Activepieces vs Dify
Side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and ratings
At a glance
| Dimension | Activepieces | Dify |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free (10 active flows) / $5 per active flow per month after that | Free (self-hosted) / Cloud plans start at $59/mo |
| Core Focus | AI-first automation platform for workflows and AI agents | Visual AI workflow builder for agents and RAG |
| AI Capabilities | AI agents with custom instructions, human approval steps, AI agent library | Built-in RAG pipeline, MCP integration, human-in-the-loop review |
| Integrations Count | 700+ app integrations | ~12 native + generic API |
| Best For | Teams wanting AI automation without coding | Teams building customer support chatbots with RAG |
| Self-Hosting | Yes (Docker, Helm, any cloud) | Yes (open-source) |
Choose Dify if your primary need is building RAG-powered AI agents and workflows with a visual builder, especially for customer support chatbots requiring human review and team template sharing. Choose Activepieces if you want a broader AI-first automation platform that replaces Zapier/Make with 700+ integrations, enterprise features like SAML SSO and RBAC, and cost-effective per-flow pricing. Dify excels in AI agent depth; Activepieces wins in breadth of automation and enterprise readiness.
Open-source AI-native automation platform for building workflows and AI agents.
Visit WebsiteFeature-by-feature
Dify is built around AI agents and RAG: it offers a visual workflow builder, multi-LLM support (OpenAI, Anthropic, open-source), a built-in RAG pipeline for data ingestion and indexing, and native MCP integration (protocol 2025-03-26) to publish workflows as MCP servers. The human-in-the-loop review node (v1.13.0+) is critical for quality control, and the recent v1.14.1 update makes workflows team-manageable assets. The Template Marketplace (launched May 2026) and Creator Center with affiliate program (PartnerStack) enable sharing and monetization. Activepieces, on the other hand, is an AI-first automation platform with over 700 integrations (Gmail, OpenAI, Slack, HubSpot, Stripe, etc.) and a drag-and-drop builder. It provides AI agents with custom instructions and human approval steps, plus an AI agent library (Lead Scorer, Deal Closer, etc.). Enterprise features include SAML 2.0/SCIM, advanced RBAC, audit logs, and an impact analytics dashboard with gamification. While Dify focuses on AI workflow depth (RAG, MCP), Activepieces focuses on breadth of automation (700+ integrations, enterprise compliance). For observability, Dify includes monitoring of AI agents; Activepieces offers impact analytics. Both are open-source and self-hostable.
Pricing compared
Dify is open-source (free self-hosted) with cloud plans starting at $59/month (details not specified). Activepieces offers a free tier with 10 active flows, then $5 per active flow per month, making it very predictable and scalable for growing teams. For example, 50 active flows cost $250/month, while Dify's cloud plan at $59/month may cover fewer flows or include more AI features. For cost-conscious organizations migrating from Zapier/Make, Activepieces' per-flow pricing is transparent and often cheaper than competing automation platforms. Dify, being free to self-host, has only infrastructure costs, but its cloud plan is pricier. Enterprises seeking self-hosted compliance will find Dify free but may need to invest in setup; Activepieces offers self-hosting with enterprise support via pricing (likely higher). Overall, for pure automation volume, Activepieces is cheaper; for AI-specific applications, Dify's cloud may be more feature-rich.
Who should pick which
- Customer support team needing RAG chatbot with human reviewPick: Dify
Dify's built-in RAG pipeline and human-in-the-loop review node (v1.13.0+) are perfect for building accurate, compliant support agents.
- Marketing team automating multi-step workflows (email, social, CRM)Pick: Activepieces
Activepieces' 700+ integrations (Gmail, HubSpot, Slack, etc.) and AI agents allow marketing teams to automate campaigns without coding, at low per-flow cost.
- Enterprise needing self-hosted, compliant automation with SSOPick: Activepieces
Activepieces offers SAML 2.0/SCIM, RBAC, audit logs, and self-hosting, making it enterprise-ready for strict compliance.
- Solo founder prototyping AI agent with templatesPick: Dify
Dify's Template Marketplace (May 2026) and Creator Center let solo founders quickly adopt and share AI workflows, accelerating time-to-market.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which tool is better for building AI chatbots with knowledge base (RAG)?
Dify, with its built-in RAG pipeline, human-in-the-loop review, and native MongoDB/Voyage AI integration (news: June 2026).
Which tool has more app integrations?
Activepieces offers over 700 integrations, far exceeding Dify's ~12 native integrations.
Can I self-host both tools?
Yes, both are open-source and support self-hosting. Dify uses Docker; Activepieces supports Docker, Helm, and any cloud.
Which is cheaper for large-scale automation?
Activepieces' per-flow pricing ($5/active flow/month) is transparent and cost-effective. Dify's self-hosted is free (infra cost only), but cloud is $59+/mo.
Do both support AI agents?
Yes. Dify focuses on custom agents with RAG and MCP; Activepieces offers AI agents with custom instructions and an agent library (Lead Scorer, etc.).
Which is more enterprise-friendly?
Activepieces offers SAML 2.0, SCIM, advanced RBAC, audit logs, and impact analytics. Dify has team asset management but fewer enterprise features.
Which has better observability?
Dify provides observability and monitoring for AI agents. Activepieces has an impact analytics dashboard and audit logs.
Can I monetize workflows?
Dify's Creator Center and Template Marketplace (May 2026) allow sharing and monetization via affiliate program (PartnerStack). Activepieces does not have such a feature.
More Activepieces or Dify comparisons
Choose Dify if you need a fully open-source, self-hosted solution with MCP server publishing and RAG pipelines, ideal for production deployments. Choose Langflow if you want a low-code, team-collabora
Choose Activepieces if AI agents, self-hosting, and cost predictability (flat $5/flow) are critical, especially for teams migrating from Zapier/Make with AI use cases. Pick Make if you need deep data
Choose Activepieces if you need cost-effective AI-native automation, self-hosting for compliance, or open-source flexibility — its $5/flow pricing and AI agents beat Zapier on value. Choose Zapier if
If you're a sales or marketing team wanting a no-code, AI-first automation platform with predictable pricing, pick Activepieces. If you're a technical team needing flexible, code-friendly workflows wi
Explore each tool further
Browse these categories
One email a week — new tools, honest comparisons, no spam.