WrongStack is live · free · last verified 23 Oct 2026 · viability monitor
WrongStack
WrongStack is an open-source AI coding agent for the terminal that plans, runs tools and coordinates specialist agents under your
WrongStack treats the security model as the product, not a footnote: deny rules that outlive YOLO, enforced budgets, and a veto-capable council is a genuinely different posture from most agent CLIs. It's MIT-licensed, a single binary, and rides the ChatGPT or coding-plan key you already hold. The catch is scope — seven surfaces and a fleet metaphor assume a terminal-native operator who wants a control plane, not a chat box.
Verdict generatedVerified 7d ago · liveness 54/100 · cite: rightaichoice.com/tools/wrongstack
- Developers who want per-action permission gates and an audit trail on an AI coding agent
- Terminal-first engineers who would rather run a TUI than install an IDE plugin
- Teams running agents against sensitive repos that cannot leave the machine
- Power users already paying for ChatGPT or a coding-plan subscription and want to reuse that key
- Non-developers looking for no-code app building
- Anyone who wants the agent to edit and ship without stopping to ask
- Teams that need a managed cloud service with a vendor support contract
We scan live Reddit threads, YouTube comments, X posts, G2 reviews and other communities — and hand you an honest verdict in under a minute.
- Honest verdict, not marketing
- Real pros & cons from real users
- Attributed quotes with receipts
3 free scans · no card needed
Skip WrongStack if you want an AI coding assistant embedded in your editor's sidebar, or if you'd rather an agent apply changes without a confirm policy standing between it and your working tree.
You bring your own provider, so model usage is billed by OpenAI, OpenCode, GLM, Kimi or MiniMax on top of the $0 tool — the homepage demo shows a running session cost of $0.014, which scales with repo size and agent
WrongStack itself is MIT-licensed at $0 with no paid runtime tier or proprietary feature gate. Your actual spend is whatever your chosen provider charges for the tokens an agent loop consumes — multi-agent fan-out is the variable to watch. That makes it cheaper on tooling than a seat-priced editor assistant, but exposed to provider usage in a way flat subscriptions are not.
In short
WrongStack — WrongStack is an open-source AI coding agent for the terminal that plans, runs tools and coordinates specialist agents under your. Best for Developers who want per-action permission gates and an audit trail on an AI coding agent, Terminal-first engineers who would rather run a TUI than install an IDE plugin, Teams running agents against sensitive repos that cannot leave the machine. Free to use.
What is WrongStack?
WrongStack — WrongStack is an open-source AI coding agent for the terminal that plans, runs tools and coordinates specialist agents under your. Best for Developers who want per-action permission gates and an audit trail on an AI coding agent, Terminal-first engineers who would rather run a TUI than install an IDE plugin, Teams running agents against sensitive repos that cannot leave the machine. Free to use.
WrongStack is an MIT-licensed AI coding agent for people who want autonomous software work they can actually audit. Point it at a repository and it reads the code, drafts a plan, then runs the agent loop — reading files, executing commands and handing tasks to specialist agents — while every tool call clears hooks and a permission policy first. It ships as a single binary with no Node.js runtime, and has just moved to v1.1.14. The v1.1.14 release leans hard into code intelligence: codebase-atlas maps dependency hubs and Louvain subsystem communities, codebase-diff-impact traces which parts of a repo a change can touch, codebase-flow-trace follows execution paths, and codebase-onboard builds a dependency-ordered architectural tour for newcomers. CodeMap 2.0 makes those relationships navigable in the WebUI, with shortest paths, hop-based blast-radius rings and collapsible clusters. A durable mission anchor keeps follow-up prompts aligned with the original request. The surface area is deliberately wide: 78 built-in tools and 106 documented commands spread across seven interfaces — CLI/REPL, TUI, WebUI, SimpleUI, VibeUI, an Electron desktop cockpit, and Fleet HQ for cross-session, cross-machine work — all composing one kernel. Coordination runs through a Global Mailbox with typed messages, a Kanban queue that routes dependency-ready cards, and a Brain Council that resolves provider-diverse seats by quorum with weighted votes and veto. You bring your own model access: sign in with ChatGPT, or attach an OpenCode Go, OpenCode Zen, GLM, Kimi or MiniMax coding-plan key. Where most coding CLIs ask you to trust the loop, WrongStack asks you to inspect it — five defense layers, deny rules that survive YOLO mode, enforced token and cost budgets, and in-repo config treated as attacker-controlled input. It's built by OxogNet and sits alongside WrongForge (execution runtime) and WrongTrace (observability). Pick it over Claude Code, Codex or Cursor if governance and a
Key features
- Reads a repository and drafts a plan before executing changes
- Permission prompts on file reads, edits and command execution
- Explicit deny rules that survive YOLO mode
- Enforced token and cost budgets with live dollar readout in the TUI
- Five defense layers with secrets encryption and untrusted repo boundary
- Seven interfaces on one kernel: CLI, TUI, WebUI, SimpleUI, VibeUI, Desktop, HQ
- Parallel agent swarm with a leader coordinating specialist workers
- Global Mailbox with typed cross-session messages (status, task, result, steer)
- Kanban work queue with dependency-ready routing and per-task dispatch
- Brain Council with quorum, weighted votes, veto and judge
- Multi-provider routing: different models for leaders, roles and fallbacks
- 78 built-in tools including grep, glob, tree, codebase index and LSP bridge
- codebase-atlas maps dependency hubs and Louvain subsystem communities
- codebase-diff-impact traces which parts of the repo a change can affect
- codebase-flow-trace follows execution paths for debugging and onboarding
Behind the verdict
The reason to reach for WrongStack is the audit trail. Every tool call clears a hook and a policy decision, the five defense layers hold even in YOLO mode, and the side-effect audit means you can answer "what just happened?" after the fact. If you've ever watched an agent CLI rewrite half a repo and had to reconstruct why, that alone justifies the eval. Pick it when you're already terminal-native and already paying for a ChatGPT or coding-plan subscription. The v1.1.14 code-intelligence additions — codebase-atlas, codebase-diff-impact, codebase-flow-trace, codebase-onboard — are the ones I'd test first, because change-impact mapping is the difference between an agent that edits a file and one that understands the blast radius. CodeMap 2.0 gives you a visual on that in the WebUI without leaving the tool. Pass if you want the agent to just edit and ship. The confirm-by-default posture and permission gates are the opposite of hands-off, and the seven-surface, fleet-scale framing is overkill for a solo dev fixing a bug in one file. Non-developers looking for no-code app building should go elsewhere entirely. Compared with Claude Code or Codex, the tradeoff isn't raw capability — it's the model. WrongStack is bring-your-own-provider, so quality tracks whatever key you attach; the upside is you're not locked to one vendor, and multi-provider routing lets different models handle leader, specialist and fallback roles. Real-world caveats worth knowing. The TUI streams a live token and dollar readout, which is great until you run a fleet and watch the number climb. The Brain Council and Kanban queue reward teams running multiple concurrent sessions; a single interactive session won't exercise them. And the broad surface area means a real learning curve — 106 commands across
Models under the hood
as of 2026-09-08
Limitations
- WrongStack is at v1.0.30, so stability and feature completeness are still evolving alongside the release cadence.
- The interface count cuts both ways: getting value out of Fleet HQ, the Global Mailbox and the Kanban queue requires understanding the fleet vocabulary — leaders, scanners, lanes, missions — which is overhead when your task is one failing test.
- The TUI-first design assumes terminal fluency; there is no editor-native sidebar experience.
- Because you bring your own provider (ChatGPT login or an OpenCode, GLM, Kimi or MiniMax plan key), your usage cost is billed by that provider, not by WrongStack, and varies by route.
as of 2026-10-03
Researching WrongStack? Get your full AI stack in 60 seconds.
Free, no signup — tell us your goal and get tools matched to your budget & existing stack.
Is WrongStack still active?
WrongStack is live · free · last verified 23 Oct 2026 · viability monitor.
Viability score
How well maintained and how widely used is WrongStack? Built from what the vendor actually publishes (docs, changelog, tutorials, integrations, pricing), whether the site is live, and how much real users discuss it. How we calculate this
Last calculated: October 2026
How we score →What do users say about WrongStack?
How we verified this
Every listed fact about WrongStack — pricing, features, links, status — is re-read from the vendor's own pages by our verification pipeline and each change is logged with a date; the last pass ran on 23 Oct 2026. Pages mix model-assisted synthesis with human review; see how we verify.
Verification history
We have re-verified WrongStack 11 times since . Each pass re-reads the vendor's own pages and re-checks every listed field against that evidence; passes where nothing had changed are marked as such.
- — changed description, pricing tiers, summary, our verdict, features
- — changed features, who it suits, description, pricing tiers, our verdict, summary
- — changed integrations, description, who should skip it, who it suits, features, our verdict, summary, pricing tiers
- — changed switching in, who it suits, description, our verdict, features, hidden costs, limitations, switching out, models, who should skip it, pricing tiers, pricing fit, setup time, summary, use cases
- — changed SSL certificate
- — changed description, pricing model, who it suits, pricing tiers, summary, integrations, who should skip it, features, our verdict
Showing the 6 most recent of 11 verification passes.
Free to cite with attribution — this page re-verifies continuously.
How much does WrongStack cost in 2026?
WrongStack: Free to use. Pricing last verified 23 Oct 2026.
Plans compared
Every published WrongStack tier, its price as the vendor publishes it, who it fits, and what it adds over the tier below. The 12-month cost projection follows.
| Plan | Price | Billing | Who it's for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Open Source (MIT) | Free | — | Individual developers, maintainers and small teams comfortable in a terminal who already pay for a ChatGPT or coding-plan subscription and want to reuse that key.Adds: Starting tier: the whole tool — all built-in tools, 99 commands and six interfaces — under MIT with no paid runtime tier or feature gate, provided you bring your own model provider. |
12-month cost
Project the real annual outlay, including the implied monthly cost when only an annual tier is published.
Vendor list price only. Add-on usage, seat overages, and contract minimums are surfaced under Hidden costs & gotchas.
Where the pricing makes sense
The company stage and team size where WrongStack's pricing actually pencils out — and where peers do it cheaper.
WrongStack itself is MIT-licensed at $0 with no paid runtime tier or proprietary feature gate. Your actual spend is whatever your chosen provider charges for the tokens an agent loop consumes — multi-agent fan-out is the variable to watch. That makes it cheaper on tooling than a seat-priced editor assistant, but exposed to provider usage in a way flat subscriptions are not.
Has WrongStack's pricing changed?
No plan price for WrongStack has moved since we began logging in Aug 2026; the pricing page is re-read on every verification pass.
Who should pick WrongStack?
Pick WrongStack if you are Developers who want per-action permission gates and an audit trail on an AI coding agent, Terminal-first engineers who would rather run a TUI than install an IDE plugin, Teams running agents against sensitive repos that cannot leave the machine, Power users already paying for ChatGPT or a coding-plan subscription and want to reuse that key.
Look elsewhere if you are Non-developers looking for no-code app building, Anyone who wants the agent to edit and ship without stopping to ask, Teams that need a managed cloud service with a vendor support contract, People who avoid the command line or want the editor itself to be the agent.
Skip it if Skip WrongStack if you want an AI coding assistant embedded in your editor's sidebar, or if you'd rather an agent apply changes without a confirm policy standing between it and your working tree.
GeneratedReal-world workflow fit
Concrete scenarios for the personas WrongStack actually fits — and what changes day-one when you adopt it.
Run 'wrongstack "trace the flaky checkout test and fix it"' and watch the agent map test → service → provider boundary, read packages/checkout/src/payment.ts, and hold at a confirm policy before editing.
Outcome: A fix proposal you approve or reject, with the session's context percentage and dollar cost visible the whole time instead of a silent edit to your working tree.
Ask for a security review of the checkout module; the swarm spins up a leader plus parallel scanners across src/auth/session and http/server, each reporting into the mission queue.
Outcome: Consolidated findings from independent lanes, with every tool call recorded and deny rules enforced even in YOLO mode.
Run wstack remote against a Linux or macOS host so the agent and its tools stay on that machine, reaching the WebUI over SSH, then carry prompts and attachments between terminal and browser.
Outcome: Source never leaves the remote host, and work survives across sessions via the Global Mailbox and shared prompt queues.
Use cases
- Refactor a legacy codebase by identifying and updating deprecated APIs across multiple files under a confirm policy.
- Debug a flaky checkout test by reading the test file and the service-to-provider boundary, then applying a fix.
- Run a security review of a module with parallel scanner agents and consolidated findings.
- Coordinate multi-agent fleets across SSH hosts and sessions from Fleet HQ.
- Automate repetitive maintenance like renaming variables or extracting functions with reviewed diffs.
- Explore an unfamiliar codebase by asking the agent to explain how specific modules work.
Setup time & first value
How long it actually takes to get something useful out of WrongStack — broken out by persona, not the marketing-page minute.
One curl or PowerShell command installs the single binary on macOS, Linux or Windows — no Node.js, no hosted account. First value is typically within an afternoon: authenticate with a ChatGPT login or a plan key, initialize the project contract, and start in the REPL for a single task. Scaling into Fleet HQ, the Kanban queue and remote SSH workspaces is a separate learning pass measured in days,
Switching to or from WrongStack
How to bring data in from common predecessors and how to get it back out — written for the switcher, not the buyer.
- →From a hosted cloud agent: install the binary, point WrongStack at the same repo, and keep execution local under a confirm policy instead of shipping source to a backend
- →From an editor-embedded assistant: replace the sidebar loop with the TUI, which streams reasoning, tool calls and fleet activity, and keep your provider key
- →From ad-hoc shell scripts: move repeatable maintenance into tool_script, which composes and parallelizes tool calls in sandboxed JavaScript with permission checks
- ↗To an editor-native assistant: if you want the agent inside your IDE rather than a terminal surface, the six WrongStack interfaces don't substitute for that
Integrations
Resources & guides
Tutorials & Learning
YouTube returned 6 videos for “WrongStack”, and we withheld 5: 5 could not be judged, because “WrongStack” is a single word that other videos use for other things. Showing the 1 we can prove is about WrongStack.
Official links
What are the best WrongStack alternatives?
The closest alternatives to WrongStack we list are Cline, CodeWhale and Shep. Ranked by direct product-type match, not category overlap.
| Alternative | Pricing | Starts at | Last verified |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cline | Free | Free | — |
| CodeWhale | Free | Free | — |
| Shep | Free | Free | — |
Alternatives to WrongStack
View all
Tools that pair well with WrongStack
Common stack mates teams adopt alongside WrongStack, with the specific reason each pairing earns its keep.
Cline
Open-source coding agent that edits files and runs bash commands in your IDE, terminal, or desktop app.
CodeWhale
Open-source terminal coding agent that reads your repo, edits files, runs commands, and uses the model you choose.
Shep
Open-source, local-first orchestrator that runs parallel AI coding agents in isolated git worktrees, from a one-line idea to a merged pull request.
WrongStack vs its closest rival
WrongStack's closest head-to-head is with Cognition Ai — Choose WrongStack if you're a developer who wants tight control over AI actions and prefers terminal workflows over cloud dependencies. Choose Cognition AI if you're an enterprise team needing autonomous, production-grade automation with Slack/Jira integration and a financial guarantee. WrongStack is ideal for privacy-conscious individuals, while Cognition AI scales for large codebases. Verdict generated
Head-to-head comparisons
Wrongstack vs Cognition Ai
Choose WrongStack if you're a developer who wants tight control over AI actions and prefers terminal workflows over cloud dependencies. Choose Cognition AI if you're an enterprise team needing autonomous, production-grade automation with Slack/Jira integration and a financial guarantee. WrongStack is ideal for privacy-conscious individuals, while Cognition AI scales for large codebases.
GeneratedWrongstack vs Bito
If you're a solo developer or small team that wants an AI agent you can control tightly from the terminal, WrongStack is the right choice. If you're a larger engineering team using agents like Cursor or Claude Code and need cross-repo context, impact analysis, and architectural planning, Bito's knowledge graph and integrations are far more valuable.
GeneratedFrequently asked questions
Best-of guides
Used WrongStack? Help shape our editorial sentiment research.