Weavy
Figma Weave (formerly Weavy) chains image, video and 3D AI models into reusable node-based workflows on one shared canvas.
If your work is a repeatable pipeline — generate, then inpaint, upscale, relight, then output — Figma Weave is one of the few hosted canvases that doesn't force you to glue APIs together yourself, and the per-model credit table is unusually honest about what a shot actually costs. Buy Starter at $24/mo billed annually as $202 if you're experimenting and Professional at $45/mo billed annually as $378 the moment you need credit rollover, because Starter's monthly allotment evaporates. Skip it if you want one-click generation, need workflow API execution today (that sits on Enterprise with your own keys), or assume a paid Figma plan covers it — the credit systems are separate.
Last checked 4d ago · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/weavy
- Designers who rebuild the same multi-step process — generate, inpaint, upscale, relight — and want it as a reusable
- Agencies that need a shared credit pool, unified billing and workspace file sharing across a visual team
- Content teams producing images, video and 3D that need commercial rights documented per model
- Visual pros who want real compositing — layers, channels, blends — sitting next to AI generation nodes
- Beginners who want one-click generation and don't want to learn a node canvas
- Teams that need to trigger workflows through the API today — that sits under Enterprise with your own API keys
- Anyone assuming a paid Figma plan includes Figma Weave — the credit systems are separate
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Figma Weave if you want one-click generation without a node canvas, need to fire workflows from your own systems today, or assume a paid Figma plan covers it — Figma and Figma Weave bill credits separately.
Free's 150 monthly credits stretch to 375 Flux Fast images but only 13 Nano Banana Pro images or 1 Hunyuan 3D V3 asset, so mixed-model work runs out fast.
Figma Weave's entry point is genuinely cheap — Free with 150 monthly credits, then Starter at $24/mo billed annually as $202 — which undercuts most pro compositing suites and per-seat AI design tools that charge $30–60/mo without giving you every model. Professional at $45/mo billed annually as $378 competes with a single high-end video tool subscription while bundling images, video and 3D. Team at $60/user/mo billed annually as $504 is priced for agencies that would otherwise reconcile several
In short
Weavy — Figma Weave (formerly Weavy) chains image, video and 3D AI models into reusable node-based workflows on one shared canvas. Best for Designers who rebuild the same multi-step process — generate, inpaint, upscale, relight — and want it as a reusable, Agencies that need a shared credit pool, unified billing and workspace file sharing across a visual team, Content teams producing images, video and 3D that need commercial rights documented per model. Free to start; paid plans from $24/mo.
What people actually say about Weavy — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
35 mentions across 4 sources (Hacker News, App Store, Bluesky, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
Average across the 4 sources that answered — each source counts once, not each post.
- +Unified credit system across all AI models simplifies budgeting.
- +Node-based visual canvas gives fine-grained control over pipelines.
- +Integrates cutting-edge models like Veo 3.1 and Runway Gen-4.5.
- +Free tier with 150 monthly credits is generous for exploration.
- +Layer-based compositing familiar to designers from traditional tools.
- −Figma acquisition raises fears of price hikes similar to other Figma products.
- −Node editors can feel bloated compared to agentic or API-only workflows.
- −Community is too small for robust user support and shared workflows.
- −Credit consumption scales quickly; top-ups can get expensive.
- −Lack of integration with popular tools like Zapier or Slack.
- • Credit top-ups beyond plan limits can cost extra
- • Potential price increase after Figma integration
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Weavy? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Node-based canvas for chaining multiple AI image, video and 3D models into reusable workflows
- Image generation via Flux Fast, Flux 2 Pro, Nano Banana 2, Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 1.5, Seedream V5, Recraft V4, Mystic and Qwen Multiangle
- Video generation via Veo 3.1, Kling 3, Kling Motion Control, Kling O1, Seedance 1.5, Runway Gen-4.5, Grok Imagine, Wan 2.5, Wan Animate, Luma Ray 2 and LTX 2
- 3D content generation via Hunyuan 3D V3 and Rodin V2
- Editing nodes: inpaint, outpaint, crop, invert and mask extractor
- Upscale node including Topaz Upscale, plus relight and Painter nodes
- Z-depth extraction and image describer nodes
- Layer-based compositing with channels, blends and type
- Workflow-to-UI conversion that auto-generates a simplified interface for teammates or clients
- ControlNet-style structure reference and camera angle control in featured workflows
- Wan LoRa nodes for style, inflation and rotation effects
- Unified credit system covering every model on the platform
- Credit rollover up to 3x the monthly amount on Professional and Team
- Shared credit pool and unified billing for teams
- Top-up credits roll over for 12 months from purchase date
About Weavy
Figma Weave — the node-based AI design platform formerly called Weavy, now at weave.figma.com — puts generation and editing models from Google, Kling, OpenAI, Bytedance, Black Forest Labs, Runway, Luma, LTX, Wan, Grok, Recraft and Bria on one visual canvas. Instead of juggling separate subscriptions and passing files between tools, you wire model nodes into editing nodes the way you would build a small pipeline: Fuse Flux Fast, Flux 2 Pro, Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 1.5, Seedream V5, Recraft V4, Mystic and Qwen Multiangle for stills; Veo 3.1, Kling 3, Kling Motion Control, Kling O1, Seedance 1.5, Runway Gen-4.5, Grok Imagine, Wan 2.5, Wan Animate, Luma Ray 2 and LTX 2 for motion; Hunyuan 3D V3 and Rodin V2 for 3D. Editing nodes cover inpaint, outpaint, crop, invert, mask extractor, upscale, Z-depth extraction, image describer, relight and a Painter node, with layer-based compositing through channels, blends and type. Two things make it more than a pretty graph. First, any workflow can be turned into a simplified UI and handed to teammates or clients, so the person hitting generate never touches the node tree. Second, credits are unified: one balance covers every model, and the pricing page prints a per-model table — 375 Flux Fast images on Free, 900 Flux 2 Pro images on Team, or 417 seconds of video on Starter — so you can budget a campaign without reconciling six vendor invoices. It is built for designers and visual teams who repeat a process rather than prompt once. Agencies get shared credit pools, workspace file sharing and team administration on Team; individuals get commercial rights plus a published per-model rights list in the Trust Center, a no-training-on-your-work policy, and SOC 2 Type II certification. The product rebranded from Weavy to Figma Weave in early 2026, and the company notes Figma and Figma Weave currently run as separate products with independent credit systems.
Behind the Verdict
Figma Weave is the rare node canvas built for people who bill for compositing rather than people who enjoy wiring graphs. The node library is really two libraries stacked: a model shelf (Flux Fast, Flux 2 Pro, Nano Banana 2 and Nano Banana Pro, GPT Image 1.5, Seedream V5, Recraft V4, Mystic, Qwen Multiangle for stills; Veo 3.1, Kling 3, Kling Motion Control, Kling O1, Seedance 1.5, Runway Gen-4.5, Grok Imagine, Wan 2.5, Wan Animate, Luma Ray 2 and LTX 2 for motion; Hunyuan 3D V3 and Rodin V2 for 3D) and an editing shelf that mirrors what you'd reach for in Photoshop — inpaint, outpaint, crop, invert, mask extractor, upscale (including Topaz Upscale), Z-depth extraction, image describer, relight, and a Painter node — plus layer-based compositing with channels, blends and type. The value is that a matte painting, a product shot or an animated sequence can live as one saved graph instead of six browser tabs. Strengths. The per-model credit table is the standout feature and the thing competitors most often hide. It publishes exactly what each plan yields per model: 375 Flux Fast images on Free versus 13 Nano Banana Pro images; on Team, 900 Flux 2 Pro, 751 Nano Banana 2, 643 GPT Image 1.5, 45 Kling 3 and 56 Hunyuan 3D V3. That level of disclosure lets a studio cost a campaign before committing. Workflow-to-UI conversion is the second real differentiator: you build the graph once, generate a simplified interface, and hand it to a client or a social team that never learns the node canvas. Feature templates like Wan LoRa Inflate, ControlNet structure reference, camera angle control, Relight 2.0 Human and Wan LoRa Rotate show the platform is opinionated about the workflows pros actually repeat. On the commercial side, the platform grants full commercial rights, states it does not train on your work, publishes per-model rights status in the Trust Center, and holds SOC 2 Type II certification — enough to clear most agency legal reviews. Weaknesses. Credit consumption varies wildly by model, and the Free tier shows it: 150 monthly credits is 375 Flux Fast images but only 13 Nano Banana Pro images and only 1 Hunyuan 3D V3 asset. Video is effectively absent from Free — nearly every video model shows a dash in the Free column — so any mixed-media project starts at Starter, $24/mo billed annually as $202. Starter has no rollover and only 1,500 monthly credits (417 seconds of video), which professional daily production burns through; rollover up to 3x the monthly allotment starts at Professional, $45/mo billed annually as $378, which also grants +20% credits. Free users cannot buy top-ups at all. API workflow execution is Enterprise-only and requires bringing your own API keys. And the rebrand has a practical wrinkle: Figma and Figma Weave are separate products with independent credit systems, so a paid Figma seat does not grant credits here, and the announcement carried 'eligible plans only, terms apply' language. Where it fits. Design and visual teams that
Researching Weavy? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Weavy actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Wire Flux 2 Pro into a Relight node, then into Upscale, and save it as one graph so every new catalogue shot follows the same path.
Outcome: A repeatable product-image pipeline that produces consistent lighting across a batch instead of re-prompting for each shot.
Build a Wan 2.5 plus Kling Motion Control sequence on the node canvas, then convert the workflow into a simplified UI on Team and hand it to a junior.
Outcome: Junior staff generate on-brand motion without learning the graph, while the agency tracks everything through one shared credit pool and unified billing.
Chain inpaint, outpaint, mask extractor and Z-depth extraction, then composite the layers with channels, blends and type on the same canvas.
Outcome: Multi-layer matte paintings assembled in one graph rather than exported between three applications.
Use Cases
- Generate product images with Flux 2 Pro and add relighting in one saved workflow.
- Create animated sequences using Wan 2.5 and Kling Motion Control for camera moves.
- Compose multi-layer matte paintings with inpaint, outpaint and blend nodes.
- Automate batch upscaling and description for e-commerce catalogs.
- Prototype marketing visuals by chaining GPT Image 1.5 with Recraft V4.
- Build team-shareable tools by converting workflows into simplified UIs.
- Generate 3D assets with Hunyuan 3D V3 and refine them alongside 2D outputs.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-10-11
Limitations
- Credit consumption varies widely by model — 150 monthly Free credits buy 375 Flux Fast images but only 13 Nano Banana Pro images or 1 Hunyuan 3D V3 asset — so heavy generations deplete the monthly allocation quickly.
- Video generation is unavailable on the Free tier for nearly every video model, meaning mixed-media projects require at least Starter at $24/mo billed annually as $202.
- Starter has no credit rollover and only 1,500 monthly credits (about 417 seconds of video); rollover up to 3x the monthly amount starts at Professional, $45/mo billed annually as $378.
- Free users cannot purchase top-up credits at all, and Enterprise-announced terms carry 'eligible plans only, terms apply'.
- API workflow execution is gated behind Enterprise and requires bringing your own API keys.
as of 2026-10-13
Verification history
We have re-verified Weavy 9 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 9 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Weavy tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Individual designers testing whether the node canvas suits their process before paying.
What this tier adds
Free entry point: 150 monthly credits, all AI image models, commercial license and 5 workflows, but no credit top-ups.
Starter
$24/mo billed annually as $202
Ideal for
Solo creators producing content occasionally who need video and 3D models unlocked.
What this tier adds
Adds full access to all AI models including video, unlimited workflows and top-ups at $10 per 1,000 credits — no rollover.
Professional
$45/mo billed annually as $378
Ideal for
Professionals generating media daily who burn through 1,500 credits well before month end.
What this tier adds
Raises the allotment to 4,000 monthly credits, adds 3-month rollover up to 3x, +20% credits and better top-up rate ($10 per 1,200).
Team
$60/user/mo billed annually as $504
Ideal for
In-house and agency visual teams sharing work across several designers.
What this tier adds
Per-user credits with a shared pool, unified billing, workspace file sharing and member administration.
Enterprise
Custom
Ideal for
Organizations that need custom credit allocation and to run workflows through the API with their own keys.
What this tier adds
Adds custom credit allocation, API workflow execution with your own keys, team training and premium Slack support.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Weavy's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Figma Weave's entry point is genuinely cheap — Free with 150 monthly credits, then Starter at $24/mo billed annually as $202 — which undercuts most pro compositing suites and per-seat AI design tools that charge $30–60/mo without giving you every model. Professional at $45/mo billed annually as $378 competes with a single high-end video tool subscription while bundling images, video and 3D. Team at $60/user/mo billed annually as $504 is priced for agencies that would otherwise reconcile several
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Weavy — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Free and Starter: roughly 30–60 minutes to first useful output if you already understand nodes, longer if you're learning the canvas. Teams converting a workflow into a shared UI should budget an afternoon for the first graph, since the simplified-UI step is what makes the handoff usable. Enterprise API work depends on your own key provisioning, not on Figma Weave.
Switching to or from Weavy
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From ComfyUI: rebuild your most-used graph node-for-node on the hosted canvas, swapping local model nodes for the equivalent Flux, Veo or Hunyuan nodes.
- →From a single-model generator: keep your prompts and add the missing editing steps — inpaint, upscale, relight — as nodes around the model you already know.
- →From a folder of exports: re-create the generate-inpaint-upscale-relight sequence as one saved workflow so the manual file passing disappears.
- →From separate vendor subscriptions: consolidate budgeting onto one credit balance using the published per-model credit table to map your current spend.
- ↗To ComfyUI: export your logic as a graph you rebuild locally if you need open-ended tinkering or local model execution.
- ↗To a single-model tool: if you rarely chain steps, drop the canvas and pay for one generator with one bill.
- ↗To Enterprise-only needs: if you require API-triggered workflows, that stays inside Figma Weave on Enterprise with your own keys rather than moving out.
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “Weavy”, and we withheld 6: 6 could not be judged, because “Weavy” is a single word that other videos use for other things. We are showing none, because we could not prove any of them are about Weavy.
Official links
Tools that pair well with Weavy
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Weavy, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
mnml AI
mnml AI turns sketches, photos and SketchUp, Revit or Rhino views into photoreal architectural renders.
Envato Elements
Envato Elements bundles unlimited stock downloads with built-in AI video, image, voice and audio generation under one commercial license.
Immersity AI
Convert 2D images and video into 3D stereoscopic output — headset-free — on the phone, tablet, or laptop you already own.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Weavy vs Splice
Choose Splice if you're a music producer needing royalty-free samples and rent-to-own plugins like Serum 2. Choose Weavy if you're a creative professional wanting to generate images/videos/3D via a node-based AI workflow. Splice is audio-focused with credits per month; Weavy is visual AI with model routing and compositing. Both freemium, but serve different creative domains.
Weavy vs Storyfile
Choose Weavy if you're a creative pro building custom visual assets through a flexible, multi-model node canvas. Choose StoryFile if you need authentic, interactive video conversations with real people for museums, legacy, or enterprise exhibits. They serve entirely different use cases — one is a production toolkit, the other a conversational preservation platform.
Weavy vs Polycam
If your work revolves around capturing real-world spaces or objects as 3D models, floor plans, or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with its specialized AI scanning and generous export options. If you need to generate and composite AI images, video, and 3D from scratch using a node-based workflow and multiple state-of-the-art models, Weavy is purpose-built for that. They solve fundamentally different problems, so your pick depends on whether you capture reality or create from imagination.
Alternatives to Weavy
View all
mnml AI
mnml AI turns sketches, photos and SketchUp, Revit or Rhino views into photoreal architectural renders.
Envato Elements
Envato Elements bundles unlimited stock downloads with built-in AI video, image, voice and audio generation under one commercial license.
Immersity AI
Convert 2D images and video into 3D stereoscopic output — headset-free — on the phone, tablet, or laptop you already own.
Used Weavy? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.