Weavy
Orchestrate all AI models and editing tools in one node-based canvas.
Figma Weave gives creative pros the orchestration power of ComfyUI with a more polished node canvas and unified credit system. Its layered compositing and workflow-to-UI sharing are standout features. The free tier (150 credits, 5 workflows) is good for testing, and paid plans are competitive—though heavy video generation can burn credits fast. If you want multi-model diversity and workflow automation over simplicity, it's worth the learning curve. For one-click generation, simpler tools like
Verified 2d ago · liveness 75/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/weavy
- Creative professionals building complex multi-model workflows
- Design teams needing shared credit pools and unified billing
- Agencies producing client-facing media with commercial rights
- Content creators wanting multiple AI models in one node-based interface
- Beginners looking for simple one-click AI tools
- Users who need offline desktop software
- Teams requiring API access now (only Enterprise, and it's coming soon)
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip Figma Weave if you need a simple one-click AI image generator, require offline desktop software, or you're a team that needs API access immediately (Enterprise-only, and it's coming soon).
Heavy video generation consumes credits rapidly—Veo 3.1 costs 17 credits per generation, so your monthly allocation may vanish quickly.
Figma Weave's pricing suits creative teams needing multi-model orchestration. The free tier is great for exploration, while paid plans are competitive with ComfyUI ($10-20/mo for basic cloud) but pricier than simple tools like Canva ($12.99/mo) or Midjourney ($10/mo). For professionals generating daily, the Professional plan at $45/mo annual is reasonable given the model diversity and editing tools. Team features (shared pool, unified billing) add value for agencies.
In short
Weavy — Orchestrate all AI models and editing tools in one node-based canvas. Best for Creative professionals building complex multi-model workflows, Design teams needing shared credit pools and unified billing, Agencies producing client-facing media with commercial rights. Free to start; paid plans from $24/user/mo.
What's new in Weavy
Checked 7 days agoAcross the latest 2 updates: 1 feature update and 1 launch.
Weavy is now Figma Weave
The product rebranded from Weavy to Figma Weave, with a new home at weave.figma.com and 'eligible plans only' terms.
Pricing page update with new model credits
Updated pricing page showing new models like Veo 3.1, Kling 3, and Runway Gen-4.5 with credit costs, plus annual billing details.
What people actually say about Weavy — is it worth it?
We ran a structured research pass across product reviews, community discussions, and post-purchase forum threads to surface the patterns vendors won't publish themselves. Below: the recurring strengths, the hidden costs people mention most, and the cohort that consistently regrets adopting this tool.
35 mentions across 4 sources (Hacker News, App Store, Bluesky, Lemmy) · researched Jul 3, 2026.
- +Unified credit system across all AI models simplifies budgeting.
- +Node-based visual canvas gives fine-grained control over pipelines.
- +Integrates cutting-edge models like Veo 3.1 and Runway Gen-4.5.
- +Free tier with 150 monthly credits is generous for exploration.
- +Layer-based compositing familiar to designers from traditional tools.
- −Figma acquisition raises fears of price hikes similar to other Figma products.
- −Node editors can feel bloated compared to agentic or API-only workflows.
- −Community is too small for robust user support and shared workflows.
- −Credit consumption scales quickly; top-ups can get expensive.
- −Lack of integration with popular tools like Zapier or Slack.
- • Credit top-ups beyond plan limits can cost extra
- • Potential price increase after Figma integration
Viability Score
How well maintained and how widely used is Weavy? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: September 2026
How we score →Key Features
- Node-based workflow editor
- Multi-model image generation
- AI video generation
- 3D generation
- Inpaint and outpaint
- Upscale and relight
- Depth extraction and image describer
- Layer-based compositing with blends and channels
- Workflow-to-UI conversion for sharing
- Unified credit system across models
- Credit rollover on Professional and Team
- Shared credit pool on Team
- Commercial license on all plans
- SOC 2 Type II certification
- Top-up credits for paid plans
About Weavy
Figma Weave (formerly Weavy) is a node-based AI design platform that centralizes multiple AI models and professional editing tools in a single visual canvas. You can connect generators like Google's Veo 3.1, Kling 3, Runway Gen-4.5, Wan 2.5, GPT Image 1.5, Seedream V5, and Recraft V4 with editing nodes such as inpaint, outpaint, upscale, relight, and depth extraction. By linking these nodes, you build reusable pipelines for compositing, multi-layer manipulation, and automated generation of images, video, and 3D content. The platform is built for designers, agencies, and content teams who need high-quality visual output with granular control and efficiency. A unified credit system simplifies usage across all models, and layered compositing with blends and channels gives you the control of traditional design software. You can even auto-generate simplified UIs from your workflows and share them with your team. A free tier offers 150 monthly credits, and paid plans scale up to 4,500 credits per user per month, with annual discounts and credit top-ups. Enterprise plans can bring your own API keys and run workflows via API (coming soon). It's SOC 2 Type II certified and provides full commercial rights on most models. Currently, Figma Weave operates independently from the main Figma product, with deeper integration planned.
Behind the Verdict
If you're a designer or creative team that juggles multiple AI tools to get a final piece, Figma Weave's node canvas removes the copy-paste dance. You wire up a generator to an inpaint node, add an upscale, chain a relight—the pipeline runs as a unit. That's the core value: automation and compositing in one place. The unified credit system is a real convenience—no more managing five different subscriptions—but it's also the biggest gotcha. Video models like Veo 3.1 or Kling 3 eat credits fast (17-48 credits per generation), so a 1,500-credit Starter plan can vanish in about 30 video clips. The free tier's 150 credits (375 images) is fine for a quick test, but you'll hit limits immediately if you try multi-model workflows. Paid plans start at $24/mo (annual) for 1,500 credits, and Professional at $45/mo adds rollover—if you use the tool daily, the rollover alone justifies the jump. Team plans at $60/user/mo add a shared credit pool, which is ideal for agencies and in-house teams with variable workloads. Enterprise is contact sales and adds API access (coming soon). Compared to ComfyUI, Figma Weave is more polished—the node editor feels native, and the compositing tools (layers, blends, channels) are genuine advantages. ComfyUI is free and open-source but requires you to assemble nodes yourself and manage model weights. Figma Weave abstracts that away, but you pay for the convenience. If you're a coder who likes tinkering, ComfyUI might still win. If you want craft-level control without the DevOps, Figma Weave is strong. Watch out for the 'eligible plans only' note on the site—it's unclear if free users get the full experience, and the rebrand to Figma Weave means the tool's roadmap might shift toward Figma integration, which could be good or bad depending on whether you
Researching Weavy? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Real-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas Weavy actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
You need to create a product mockup with multiple lighting setups.
Outcome: Chain a product image generation node (e.g., Flux) with a relight node to produce three lighting variations in one workflow, saving hours of manual editing.
Your team needs to create animated sequences for client campaigns.
Outcome: Use Wan 2.5 for video generation and Kling Motion Control for camera moves, all within a single node graph, then share the workflow as a simplified UI for non-technical teammates.
Your team wants to standardize image creation across multiple models.
Outcome: Create a master workflow with GPT Image 1.5 for ideation and Recraft V4 for final style, automate batch upscaling, and share the workflow with the team via the auto-generated UI.
Use Cases
- Generate product images with Flux and add relighting in one workflow.
- Create animated sequences using Wan 2.5 and Kling Motion Control for camera moves.
- Compose multi-layer matte paintings with inpaint, outpaint, and blend nodes.
- Automate batch upscaling and description for e-commerce catalogs.
- Prototype marketing visuals by chaining GPT Image 1.5 with Recraft V4.
- Build team-shareable tools by converting workflows to simplified UIs.
Models Under the Hood
as of 2026-08-28
Limitations
- The platform is web-based with no offline desktop or mobile apps.
- API access is not yet available (coming soon for Enterprise).
- The credit system can be restrictive; the free plan offers only 150 monthly credits and 5 workflows, and top-ups cost $10 for 1,000–1,200 credits.
- Video generation consumes credits quickly (e.g., Veo 3.1 costs 17 credits per generation).
as of 2026-08-26
Verification history
We have re-verified Weavy 7 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
- — re-verified summary, description, our verdict, our analysis, pricing model, pricing tiers, features, integrations, who it suits, who should skip it
Showing the 6 most recent of 7 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Plans compared
For each published Weavy tier: who it actually fits, and what it adds vs. the previous tier. Cross-reference the cost calculator above for projected annual outlay.
Free
$0/mo
Ideal for
Solo creatives or curious beginners exploring AI generation with a modest monthly quota.
What this tier adds
Starting tier with 150 monthly credits and 5 workflows—all image models and editing tools included.
Starter
$24/mo (annual)
Ideal for
Occasional creators producing content a few times a month who need more volume and unlimited workflows.
What this tier adds
Adds 1,500 monthly credits and unlimited workflows over the Free plan, with top-ups at $10/1000 credits.
Professional
$45/mo (annual)
Ideal for
Daily professional use where credit rollover and higher volume justify the price.
What this tier adds
Increases credits to 4,000/month, adds 3-month rollover, and lowers top-up cost to $10/1200 credits.
Team
$60/user/mo (annual)
Ideal for
In-house and agency teams that need collaborative workflows and shared credit pools.
What this tier adds
Per-user pricing with 4,500 credits/user, shared credit pool, workspace file sharing, and team administration.
Enterprise
Contact sales
Ideal for
Large organizations needing custom credit allocation, training, and premium support.
What this tier adds
Adds custom credit allocation, team training, Slack support, and your own API keys (plus API workflows coming soon).
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where Weavy's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
Figma Weave's pricing suits creative teams needing multi-model orchestration. The free tier is great for exploration, while paid plans are competitive with ComfyUI ($10-20/mo for basic cloud) but pricier than simple tools like Canva ($12.99/mo) or Midjourney ($10/mo). For professionals generating daily, the Professional plan at $45/mo annual is reasonable given the model diversity and editing tools. Team features (shared pool, unified billing) add value for agencies.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of Weavy — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
Setup is quick—sign up and you're in the node canvas within minutes. The free tier lets you experiment immediately. Expect 30-60 minutes to learn the basics of node chaining if you're new to node-based tools. Teams can test the shared credit pool and UI generation within a day.
Switching to or from Weavy
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From ComfyUI: Import your workflow JSON and rebuild with Figma Weave's visual editor—no code required.
- →From Photoshop: Use Weave's compositing layers and blend channels to replicate your editing steps, then automate with AI nodes.
- ↗To ComfyUI: Export your workflow logic manually, but note you'll lose Weave's credit system and UI generation.
- ↗To Midjourney: Simple one-off generations are easy, but you lose multi-model orchestration and editing tools.
Integrations
Resources & Guides
Tutorials & Learning
Official links
Tools that pair well with Weavy
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside Weavy, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Featured Head-to-Head Comparisons
Weavy vs Splice
Choose Splice if you're a music producer needing royalty-free samples and rent-to-own plugins like Serum 2. Choose Weavy if you're a creative professional wanting to generate images/videos/3D via a node-based AI workflow. Splice is audio-focused with credits per month; Weavy is visual AI with model routing and compositing. Both freemium, but serve different creative domains.
Weavy vs Storyfile
Choose Weavy if you're a creative pro building custom visual assets through a flexible, multi-model node canvas. Choose StoryFile if you need authentic, interactive video conversations with real people for museums, legacy, or enterprise exhibits. They serve entirely different use cases — one is a production toolkit, the other a conversational preservation platform.
Weavy vs Polycam
If your work revolves around capturing real-world spaces or objects as 3D models, floor plans, or point clouds, Polycam is the clear choice with its specialized AI scanning and generous export options. If you need to generate and composite AI images, video, and 3D from scratch using a node-based workflow and multiple state-of-the-art models, Weavy is purpose-built for that. They solve fundamentally different problems, so your pick depends on whether you capture reality or create from imagination.
Alternatives to Weavy
View all
Runway Gen-4
Professional AI video generation and editing platform with multiple models.
Envato Elements
Unlimited creative asset subscription for designers and creators.
Frequently Asked Questions
Used Weavy? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.