Teammate Skill

Teammate Skill

Teammate Skill turns a colleague's Slack, Teams, and GitHub habits into a portable AI agent skill.

82/100Safe BetFrom $16.6/mo billed yearly ($199/yr); $29/mo month-to-monthPaid

Teammate Skill attacks agent setup from the opposite end of prompt libraries: harvest the behavior, then export it. The portability across Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Claude Code, and Codex is the reason to care if you run more than one runtime. Budget honestly though — you are renting MyClaw hosting on top of separately billed AI tokens, and the persona is only as good as the Slack and PR trail your experts actually leave.

Verified 5d ago · liveness 82/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/teammate-skill

Best for
  • Engineering leads encoding a senior colleague's decision logic before they rotate off a project
  • Teams whose institutional knowledge lives in Slack threads and pull requests, not documentation
  • Mixed agent stacks that need one Skill portable across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and Hermes
  • Consultants embedding a repeatable specialist process into client-facing agents
Not ideal for
  • Teams that need on-premise or self-hosted deployment — hosting is MyClaw-managed
  • Groups uncomfortable feeding Slack, Teams, or GitHub communication data into a hosted service
  • Anyone wanting a visual no-code agent builder rather than Skill export and runtime setup
Visit Website

IntermediateTeammate Skill deploys in about 30 seconds per MyClaw's launch claim — the plan tier decides your resources, not your wait. The longer clock is data capture: a Skill built from a rich Slack and GitHub trail is usable quickly, while a thin trail needs weeks of accumulated activity before the persona and Work Skill are worth trusting.WebAPI availableVerified 5d ago
Pricing
From $16.6/mo billed yearly ($199/yr); $29/mo month-to-month
Paid4 plans5 hidden costs
Learning curve
Intermediate
Teammate Skill deploys in about 30 seconds per MyClaw's launch claim — the plan tier decides your resources, not your wait. The longer clock is data capture: a Skill built from a rich Slack and GitHub trail is usable quickly, while a thin trail needs weeks of accumulated activity before the persona and Work Skill are worth trusting.
Runs on
Web
API available · 10 integrations
Who it's for
Engineering leadSupport leadSolo consultant
Live sentiment
Is Teammate Skill actually worth it?

We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.

  • Honest verdict, not marketing
  • Real pros & cons from real users
  • Attributed quotes with receipts
Run a free scan

3 free scans · no card needed

Skip it if

Skip Teammate Skill if your team's know-how isn't already flowing through Slack, Teams, or GitHub — there's nothing to capture — or if you need self-hosted deployment rather than MyClaw's managed hosting.

The 30-second take
Biggest gripe

AI token usage is not included in the subscription, so a busy agent adds a metered bill on top of your plan.

Price reality

Lite at $16.6/mo billed annually ($29/mo month-to-month) undercuts managed-agent hosting from most DevOps-heavy alternatives, but you're buying a specific packaged stack rather than raw compute. Pro at $33.3/mo annually adds $100 of AI credits and priority support, which is the tier most daily-use teams should start on. Budget for separate token spend above the subscription.

In short

Teammate Skill — Teammate Skill turns a colleague's Slack, Teams, and GitHub habits into a portable AI agent skill. Best for Engineering leads encoding a senior colleague's decision logic before they rotate off a project, Teams whose institutional knowledge lives in Slack threads and pull requests, not documentation, Mixed agent stacks that need one Skill portable across Claude Code, Codex, OpenClaw, and Hermes. Plans from $16.6/mo.

What's new in Teammate Skill

Checked 5 days ago

Across the latest 3 updates: 3 news mentions.

What people actually say about Teammate Skill — is it worth it?

We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.

7 mentions across 2 sources (GitHub, Lemmy) · researched Sep 22, 2026.

51% positive49% critical

Weighted by the 16 posts each of 2 sources contributed.

Recurring strengths
  • +Exports one Skill across Claude Code, OpenClaw, Hermes, and Codex — rare multi-runtime portability
  • +Auto-collects from Slack, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub with no manual transcription work
  • +5-layer persona (values, comms, decisions, domain, habits) is a genuinely specific design
  • +One-click deploy with MyClaw-managed hosting removes infra work for small teams
  • +Continuous evolution keeps the Skill current as workflows and people shift
Recurring frustrations
  • −No meaningful public reviews — almost everything we know comes from the vendor
  • −Slack and Teams ingestion raises unresolved consent and data-governance questions
  • −Continuous evolution has no obvious version pinning, risking silent persona drift
  • −Ties you to MyClaw's hosted pipeline for generation, updates, and backups
  • −Not a general-purpose agent — only works inside AgentSkills-compatible runtimes
Patterns worth knowing
Portability across multiple agent runtimes is the strongest hook and most-cited reason to try it
Seen on GitHub, Lemmy
Feeding Slack, Teams, and GitHub history into an AI persona raises unresolved privacy and consent worries
Seen on Lemmy
Continuous evolution is appealing but risks silent drift with no version pinning
Seen on Lemmy
Learning curve
intermediateProductive in ~A few hours
Hidden costs people mention
  • • MyClaw-managed hosting is bundled, so there's no self-host escape hatch if you want to avoid recurring cost
  • • Continuous evolution implies ongoing data ingestion — the more sources you connect, the more value (and the more vendor dependency) you accumulate
  • • No public free-tier detail, so evaluating the tool requires a paid commitment

Viability Score

82/100
Safe Bet

How well maintained and how widely used is Teammate Skill? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this

Recent activity
90
Traction
100
Site health
95
User sentiment
60
What the vendor publishes
60

Last calculated: October 2026

How we score →

Key Features

  • 5-layer persona generation: values, communication style, decision logic, domain expertise, work habits
  • Work Skill captures step-by-step know-how behind a teammate's day-to-day tasks
  • Auto-collects working data from Slack, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub
  • Continuous Skill evolution as new data streams arrive
  • Export Skills to AgentSkills-compatible runtimes (Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Claude Code, Codex)
  • No manual prompt engineering required to get started
  • One-click deploy with managed hosting and 30-second launch
  • 24/7 always-on agent uptime
  • Daily backups with private, encrypted storage
  • Reach your agent from email, Telegram, WhatsApp, or browser
  • Schedule recurring runs: daily reports, price monitoring, inbox triage, page watch
  • Agents browse, write code, generate files, and draft pages beyond chat replies
  • 100+ integrations documented by MyClaw
  • 200+ model options for hosted agents
  • Auto-updates and zero infrastructure maintenance

About Teammate Skill

PaidIntermediateAPI availableWeb

Teammate Skill is a MyClaw.ai product for teams whose institutional knowledge never made it into documentation. Instead of you writing prompts that describe how a process works, it collects working data from Slack, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub, then builds a profile across five layers: values, communication style, decision logic, domain expertise, and work habits. Alongside the persona it produces a Work Skill that captures the step-by-step know-how behind a teammate's recurring tasks, and the whole package evolves as new data arrives. The output follows the AgentSkills format, so the same Skill can be exported to AgentSkills-compatible runtimes including Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Claude Code, and Codex. You do not hand-engineer prompts to get going; deploy is one click and MyClaw reports a 30-second launch. Hosting is the MyClaw platform itself: agents run 24/7 with auto-updates and daily backups, reachable from email, Telegram, WhatsApp, or a browser, and you can put them on schedules for daily reports, price monitoring, inbox triage, and page watch. MyClaw documents 100+ integrations and 200+ model options for hosted agents, which is why the model-choice content on its blog reads like buying advice rather than release notes. Pricing is subscription-based hosting: Lite at $16.6/mo billed yearly ($199/yr) or $29/mo month-to-month, Pro at $33.3/mo yearly ($399/yr), Max at $66.6/mo yearly ($799/yr), and Ultra from $133.3/mo yearly ($1,599/yr). Pro and above bundle AI credits; AI token usage is not included in the subscription. This suits engineering leads encoding a senior colleague's judgment before they rotate off a project, mixed agent stacks that need one Skill portable across runtimes, and solo operators who want an agent that mirrors their own process. It is not a visual no-code builder, and hosting stays with MyClaw rather than your own infrastructure.

Behind the Verdict

Most agent tooling asks you to describe your process. Teammate Skill asks you to point at the place your process already happened. That inversion is the whole pitch, and it is a genuinely different on-ramp if your team lives in Slack threads and pull request reviews rather than a process wiki. Pick this when a person's judgment is the asset you are trying to keep. A staff engineer rotating off a project, a consultant whose method is the deliverable, an ops lead whose triage rules exist only in their head and their DMs. The five-layer persona and the Work Skill give you something concrete to hand over instead of a stale onboarding doc. Pick it too if you run mixed runtimes. Building once and exporting to Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, Claude Code, and Codex beats maintaining four separate prompt sets that drift apart the moment someone edits one. Pass when the knowledge is not in the connected tools. If your experts work in email, Jira tickets, or a private wiki, Teammate Skill has nothing to harvest and you will get a thin persona. The same applies if feeding Slack, Teams, and GitHub communication data into a hosted service is a non-starter for your legal or security team — hosting is MyClaw-managed, full stop. Expect a cost stack. The $16.6/mo billed yearly Lite plan covers the agent's cloud computer, not the model calls. MyClaw states plainly that AI token usage is not included in the subscription, and the credits bundled into Pro, Max, and Ultra are described as extra rather than unlimited. High-volume scheduled runs add up. The closest alternative is not another skill extractor, it is doing this by hand: a curated prompt library plus a Notion or Confluence page. That is cheaper and fully under your control, but it captures what people say about their work, not what they actually

Researching Teammate Skill? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.

Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.

Real-world workflow fit

Concrete scenarios for the personas Teammate Skill actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.

Engineering lead

Connect the team's Slack workspace and GitHub org, generate a Skill from a senior reviewer's PR comments and architecture threads, then export it to the junior engineer's agent runtime before the senior rotates off the project.

Outcome: The junior's agent arrives already matching the senior's review standards and architectural preferences, instead of a written onboarding doc nobody reads.

Support lead

Build a Skill from the most experienced support agent's Slack replies and ticket reasoning, deploy it to a MyClaw-hosted agent, and schedule it to handle first-line responses during off hours.

Outcome: First-line replies keep the experienced lead's tone and decision logic around the clock, with the agent asking for review only on edge cases.

Solo consultant

Turn your own working process into a Skill, deploy it on a Lite plan, and point it at client-facing channels via email or browser access.

Outcome: Client-facing agents run your repeatable specialist process without you re-explaining it each engagement.

Use Cases

Models Under the Hood

GPT-5.6 TerraGPT-5.5Hermes AgentClaude CodeOpenClawCodex

as of 2026-10-18

Limitations

  • Teammate Skill runs on MyClaw's managed hosting, so an account and paid plan are required; the published pricing page shows no free tier.
  • AI token usage is not included in the subscription, so heavy agent use adds cost beyond the plan fee.
  • Skill quality depends on the volume and consistency of input data captured from Slack, Microsoft Teams, and GitHub, so sparse trails produce weaker Skills.

as of 2026-10-02

Verification history

We have re-verified Teammate Skill 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.

  1. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  2. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  3. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  4. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  5. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
  6. — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it

Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.

Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.

12-month cost

Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.

Annual total
$199
Over 12 months
Effective monthly
$17
Billed monthly

Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.

Plans compared

For each published Teammate Skill tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.

Lite

$16.6/mo billed yearly ($199/yr); $29/mo month-to-month

Ideal for

Solo operator or personal project running one agent intermittently, with modest data capture volume.

What this tier adds

Starting tier: 2 vCPU, 4 GB RAM, 40 GB SSD, 3 TB traffic/month, no AI credits included.

Pro

$33.3/mo billed yearly ($399/yr); $59/mo month-to-month

Ideal for

Power user relying on an agent daily, or a small team piloting Teammate Skill on a real workflow.

What this tier adds

Doubles to 4 vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 80 GB SSD, 5 TB traffic, and adds $100 AI credits plus priority support.

Max

$66.6/mo billed yearly ($799/yr); $119/mo month-to-month

Ideal for

Teams running multiple persistent agents or heavy scheduled jobs like monitoring and inbox triage.

What this tier adds

Raises to 8 vCPU, 16 GB RAM, 160 GB SSD, 10 TB traffic, and $150 AI credits.

Ultra

From $133.3/mo billed yearly ($1,599/yr); $239/mo

Ideal for

Organizations with demanding, always-busy agents that need guaranteed compute rather than shared resources.

What this tier adds

Adds 16~64 vCPU, 32~128 GB RAM, 320~1280 GB SSD, 20 TB traffic, $200 AI credits, and high-performance guaranteed resources.

Hidden costs & gotchas

What the public pricing page doesn't put in bold. Captured from pricing-page footnotes, contract terms, and recurring complaints.

  • AI token usage is not included in the subscription, so a busy agent adds a metered bill on top of your plan.
  • Only Pro ($33.3/mo yearly, $59/mo monthly), Max ($66.6/mo yearly, $119/mo monthly) and Ultra ($133.3+/mo yearly, $239/mo monthly) include AI credits ($100, $150, $200) — Lite buyers get none.
  • Yearly billing is roughly 43-58% cheaper than monthly, so month-to-month Lite at $29/mo costs nearly double the $16.6/mo annual rate.
  • Priority support is not on Lite; it starts at Pro, and high-performance guaranteed resources only appear at Ultra.
  • Traffic is capped per plan (3 TB, 5 TB, 10 TB, 20 TB/month); heavy browsing or file generation pushes you up a tier.

Where the pricing makes sense

The company stage and team size where Teammate Skill's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.

Lite at $16.6/mo billed annually ($29/mo month-to-month) undercuts managed-agent hosting from most DevOps-heavy alternatives, but you're buying a specific packaged stack rather than raw compute. Pro at $33.3/mo annually adds $100 of AI credits and priority support, which is the tier most daily-use teams should start on. Budget for separate token spend above the subscription.

Setup time & first value

How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Teammate Skill — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.

Teammate Skill deploys in about 30 seconds per MyClaw's launch claim — the plan tier decides your resources, not your wait. The longer clock is data capture: a Skill built from a rich Slack and GitHub trail is usable quickly, while a thin trail needs weeks of accumulated activity before the persona and Work Skill are worth trusting.

Switching to or from Teammate Skill

How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.

Migrating in
  • →From a hand-built prompt library: connect Slack, Teams, and GitHub and let Teammate Skill generate the persona instead of maintaining prompt files by hand.
  • →From a custom GPT or vendor-locked assistant: export the generated Skill to an AgentSkills-compatible runtime so it isn't tied to one provider.
  • →From an unmanaged OpenClaw or Hermes Agent install: move to MyClaw's one-click deploy and drop the server maintenance.
  • →From written onboarding docs: point capture at the Slack threads and pull requests the docs were meant to summarize.
Migrating out
  • ↗To a self-hosted agent stack: not supported — Teammate Skill and MyClaw hosting are managed together.
  • ↗To a visual no-code agent builder: rebuild the workflow manually; there is no Skill import path for that shape of tool.
  • ↗To a general-purpose agent outside the AgentSkills ecosystem: you would lose the Skill portability that is the product's main advantage.

Integrations

SlackMicrosoft TeamsGitHubClaude CodeOpenClawHermes AgentCodexTelegramWhatsAppEmail

Resources & Guides

Tutorials & Learning

YouTube returned 6 videos for “Teammate Skill”, and we withheld 6: 6 did not mention Teammate Skill. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Teammate Skill.

Tools that pair well with Teammate Skill

Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Teammate Skill, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.

Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons

Alternatives to Teammate Skill

View all
Tessl

Tessl

Tessl is an agent enablement platform for versioning, scanning and evaluating the AI agent skills your coding agents run.

FreemiumTry
Zhipu GLM

Zhipu GLM

Zhipu GLM is a full-stack large-model platform with open-weights GLM-5.3 coding models, MaaS APIs and autonomous agents.

FreemiumTry
MetaGPT

MetaGPT

Open-source multi-agent framework that assigns PM, architect, engineer and QA roles to LLMs for structured software tasks

FreeTry

Frequently Asked Questions

Used Teammate Skill? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.