, missed edge cases and security issues in changed code before merge, with an explanation and a fix.
- Run continuous security scans to find exposed secrets, vulnerable dependencies with known CVEs, and misconfigured infrastructure.
- Enforce your own review rules and style guide across repos instead of arguing about them in code review.
- Auto-approve low-risk PRs so trivial changes merge as soon as CI passes.
- Get review feedback inside VS Code, PyCharm, JetBrains, Cursor or Windsurf before you ever commit.
- Let coding agents consume Sourcery findings to resolve security issues across multiple files.
- Wire security findings into your own pipelines and dashboards through the Sourcery API.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-16
Limitations
- Security scan frequency and repo coverage are tiered, not flat.
- Open Source and Pro run security scans biweekly, capped at 3 and 10 repos respectively; only Team moves to nightly scans, and Team covers 50 repos rather than an unlimited number.
- Team also raises Pro's review rate limits, so unusually busy repos can hit a ceiling below Team.
- Annual billing saves 20% — Pro is $12/seat/month billed annually vs $15 month-to-month, Team $24 vs $30 — so month-to-month costs more.
- Self-hosting, GitHub Enterprise Server, SSO and bring-your-own LLM keys are Enterprise-only.
- Sourcery routes code through third-party LLM providers — Microsoft Azure OpenAI, Anthropic and OpenAI per the vendor's docs — so your security review needs to cover that path even though Sourcery states it retains no copy and never trains on your code.
- It is not an exhaustive taint-analysis scanner for teams benchmarking against Semgrep or SonarQube on dataflow tracing.
as of 2026-10-20
Verification history
We have re-verified Sourcery 20 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-checked, vendor evidence unchanged
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 20 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Sourcery tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Open Source
$0/mo
Ideal for
Maintainers of public GitHub or GitLab repositories who want AI review and per-PR security checks at no cost.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: public-repo AI reviews, PR summaries and diagrams, one-click fixes, custom review rules, auto-approve and security checks on every PR.
Pro
$12/developer/month billed annually ($15 billed monthly)
Ideal for
Small to mid-size private-repo teams that want AI review but don't yet need codebase-wide scanning.
What this tier adds
Adds AI reviews on private repos, higher review limits and Jira integration; security scanning stays biweekly and capped at 10 repos.
Team
$24/developer/month billed annually ($30 billed monthly)
Ideal for
Engineering orgs up to roughly 50 repos that need continuous security coverage alongside review, plus dashboards for triage.
What this tier adds
Adds codebase security scanning, nightly scans of 50 repos, the full issues dashboard, on-demand scans, higher review limits and team analytics.
Enterprise
Custom, billed annually
Ideal for
Regulated or large organizations that must run review and scanning inside their own infrastructure with SSO and their own model keys.
What this tier adds
Adds self-hosting, GitHub Enterprise Server, SSO, bring-your-own LLM keys, a dedicated success manager and invoice billing.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Sourcery's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
The pricing ladder is honest and shallow. Free for public repos, $12/seat/month billed annually ($15 month-to-month) for private-repo review on Pro, $24 ($30 monthly) for Team with nightly scanning and the issues dashboard. That's mid-market territory: cheaper than enterprise review platforms bundled with an appsec suite, more than a bare PR-comment bot. Small teams should budget for Team, not Pro, once scanning matters.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Sourcery — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
GitHub or GitLab: roughly two minutes to install and get the first PR review — the vendor puts the install at two minutes and no credit card is needed. IDE extension: minutes to install, but budget a session to tune review rules and custom prompts. Team-tier scanning: plan a day to set per-repository risk profiles and triage the initial nightly findings backlog. Enterprise self-hosting is a
Switching to or from Sourcery
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a review-only PR bot: run Sourcery alongside it for a sprint on a few repos, compare findings, then disable the old bot's status check.
- →From a standalone SAST tool: keep the SAST for exhaustive taint analysis and route diff-level and nightly scanning to Sourcery, or pilot Team on 50 repos before consolidating.
- →From no automated review: install on a single high-traffic repo first, tune review rules and custom prompts there, then roll out org-wide.
- →From GitHub-native review only: add Sourcery as a required status check once you've calibrated auto-approve for low-risk PRs.
- ↗To a dedicated SAST engine: export findings through the Sourcery API into your scanner's format and keep Sourcery for PR review.
- ↗To a review-only bot: remove Sourcery's status check, but backfill codebase scanning with your new SAST before you lose nightly coverage.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
- Resourcesourcery.ai
Sourcery Blog
Thoughts, advice, and best practice tutorials on programming and AI
- Documentationsourcery.ai
Docs
Full product docs from sourcery.ai
- Resourcesourcery.ai
Changelog
Sourcery changelog
- Resourcesourcery.ai
Sourcery Pricing
Sourcery is free to use for open source projects. We offer a range of plans for private repos and enterprise use.
- Resourcesourcery.ai
Tackling Complex Tasks with LLMs
How we tackle reviewing PRs for code complexity issues
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Sourcery”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Sourcery” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Sourcery.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Sourcery
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Sourcery, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Diamond by Graphite
Graphite's AI code review agent that comments only on real logic, security, and performance issues in your GitHub pull requests, with one-click fixes.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding agent that completes code, reviews pull requests, and runs agent tasks from issue to merge.
CodiumAI
Agentic AI code review with a governance layer that enforces your team's coding rules on every pull request
Alternatives to Sourcery
View allDiamond by Graphite
Graphite's AI code review agent that comments only on real logic, security, and performance issues in your GitHub pull requests, with one-click fixes.
GitHub Copilot
GitHub Copilot is an AI coding agent that completes code, reviews pull requests, and runs agent tasks from issue to merge.
Frequently Asked Questions
Used Sourcery? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.